Skip to content

REPAIR - transcatheteR rEPair of mitrAl Insufficiency With caRdioband System

REPAIR - transcatheteR rEPair of mitrAl Insufficiency With caRdioband System

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02703311
Acronym
REPAIR
Enrollment
11
Registered
2016-03-09
Start date
2016-08-31
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2020-11-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Valve Annuloplasty, Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases, Heart Valve Diseases, Mitral Regurgitation, Mitral Valve Annuloplasty, Mitral Valve Insufficiency

Keywords

Valtech Cardio, Cardioband, Mitral Valve

Brief summary

The Cardioband Transcatheter System (Cardioband) is indicated for the treatment of secondary (functional) mitral regurgitation (FMR). The Cardioband is a transcatheter system, deployed on the beating heart through a transseptal approach. The Cardioband is deployed along the posterior annulus of the mitral valve (MV) and is adjusted under trans-esophageal guidance on the beating heart. A CE mark study with 30 subjects has been completed and documented reduction of severity of mitral regurgitation (MR) and improvement in 6- minute walk test in subjects with moderate to severe MR. Study objectives are to test the efficacy of the Cardioband in improving MR and heart failure symptoms in patients with symptomatic (New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III-IVa), severe MR in the post-marketing setting, And to evaluate the safety of the Cardioband system in the post-marketing setting.

Interventions

Mitral valve repair with Cardioband implanted via transcatheter procedure under transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and fluoroscopy guidance

Sponsors

Edwards Lifesciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥18 years 2. Severe (3+ to 4+) secondary Mitral Regurgitation 3. Symptomatic heart failure (NYHA Class III-IVa) despite guideline directed medical therapy including CRT if indicated 4. The Local Site Heart Team concur that surgery will not be offered as a treatment option and that medical therapy is the intended therapy. 5. Transfemoral access and transseptal deployment of the Cardioband is determined to be feasible 6. Subject is willing and able to provide informed consent and follow protocol

Exclusion criteria

1. EF \< 20% 2. LVEDD ≥ 70 mm 3. Heavily calcified annulus or leaflets 4. Significant CAD requiring revascularization 5. Active bacterial endocarditis 6. Any percutaneous coronary, carotid, endovascular intervention or carotid surgery within 30 days or any coronary or endovascular surgery within 3 months 7. Renal insufficiency requiring dialysis 8. Life expectancy of less than twelve months 9. Subject is participating in concomitant research studies of investigational products that have not reached their primary endpoint 10. Pulmonary hypertension ≥ 70mmHg at rest 11. Mitral valve anatomy which may preclude proper device treatment 12. Right-sided congestive heart failure with echocardiographic evidence of severe right ventricular dysfunction and/or severe tricuspid regurgitation 13. Severe liver disease 14. Patient is pregnant or lactating 15. Hypersensitivity to Nickel or Chromium 16. Clinically significant bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy 17. History of mitral valve repair 18. TIA or CVA within 3 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reduction in Severity of MR at 30 Days of at Least One Category on a 0-4 Scale.30 daysPercentage of Patients with Reduction in MR Severity of at least one grade at 30 days compared to baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Distance Walked on 6 Minute Walk Test6 months over BaselineMedian distance in meters walked during 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) at 6 months compared to baseline
Change in Mitral Regurgitation Severity6, 12, and 24 months over baselineMitral Regurgitation at 6, 12, and 24 months compared to baseline

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)6, 12, and 24 months over baselineMedian LVEDV data, as measured by TTE at 6, 12, and 24 months compared to baseline
Change in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)6, 12, and 24 months over baselinesMedian LVESV data, as measured by TTE at 6, 12, and 24 months compared to baseline
Number of Participants With Device SuccessDischargeDevice success is defined as deployment of the Cardioband, with MR reduction at hospital discharge.
Change in Distance Walked on 6 Minute Walk Test12, and 24 months over baselineMedian distance in meters walked during 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) at 12 and 24 months compared to baseline
Number of Days Alive and Out of Hospital12 monthsDays alive and out of hospital due to major cardiovascular events at 1 year
Freedom From All-cause Mortality and Major Adverse Events (AE)30 days from implant procedure or hospital discharge, whichever is later.Freedom from all-cause mortality and major AE is defined as disabling stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) (peri-procedural or spontaneous), renal failure requiring dialysis, life-threatening bleeding, cardiac tamponade and device related cardiac surgical intervention at 30 days from the implant procedure or hospital discharge, whichever is later.
Need for Urgent/Emergent Surgical Intervention24 monthsNumber of patients who undergo urgent/emergent surgical intervention post procedure
Number of Participants With Patient Success6 and 12 monthsIndividual patient success (measured at 6 months and 1 year) defined as device success and the following: * Discharged from index hospitalization * NYHA class improvement by at least 1 level from baseline
Change in Quality of Life (QoL) as Measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)6, 12, and 24 months over baselineMedian KCCQ Score. The KCCQ is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. Scores range from 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class6, 12, and 24 months over baselineNYHA Class at 6, 12, and 24 months compared to baseline

Countries

France, Germany, Italy

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cardioband
Patients who were enrolled and had the Cardioband procedure attempted
11
Total11

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath5
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCardioband
Age, Continuous73.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
Chronic Renal Disease8 Participants
Dilated Cardiomyopathy5 Participants
EuroScore II7.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3
Ischemic Etiology of Regurgitation4 Participants
NYHA Functional Class III or IV11 Participants
Paroxysmal, Persistent, Chronic Atrial Flutter/Fibrillation10 Participants
Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Graft4 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
5 / 11
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
9 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Reduction in Severity of MR at 30 Days of at Least One Category on a 0-4 Scale.

Percentage of Patients with Reduction in MR Severity of at least one grade at 30 days compared to baseline

Time frame: 30 days

Population: Intra-subject comparison of patients with paired data at baseline and 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CardiobandReduction in Severity of MR at 30 Days of at Least One Category on a 0-4 Scale.4 Participants
Secondary

Change in Distance Walked on 6 Minute Walk Test

Median distance in meters walked during 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) at 6 months compared to baseline

Time frame: 6 months over Baseline

Population: Intra-subject comparison of patients with paired data at baseline and 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
CardiobandChange in Distance Walked on 6 Minute Walk Test30.7 MetersStandard Deviation 60.4
Secondary

Change in Mitral Regurgitation Severity

Mitral Regurgitation at 6, 12, and 24 months compared to baseline

Time frame: 6, 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: This planned endpoint of change mitral regurgitation severity in was unable to be analyzed due to the small sample size that was achieved in this study. Data available at each time point were reported as number of patients with MR grades None/Trace, Mild, Moderate, Severe.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CardiobandChange in Mitral Regurgitation SeverityBaselineNone/Trace0 Participants
CardiobandChange in Mitral Regurgitation SeverityBaselineMild2 Participants
CardiobandChange in Mitral Regurgitation SeverityBaselineModerate4 Participants
CardiobandChange in Mitral Regurgitation SeverityBaselineSevere3 Participants
CardiobandChange in Mitral Regurgitation Severity6 MonthsNone/Trace1 Participants
CardiobandChange in Mitral Regurgitation Severity6 MonthsMild3 Participants
CardiobandChange in Mitral Regurgitation Severity6 MonthsModerate1 Participants
CardiobandChange in Mitral Regurgitation Severity6 MonthsSevere0 Participants
CardiobandChange in Mitral Regurgitation Severity12 MonthsNone/Trace0 Participants
CardiobandChange in Mitral Regurgitation Severity12 MonthsMild3 Participants
CardiobandChange in Mitral Regurgitation Severity12 MonthsModerate0 Participants
CardiobandChange in Mitral Regurgitation Severity12 MonthsSevere0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Change in Distance Walked on 6 Minute Walk Test

Median distance in meters walked during 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) at 12 and 24 months compared to baseline

Time frame: 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: This planned endpoint was unable to be analyzed due to the small sample size that was achieved in this study

Other Pre-specified

Change in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)

Median LVEDV data, as measured by TTE at 6, 12, and 24 months compared to baseline

Time frame: 6, 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: This planned endpoint was unable to be analyzed due to the small sample size that was achieved in this study

Other Pre-specified

Change in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)

Median LVESV data, as measured by TTE at 6, 12, and 24 months compared to baseline

Time frame: 6, 12, and 24 months over baselines

Population: This planned endpoint was unable to be analyzed due to the small sample size that was achieved in this study

Other Pre-specified

Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class

NYHA Class at 6, 12, and 24 months compared to baseline

Time frame: 6, 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: This planned endpoint was unable to be analyzed due to the small sample size that was achieved in this study

Other Pre-specified

Change in Quality of Life (QoL) as Measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)

Median KCCQ Score. The KCCQ is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. Scores range from 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.

Time frame: 6, 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: This planned endpoint was unable to be analyzed due to the small sample size that was achieved in this study

Other Pre-specified

Freedom From All-cause Mortality and Major Adverse Events (AE)

Freedom from all-cause mortality and major AE is defined as disabling stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) (peri-procedural or spontaneous), renal failure requiring dialysis, life-threatening bleeding, cardiac tamponade and device related cardiac surgical intervention at 30 days from the implant procedure or hospital discharge, whichever is later.

Time frame: 30 days from implant procedure or hospital discharge, whichever is later.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CardiobandFreedom From All-cause Mortality and Major Adverse Events (AE)10 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Need for Urgent/Emergent Surgical Intervention

Number of patients who undergo urgent/emergent surgical intervention post procedure

Time frame: 24 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CardiobandNeed for Urgent/Emergent Surgical Intervention0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Days Alive and Out of Hospital

Days alive and out of hospital due to major cardiovascular events at 1 year

Time frame: 12 months

Population: This planned endpoint was unable to be analyzed due to the small sample size that was achieved in this study

Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Device Success

Device success is defined as deployment of the Cardioband, with MR reduction at hospital discharge.

Time frame: Discharge

Population: The outcome is reported for subjects where data is available. Subjects with missing data are excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CardiobandNumber of Participants With Device Success7 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Patient Success

Individual patient success (measured at 6 months and 1 year) defined as device success and the following: * Discharged from index hospitalization * NYHA class improvement by at least 1 level from baseline

Time frame: 6 and 12 months

Population: The outcome is reported for subjects where data is available. Subjects with missing data are excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CardiobandNumber of Participants With Patient Success6 Months3 Participants
CardiobandNumber of Participants With Patient Success12 Months3 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026