Skip to content

Comparison of Two Endoscopically Placed Nasojejunal Probes

Randomized, Controlled Comparison of Two Endoscopically Placed Nasojejunal Probes in Critically Ill Patients in Terms of Application Time and Technical Success

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02705027
Enrollment
64
Registered
2016-03-10
Start date
2012-08-31
Completion date
2016-08-31
Last updated
2016-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Investigation Time

Brief summary

A direct application of jejunal tube feeding is necessary especially in patients with gastroparesis due of existing diabetes mellitus, postoperative or severe underlying disease. Since the jejunal tube feedings, the secretion of gastric juice can be increased, the use of probes that allow both: jejunal nutrition, as well as a gastric outflow of secretions are beneficial. While in a randomized trial of Schwab et al. it could be shown that the use of Freka-Trilumina® compared to Dobbhoff probe by so-called drag technique is significantly faster there are currently no comparative data to use the Easy-In® probe subsequently developed , which is directly introduced through the working channel of the endoscope, and thus shortening the procedure time.

Detailed description

The use of probes nasojejunal has increasingly become important especially in critically ill patients because of the beneficial effect in patients e.g. with necrotizing pancreatitis, according trauma or major surgical procedures. A direct application of jejunal tube feeding is necessary especially in patients with gastroparesis due of existing diabetes mellitus, postoperative or severe underlying disease. Since the jejunal tube feedings, the secretion of gastric juice can be increased, the use of probes that allow both: jejunal nutrition, as well as a gastric outflow of secretions are beneficial. While in a randomized trial of Schwab et al. it could be shown that the use of Freka-Trilumina® compared to Dobbhoff probe by so-called drag technique is significantly faster there are currently no comparative data to use the Easy-In® probe subsequently developed , which is directly introduced through the working channel of the endoscope, and thus shortening the procedure time. In the presented study should be investigated to what extent the use of imported directly via the working channel Easy-Inn® probe, application time and thus the investigation period may be shortened compared to the usual nasojenunal probes.

Interventions

DEVICEFreka®-Trilumina versus Freka®-EasyIn

Direct placement of probe via endoscope

Sponsors

Ruhr University of Bochum
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years * Clinical indication for enteral feeding via naso-jejunal probe

Exclusion criteria

* Lack of consent of the patient or their relatives (in intubated and mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Examination time for the probe systemThrough study completion, an average of 1 year

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactAndrea Riphaus, MD, PhD
ariphaus@web.de+49-511-8208

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026