Skip to content

Effect of Mechanical Stimulation on Mastectomy Scars

A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial to Investigate the Effect of Mechanical Stimulation on Mastectomy Scars

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02702050
Enrollment
108
Registered
2016-03-08
Start date
2016-03-31
Completion date
2018-03-29
Last updated
2018-04-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

Physiotherapy, Mechanical Stimulation, Mastectomy Scar

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of mechanical stimulation on mastectomy scars in: (i) alleviating scar appearance - pigmentation, vascularity, pliability and thickness, (ii) reducing shoulder morbidities, (iii) improving arm functions, and (iv) enhancing quality of life, in women with breast cancer after mastectomy.

Detailed description

Background: Breast cancer is common among women. After surgical interventions like mastectomies, women with breast cancer may suffer physical, emotional and psychosocial complications. Evidence suggests that comprehensive physiotherapy program, including patient education, manual techniques, therapeutic exercises and compression bandaging, is effective in managing the above complications. Scarring was frequently overlooked in past studies. Besides cosmetic issues, a post mastectomy scar may cause adverse physical, functional, and psychological outcomes. The effects of mechanical stimulation on mastectomy scars have not been well investigated yet. Objectives: To investigate the efficacy of mechanical stimulation in: (i) alleviating scar appearance - pigmentation, vascularity, pliability and thickness, (ii) reducing shoulder morbidities, (iii) improving arm functions, and (iv) enhancing quality of life, in women with breast cancer after mastectomy. Setting: Out-patient physiotherapy breast care clinic at the Hong Kong Queen Elizabeth Hospital Participants: One hundred and eight women with breast cancer after mastectomy in recent 6 weeks will be recruited. Methodology: An assessor-blind, randomized controlled trial will be conducted. 108 women with breast cancer after mastectomy will be recruited from the breast care clinic of the Queen Elizabeth Hospital. They will be randomly allocated by block randomization method into either the mechanical stimulation group (n= 54) or conventional treatment group (n=54). Both study groups will receive an educational session before commencement of the program. Twelve sessions of 40-minute remedial exercises, 5-minute warm up and 5-minute cool down exercises will be provided within a 6-week period (i.e., two sessions per week) to all subjects. For the mechanical stimulation group, a ten-minute mechanical stimulation program will be provided. For the conventional treatment group, no mechanical stimulation will be given. Primary outcomes include scar evaluations by the Vancouver Scar Scale and spectrophotometry. Secondary outcomes are composite measurements of shoulder morbidities, including numeric pain rating scale (NPS), shoulder range of movement and hand grip strength; arm function as evaluated by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH-HKPWH) questionnaire; and quality of life as measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B). Outcome assessments at baseline, immediately after the 6-week program, and 3-month follow-up periods will be conducted by blinded assessors at the breast care clinic. Data Analysis: The results will be analyzed using two-way repeated measures analysis of variance with Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 21.0. Alpha level will be set at 0.05. Potential Clinical Significance of Study: Improvement of physiotherapy in scar management might potentially improve scar appearance - pigmentation, vascularity, pliability and thickness, decrease shoulder morbidities, improve upper limb functions, and enhance quality of life for women with breast cancer after mastectomy. If the mechanical stimulation protocol is proven to be effective, it will bring about significant advances in physiotherapy practice in post-mastectomy care in an evidence-based manner.

Interventions

OTHERMechanical stimulation (LPG system; Cellu M6 Integral I)

For the mechanical stimulation group, an additional ten-minute mechanical stimulation will be provided in each of the twelve sessions of convention treatment program. The device produced skin lift through suction via a treatment head with 2 rollers installed. It was a non-invasive technique which aimed to mobilize soft tissues by creating skin folds and stretching the underlying soft tissues while manipulating the treatment head according to protocol.

OTHERConventional treatment

Twelve sessions of 40-minute remedial exercises, 5-minute warm up and 5-minute cool down exercises, within a 6-week period (i.e., two sessions per week)

Sponsors

The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women aged 18 years old or above with mastectomy performed in recent 6 weeks; * Able to attend physiotherapy treatment and follow-ups during the study period.

Exclusion criteria

* Altered mental state for cooperation and informed consent; * Signs and symptoms of mastectomy scar infections or inflammations; * Unhealed mastectomy wounds; * History of lymphoedema; * Diagnosed bilateral breast cancers; * Unstable medical or cardiovascular conditions; * Pre-existing arm impairments/dysfunctions that will affect testing or exercising the affected arm; * Receiving radiotherapy during the study period; * Known sensitivity to mechanical stimulation; * Skin cancer on the treatment area; * Unclear cut margins of the cancer; * Known metastasis to other areas; * HIV positive.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vancouver Scare Scale (VSS) to study scar appearance6 monthsA scar scale to quantify scar appearance by observing the thickness, pliability, pigmentation and vascularity of mastectomy scar. The former two items were rated on ordical scales whereas the later two items in a descriptive manner. Total score ranged from 0 to 13.
Spectrophotometry to measure scar color6 monthsA spectrophotometer (Hunterlab Miniscan Ez4500S, USA) is used to measure level of lightness, redness and yellowness of the mastectomy scar versus adjacent normal skin. Level of redness indicated vascularization and pigmentation represented significance of melanin deposited in a scar.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Grip strength by hand-held dynamometer6 monthsThe hand grip strength will be evaluated using the JAMAR Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer
Numeric pain rating scale (NPS) to study pain over affected breast6 months11-item numeric rating scale (NRS) is valid, reliable and appropriate for use in clinical setting for pain measurement
Quality of life6 monthsThe Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B), traditional Chinese version 4 questionnaire would be adopted for measurement of quality of life for women with breast cancer
Arm function6 monthsThe Chinese version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH-HKPWH) questionnaire will be used as an outcome measurement for upper extremities disabilities and symptoms.
Shoulder range by goniometry6 monthsShoulder range of motion (ROM) will be evaluated by measuring active shoulder flexion and abduction

Countries

Hong Kong

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026