Skip to content

Combination of SBRT With Sequential S-1 for Treating Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With Sequential S-1 for Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer and Poor Medical Conditions --a Phase II Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02704143
Enrollment
63
Registered
2016-03-09
Start date
2016-02-29
Completion date
2020-05-31
Last updated
2020-10-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic Cancer

Keywords

stereotactic body radiation therapy, S-1, locally advanced pancreatic cancer, poor medical conditions

Brief summary

The safety and efficacy of combination of SBRT with sequential S-1 in treating patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer and poor medical conditions will be evaluated.

Detailed description

Although the incidence rate of pancreatic cancer is not as high as that of other gastrointestinal carcinoma in China, the cancer mortalities of males and females ranked the sixth and seventh respectively in 2013, with a surprising low 5-year survival rate (\<5%). Only 15%-20% patients are suitable for surgeries among those first diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and the 5-year survival rate of patients with R0 resection is still less than 20%. Therefore, better efficacy is not available via surgeries alone resulting in great emphasis on adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. In 1997, gemcitabine was confirmed to be the standard chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer. However, it has not been proved that gemcitabine significantly improved prognosis in long term follow-up while some patients are refractory to gemcitabine. Hence, development of more effective chemotherapy is urgent. S-1 is the prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), comprised of tegafur, gimeracil (dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor) and oteracil (the inhibitor of phosphorylation in gastrointestinal tract) with a ratio of 1:0.4:1. The first phase II clinical trials showed good clinical efficacy with S-1.Moreover, Ueno et al. identified better objective response rates with S-1 than those with gemcitabine. Besides, S-1 is not inferior to gemcitabine regarding to overall survival rates and progression free survival rates. And significant improvement of progression free survival rates can be achieved by combination of S-1 and gemcitabine. There was no difference between incidence rates of adverse effects of S-1 and gemcitabine, with more gastrointestinal toxicities with S-1 while more hematologic toxicities with gemcitabine. Therefore, S-1 is an alternative for treating locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, especially for those resistant to gemcitabine. Although there are no phase III studies on S-1, phase II studies have already shown better disease control rates (52%-58%), median overall survival time (4.5-6.3 months) and tolerable adverse effects in advanced pancreatic cancer resistant to gemcitabine treated with S-1. Though S-1 is appropriate for advanced pancreatic cancer, it is not superior to gemcitabine with respect to clinical efficacy. In addition, fewer encouraging results are gained with combination of S-1 and other drug. As a result, S-1 combined with radiotherapy is gradually applied in treatment of pancreatic cancer. 5-FU was proved to be radiosensitive thus improving clinical efficacy. S-1 combined with radiotherapy has demonstrated better prognosis with the median overall survival time of 12.9-16.8 months. Furthermore, some patients can be operable after S-1 and radiotherapy. Compared with conventional radiation, a single-fraction dose and total dose of target volume can be increased in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). In addition, doses of organs at risk would be reduced, thus effectively improving local control rates and reducing radiation related toxicity. Shorter courses of SBRT also enhance patients' compliance and render the initial of other treatment on schedule possible. Nevertheless, there are few studies focusing on S-1 combined with SBRT for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Especially for patients with poor medical coonditions, though gemcitabine alone is recommended in the NCCN guideline, S-1 may be a better option due to more adverse effects induced by gemcitabine in Asian. Additionally, local ablative treatment combined with chemotherapy may provide more survival benefits for those patients. Hence, efficacy of combination of S-1 and SBRT needs to be further confirmed. Based on our experience in treating locally advanced pancreatic cancer, SBRT combined with sequential S-1 as the initial treatment for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer and poor medical conditions is proposed to evaluate its clinical efficacy. Study Procedure: 1. CyberKnife SBRT body fixation (vacuum-bag) will be used in immobilizing the body, the arms and the legs. Patients will undergo a plain CT as well as an enhanced pancreatic parenchymal CT for radiation treatment planning and target delineation. 2. SBRT will be delivered on CyberKnife with Synchrony Respiratory Tracking system. The tumor will be tracked with implanted fiducial markers by Fiducial Tracking System. Treatment will be delivered in 5 fractions within 1 to 2 weeks at the discretion of the investigator. 3. A body fixation (vacuum-bag) will be used in immobilizing the body, the arms (both arms are along the body) and the legs. 4. The total doses depend on patients' medical conditions, ranging from 35Gy-40Gy/5Fx. 5. Patients receive 80 mg of S-1 per square meter of body surface area twice a day for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks of rest as one course, which would repeat for six cycles.The initiation of S-1 is one month after SBRT.

Interventions

OTHERcombination of Cyberknife with S-1

Radiation therapy combined with chemotherapy

Sponsors

Changhai Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

stereotactic bodt radiation therapy plus sequential S-1 for locally pancreatic cancer

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Locally advanced pancreatic cancer proved by CT or MRI and biopsy 2. Without any other treatment before SBRT 3. A life expectancy of \>3months 4. ECOG: 2 or 3 points 5. Age of more than 18 years old 6. Blood routine examination: Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 ×10\^9 cells/L, leukocyte count≥ 3.5 ×10\^9 cells/L, platelets ≥ 70×10\^9 cells/L, hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dl 7. Liver and kidney function tests: Albumin \> 2.5 g/dL, total bilirubin \< 3 mg/dL, creatinine \< 2.0 mg/dL, AST\<2.5 × ULN(Upper Limit of Normal)(0-64U/L), ALT\<2.5 × ULN(0-64U/L) 8. INR \< 2 (0.9-1.1) 9. Ability of the research subject or authorized legal representative to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.

Exclusion criteria

1. Prior surgery, chemotherapy or radiation for the pancreatic cancer 2. Evidences of metastatic disease such as nodal or distant metastases by abdomen CT and chest CT or FDG PET-CT 3. Contraindication to receiving radiotherapy 4. ECOG: 0-1 point 5. Age\<18 6. Abnormal results of blood routine examinations and liver and kidney tests 7. Patients with active inflammatory bowel diseases or peptic ulcer 8. Gastrointestinal bleeding or perforation within 6 months 9. Heart failure: NYHA III-IV 10. Women who are pregnant 11. Participation in another clinical treatment trial while on study 12. Patients in whom fiducial implantation was not possible 13. Inability of the research subject or authorized legal representative to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
One-year Overall Survival Rate1 yearOne-year overall survival rate is calculated by the ratio of number of patients surviving more than 1 year to the total number of patients enrolled.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Acute Toxicities Following SBRTWithin 90 days after completion of SBRTThe acute toxicities are determined by RTOG Acute Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria.
Number of Participants With Late Toxicities Following SBRT90 days after SBRTThe late toxicities are determined by RTOG/EORTC Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria.
The Median Progression Free Survival Time Will be Determined.3 yearsProgression-free survival is the time from the date of enrollment to the confirmation of disease progression at any sites, including local progression or metastasis, or death from any causes, if this occurred before disease progression. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.
The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed.1 yearsThe analysis of quality of life is based on The European Organization for Reasearch and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC): Quality of Life Questionnare-Core 30 (QLQ-C30). Higher scores in function domains and global health status indicate better quality of life, while higher scores in symptom domains imply worse quality of life. The scale range of all domains of QLQ-C30 is 0-100 (the minimum and maximum score is 0 and 100 points, respectively).
Median Overall Survival Will be Determined.3 yearsMedian overall survival is calculated by Kaplan-Meier method.

Countries

China

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The recruitment period was from February 2016 to March 2018 in Changhai Hospital affiliated to Navy Medical University.

Pre-assignment details

There were significant events that occur after participant enrollment, but prior to assignment of participants to an arm or group.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Combination of Cyberknife With S-1
Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer meeting all inclusion criteria will receive combination of Cyberknife with S-1. combination of Cyberknife with sequential S-1: Radiation therapy combined with sequential chemotherapy
63
Total63

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall Studydisease progression10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCombination of Cyberknife With S-1
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
52 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
11 Participants
Age, Continuous76.0 years
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
63 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
China
63 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
36 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
63 / 63
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 63
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 63

Outcome results

Primary

One-year Overall Survival Rate

One-year overall survival rate is calculated by the ratio of number of patients surviving more than 1 year to the total number of patients enrolled.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Combination of Cyberknife With S-1One-year Overall Survival Rate46 Participants
Secondary

Median Overall Survival Will be Determined.

Median overall survival is calculated by Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: 3 years

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Combination of Cyberknife With S-1Median Overall Survival Will be Determined.14.4 months
Secondary

Number of Participants With Acute Toxicities Following SBRT

The acute toxicities are determined by RTOG Acute Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria.

Time frame: Within 90 days after completion of SBRT

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Combination of Cyberknife With S-1Number of Participants With Acute Toxicities Following SBRT9 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Late Toxicities Following SBRT

The late toxicities are determined by RTOG/EORTC Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria.

Time frame: 90 days after SBRT

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Combination of Cyberknife With S-1Number of Participants With Late Toxicities Following SBRT5 Participants
Secondary

The Median Progression Free Survival Time Will be Determined.

Progression-free survival is the time from the date of enrollment to the confirmation of disease progression at any sites, including local progression or metastasis, or death from any causes, if this occurred before disease progression. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.

Time frame: 3 years

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Combination of Cyberknife With S-1The Median Progression Free Survival Time Will be Determined.10.1 months
Secondary

The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed.

The analysis of quality of life is based on The European Organization for Reasearch and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC): Quality of Life Questionnare-Core 30 (QLQ-C30). Higher scores in function domains and global health status indicate better quality of life, while higher scores in symptom domains imply worse quality of life. The scale range of all domains of QLQ-C30 is 0-100 (the minimum and maximum score is 0 and 100 points, respectively).

Time frame: 1 years

Population: All domains of QLQ-C30 at 6 months after treatment are reported. Higher scores in function domains and global health status indicate better quality of life, while higher scores in symptom domains imply worse quality of life. The scale range of all following domains is 0-100 (the minimum and maximum score is 0 and 100 points, respectively).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Combination of Cyberknife With S-1The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed.Global health status50.0 units on a scale
Combination of Cyberknife With S-1The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed.Physical functioning64.2 units on a scale
Combination of Cyberknife With S-1The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed.Role functioning54.8 units on a scale
Combination of Cyberknife With S-1The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed.Pain48.7 units on a scale
Combination of Cyberknife With S-1The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed.Dyspnea9.5 units on a scale
Combination of Cyberknife With S-1The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed.Emotional functioning68.5 units on a scale
Combination of Cyberknife With S-1The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed.Cognitive functioning73.8 units on a scale
Combination of Cyberknife With S-1The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed.Social functioning74.6 units on a scale
Combination of Cyberknife With S-1The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed.Fatigue46.7 units on a scale
Combination of Cyberknife With S-1The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed.Nausea and vomiting55.3 units on a scale
Combination of Cyberknife With S-1The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed.Insomnia19.0 units on a scale
Combination of Cyberknife With S-1The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed.Appetite loss59.2 units on a scale
Combination of Cyberknife With S-1The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed.Constipation13.2 units on a scale
Combination of Cyberknife With S-1The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed.Diarrhea13.7 units on a scale
Combination of Cyberknife With S-1The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed.Financial difficulties31.2 units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026