Skip to content

Combined tDCS and Vision Restoration Training in Post-acute Stroke: an Exploratory Efficacy and Safety Study

Combined tDCS and Vision Restoration Training in Post-acute Stroke: an Exploratory Efficacy and Safety Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02703870
Enrollment
19
Registered
2016-03-09
Start date
2013-03-31
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2016-03-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemianopia, Stroke

Brief summary

The purpose of this Study is to determine whether non-invasive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is effective in increasing rehabilitation effects after stroke in visual Cortex.

Detailed description

Visual field defects after posterior cerebral artery stroke can be improved by vision restoration training (VRT), but when combined with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) which alters brain excitability, vision restoration can be potentiated in the chronic stage. Because it is possible that such therapy may be more effective during the early recovery phase after the stroke and can reach patients during the rehabilitation phase, investigators wished to explore the applicability, efficacy and safety of early intervention with a combined tDCS/VRT treatment. 19 post-acute stroke homonymous hemianopia patients were randomly assigned to either 10 sessions of combined rea-tDCS (2mA, 10 daily sessions of 15-20 min) and VRT, or sham-tDCS and VRT. The primary outcome criterion was the pre-post change in perimetric detection thresholds. Secondary outcome is neurophysiological changes in EEG measures (VEP, Connectivity, Spectral Power, ...)

Interventions

real transcranial direct current stimulation,10 sessions, 2mA for 20 minutes

DEVICEsham tDCS

sham transcranial direct current stimulation, 10 sessions, for 20 minutes

BEHAVIORALVRT

Vision restoration training, 10 sessions, 20 minutes

Sponsors

Neurologisches Therapiezentrum Gmundnerberg
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Magdeburg
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Posterior Cerebral Artery Stroke * Visual Field Defect * Lesion age 4 weeks up to 6 month max.

Exclusion criteria

* Electrical Implants * Metal artefacts in head * Epilepsy * Visual Neglect

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change of mean sensitivity (in dB) detection threshold from baseline to post-intervention and follow up14-20 days post treatment, 3 months follow up

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in power spectra (Volts-squared per Hz (V^2/Hz) from baseline to post-intervention and follow up14-20 days post treatment, 3 months follow uppower spectra (Volts-squared per Hz (V\^2/Hz)
Change in VEP latencies (ms) from baseline to post-intervention and follow up14-20 days post treatment, 3 months follow upVEP latencies (ms)
Change in VEP amplitudes (µV) from baseline to post-intervention and follow up14-20 days post treatment, 3 months follow upVEP amplitudes (µV)
Change in network coherence from baseline to post-intervention and follow up14-20 days post treatment, 3 months follow upnetwork coherence correlations
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events assessed by a questionnaireup to 4 monthsquestionnaire recording adverse effects

Countries

Austria, Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026