Skip to content

Patient Centered Methods to Collect Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Status in the ED

Emergency Department Query For Patient-centered Approaches To Sexual Orientation And Gender Identity

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02701049
Acronym
EQUALITY
Enrollment
749
Registered
2016-03-08
Start date
2016-02-16
Completion date
2017-03-29
Last updated
2018-11-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gender Identity, Homosexuality

Brief summary

This trial is the final phase of a three phase PCORI-funded study to develop and test patient-centered approaches to collect sexual orientation and gender identity (SO/GI) information in the ED. From the results of Phase 1 qualitative interviews and national quantitative survey and Phase 2 Delphi rounds with the Stakeholder Advisory Board, we have determined two methods of collection favored by patients and providers to implement in the trial. The first method, nurse verbal collection, is in alignment with Partners recommended clinical practice and is therefore a quality improvement (QI) evaluation. The second method, non-verbal registrar form collection with nurse verbal confirmation, is a research intervention to evaluate and compare a new patient-centered approach to SO/GI collection. To compare the patient-centeredness of the two different approaches, satisfaction surveys will be administered to ED patients and staff members involved in collection. In summary, the study design (1) evaluates recommended current practice (QI), (2) evaluates a quality improvement project to increase recommended current practice, and (3) evaluates a new method of collecting SO/GI (research intervention).

Interventions

OTHERMethods to collect SO/GI information in the ED

In Mode 1, all patients presenting to the ED will have SO/GI information collected verbally by the nurse, which is standard of care. In Mode 2, all patients presenting to the ED will have SO/GI information collected in a non-verbal manner, in which the registrar will ask them to complete an electronic form.

Sponsors

Johns Hopkins University
CollaboratorOTHER
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adult ED patients who are cognitively and physically capable of informed consent * Adult ED nurses and registrars who are cognitively and physically capable of informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Children * Any person not cognitively and physically capable of informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Communication Climate Assessment Toolkit Questionnaire (Patient)Through study completion (approximately 1 year)The primary outcome was patient satisfaction as measured by a modified Communication Climate Assessment Toolkit (CCAT) patient survey, an assessment of attitudes towards organizational climate and provider/patient communication.The CCAT is reliable, validated in geographically and ethnically diverse health care organizations, and accurately predicts patient-reported quality and trust. Containing 5/7 items from the full CCAT, our pre-specified modified scale included only questions that were applicable to the ED population, e.g. we kept the question Do you feel welcome at the hospital? but eliminated the question Was it easy to reach someone on the phone if you had a question? from analyses.Each scale item was scored as a 0 (most disagreement), ½ (neutral), or 1 (agreement), resulting in a scale score ranging from 0-5; higher scores were considered more favorable. The average score for the modified scale was calculated and multiplied by 20 to provide the overall score out of 100.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Staff-reported Outcomes Measure QuestionnaireThrough study completion (approximately 1 year)Measures responses to the staff survey question, Did you experience difficulty collecting sexual orientation data from patients?
Proportion of Patients Reporting SO/GIThrough study completion (approximately 1 year)Measures the proportion of all adult emergency department patients from whom SO/GI was collected during the study period

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Mode 0
Patients who were not asked their SO/GI
209
Mode 1
Patients who were verbally asked by a nurse their SO/GI
342
Mode 2
Patients whose SO/GI was collected non-verbally on a form
198
Total749

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMode 0Mode 1Mode 2Total
Age, Customized
Age
48 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.2
38.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
39.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.2
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian
0 Participants1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
4 Participants3 Participants2 Participants9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
78 Participants178 Participants85 Participants341 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Declined
1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
17 Participants30 Participants25 Participants72 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
34 Participants0 Participants0 Participants34 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
3 Participants4 Participants4 Participants11 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
3 Participants2 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
69 Participants123 Participants77 Participants269 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Declined to State
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
107 Participants149 Participants85 Participants341 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
97 Participants75 Participants32 Participants204 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Other
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Queer/Genderqueer
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Questioning/Unsure
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Transgender Female to Male
0 Participants3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Transgender Male to Female
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Unavailable/Not Asked
5 Participants114 Participants74 Participants193 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 2090 / 3420 / 198
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2090 / 3420 / 198
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2090 / 3420 / 198

Outcome results

Primary

Communication Climate Assessment Toolkit Questionnaire (Patient)

The primary outcome was patient satisfaction as measured by a modified Communication Climate Assessment Toolkit (CCAT) patient survey, an assessment of attitudes towards organizational climate and provider/patient communication.The CCAT is reliable, validated in geographically and ethnically diverse health care organizations, and accurately predicts patient-reported quality and trust. Containing 5/7 items from the full CCAT, our pre-specified modified scale included only questions that were applicable to the ED population, e.g. we kept the question Do you feel welcome at the hospital? but eliminated the question Was it easy to reach someone on the phone if you had a question? from analyses.Each scale item was scored as a 0 (most disagreement), ½ (neutral), or 1 (agreement), resulting in a scale score ranging from 0-5; higher scores were considered more favorable. The average score for the modified scale was calculated and multiplied by 20 to provide the overall score out of 100.

Time frame: Through study completion (approximately 1 year)

Population: Patients who were not asked SO/GI or who provided their SO/GI in the ED via verbal or nonverbal collection and provided complete data on the patient outcome survey

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mode 0Communication Climate Assessment Toolkit Questionnaire (Patient)92.78 ScoreStandard Deviation 18.05
Mode 1Communication Climate Assessment Toolkit Questionnaire (Patient)91.32 ScoreStandard Deviation 18.52
Mode 2Communication Climate Assessment Toolkit Questionnaire (Patient)94.14 ScoreStandard Deviation 13.44
Secondary

Proportion of Patients Reporting SO/GI

Measures the proportion of all adult emergency department patients from whom SO/GI was collected during the study period

Time frame: Through study completion (approximately 1 year)

Population: All adult patients who were seen in the ED during the intervention periods

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Mode 0Proportion of Patients Reporting SO/GI228 Participants
Mode 1Proportion of Patients Reporting SO/GI132 Participants
Comparison: Historical controls included all patients entering participating EDs as identified by the Electronic Health Record.
Secondary

Staff-reported Outcomes Measure Questionnaire

Measures responses to the staff survey question, Did you experience difficulty collecting sexual orientation data from patients?

Time frame: Through study completion (approximately 1 year)

Population: Nurses and registrars who completed staff outcome surveys

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Mode 0Staff-reported Outcomes Measure QuestionnaireSometimes16 Participants
Mode 0Staff-reported Outcomes Measure QuestionnaireOther6 Participants
Mode 0Staff-reported Outcomes Measure QuestionnaireUsually/Always7 Participants
Mode 0Staff-reported Outcomes Measure QuestionnaireDecline to answer1 Participants
Mode 0Staff-reported Outcomes Measure QuestionnaireNever/rarely11 Participants
Mode 1Staff-reported Outcomes Measure QuestionnaireDecline to answer0 Participants
Mode 1Staff-reported Outcomes Measure QuestionnaireNever/rarely14 Participants
Mode 1Staff-reported Outcomes Measure QuestionnaireSometimes14 Participants
Mode 1Staff-reported Outcomes Measure QuestionnaireUsually/Always8 Participants
Mode 1Staff-reported Outcomes Measure QuestionnaireOther2 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026