Skip to content

Cayenne Pepper Cataplasm - Effect Study

Cayenne Pepper Cataplasm - Effect Study on Healthy Subjects and Subjects With Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02705209
Enrollment
20
Registered
2016-03-10
Start date
2015-10-31
Completion date
2016-02-29
Last updated
2016-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Back Pain, Low Back Pain

Brief summary

The beneficial analgesic effects of Rubefacenciae (redden skin substances), is known since 1830 as a treatment for pain, cramps, and disorders of the musculoskeletal system. Herbal cataplasms containing rubefacient substances, such as Cayenne pepper, are commonly used as natural medications to treat painful or aching areas in the case of acute or chronic back pain, and rheumatisms. In Vienna and lower Austria, a Cayenne Pepper Cataplasm (CPC) application containing Cayenne pepper and Kaolin powder in mixed proportion, is commonly used to treat musculoskeletal conditions of pain especially of the low back. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to test effects of a series of ten applications of CPC prepared with 5% of pepper, investigating the resulting effect on: skin temperature, skin sensory functions, pain threshold, and proprioception. Placebo control condition (0% cayenne pepper) was also tested. It was hypothesized that a series of 20-minute application of a CPC will have significant effects on the measured parameters. 40 subjects will be randomized into Treatment/control group.

Interventions

OTHERCayenne Pepper Cataplasm

Poultice of Kaolin, Cayenne Peppfer (5%) and Water

OTHERPlacebo Cataplasm

Poultice of Kaolin and Water

Sponsors

Comenius University
CollaboratorOTHER
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Electrical Stimulation and Physical Rehabilitation
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* chronic lumbar spine pain \>= 3 months * pain during activity VAS \>= 4 * Oswestry Disabilty Index \>= 20%

Exclusion criteria

* pregnancy * sensibility disorders (e.g. due to neurological disease) * injuries, open wounds or rash in intervention area * known hypersensitivity against the applied substances * HIV, Hepatitis C and other due blood communicable infectious diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Two-point discrimination testbefore 1st and 3 weeks later after 10th interventionThe subject is lying prone during the test and test will be performed with a BASELINE Aesthesiometer (0-100mm). The test will be performed at the level of L3 spinal process, the medial pin 3 cm laterally from midline and the pins oriented in medial-lateral direction. The two pins will be pressed perpendicular to the skin and the subject will be asked to report whether he/she feels one or two pins. Each inter-pin distance will be used three times using single pin touches in between for a control. The smallest inter-pin distance which the subject reports correctly at least 2 out of 3 repetitions, will be taken, as the result of the test.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Monofilament Testbefore 1st and 3 weeks later after 10th interventionDifferent monofilaments (Semmes-Weinstein) will be randomly pressed perpendicular to the same area as primary outcome measure. The thinest filament recognized from the subject will be taken as the result of the test.
Skin Temperaturebefore 1st and 3 weeks later after 10th interventionmeasured via Infrared thermometer
Blood Samplebefore, 1h and 48h after the first intervention and 3 weeks later before, 1h and 48h after 10 interventionstest: hemogram, CRP, CK, blood sedimentation rate, albumin and different molecular markers
Range of Motion (thoracic and lumbar spine)before 1st and 3 weeks later after 10th interventionMeasured according to Schober and Ott test

Countries

Austria, Slovakia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026