Postoperative Pain
Conditions
Keywords
adnexal mass, laparoscopy, removal route, postoperative pain
Brief summary
In cases of benign adnexal mass laparoscopic surgery, women were randomized to two groups: transumbilical vs. transabdominal removal. Need for pain medication, postoperative pain and patients´ satisfaction were assessed between the groups, as well as surgeons´ opinions and costs.
Detailed description
Women assigned to laparoscopic surgery for removal of a benign adnexal mass were randomly divided into two groups as regards surgery: a transumbilical (TU) group (n=21) and a transabdominal (TA) group (n=21). General anesthesia and use of local anesthetics were standardized. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain and side effects (nausea/vomiting) and the amount of postoperative analgesic used were recorded for 24 hours. Investigators also investigated the expenses related to endobags and trocars. Further, peri- and postoperative complications were recorded. Investigators inquired about patient satisfaction as well as the surgeons' opinions of the alternative methods available.
Interventions
Transumbilical removal of a benign adnexal mass from the abdominal cavity in laparoscopy
Lateral transabdominal removal of a benign adnexal mass from the abdominal cavity in laparoscopy
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* The criteria for inclusion were scheduled laparoscopy for oophorectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy or cyst enucleation.
Exclusion criteria
* The
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The use of analgesics for postoperative pain | Change in 24 hours after surgery | The total amount of analgesics used measured by use of Oxycodone (mg) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Nausea | Change in 24 hours after surgery | Nausea after the procedure: Visual Analog Score (VAS) for nausea, to measure quality of nausea. 10-point VAS score for nausea \[(0-10), 0 indicating no nausea and 10 indicating unbearable nausea. at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h (hour) after surgery. (Units on a Scale; 0-10) |
| Vomiting | Change in 24 hours after surgery | Vomiting after the procedure: Visual Analog Score (VAS) for vomiting to measure quality of vomiting. 10-point VAS score for vomiting \[(0-10), 0 indicating no vomiting and 10 indicating unbearable vomiting\] at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h (hour) after surgery. (Units on a Scale; 0-10) |
| Length of hospital stay in hours | Up to one week | Length of hospital stay measured from the end of the operation until discharge (hours) |
| Quality of life | At baseline and 6 months after the surgery | A questionnaire six months after operation concerning wellbeing outcome after six months (% of respondents in the group) |
| Complications | The first six months after the surgical intervention | Frequency of complications. Values are given as n (%) and eventual complications are specified |
| Costs | During the surgery | Calculating the comparative direct costs of both techniques. The cost of equipment used in the surgical intervention. (euros) |
| Surgeon perception of both techniques | After one month after the operation | A questionnaire one month after operation of opinion of surgeons on preferred route of specimen removal (% of respondents in the group) |
| Length of need of postoperative pain medication | Change in one month after surgery | A questionnaire of pain medication needed postoperatively. (Days) |
| Postoperative pain scores | Change in 24 hours after surgery | Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain to measure quality of pain. 10-point VAS score for pain \[(0-10), 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating unbearable pain\] at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h (hour) after surgery (Units on a Scale; 0-10) |
| Cosmetic outcome | At baseline and 6 months after the surgery | A questionnaire six months after operation concerning cosmetic outcome after six months (% of respondents in the group) |
Countries
Finland