Skip to content

Study to Examine Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Post Marketing Non Interventional Clinical Research of Administration of Rituximab in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02699892
Acronym
RITAM
Enrollment
130
Registered
2016-03-04
Start date
2007-10-31
Completion date
2014-02-28
Last updated
2016-10-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

This Phase IV post-marketing, non-interventional, open label, non-comparative and prospective study will examine the efficacy and safety of rituximab in participants who had previously received rituximab in terms of everyday medical practice. Efficacy and safety of rituximab will be determined 24 weeks after receiving the first infusion, 24 weeks after the second infusion repeated courses of treatment (if the participants receive another course of rituximab) and 24 weeks after the third infusion repeated courses of treatment (if the participants receive third course of rituximab). Protocol does not specify the criteria for initiation of treatment with rituximab and procedure of the infusion of rituximab. Rituximab will be administered at the discretion of treating physician according to approved label.

Interventions

DRUGRituximab

Rituximab will be administered at the discretion of treating physician according to approved label. Protocol does not specify/enforce the criteria for initiation of treatment with rituximab and procedure of the infusion of rituximab.

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

-Participants receiving rituximab no longer than 4 weeks before the start of monitoring

Exclusion criteria

-Not Applicable

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving Reduction From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joints Count (DAS28) of More Than 1.2 Units After 24 Weeks of First Rituximab InfusionBaseline, 24 weeks after first rituximab infusion (Week 24)DAS28 score is a measure of participant's disease activity calculated using tender joint count \[28 joints\] (TJC28), swollen joint count \[28 joints\] (SJC28), participant's global assessment of disease activity (PGH) \[visual analog scale (VAS): 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\] and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). DAS28 was calculated according to following formula: \[0.56 multiplied by (\*) square root (√) of TJC\] plus (+) \[0.28\*√SJC\]+\[0.70\*the natural logarithm (ln) ESR\]+\[0.014\*PGH\]. Total possible score of 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores represented higher disease activity. Scores below 2.6 indicated clinical remission, score of less than or equals to (\</=) 3.2 indicated low disease activity, score of greater than (\>) 3.2 to \</=5.1 indicated moderate disease activity, scores above 5.1 indicated high or severe disease.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good ResponseBaseline, Weeks 24, 48 and 72Clinical response was assessed according to EULAR categorical DAS28 response criteria, which defined clinically meaningful improvement at Weeks 24, 48, and 72. EULAR response was based on change from baseline (CFB) in DAS28 score and on actual DAS28 score, at Weeks 24, 48, and 72. DAS28 score: participant's disease activity calculated using TJC28, SJC28, PGH \[VAS: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\] and ESR. DAS28 was calculated by following formula: (0.56\*√TJC)+(0.28\*√SJC)+(0.70\*ln ESR)+(0.014\*PGH). Total possible score = 0-10, higher scores represented higher disease activity. EULAR Good response: DAS28\</=3.2; reduction of DAS28 \>1.2.

Countries

Serbia

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

There was no documentation for the reason for discontinuation; hence, in Participant Flow module, for all participants who did not complete the study, the reason is reported as Unspecified.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rheumatoid Arthritis Participants
Participants who were on rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis and who continued receiving rituximab treatment (at the discretion of treating physician) according to approved label were observed for a period of 72 weeks.
130
Total130

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyOther36

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRheumatoid Arthritis Participants
Age, Continuous51.28 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.75
Sex: Female, Male
Female
110 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 130
serious
Total, serious adverse events
11 / 130

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Reduction From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joints Count (DAS28) of More Than 1.2 Units After 24 Weeks of First Rituximab Infusion

DAS28 score is a measure of participant's disease activity calculated using tender joint count \[28 joints\] (TJC28), swollen joint count \[28 joints\] (SJC28), participant's global assessment of disease activity (PGH) \[visual analog scale (VAS): 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\] and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). DAS28 was calculated according to following formula: \[0.56 multiplied by (\*) square root (√) of TJC\] plus (+) \[0.28\*√SJC\]+\[0.70\*the natural logarithm (ln) ESR\]+\[0.014\*PGH\]. Total possible score of 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores represented higher disease activity. Scores below 2.6 indicated clinical remission, score of less than or equals to (\</=) 3.2 indicated low disease activity, score of greater than (\>) 3.2 to \</=5.1 indicated moderate disease activity, scores above 5.1 indicated high or severe disease.

Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks after first rituximab infusion (Week 24)

Population: ITT population. Here, number of participants analyzed signified those participants who were evaluable for this outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Achieving Reduction From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joints Count (DAS28) of More Than 1.2 Units After 24 Weeks of First Rituximab Infusion61.60 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good Response

Clinical response was assessed according to EULAR categorical DAS28 response criteria, which defined clinically meaningful improvement at Weeks 24, 48, and 72. EULAR response was based on change from baseline (CFB) in DAS28 score and on actual DAS28 score, at Weeks 24, 48, and 72. DAS28 score: participant's disease activity calculated using TJC28, SJC28, PGH \[VAS: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\] and ESR. DAS28 was calculated by following formula: (0.56\*√TJC)+(0.28\*√SJC)+(0.70\*ln ESR)+(0.014\*PGH). Total possible score = 0-10, higher scores represented higher disease activity. EULAR Good response: DAS28\</=3.2; reduction of DAS28 \>1.2.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24, 48 and 72

Population: ITT Population. Here, number of participants analyzed signified those participants who were evaluable for this outcome and n signified those participants who were evaluable for a specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good ResponseWeek 24 (n=112)21.43 Percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good ResponseWeek 48 (n=81)16.05 Percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good ResponseWeek 72 (n=59)18.64 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026