Skip to content

Efficacy of Electric 3D Versus Manual Toothbrushes in Patients With Fixed Orthodontic Appliances

A Randomized, Investigator-blinded, 3-month, Parallel Group Clinical Study to Compare the Efficacy of Electric 3D Toothbrushes Versus Manual Toothbrushes in Patients With Fixed Orthodontic Appliances

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02699931
Enrollment
80
Registered
2016-03-07
Start date
2016-04-30
Completion date
2019-04-30
Last updated
2019-06-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Plaque, Gingivitis

Brief summary

This study evaluates if electric toothbrushes with a 3D action (rotation / oscillation and pulsation) are more effective than manual toothbrushes in removing plaque and reducing gingival inflammation in patients under orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances.

Detailed description

This trial is designed as a randomized, controlled, investigator blinded superiority trial, with two parallel groups and a 1:1 allocation ratio. Equal number of males and females will be allocated to each group. One group of orthodontic patients will receive an electric toothbrush with orthodontic head and the other group will receive a manual orthodontic brush. Tooth brushing instructions will be provided. Measurements of two plaque indices and two gingival indices will be taken at baseline and at 3 monthly intervals.

Interventions

DEVICEElectric3D

Oral-B 3D with orthodontic head

DEVICEManual

Oral-B orthodontic

Sponsors

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

\- Age between 12 and 16 years. Good general health according to a recent full medical history. Fixed labial orthodontic appliances on all teeth from central incisor to first molar (bands on first molars, metallic brackets-conventional, not self ligating-on other teeth), in both the maxillary and the mandibular arch, placed at least two months before the patient is accepted into the study and no more than two years. Non-extraction orthodontic treatment. Plaque-induced gingivitis: patients will be included if they have gingival bleeding on at least 30% of the sites examined using the criteria for bleeding of the Modified Simplified Gingival Index.

Exclusion criteria

\- Active caries. Periodontitis. Tooth agenesis (excluding third molars). Syndromes and craniofacial deformities. Current use of electric toothbrush. More than two cervical and/or proximal fillings. Dental prostheses or dental implants. Smoking or use of other tobacco products. Antibiotics during the last 2 months. Medication that may result in gingival enlargement (e.g. anticonvulsants, immunosuppressants, calcium channel blockers). Disabilities that might affect toothbrushing skills (manual dexterity, mental disabilities). Peri-oral or intra-oral piercing. Cardiac or other medical condition that requires antibiotic prophylaxis for dental treatment. Participation in other trials.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Modified Silness and Löe plaque indexBaseline and monthly for 3 months
Modified Full mouth plaque scoreBaseline and monthly for 3 months
Modified Gingival indexBaseline and monthly for 3 months
Modified Simplified Gingival indexBaseline and monthly for 3 months

Countries

Greece

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026