Skip to content

Magnetic Resonance Tumour Regression Grade (mrTRG) as a Novel Biomarker - Phase III Non CTIMP Trial

Magnetic Resonance Tumour Regression Grade (mrTRG) as a Novel Biomarker to Stratify Management of Good and Poor Responders to Radiotherapy: A Rectal Cancer Multicentre Randomised Control Trial to Avoid Surgery With 'Watch and Wait' or Intensify Treatment According to mrTRG

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02704520
Acronym
TRIGGER
Enrollment
441
Registered
2016-03-10
Start date
2016-03-31
Completion date
2036-12-31
Last updated
2024-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rectal Cancer

Keywords

Rectal Cancer, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Chemoradiotherapy, Chemotherapy, Diagnostic Imaging

Brief summary

Open to patients undergoing any pre-operative treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer, TRIGGER is the only phase III clinical trial in the UK offering watch and wait. All patients will have post treatment MRI scans routinely performed, no change from the MERCURY trials high resolution MRI protocol is required. Patients will be randomised to either the control arm for management according to national guidelines - conventional MDT, clinical assessment post-treatment planning using the baseline MRI. Patients in the interventional arm will have their post treatment MRI scans read by a radiologist trained and supported to reliably report the mrTRG grade and have their management directed accordingly - 'Good response' (mrTRG 1&2) - watch and wait (avoidance of surgery) offered. 'Poor response' (mrTRG 3-5) - local colorectal MDT is informed and uses information to discuss and agree next steps in treatment and surveillance. Patients are followed up for five years with QoL questionnaires completed at registration, 3 and 5 years.

Detailed description

The only phase III clinical trial in the UK offering watch and wait, the TRIGGER trial aims to validate mrTRG as an imaging biomarker for the stratified management of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. The 'good responders' (mrTRG1&2) often have no evidence of tumour and it may be possible to avoid surgery in this group and so maintaining QoL while not impacting survival rates. The 'poor responders' (mrTRG3-5) are at high risk of poor oncological outcomes and this knowledge is useful in planning ongoing treatment and surveillance. TRIGGER is now a non-cTIMP trial as the protocol does not specify chemotherapy or IMP treatments. Decisions about the use of chemotherapy will be based upon local MDT discussions as is normal practice and national policy and the trial CRFs will capture these decisions and whether more treatment is given to patients or not. TRIGGER does not mandate or recommend the use of any treatments: specifically it does not suggest the use of investigational medicinal products. If any centre wishes to use IMPs this would be in the context of separate trial protocols and would not preclude entry into TRIGGER.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTHigh resolution MRI scan

MRI reporting of tumour but not mrTRG in the control arm = standard of care

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTmrTRG assessment

Watch and wait offered for good responders Consider further treatment for poor responders

Sponsors

Imperial College London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. MRI defined locally advanced rectal carcinoma i.e. one or more: greater than or equal to mrT3c; mrEMVI positive; mr N1c; mr CRM positive 2. Biopsy confirmed adenocarcinoma of radiologically defined rectum 3. Be deemed to require preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT)

Exclusion criteria

1. Metastatic disease 2. MRI, radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy contraindications 3. A post-treatment MRI performed more than 10 weeks after the completion of radiotherapy if given 4. Previous malignancy within preceding 5 years if risk of recurrence \>5%

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To show that patients can successfully avoid surgery after achieving a good response to treatment as measured on MRI (mrTRG).Up to 5 yearsNon-inferiority of overall survival at 3 years for the mrTRG (MRI Tumour Regression Grade) good response group (mrTRG 1 and 2) compared with control.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To show mrTRG (Tumour Regression Grade) as a measurement tool can be reproduced by appropriately trained radiologists.Up to 2 yearsAgreement between local and centrally measured mrTRG (MRI Tumour Regression Grade) (mrTRG 1 good to mrTRG 5 poor)
Surgical morbidity30 days post operativeComparison by arm of early (30 day) surgical morbidity according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.
To investigate the effect of the preoperative treatment regime on mrTRG measurementUp to 2 years, 3 years and 5 yearsReporting of treatment given against measurement of mrTRG (MRI Tumour Regression Grade) response (mrTRG 1 good to mrTRG 5 poor)
To investigate the effect of the preoperative treatment regime on survival outcomesUp to 2 years, 3 years and 5 yearsReporting of treatment given survival outcomes
To describe the prognostic features associated with good and poor response to treatment as measured by MRI (mrTRG)3 years and 5 yearsCorrelation of baseline and post treatment prognostic factors on imaging and pathology against survival outcomes
To investigate the economic impact of introducing an mrTRG directed treatment strategyUp to 2 years, 3 years and 5 yearsHealthcare costs using NHS Reference Costs combined with health resource utilization and QoL data
To define molecular and immunological characteristics associated with treatment response as measured by MRI (mrTRG).Up to 2 years, 3 years and 5 yearsCorrelate molecular and immunological biomarkers with outcome measures of mrTRG (MRI Tumour Regression Grade) response, (mrTRG 1 good to mrTRG 5 poor) and survival outcomes
To assess whether the detection of ctDNA predicts for relapse in patients with locally advanced rectal cancerUp to 2 years, 3 years and 5 yearsCorrelate ctDNA levels with outcome measures of mrTRG (MRI Tumour Regression Grade) (mrTRG 1 good to mrTRG 5 poor) and survival outcomes
To investigate the effect of mrTRG directed treatment strategy on Quality of Life1 year, 2 years, 3 years and 5 yearsQuality of life assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30, EQ-5D and Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score (LARS).scans performed at baseline, post-CRT and during surveillance schedule.

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Primary ContactCaroline Martin
cmartin1@imperial.ac.uk+44 (0) 7749 655 817
Backup ContactSyvella Ellis
giclinicaltrials@imperial.ac.uk+44 (0) 7732 315 234

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026