Skip to content

Physicians in Training and Critical Care Nurses Performance in Medical Code Events: Effect of Simulation-Based Training

Physicians in Training and Critical Care Nurses Performance in Medical Code Events: Effect of Simulation-Based Training

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02707185
Enrollment
157
Registered
2016-03-14
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2016-03-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ventricular Fibrillation

Brief summary

METHODS: Subjects: All internal medicine (IM), emergency medicine (EM), anesthesia (A), surgery (S) residents and all hospital ICU nurses (approximately 400 subjects) will be undergoing evaluation and training in CPR techniques according to their department training policy. Study Assessment Tool: An objective assessment tool has been developed and tested in medical code scenarios during training sessions recently done in the simulation lab. The tool has five domains: Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Communications/Leadership, and Defibrillation. Each domain consists of 3-8 tasks and skills (attachment A). Design: * Phase I: In groups of five to six subjects, residents and nurses will undergo baseline assessment in CPR techniques in the simulation lab. Subject will be presented with a clinical scenario that includes cardiopulmonary arrest. Subjects will be scored by observers based on the previously described assessment tool and will be video recorded. * Phase II: All study subjects who completed phase I assessment will undergo standardized debriefing and demonstration of proper CPR techniques after reviewing their individual baseline videotape followed by repeated demonstration in CPR techniques during a clinical scenario with cardiopulmonary arrest in the simulation lab. Knowledge retention will be assessed periodically. * Phase III: Rates of survival to hospital discharge and survival at 24 hours in hospitalized patients after cardiopulmonary arrest collected by the CPR committee and QA department longitudinally for one year after completion of project training (phase II) will be reviewed and compared to the same period one year earlier (CPR outcome data are being collected since 2005 at St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospitals).

Interventions

An objective assessment tool has been developed and tested in medical code scenarios during training sessions recently done in the simulation lab. The tool has five domains: Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Communications/Leadership, and Defibrillation. Each domain consists of 3-8 tasks and skills.

Sponsors

St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Physicians in training and nurses

Exclusion criteria

* Physicians in training and nurses refusing to have their data included in final analysis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Performance scaleBaseline and 1 yearChange in performance scale at 1 year as compared to baseline
Rates of survival1 yearRates of survival to hospital discharge after cardiopulmonary arrest one year after completion of the simulation based training in CPR

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Survey questionnaireBaseline and 1 yearChange in survey questionnaire score at 1 year as compared to baseline. The questionnaire consists of 4 parts, including: adequacy of training, sense of preparedness, supervision and feedback, and general information. With the exception of the section on general information, responses are scored on a 5 point Likert scale.
Perceptions of preparednessBaseline and 1 yearChange in perceptions of preparedness at 1 year as compared to baseline. The method of assessment for this outcome measure is the Likert Scale

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026