Pancreatic Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
stereotactic body radiation therapy, S-1, locally advanced pancreatic cancer, poor medical conditions
Brief summary
The safety and efficacy of combination of SBRT with sequential S-1 in treating patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer and poor medical conditions will be evaluated.
Detailed description
Although the incidence rate of pancreatic cancer is not as high as that of other gastrointestinal carcinoma in China, the cancer mortalities of males and females ranked the sixth and seventh respectively in 2013, with a surprising low 5-year survival rate (\<5%). Only 15%-20% patients are suitable for surgeries among those first diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and the 5-year survival rate of patients with R0 resection is still less than 20%. Therefore, better efficacy is not available via surgeries alone resulting in great emphasis on adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. In 1997, gemcitabine was confirmed to be the standard chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer. However, it has not been proved that gemcitabine significantly improved prognosis in long term follow-up while some patients are refractory to gemcitabine. Hence, development of more effective chemotherapy is urgent. S-1 is the prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), comprised of tegafur, gimeracil (dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor) and oteracil (the inhibitor of phosphorylation in gastrointestinal tract) with a ratio of 1:0.4:1. The first phase II clinical trials showed good clinical efficacy with S-1.Moreover, Ueno et al. identified better objective response rates with S-1 than those with gemcitabine. Besides, S-1 is not inferior to gemcitabine regarding to overall survival rates and progression free survival rates. And significant improvement of progression free survival rates can be achieved by combination of S-1 and gemcitabine. There was no difference between incidence rates of adverse effects of S-1 and gemcitabine, with more gastrointestinal toxicities with S-1 while more hematologic toxicities with gemcitabine. Therefore, S-1 is an alternative for treating locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, especially for those resistant to gemcitabine. Although there are no phase III studies on S-1, phase II studies have already shown better disease control rates (52%-58%), median overall survival time (4.5-6.3 months) and tolerable adverse effects in advanced pancreatic cancer resistant to gemcitabine treated with S-1. Though S-1 is appropriate for advanced pancreatic cancer, it is not superior to gemcitabine with respect to clinical efficacy. In addition, fewer encouraging results are gained with combination of S-1 and other drug. As a result, S-1 combined with radiotherapy is gradually applied in treatment of pancreatic cancer. 5-FU was proved to be radiosensitive thus improving clinical efficacy. S-1 combined with radiotherapy has demonstrated better prognosis with the median overall survival time of 12.9-16.8 months. Furthermore, some patients can be operable after S-1 and radiotherapy. Compared with conventional radiation, a single-fraction dose and total dose of target volume can be increased in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). In addition, doses of organs at risk would be reduced, thus effectively improving local control rates and reducing radiation related toxicity. Shorter courses of SBRT also enhance patients' compliance and render the initial of other treatment on schedule possible. Nevertheless, there are few studies focusing on S-1 combined with SBRT for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Especially for patients with poor medical coonditions, though gemcitabine alone is recommended in the NCCN guideline, S-1 may be a better option due to more adverse effects induced by gemcitabine in Asian. Additionally, local ablative treatment combined with chemotherapy may provide more survival benefits for those patients. Hence, efficacy of combination of S-1 and SBRT needs to be further confirmed. Based on our experience in treating locally advanced pancreatic cancer, SBRT combined with sequential S-1 as the initial treatment for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer and poor medical conditions is proposed to evaluate its clinical efficacy. Study Procedure: 1. CyberKnife SBRT body fixation (vacuum-bag) will be used in immobilizing the body, the arms and the legs. Patients will undergo a plain CT as well as an enhanced pancreatic parenchymal CT for radiation treatment planning and target delineation. 2. SBRT will be delivered on CyberKnife with Synchrony Respiratory Tracking system. The tumor will be tracked with implanted fiducial markers by Fiducial Tracking System. Treatment will be delivered in 5 fractions within 1 to 2 weeks at the discretion of the investigator. 3. A body fixation (vacuum-bag) will be used in immobilizing the body, the arms (both arms are along the body) and the legs. 4. The total doses depend on patients' medical conditions, ranging from 35Gy-40Gy/5Fx. 5. Patients receive 80 mg of S-1 per square meter of body surface area twice a day for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks of rest as one course, which would repeat for six cycles.The initiation of S-1 is one month after SBRT.
Interventions
Radiation therapy combined with chemotherapy
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
stereotactic bodt radiation therapy plus sequential S-1 for locally pancreatic cancer
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Locally advanced pancreatic cancer proved by CT or MRI and biopsy 2. Without any other treatment before SBRT 3. A life expectancy of \>3months 4. ECOG: 2 or 3 points 5. Age of more than 18 years old 6. Blood routine examination: Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 ×10\^9 cells/L, leukocyte count≥ 3.5 ×10\^9 cells/L, platelets ≥ 70×10\^9 cells/L, hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dl 7. Liver and kidney function tests: Albumin \> 2.5 g/dL, total bilirubin \< 3 mg/dL, creatinine \< 2.0 mg/dL, AST\<2.5 × ULN(Upper Limit of Normal)(0-64U/L), ALT\<2.5 × ULN(0-64U/L) 8. INR \< 2 (0.9-1.1) 9. Ability of the research subject or authorized legal representative to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
Exclusion criteria
1. Prior surgery, chemotherapy or radiation for the pancreatic cancer 2. Evidences of metastatic disease such as nodal or distant metastases by abdomen CT and chest CT or FDG PET-CT 3. Contraindication to receiving radiotherapy 4. ECOG: 0-1 point 5. Age\<18 6. Abnormal results of blood routine examinations and liver and kidney tests 7. Patients with active inflammatory bowel diseases or peptic ulcer 8. Gastrointestinal bleeding or perforation within 6 months 9. Heart failure: NYHA III-IV 10. Women who are pregnant 11. Participation in another clinical treatment trial while on study 12. Patients in whom fiducial implantation was not possible 13. Inability of the research subject or authorized legal representative to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| One-year Overall Survival Rate | 1 year | One-year overall survival rate is calculated by the ratio of number of patients surviving more than 1 year to the total number of patients enrolled. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Acute Toxicities Following SBRT | Within 90 days after completion of SBRT | The acute toxicities are determined by RTOG Acute Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria. |
| Number of Participants With Late Toxicities Following SBRT | 90 days after SBRT | The late toxicities are determined by RTOG/EORTC Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria. |
| The Median Progression Free Survival Time Will be Determined. | 3 years | Progression-free survival is the time from the date of enrollment to the confirmation of disease progression at any sites, including local progression or metastasis, or death from any causes, if this occurred before disease progression. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. |
| The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed. | 1 years | The analysis of quality of life is based on The European Organization for Reasearch and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC): Quality of Life Questionnare-Core 30 (QLQ-C30). Higher scores in function domains and global health status indicate better quality of life, while higher scores in symptom domains imply worse quality of life. The scale range of all domains of QLQ-C30 is 0-100 (the minimum and maximum score is 0 and 100 points, respectively). |
| Median Overall Survival Will be Determined. | 3 years | Median overall survival is calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. |
Countries
China
Participant flow
Recruitment details
The recruitment period was from February 2016 to March 2018 in Changhai Hospital affiliated to Navy Medical University.
Pre-assignment details
There were significant events that occur after participant enrollment, but prior to assignment of participants to an arm or group.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Combination of Cyberknife With S-1 Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer meeting all inclusion criteria will receive combination of Cyberknife with S-1.
combination of Cyberknife with sequential S-1: Radiation therapy combined with sequential chemotherapy | 63 |
| Total | 63 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | disease progression | 10 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Combination of Cyberknife With S-1 |
|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 52 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 11 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 76.0 years |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 63 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment China | 63 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 27 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 36 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 63 / 63 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 63 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 6 / 63 |
Outcome results
One-year Overall Survival Rate
One-year overall survival rate is calculated by the ratio of number of patients surviving more than 1 year to the total number of patients enrolled.
Time frame: 1 year
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Combination of Cyberknife With S-1 | One-year Overall Survival Rate | 46 Participants |
Median Overall Survival Will be Determined.
Median overall survival is calculated by Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: 3 years
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Combination of Cyberknife With S-1 | Median Overall Survival Will be Determined. | 14.4 months |
Number of Participants With Acute Toxicities Following SBRT
The acute toxicities are determined by RTOG Acute Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria.
Time frame: Within 90 days after completion of SBRT
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Combination of Cyberknife With S-1 | Number of Participants With Acute Toxicities Following SBRT | 9 Participants |
Number of Participants With Late Toxicities Following SBRT
The late toxicities are determined by RTOG/EORTC Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria.
Time frame: 90 days after SBRT
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Combination of Cyberknife With S-1 | Number of Participants With Late Toxicities Following SBRT | 5 Participants |
The Median Progression Free Survival Time Will be Determined.
Progression-free survival is the time from the date of enrollment to the confirmation of disease progression at any sites, including local progression or metastasis, or death from any causes, if this occurred before disease progression. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.
Time frame: 3 years
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Combination of Cyberknife With S-1 | The Median Progression Free Survival Time Will be Determined. | 10.1 months |
The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed.
The analysis of quality of life is based on The European Organization for Reasearch and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC): Quality of Life Questionnare-Core 30 (QLQ-C30). Higher scores in function domains and global health status indicate better quality of life, while higher scores in symptom domains imply worse quality of life. The scale range of all domains of QLQ-C30 is 0-100 (the minimum and maximum score is 0 and 100 points, respectively).
Time frame: 1 years
Population: All domains of QLQ-C30 at 6 months after treatment are reported. Higher scores in function domains and global health status indicate better quality of life, while higher scores in symptom domains imply worse quality of life. The scale range of all following domains is 0-100 (the minimum and maximum score is 0 and 100 points, respectively).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combination of Cyberknife With S-1 | The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed. | Global health status | 50.0 units on a scale |
| Combination of Cyberknife With S-1 | The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed. | Physical functioning | 64.2 units on a scale |
| Combination of Cyberknife With S-1 | The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed. | Role functioning | 54.8 units on a scale |
| Combination of Cyberknife With S-1 | The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed. | Pain | 48.7 units on a scale |
| Combination of Cyberknife With S-1 | The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed. | Dyspnea | 9.5 units on a scale |
| Combination of Cyberknife With S-1 | The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed. | Emotional functioning | 68.5 units on a scale |
| Combination of Cyberknife With S-1 | The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed. | Cognitive functioning | 73.8 units on a scale |
| Combination of Cyberknife With S-1 | The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed. | Social functioning | 74.6 units on a scale |
| Combination of Cyberknife With S-1 | The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed. | Fatigue | 46.7 units on a scale |
| Combination of Cyberknife With S-1 | The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed. | Nausea and vomiting | 55.3 units on a scale |
| Combination of Cyberknife With S-1 | The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed. | Insomnia | 19.0 units on a scale |
| Combination of Cyberknife With S-1 | The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed. | Appetite loss | 59.2 units on a scale |
| Combination of Cyberknife With S-1 | The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed. | Constipation | 13.2 units on a scale |
| Combination of Cyberknife With S-1 | The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed. | Diarrhea | 13.7 units on a scale |
| Combination of Cyberknife With S-1 | The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed. | Financial difficulties | 31.2 units on a scale |