Skip to content

AtriClip® Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion Concomitant to Structural Heart Procedures (ATLAS)

AtriClip® Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion Concomitant to Structural Heart Procedures (ATLAS)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02701062
Acronym
ATLAS
Enrollment
562
Registered
2016-03-08
Start date
2016-02-29
Completion date
2019-06-01
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post-Operative Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

Left Atrial Appendage, Anticoagulation, CHA2DS2- VASc, HASBLED

Brief summary

Patients without a documented history of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and will undergo a valve or Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) procedure with direct visual access to the Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) will be eligible to participate. Patients enrolled will be randomized 2:1 (2 with AtriClip to 1 without AtriClip. Subjects who develop Post-operative Atrial Fibrillation (POAF) and receive the AtriClip will be followed for 365 days post index procedure.

Detailed description

Patients without a documented history of AF but who present with a CHA2DS2- VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75 years, diabetes mellitus, stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), vascular disease, age 65 to 74 years, sex category) of =\> 2 and HASBLED (Hypertension, Abnormal Renal/Liver Function, Stroke, Bleeding History or Predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly, Drugs/Alcohol Concomitantly) of =\> 2 and will undergo a valve or CABG (structural heart) procedure with direct visual access to the LAA will be eligible to participate based upon the inclusion and exclusion criteria defined in this protocol. Up to 2000 patients will enroll at up to 40 sites and will be randomized 2:1 (2 with AtriClip to 1 without AtriClip. Subjects who not develop Post-operative Atrial Fibrillation (POAF) will be followed for 30 days for safety. Subjects who develop POAF and receive the AtriClip will be followed for 365 days post index procedure.

Interventions

DEVICEAtriClip® Gillinov-Cosgrove™ LAA Exclusion Systems

Anticoagulation Therapy- Standard of Care at the discretion of the Investigator.

Sponsors

AtriCure, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients satisfying the following criteria will be considered the screening population and will be eligible for participation: * Age \> 18 years male or female. * Scheduled for any non-mechanical valve and/or CABG (structural heart) procedure where direct access to the LAA is expected. * No documented preoperative AF. * CHA2DS2-VASc score of =\> 2. * HASBLED score of =\> 2. * Acceptable surgical candidate, including use of general anesthesia. * Willing and able to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Patients satisfying the following criteria will not be eligible for participation: * Redo cardiac surgery. * Mechanical heart valve or other anticipated or current requirement for anticoagulation therapy during the post-operative (30 day) period. * Hypercoagulability conditions that may confound the study. * Ejection Fraction \< 30. * Left Atrium \> 6 cm. * Severe Diastolic Dysfunction. * Requires anticoagulation therapy. * Patient had a stroke/cerebrovascular accident (CVA) within previous 30 days prior to signing informed consent. Intra-Operative

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Perioperative Complications Associated With AtriClip PlacementWithin any 24 hour period during the first 2 days post-index procedureDefined as: stroke, major bleeding that requires re-operation and/or transfusion of \> 2 U packed red blood cells (PRBC), myocardial infarction (MI), or death.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite Event Rates for ALL Subjects Regardless of POAF Through 365 Days365 Days Post-ProcedureEvents to be evaluated include: Thromboembolic & Hemorrhagic Events such as cerebrovascular accident (CVA), transient ischemic attack (TIA), peripheral ischemia, hemorrhagic stroke, neurologic bleed, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeds, or other major bleeding event.
Number of Subjects With Intraoperative Successful Exclusion of LAA.Intraoperative periodSuccessful exclusion of LAA is defined as no (0 mm) flow between LAA and LA and \< 5 mm LAA remnant by intraoperative TEE with Doppler.
Composite Event Rates Between Subjects Diagnosed With Post-operative Atrial Fibrillation (POAF) (Through 365 Days)365 days post index procedureEvents to be evaluated include: Thromboembolic & Hemorrhagic Events such as cerebrovascular accident (CVA), transient ischemic attack (TIA), peripheral ischemia, hemorrhagic stroke, neurologic bleed, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeds, or other major bleeding event.
Composite Event Rates Between Subjects Not Diagnosed With POAF (Through 30 Days)30 days Post-ProcedureEvents to be evaluated include: Thromboembolic & Hemorrhagic Events such as cerebrovascular accident (CVA), transient ischemic attack (TIA), peripheral ischemia, hemorrhagic stroke, neurologic bleed, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeds, or other major bleeding event.
Healthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Median Values)365 Days Post-ProcedureHealthcare resource utilization variance between groups as related to hospital length-of-stay (LOS) and hospital readmissions.
Healthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Event Rates)365 Days Post-ProcedureSpecifically, reoperation for bleeding, neurologic consults for stroke or TIA, and emergency department (ED) visits.
Healthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Mean Values)365 Days Post-ProcedureHealthcare resource utilization variance between groups as related to hospital length-of-stay (LOS) and hospital readmissions.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients without a documented history of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) but who presented with a CHA2DS2- VASc of =\> 2 and HASBLED of =\> 2 and were to undergo a valve or CABG (structural heart) procedure with direct visual access to the Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) were recruited to participate based upon the inclusion and exclusion criteria defined in the protocol. A total of 562 participants were enrolled across 23 sites. The study visits took place between February 2016 and April 2019.

Pre-assignment details

Prior to randomization, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) with Doppler was performed to assess for presence of thrombus. If a thrombus was present in the left atrium (LA) or LAA, the subject was not included in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
AtriClip®
LAA Exclusion with AtriClip®: AtriClip® is used per label and is not experimental. AtriClip® Gillinov-Cosgrove™ LAA Exclusion Systems
376
No AtriClip®
Medical Management: Standard of Care Oral Anticoagulation Therapy at the discretion of the Investigator. Other Names: * Warfarin/Coumadin * New oral anticoagulants (NOACs): dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban No AtriClip® used.
186
Total562

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAtriClip®No AtriClip®Total
Age, Continuous69.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
68.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
69.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
BMI (kg/m²)31.0 kg/m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
30.0 kg/m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9
30.6 kg/m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
Echocardiogram: Left Atrial Diameter (cm)3.9 cm3.9 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
4.0 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
Echocardiogram: Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction %60.0 %60.0 %57.8 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
370 Participants180 Participants550 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
American Indian or Alaskan Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
5 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black or African American
13 Participants7 Participants20 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
More Than One Race
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Other
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
354 Participants171 Participants525 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
376 participants186 participants562 participants
Risk Assessment: CHA2DS2VASc Score3.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
3.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
3.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
Risk Assessment: HAS-BLED Score2.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
2.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
2.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
Sex: Female, Male
Female
113 Participants50 Participants163 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
263 Participants136 Participants399 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
20 / 3764 / 186
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 3760 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 3760 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Perioperative Complications Associated With AtriClip Placement

Defined as: stroke, major bleeding that requires re-operation and/or transfusion of \> 2 U packed red blood cells (PRBC), myocardial infarction (MI), or death.

Time frame: Within any 24 hour period during the first 2 days post-index procedure

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AtriClip®Number of Perioperative Complications Associated With AtriClip Placement0 perioperative complications reported
Secondary

Composite Event Rates Between Subjects Diagnosed With Post-operative Atrial Fibrillation (POAF) (Through 365 Days)

Events to be evaluated include: Thromboembolic & Hemorrhagic Events such as cerebrovascular accident (CVA), transient ischemic attack (TIA), peripheral ischemia, hemorrhagic stroke, neurologic bleed, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeds, or other major bleeding event.

Time frame: 365 days post index procedure

Population: Analysis includes only subjects diagnosed with POAF through 365 days.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AtriClip®Composite Event Rates Between Subjects Diagnosed With Post-operative Atrial Fibrillation (POAF) (Through 365 Days)19.6 percent of participants
AtriClip Without OACComposite Event Rates Between Subjects Diagnosed With Post-operative Atrial Fibrillation (POAF) (Through 365 Days)8.2 percent of participants
Standard of Care With OACComposite Event Rates Between Subjects Diagnosed With Post-operative Atrial Fibrillation (POAF) (Through 365 Days)16.0 percent of participants
Standard of Care Without OACComposite Event Rates Between Subjects Diagnosed With Post-operative Atrial Fibrillation (POAF) (Through 365 Days)6.5 percent of participants
Combined Standard of CareComposite Event Rates Between Subjects Diagnosed With Post-operative Atrial Fibrillation (POAF) (Through 365 Days)9.9 percent of participants
p-value: 0.2593Fisher Exact
Secondary

Composite Event Rates Between Subjects Not Diagnosed With POAF (Through 30 Days)

Events to be evaluated include: Thromboembolic & Hemorrhagic Events such as cerebrovascular accident (CVA), transient ischemic attack (TIA), peripheral ischemia, hemorrhagic stroke, neurologic bleed, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeds, or other major bleeding event.

Time frame: 30 days Post-Procedure

Population: Analysis includes only subjects not diagnosed with POAF through 365 days.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AtriClip®Composite Event Rates Between Subjects Not Diagnosed With POAF (Through 30 Days)5.0 percent of participants
AtriClip Without OACComposite Event Rates Between Subjects Not Diagnosed With POAF (Through 30 Days)5.1 percent of participants
Standard of Care With OACComposite Event Rates Between Subjects Not Diagnosed With POAF (Through 30 Days)0.0 percent of participants
Standard of Care Without OACComposite Event Rates Between Subjects Not Diagnosed With POAF (Through 30 Days)8.0 percent of participants
Combined Standard of CareComposite Event Rates Between Subjects Not Diagnosed With POAF (Through 30 Days)7.8 percent of participants
p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Secondary

Composite Event Rates for ALL Subjects Regardless of POAF Through 365 Days

Events to be evaluated include: Thromboembolic & Hemorrhagic Events such as cerebrovascular accident (CVA), transient ischemic attack (TIA), peripheral ischemia, hemorrhagic stroke, neurologic bleed, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeds, or other major bleeding event.

Time frame: 365 Days Post-Procedure

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AtriClip®Composite Event Rates for ALL Subjects Regardless of POAF Through 365 Days15.8 percent of participants
AtriClip Without OACComposite Event Rates for ALL Subjects Regardless of POAF Through 365 Days6.7 percent of participants
Standard of Care With OACComposite Event Rates for ALL Subjects Regardless of POAF Through 365 Days8.5 percent of participants
Standard of Care Without OACComposite Event Rates for ALL Subjects Regardless of POAF Through 365 Days14.8 percent of participants
Combined Standard of CareComposite Event Rates for ALL Subjects Regardless of POAF Through 365 Days7.5 percent of participants
Combined Standard of CareComposite Event Rates for ALL Subjects Regardless of POAF Through 365 Days8.6 percent of participants
p-value: 0.1238Fisher Exact
Secondary

Healthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Event Rates)

Specifically, reoperation for bleeding, neurologic consults for stroke or TIA, and emergency department (ED) visits.

Time frame: 365 Days Post-Procedure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AtriClip®Healthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Event Rates)Reoperation3.9 percentage of participants
AtriClip®Healthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Event Rates)ED Visit9.2 percentage of participants
AtriClip®Healthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Event Rates)Neurologic Consult2.6 percentage of participants
AtriClip®Healthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Event Rates)Hospital Readmission11.8 percentage of participants
AtriClip Without OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Event Rates)ED Visit3.3 percentage of participants
AtriClip Without OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Event Rates)Neurologic Consult2.7 percentage of participants
AtriClip Without OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Event Rates)Hospital Readmission3.7 percentage of participants
AtriClip Without OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Event Rates)Reoperation2.7 percentage of participants
Standard of Care With OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Event Rates)Neurologic Consult3.7 percentage of participants
Standard of Care With OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Event Rates)ED Visit7.4 percentage of participants
Standard of Care With OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Event Rates)Hospital Readmission7.4 percentage of participants
Standard of Care With OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Event Rates)Reoperation3.7 percentage of participants
Standard of Care Without OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Event Rates)Hospital Readmission2.5 percentage of participants
Standard of Care Without OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Event Rates)ED Visit4.4 percentage of participants
Standard of Care Without OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Event Rates)Reoperation1.3 percentage of participants
Standard of Care Without OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Event Rates)Neurologic Consult4.4 percentage of participants
Comparison: Reoperationp-value: 0.5442Fisher Exact
Comparison: ED Visitp-value: 0.2598Fisher Exact
Comparison: Neurologic Consultp-value: 0.5442Fisher Exact
Comparison: Hospital Readmission (per subject)p-value: 0.2921Fisher Exact
Secondary

Healthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Mean Values)

Healthcare resource utilization variance between groups as related to hospital length-of-stay (LOS) and hospital readmissions.

Time frame: 365 Days Post-Procedure

Population: In LOS (Total), 1 Subject removed due to incorrect date entry

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtriClip®Healthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Mean Values)LOS (Total)9.1 daysStandard Deviation 7
AtriClip®Healthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Mean Values)Readmission LOS (per subject)6.1 daysStandard Deviation 4.1
AtriClip®Healthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Mean Values)LOS (Post-Procedure)7.7 daysStandard Deviation 5.3
AtriClip Without OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Mean Values)LOS (Total)8.1 daysStandard Deviation 5.2
AtriClip Without OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Mean Values)Readmission LOS (per subject)4.7 daysStandard Deviation 3.4
AtriClip Without OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Mean Values)LOS (Post-Procedure)6.4 daysStandard Deviation 3.8
Standard of Care With OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Mean Values)LOS (Post-Procedure)7.7 daysStandard Deviation 3.1
Standard of Care With OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Mean Values)LOS (Total)8.4 daysStandard Deviation 3.5
Standard of Care With OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Mean Values)Readmission LOS (per subject)21.0 daysStandard Deviation 18.4
Standard of Care Without OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Mean Values)LOS (Total)7.3 daysStandard Deviation 4.4
Standard of Care Without OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Mean Values)Readmission LOS (per subject)7.0 daysStandard Deviation 8.3
Standard of Care Without OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Mean Values)LOS (Post-Procedure)5.9 daysStandard Deviation 2.7
Comparison: LOS (Total)p-value: 0.6603t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: LOS (Post-Procedure)p-value: 0.0783t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Readmission LOS (per subject)p-value: 0.4282t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Healthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Median Values)

Healthcare resource utilization variance between groups as related to hospital length-of-stay (LOS) and hospital readmissions.

Time frame: 365 Days Post-Procedure

Population: In LOS (Total), 1 Subject removed due to incorrect date entry

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
AtriClip®Healthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Median Values)LOS (Total)7.0 days
AtriClip®Healthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Median Values)Readmission LOS (per subject)5.0 days
AtriClip®Healthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Median Values)LOS (Post-Procedure)6.0 days
AtriClip Without OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Median Values)LOS (Total)7.0 days
AtriClip Without OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Median Values)Readmission LOS (per subject)5.0 days
AtriClip Without OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Median Values)LOS (Post-Procedure)5.0 days
Standard of Care With OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Median Values)LOS (Post-Procedure)7.0 days
Standard of Care With OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Median Values)LOS (Total)9.0 days
Standard of Care With OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Median Values)Readmission LOS (per subject)21.0 days
Standard of Care Without OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Median Values)LOS (Total)6.0 days
Standard of Care Without OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Median Values)Readmission LOS (per subject)4.0 days
Standard of Care Without OACHealthcare Resource Utilization Variance Between Groups as Related to the Composite Events Above (Median Values)LOS (Post-Procedure)5.0 days
p-value: 0.6603t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: LOS (Post-Procedure)p-value: 0.0783t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Readmission LOS (per subject)p-value: 0.4282t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Intraoperative Successful Exclusion of LAA.

Successful exclusion of LAA is defined as no (0 mm) flow between LAA and LA and \< 5 mm LAA remnant by intraoperative TEE with Doppler.

Time frame: Intraoperative period

Population: Of the 376 surgical cases where placement of an AtriClip was attempted:~* 3 AtriClip devices were not implanted~* 2 patients could not have the intra-operative TEE imaging assessments verified post-operatively and were removed from the LAA exclusion analyses for stump and flow.~* 1 patient that had a reported stump did not have an assessment for flow recorded.~Therefore, 370 patients had complete data available to assess intra-operative LAA exclusion success.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AtriClip®Number of Subjects With Intraoperative Successful Exclusion of LAA.Total Patients, No Flow and No Stump82.2 percentage of participants
AtriClip®Number of Subjects With Intraoperative Successful Exclusion of LAA.Total Patients, No Flow with Stump <= 5mm95.4 percentage of participants
AtriClip®Number of Subjects With Intraoperative Successful Exclusion of LAA.Total Patients, No Flow with Stump <= 10mm98.9 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026