Skip to content

Feasibility and Acceptability of Offering Self-sampling to Non-attendees in Primary Care

Human Papillomavirus Testing Versus Liquid-based Cytology for Non-attendees of Cervical Cancer Screening: Results of a Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02698423
Acronym
DEPIST
Enrollment
667
Registered
2016-03-03
Start date
2011-09-30
Completion date
2016-01-31
Last updated
2018-06-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer of the Uterine Cervix

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether human-papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling can be used as a primary screening test for unscreened women.

Detailed description

Women residing in the canton of Geneva, aged between 25 and 69 years, who haven't had a Pap test in the last three years, will be invited to participate. Participation to the study will be encouraged through public displays, social networks, and medical consultations. Women meeting the eligibility criteria will be enrolled in the study. They will be randomized into two groups and will receive a home-sent letter, inviting them to either come in for a Pap test or to perform and send back the HPV self-sample that they'll receive at their domicile. Both groups will also receive a questionnaire, in order to better understand the reasons for their previous non-attendance to cervical cancer screening.

Interventions

DEVICECobas HPV DNA Test

Women will receive a home-sent sample for HPV self-testing

OTHERPapanicolau test

Women will be invited to come in for a physician-performed Pap test

Sponsors

University Hospital, Geneva
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
25 Years to 69 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* No previous cervical cancer screening test in the last three years

Exclusion criteria

* pregnancy * previous hysterectomy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Who Performed HPV Self-testing Compared to the Number of Participants Who Responded to the Invitation to Come to the Hospital for Pap Testing1 yearCompare the participation rate to cervical cancer screening for home-based human papillomavirus testing based on self-sampling versus clinic-based, physician-performed Pap testing.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Women With a Positive HPV Self-test Who Underwent All the Recommended Follow-up Clinical Investigations.1 yearAssess the compliance with further follow-up among women having tested positive for the presence of HPV at baseline screening.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cobas HPV DNA Test
Women will be invited to perform HPV self-testing with the Cobas HPV DNA test at home. Cobas HPV DNA Test: Women will receive a home-sent sample for HPV self-testing
336
Papanicolau Test
Women will be invited to come to the hospital to undergo a Papanicolau test (Pap test), which will be performed by the clinician. Papanicolau test: Women will be invited to come in for a physician-performed Pap test
331
Total667

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1924

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPapanicolau TestTotalCobas HPV DNA Test
Age, Continuous42.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
42.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
42.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
106 Participants211 Participants105 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
225 Participants456 Participants231 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Relationship Status
Single
177 Participants352 Participants175 Participants
Relationship Status
With a partner
154 Participants315 Participants161 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
331 Participants667 Participants336 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Who Performed HPV Self-testing Compared to the Number of Participants Who Responded to the Invitation to Come to the Hospital for Pap Testing

Compare the participation rate to cervical cancer screening for home-based human papillomavirus testing based on self-sampling versus clinic-based, physician-performed Pap testing.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cobas HPV DNA TestNumber of Participants Who Performed HPV Self-testing Compared to the Number of Participants Who Responded to the Invitation to Come to the Hospital for Pap Testing317 Participants
Papanicolau TestNumber of Participants Who Performed HPV Self-testing Compared to the Number of Participants Who Responded to the Invitation to Come to the Hospital for Pap Testing307 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Women With a Positive HPV Self-test Who Underwent All the Recommended Follow-up Clinical Investigations.

Assess the compliance with further follow-up among women having tested positive for the presence of HPV at baseline screening.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cobas HPV DNA TestProportion of Women With a Positive HPV Self-test Who Underwent All the Recommended Follow-up Clinical Investigations.317 Participants
Papanicolau TestProportion of Women With a Positive HPV Self-test Who Underwent All the Recommended Follow-up Clinical Investigations.307 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026