Skip to content

Assessment of the Effect of PAP on Energy and Vitality in Mild OSA Patients: The Merge Study

Assessment of the Effect of Positive Airway Pressure on Energy and Vitality in Mild Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients: The Merge Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02699463
Enrollment
301
Registered
2016-03-04
Start date
2016-12-31
Completion date
2019-08-31
Last updated
2021-01-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Brief summary

The investigators wish to prospectively determine the response to CPAP in patients presenting with mild OSA. In many healthcare systems, patients with mild OSA (AHI 5-15) are not reimbursed for treatment. Although some evidence exists of the benefits of treating mild OSA when scoring as per AASM 2007 criteria, more evidence is needed. The investigators wish to add to this pool of knowledge and also increase the inclusion criteria to include the AASM 2012 definition of mild OSA. By including the 2012 AASM definition of mild OSA, the investigators will add novel information to the field by assessing the benefits of treatment in both sub-groups of mild OSA.

Detailed description

Patients who visit their local sleep service for OSA investigation, and are found to have mild OSA (AHI ≤ 15) from an Apnealink polygraphy (PG) home sleep test, scored as per AASM 2007 and/or AASM 2012, will be invited to take part in the study (pre-screening). At the study visit, informed consent, baseline demographics, and standardised questionnaires will be administered. Participants will then be randomised to a CPAP treatment group or control group. After 3 months, participants will be asked to repeat the standardised questionnaires, the trial will then be complete and they will return to routine clinical care.

Interventions

CPAP refers to the application of positive airway pressure through a mask and tubing to splint a patients throat open at night. CPAP is considered standard treatment for OSA

OTHERControl Group

Standard sleep hygiene counseling as per published guidelines

Sponsors

ResMed
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Study Inclusion Criteria * Aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 * Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent * AHI ≤ 15 as per AASM 2007 scoring criteria * Ability to tolerate a CPAP one hour long run in test

Exclusion criteria

* The presence of unstable cardiac disease * Inability to give fully informed consent * Supplemental oxygen * Secondary sleep pathology e.g. Periodic Limb Movement Syndrome, Narcolepsy, Circadian Disorder, obesity hypoventilation syndrome * ESS ≥ 15, or concerns about sleepy driving from physician/ sleep lab staff * BMI ≥ 40

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Quality of Life Using the Energy and Vitality Subscale of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Questionnaire3 monthsThe Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire measures quality of life through a range of questions asking about patients physical and mental functioning. Specifically, the Energy and Vitality subscale records patients perceptions of their levels of energy and fatigue. Participants were administered the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire at baseline and 3 months. The change in score (value at 3 months minus value at baseline) was compared between the CPAP group and the Control group. In the SF-36 Energy and Vitality subscale, an increase in score indicates improvement, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 100 possible.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

301 participants were randomised. 233 patients formed the primary analysis group. Of those, 115 were allocated to the CPAP group and 118 were allocated to standard care. The remaining 68 patients were not analysed as part of the primary analysis but were analysed for secondary analysis.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Continous Positive Airway Pressure
Participants in this group will use CPAP therapy, nightly, for the 3 month duration of the trial Continous Positive Airway Pressure: CPAP refers to the application of positive airway pressure through a mask and tubing to splint a patients throat open at night. CPAP is considered standard treatment for OSA
115
Control Group
Participants will receive standard care (Sleep hygiene counseling) during the study. Control Group: Standard sleep hygiene counseling as per published guidelines
118
Total233

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up118
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject41

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicContinous Positive Airway PressureControl GroupTotal
Age, Continuous50.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
50.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
50.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
non-white
10 Participants15 Participants25 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
white
105 Participants103 Participants208 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
34 Participants37 Participants71 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
81 Participants81 Participants162 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1150 / 118
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 11513 / 118
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 1152 / 118

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Quality of Life Using the Energy and Vitality Subscale of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Questionnaire

The Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire measures quality of life through a range of questions asking about patients physical and mental functioning. Specifically, the Energy and Vitality subscale records patients perceptions of their levels of energy and fatigue. Participants were administered the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire at baseline and 3 months. The change in score (value at 3 months minus value at baseline) was compared between the CPAP group and the Control group. In the SF-36 Energy and Vitality subscale, an increase in score indicates improvement, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 100 possible.

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Continous Positive Airway PressureChange in Quality of Life Using the Energy and Vitality Subscale of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Questionnaire7.5 score on a scale
Control GroupChange in Quality of Life Using the Energy and Vitality Subscale of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Questionnaire0 score on a scale
p-value: <0.01ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026