Skip to content

Unloading Induced Effects on Local Glucose Uptake Into m. Soleus

Effects of Nutrition and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Local Glucose Uptake Into m. Soleus During 60 Days of Lower Leg Unloading

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02698878
Acronym
NutriHEP
Enrollment
13
Registered
2016-03-04
Start date
2014-04-30
Completion date
2014-08-31
Last updated
2016-03-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glucose Metabolism Disorders, Local Glucose Uptake

Keywords

Lupin Protein, Glucose Metabolism, GLUT4, Muscle Unloading, Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation

Brief summary

The present study aimed to investigate whether a daily intake of lupin protein and a neuromuscular electrical stimulation training twice a day can improve local glucose uptake into m. soleus during a 60 day unloading phase with a special unloading device, the HEPHAISTOS orthosis (HEP).

Detailed description

The 60 day unloading intervention with the HEPHAISTOS unloading device had the following key objectives: primary hypothesis: * Assesment and evaluation of insulin sensitivity and local glucose uptake in the unloaded m. soleus and whether it can be improved by dietary supplementation of lupin seeds and neuromuscular electrical stimulation. secondary hypotheses: * Assesment and evaluation of unloading-induced reductions in muscle mass and whether they can be mitigated by dietary supplementation of lupin seed and neuromuscular electrical stimulation. * Assesment and evaluation of whole-body glycemic effects of the interventions.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTlupin protein

19g of lupin crunchy every day for the whole duration of the intervention phase (60 days)

OTHERNeuromuscular electrical stimulation

Individual neuromuscular electrical stimulation training had to be performed twice a day (morning and evening) over the whole duration of the intervention phase (60 days). Subjects were asked to continuously increase the intensity until a maximum intensity of 100mA per training.

DEVICEHEPHAISTOS unloading orthotic device

Orthotic device which unloads the muscles of the lower leg. Subjects had to wear the device for the whole duration of the intervention phase (60 days).

Sponsors

DLR German Aerospace Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
20 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male volunteers * Age: between 20 and 45 years * Body mass index (BMI): 20 -26 kg/m2 * Agreement and signed consent before the study

Exclusion criteria

* Smoker * Competitive Athletes * Diabetes mellitus * Rheumatic disease * Muscle or joint disease * Bone fractures in the period up to one year before study start * Herniated disc * Flatfeet (pes planus) * Allergy to nuts or legume * Vascular diseases * Epilepsy * Severe hyperlipidemia * Anemia (\< Hb standard values; standard values healthy men: 13.5 -17.5 g/dl) \* * Increased thrombosis risk \* * Kidney disorder: deviations from normal values for creatinine in plasma. (Normal value: Creatinine \< 1.20 mg/dl)\* * Lesions of the cruciate ligaments, or orthopedic surgery in the past 10 years on the side of the Hephaistos orthosis * Achilles tendon injury, or rupture in the past 10 years on the side of the orthosis * hyper-/hypocalcaemia (abnormal levels of calcium in the blood, normal level: 2.15 - 2.64 mmol/l) * Intake of anti-inflammatory drugs during the study * Abuse of drugs or alcohol (\> than 20-30g alcohol/day) * Participation in another clinical study within the last 2 months before the start of this study * Increased bleeding tendency (hemophilia, regular use of anticoagulants) * History of intolerance to local anesthetics * Imprisoned during study * Any other condition classed as unsuitable for study participation by the medical executive director * prior convictions (objectionable criminal record) Additional

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Local Glucose Uptake into m. soleusBaseline to day 59 of the intervention phaseBiopsies were taken from m. soleus
Changes in Local Glucose Metabolism in m. soleusBaseline to day 60 of the intervention phaseMicrodialysis was performed in m. soleus

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Blood HbA1c (changes in the whole body glucose metabolism)Baseline and day 2 & 1 before the intervention phase, day 4, 14, 28, 42 & 60 of the intervention phase and day 2 & 14 after the intervention phase
Blood Fructosamine (changes in the whole body glucose metabolism)Baseline and day 2 & 1 before the intervention phase, day 4, 14, 28, 42 & 60 of the intervention phase and day 2 & 14 after the intervention phase
Insulin Sensitivity (changes in the whole body glucose metabolism)Baseline and day 60 of the intervention phaseWhole body insulin sensitivity assessed by hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp
Changes in Muscle VolumeBaseline to day 58 of the intervention phaseMuscle volume measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Blood Glucose (changes in the whole body glucose metabolism)Baseline and day 2 & 1 before the intervention phase, day 4, 14, 28, 42 & 60 of the intervention phase and day 2 & 14 after the intervention phase
Changes in Muscle Function (MVC)Baseline to day 58 of the intervention phaseMaximal voluntary contractions (MVC) - isometric and isokinetic - were performed
ComplianceDuring 60 days of interventionElectronic wearing time devices from Orthotimer were used to assess compliance of the subjects.
MovementDuring 60 days of intervention and during 14 days of the recovery phase (post intervention phase)Accelerometers were used to assess movement of the subjects.
Changes in Muscle Function (jump performance)Baseline to day 58 of the intervention phaseA jump test was performed
Blood C-Peptide (changes in the whole body glucose metabolism)Baseline and day 2 & 1 before the intervention phase, day 4, 14, 28, 42 & 60 of the intervention phase and day 2 & 14 after the intervention phase

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026