Skip to content

Near Infrared Spectroscopy Cortical Response to Noxious and Auditory Stimuli in Subjects Under General Anesthesia

Assessing the Cortical Response to Noxious and Auditory Stimuli Using Near Infrared Spectroscopy in Subjects Under General Anesthesia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02703090
Enrollment
44
Registered
2016-03-09
Start date
2016-10-31
Completion date
2020-03-10
Last updated
2025-12-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Pain

Brief summary

The primary aim is to utilize near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) in patients under general anesthesia to measure changes in brain blood flow in the bilateral somatosensory cortices and the prefrontal cortices in response to noxious stimulation.

Detailed description

Participants: Patients with a structurally normal heart scheduled to undergo elective electrophysiology study with catheter ablation of an arrhythmia under general anesthesia were recruited. Forty one patients were enrolled from October 2016 to March 2020. Written informed consent was obtained from the participants or their respective parents/guardians before the study and written assent was obtained from children ≥7 years of age. All study procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB-P00021030) of Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts and the study registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02703090). Randomization, Allocation concealment and blinding: The hospital research pharmacy used a parallel group design, with block randomization to allocate the patients into either high-dose, low-dose or placebo groups. The clinical staff, research personnel and the patients were unaware of the drug allocated to a particular patient (double-blinded). The decision to unblind was made by the principal investigators (B.K and D.B) and performed by the pharmacy after all the data were acquired, preprocessed and were ready for group level statistical analysis. Power Analysis: In our pilot study we had useable data from five of the eleven patients enrolled (45%). The signal of interest had a mean value of -3.764x10-7 Moles with a standard deviation of 2.135x10-7 Moles. This resulted in a standardized effect size of 1.763, when using a zero mean for the null case. In order to achieve a 90% power level for this measure, the number of usable data sets is therefore 8 for each group (total of 24 patients). Considering our previous success rate of 45%, approximately 18 patients will need to be enrolled into each group. However, only 41 patients were able to complete the study, as recruitment was discontinued in March 2020 (a year earlier than projected) due to the Coronavirus pandemic in the United States. The decision to unblind was ultimately made by the principal investigators (B.K and D.B). fNIRS Acquisition: Changes in hemoglobin concentration during the procedure were recorded using a multichannel continuous wave fNIRS system (CW7, Tech En, Massachusetts, USA) at 690 and 830 nm wavelengths and a sampling frequency of 25 Hz. A customized head probe consisting of 9 optical sources, 12 long-separation optical detectors placed at a distance of 3 cm from the source, and 9 short-separation optical detectors placed at a distance of 0.8 cm from the source, was used. Of the total 33 channels (a channel being a source and detector pair), 24 channels recorded cortical hemoglobin concentration changes and 9 channels recorded physiological hemoglobin concentration changes from extra-cerebral tissue. Cortical regions of interest: The 24 channels recorded activity from three different cortical regions viz. left lateral prefrontal cortex (left lPFC), medial frontopolar cortex (mFPC), and right somatosensory cortex (S1). Twelve of these 24 channels were subdivided into six regions of interest (ROI) based on their consistent activation/deactivation to acute nociception in previous studies. Anesthetic and fNIRS Protocol: The anesthetic technique was standardized for all patients and the hospital research pharmacy used block randomization to allocate the patients into three groups, Group 1: high-dose remifentanil - 0.5 mcg/kg/min (HD), Group 2: low-dose remifentanil - 0.25 mcg/kg/min (LD), and Group 3: placebo - 0.9% NaCL (PL). The syringes were prepared by the hospital pharmacy and this randomized controlled trial was double-blinded. Following premedication with 2 mg IV midazolam, anesthesia was induced with fentanyl (1.5 mcg/kg up to a maximum of 3 mcg/kg) and a standard dose of propofol titrated to effect. Rocuronium was used for neuromuscular blockade for endotracheal intubation and during the procedure. No additional fentanyl was administered after induction of anesthesia. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane (end-tidal concentration 1% to 4%), adjusting the end-tidal concentration to maintain a Bispectral Index (BIS) (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) value between 40 to 60. The test drug infusion and fNIRS monitoring was started after induction of anesthesia while the patient was being prepped and continued until just after the last ablation. A qualified member of the research team continuously monitored the fNIRS data quality throughout the procedure and time-stamped each ablation attempt. A research nurse and/or research assistant manually documented the time, duration and mode (radiofrequency (RF) and/or cryoablation) of each ablation attempt. An audio stimulus prompting a motor task was presented as a control to the patient at least 45 minutes after the start of the procedure. fNIRS Preprocessing: The fNIRS data was preprocessed and analyzed using in-house scripts in MATLAB R2019b platform. The raw fNIRS data of each subject was first converted from intensity measures to optical density measures. Head-motion correction was then performed using a wavelet-based algorithm. To remove physiological (heart rate, respiration) and other confounding noise sources, a third-order bandpass filter at 0.01-0.15 Hz was applied. Using the modified Beer-Lambert law, optical density measures were converted to oxy-, deoxy- and total-hemoglobin concentrations using hmrOD2conc function in the Homer2 toolbox. A linear temporal regression of the resulting concentration of oxygenated hemoglobin (deltaHbO) time series of each channel was regressed using both the nearest short-separation (physiological channel) signal and the global average of all short-separation signals as the nuisance regressor to remove the effect of extra-cerebral tissue on cortical activity. The residuals of the deltaHbO time series from temporal regression were then used to perform a third-order polynomial fit to regress non-linear drifts and linear trends before further analysis. fNIRS Data Analysis: The primary outcome measure was the changes in HbO concentration to ablation in placebo vs. remifentanil groups. Therefore, the low and high dose remifentanil subgroups were combined and compared to the placebo group. For those regions that were statistically different between placebo and remifentanil, a post-hoc analysis was performed to identify any differences between the two doses. Secondary outcome measures included the changes in HbO concentration to actual or intended movement, in response to the auditory instruction, and/or the auditory stimuli. Combined analysis of the remifentanil subgroups, and sex-based differences were supplemented to the analysis defined in the protocol on an ad-hoc basis. Cortical Response to Ablation: The fNIRS hemodynamic response to an ablation event was computed using the block-averaging technique whereby the preprocessed deltaHbO time series was averaged across the total number of ablations for each subject. Since the duration of ablation varied between events and between individuals, each block or trial was defined as the 5 seconds before the start of an ablation event and the 20 seconds following the start of ablation for consistency. Each block was then normalized to the 5 seconds of baseline prior to the start of the ablation in a given block. Hemodynamic-based measures quantified from the block-averaged hemodynamic response to ablation stimuli included: (1) Peak deltaHbO (PeakHbO) which was defined as the maximum HbO concentration change from 4 seconds to 15 seconds following stimulus after subtracting the average HbO concentration change during the initial 0-3 seconds of stimulus; PeakHbO for deactivation to stimulus was computed on the absolute hemodynamic response. (2) Minimum deltaHbO (NadirHbO) was defined as the greatest decrease in HbO concentration in the 15 seconds following the start of ablation; (3) Area under the deltaHbO curve (AUC) was defined as the integral of the HbO curve during the 0-15 seconds period following the start of stimulus. The deltaHbO curve was first scaled using the minimum HbO concentration change for that duration i.e., the NadirHbO becomes the 0 baseline for calculation of AUC. Two sample t-tests were performed to compare the activation measures between placebo and drug groups. A statistical threshold of p\<0.05, with multiple comparison correction using Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery rate (FDR) approach at an alpha of 0.05 was employed to minimize Type-I errors. Multiple comparison correction using FDR was applied for comparisons from all three measures (PeakHbO, NadirHbO, AUC) together. Results that survived the FDR-p threshold are reported to be significant at FDR-corrected p\<0.05. Results with p values \> FDR-p threshold did not survive multiple comparison correction. The FDR-p threshold, and the original p values are both provided for all comparisons. The 95% confidence intervals were generated using false coverage-statement rate that defines the confidence interval coverage corresponding to the FDR-adjusted p-values. A post-hoc analysis using two sample t-test was performed to identify dose-dependent differences between the remifentanil groups (low-dose vs. high-dose). Sex-related differences in pain response: Hemodynamic measures of activation (PeakHbO, NadirHbO, and AUC) during ablation was compared between male (n=16) and female (n=16) participants using a two-way Analysis of Covariance (ANOVA) with sex (males, and females), and drug (drug, and PL) as factors. Effect of biological sex was evaluated due to the altered pain sensitivity and treatment outcomes typically found in male vs female patients. Significant effects of sex were obtained using a statistical threshold of p\<0.05, and a multiple comparison correction using Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery rate was applied at alpha of 0.05 to account for Type-I errors.The 95% confidence intervals were also adjusted for effects that were significant at FDR-corrected p\<0.05 using method proposed by Benjamini and Yuketeili. Cortical Response to non-painful stimuli: The fNIRS hemodynamic response to auditory stimuli instructing individuals to perform a motor imagery task was also computed using the block averaging technique. The task paradigm lasted for a total of 5 minutes and was presented at least once during the procedure in every subject. A single run with five blocks of stimuli was used to calculate hemodynamic response to auditory stimuli during the procedure. A block was defined as the 5 seconds before auditory cue instructing the patient to start the task (lasting a duration of 1 second), and the 29 seconds following the first auditory cue, including the auditory cue to end task at 15 seconds. Hemodynamic-based measures quantified from the block-averaged hemodynamic response were also defined using the peak change in HbO concentration (PeakHbO), Nadir of deltaHbO concentration (NadirHbO), and AUC measures described earlier. A mixed ANOVA was performed to compare the activation measures during the two types of stimulus between placebo and drug groups and their interaction, where task is the within-subject factor with two levels (audio and pain/ablation) and group is the between-subject factor with two levels (remifentanil and placebo). A statistical threshold of p\<0.05 with multiple comparison correction using Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery rate approach at an alpha of 0.05 was once again employed. Multiple comparison correction using FDR was applied for comparisons from each measure (PeakHbO, NadirHbO, AUC) separately. As noted earlier, the 95% confidence intervals were adjusted for effects that were significant at FDR-corrected p\<0.05 using method proposed by Benjamini and Yuketeili.

Interventions

DRUGRemifentanil
DRUGNormal saline

Sponsors

Boston Children's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 12-30 years of age * Structurally normal heart * Right-handed * English-speaking

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to cooperate or understand the study * Neurologic disease * Diabetes mellitus * Syndrome of greater than minor severity. * Smoker * Scalp or hair does not permit sufficient optical light detection * Unable to keep his/her head still for a period of 200 consecutive seconds

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to Ablation5 seconds before the start of an ablation event and the 20 seconds following the start of ablationChanges in peak oxyhemoglobin concentration (PeakHbO) to ablation in placebo vs. the remifentanil groups.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

44 participants were enrolled in the study. 41 participants completed the study. 3 participants were withdrawn from the study prior to any interventions. 32 participants data were analyzed (of the 41 completing the study, 7 participants were excluded due to poor fNIRS signal quality, and 2 participants were excluded because they received only cryoablations).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Normal saline infusion
14
Drug Lower Dose
Remifentanil infusion
14
Drug Higher Dose
Remifentanil infusion
13
Total41

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboDrug Lower DoseDrug Higher DoseTotal
Age, Continuous15.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
15.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
16.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3
15.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants9 Participants6 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants5 Participants7 Participants21 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 140 / 140 / 13
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 140 / 140 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 140 / 140 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Changes in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to Ablation

Changes in peak oxyhemoglobin concentration (PeakHbO) to ablation in placebo vs. the remifentanil groups.

Time frame: 5 seconds before the start of an ablation event and the 20 seconds following the start of ablation

Population: All enrolled subjects with the exclusion of those with inadequate fNIRS signals (n=7) and those receiving cyroablation (n=2).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationPeak HbO superior medial frontopolar cortex (Sup.mFPC)0.157 μMStandard Error 0.03
PlaceboChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationPeak HbO superior lateral prefrontal cortex (Sup.lPFC)0.250 μMStandard Error 0.178
PlaceboChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationPeak HbO anterior superior somatosensory cortex (Ant.SS1)0.386 μMStandard Error 0.082
PlaceboChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationPeak HbO inferior medial frontopolar cortex (Inf.mFPC)0.170 μMStandard Error 0.032
PlaceboChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationPeak HbO inferior lateral prefrontal cortex (Inf.lPFC)0.099 μMStandard Error 0.035
PlaceboChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationPeak HbO posterior superior somatosensory cortex (Pos.SS1)0.408 μMStandard Error 0.124
Drug lower doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationPeak HbO inferior lateral prefrontal cortex (Inf.lPFC)0.003 μMStandard Error 0.016
Drug lower doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationPeak HbO inferior medial frontopolar cortex (Inf.mFPC)0.057 μMStandard Error 0.021
Drug lower doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationPeak HbO superior medial frontopolar cortex (Sup.mFPC)0.072 μMStandard Error 0.019
Drug lower doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationPeak HbO anterior superior somatosensory cortex (Ant.SS1)0.350 μMStandard Error 0.095
Drug lower doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationPeak HbO posterior superior somatosensory cortex (Pos.SS1)0.212 μMStandard Error 0.074
Drug lower doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationPeak HbO superior lateral prefrontal cortex (Sup.lPFC)0.022 μMStandard Error 0.028
Drug higher doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationPeak HbO inferior medial frontopolar cortex (Inf.mFPC)0.085 μMStandard Error 0.016
Drug higher doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationPeak HbO superior lateral prefrontal cortex (Sup.lPFC)0.156 μMStandard Error 0.05
Drug higher doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationPeak HbO posterior superior somatosensory cortex (Pos.SS1)0.130 μMStandard Error 0.062
Drug higher doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationPeak HbO superior medial frontopolar cortex (Sup.mFPC)0.077 μMStandard Error 0.021
Drug higher doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationPeak HbO inferior lateral prefrontal cortex (Inf.lPFC)0.086 μMStandard Error 0.037
Drug higher doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationPeak HbO anterior superior somatosensory cortex (Ant.SS1)0.185 μMStandard Error 0.109
Primary

Changes in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to Ablation

Changes in nadir oxyhemoglobin concentration (NadirHbO) to ablation in placebo vs. remifentanil groups.

Time frame: 5 seconds before the start of an ablation event and the 20 seconds following the start of ablation

Population: All enrolled subjects with the exclusion of those with inadequate fNIRS signals (n=7) and those receiving cyroablation (n=2).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationNadir of deltaHbO Sup.lPFC-0.237 μMStandard Error 0.115
PlaceboChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationNadir of deltaHbO Inf.mFPC-0.141 μMStandard Error 0.033
PlaceboChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationNadir of deltaHbO Ant.SS1-0.292 μMStandard Error 0.198
PlaceboChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationNadir of deltaHbO Inf.lPFC-0.105 μMStandard Error 0.026
PlaceboChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationNadir of deltaHbO Sup.mFPC-0.130 μMStandard Error 0.025
PlaceboChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationNadir of deltaHbO Pos.SS1-0.585 μMStandard Error 0.252
Drug lower doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationNadir of deltaHbO Sup.mFPC-0.036 μMStandard Error 0.015
Drug lower doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationNadir of deltaHbO Inf.lPFC-0.093 μMStandard Error 0.033
Drug lower doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationNadir of deltaHbO Sup.lPFC-0.243 μMStandard Error 0.1
Drug lower doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationNadir of deltaHbO Pos.SS1-0.541 μMStandard Error 0.179
Drug lower doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationNadir of deltaHbO Ant.SS1-0.659 μMStandard Error 0.234
Drug lower doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationNadir of deltaHbO Inf.mFPC-0.041 μMStandard Error 0.015
Drug higher doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationNadir of deltaHbO Sup.lPFC-0.137 μMStandard Error 0.048
Drug higher doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationNadir of deltaHbO Inf.mFPC-0.040 μMStandard Error 0.017
Drug higher doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationNadir of deltaHbO Sup.mFPC-0.044 μMStandard Error 0.02
Drug higher doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationNadir of deltaHbO Ant.SS1-0.433 μMStandard Error 0.147
Drug higher doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationNadir of deltaHbO Pos.SS1-0.284 μMStandard Error 0.076
Drug higher doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationNadir of deltaHbO Inf.lPFC-0.089 μMStandard Error 0.031
Primary

Changes in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to Ablation

Changes in oxyhemoglobin concentration area under the curve (AUC) to ablation in placebo vs. remifentanil groups.

Time frame: during the 0- to 15-second period following the start of stimulus

Population: All enrolled subjects with the exclusion of those with inadequate fNIRS signals (n=7) and those receiving cyroablation (n=2).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationAUC Inf.lPFC35.787 microMolar*secondsStandard Error 8.049
PlaceboChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationAUC Ant.SS1143.725 microMolar*secondsStandard Error 37.211
PlaceboChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationAUC Sup.lPFC81.577 microMolar*secondsStandard Error 36.49
PlaceboChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationAUC Inf.mFPC25.196 microMolar*secondsStandard Error 5.495
PlaceboChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationAUC Pos.SS1155.067 microMolar*secondsStandard Error 39.318
PlaceboChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationAUC Sup.mFPC25.399 microMolar*secondsStandard Error 5.024
Drug lower doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationAUC Pos.SS1108.374 microMolar*secondsStandard Error 16.526
Drug lower doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationAUC Inf.lPFC35.496 microMolar*secondsStandard Error 12.386
Drug lower doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationAUC Sup.mFPC15.731 microMolar*secondsStandard Error 2.489
Drug lower doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationAUC Sup.lPFC75.484 microMolar*secondsStandard Error 30.408
Drug lower doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationAUC Inf.mFPC15.706 microMolar*secondsStandard Error 3.909
Drug lower doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationAUC Ant.SS1112.650 microMolar*secondsStandard Error 24.229
Drug higher doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationAUC Sup.lPFC41.614 microMolar*secondsStandard Error 12.418
Drug higher doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationAUC Inf.mFPC15.634 microMolar*secondsStandard Error 3.623
Drug higher doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationAUC Sup.mFPC15.634 microMolar*secondsStandard Error 3.623
Drug higher doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationAUC Ant.SS195.376 microMolar*secondsStandard Error 21.719
Drug higher doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationAUC Pos.SS195.199 microMolar*secondsStandard Error 24.33
Drug higher doseChanges in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to AblationAUC Inf.lPFC39.077 microMolar*secondsStandard Error 15.493

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026