Skip to content

Role of Provider-at-Triage on ED Efficiency and Quality of Care

Effects of Provider-at-Triage on Emergency Department Efficiency, Information Delivery and Patient Satisfaction

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02703701
Acronym
MD at Triage
Enrollment
439
Registered
2016-03-09
Start date
2015-10-31
Completion date
2016-03-31
Last updated
2019-09-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patient Satisfaction With Emergency Department Efficiency

Keywords

Patient Satisfaction, Emergency Department efficiency

Brief summary

The United States spends over $8,000 per capita annually on health care and its health care system is more expensive than other developed countries. Even with high per capita costs and a high proportion of physician specialists, the US lags in health care performance from patients' perspectives. The hospital emergency department (ED) is often the portal of entry for patients seeking health care services and is therefore an ideal setting for initiatives to improve efficiency of care delivery and patient satisfaction. Reduction in wait times, enhanced information delivery and ED staff service quality all have a positive influence on patient perception of health care quality and satisfaction. Prior studies have attempted to increase patient satisfaction by improving staff communication and courtesy, implementing a patient satisfaction team in triage, and delivering information to patients in a timely manner. Another strategy to increase the efficiency of ED operations is adding a physician to triage to perform brief medical screenings and initiate necessary patient testing and treatment. This contrasts to usual practice in which physicians evaluate patients only following registration and nurse assessment of illness or injury severity.

Detailed description

This study will assess the impact of early patient assessment by a physician at Emergency Department (ED) triage on patient perception of information delivery, overall patient satisfaction and ED efficiency. ED efficiency will be assessed by ED length of patient stay, ED left-without-being-seen and ED left during treatment rates. Participants who decide to take part in this study, will be asked questions by research staff, who will document responses on a secure iPAD device. The survey will ask participants how they feel about their health condition, the emergency department wait, the care they received in the emergency department and how satisfied the participant was with the care received.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPhysician at triage

A physician embedded at triage

OTHERUsual Care

No physician at triage

Sponsors

University of Florida
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 110 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Participants are eligible to participate in the study if they are: * English speaking * Without hemodynamic or respiratory compromise * Do not have a nurse-assigned triage severity score of Emergency Severity Index 1 (most severe illness or injury score).

Exclusion criteria

Participants will be excluded if they are: * Unwilling or unable to sign an informed consent * In police custody * Too ill to participate in study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Satisfaction60 minutes after Emergency Department triagePatient Satisfaction Score- brief survey measured on a Likert Scale * 1= Never * 2= Sometimes * 3= Usually * 4= Always * 5= Not applicable - I did not see a doctor today

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Emergency Department efficiency24 hours after ED triage in minutesImpact of physician at triage on ED length of stay rates
Left without being seen rate12 hours after ED triage in minutesImpact of physician at triage on left without being seen rate

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026