Skip to content

Veteran Peer Coaches Optimizing and Advancing Cardiac Health

Vet COACH (Veteran Peer Coaches Optimizing and Advancing Cardiac Health)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02697422
Acronym
Vet-COACH
Enrollment
264
Registered
2016-03-03
Start date
2017-05-30
Completion date
2023-02-28
Last updated
2024-08-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular Disease (CVD), Hyperlipemia, Hypertension, Obesity

Keywords

Smoking (tobacco use), Peer health coach, Systolic blood pressure, Framingham Cardiovascular risk score, Lipid, Health related quality of life, Health care utilization, Medication adherence, Physical activity, Nutrition, Alcohol use, Stress management

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to test if having a Veteran peer health coach will improve blood pressure control among Veterans with high blood pressure and at least one other Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor. The intervention will deliver brief health messages, discuss goal setting, and action planning around health behavior changes shown to decrease CVD risk, including healthy diet, regular to moderate-intensity physical activity, and smoking cessation. Facilitators, barriers, and costs of the intervention will be determined.

Detailed description

The Vet-COACH study is a peer health coaching program to help reduce Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk among Veterans. The goal of the study is to test the effectiveness of a home-visit peer health coach intervention to promote health outcomes and behavior change among Veterans with multiple CVD risk factors with a hybrid type 1 implementation study. The study will focus on Veterans with poorly controlled hypertension and at least one other CVD risk factor to target a high risk population. The study will conduct a randomized controlled trial to enroll n=400 Veterans to compare a peer health coach intervention consisting of home visits, telephone support, and linkages to appropriate community-based and clinic resources compared to usual VHA primary care. The primary outcome is reduction in systolic blood pressure from baseline to follow-up at 1-year. Secondary outcomes include a reduction in Framingham Cardiovascular risk score, individual cardiovascular risks (tobacco use, lipids), health related quality of life, and health care use. The investigators will also assess the effects of the peer health coach intervention on intermediate outcomes including social support, patient activation, patient/provider communication and health behaviors (e.g. medication adherence, physical activity, nutrition, alcohol use, and stress management). The cost of the intervention will be assessed to inform feasibility for future studies, determine Veteran and staff satisfaction with the intervention, and identify barriers and facilitators to adoption. Note, the intermediate outcomes were not prespecified in the protocol for evaluation and were not specified in the grant, protocol paper, or in our SAP as outcomes and were removed from results analysis.

Interventions

OTHERCommunity-based peer health coach intervention

The focus of the peer health coach intervention will be to deliver brief health messages, discuss goal setting, and action planning around health behavior changes shown to decrease CVD risk (for instance, healthy diet, regular to moderate-intensity physical activity, and quitting smoking).

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Masking description

N/A; No masking will occur in this clinical trial.

Intervention model description

Parallel: Participants are assigned to one of two groups--the control or intervention group- in parallel for the duration of the study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Must be a Veteran * Have \> 1 visit to VA Puget Sound Health Care Center(Seattle or American Lake VA) primary care or women's clinic in the past year * Poorly controlled hypertension (\> 150/90 mmHg) * At least one other CVD risk (including overweight or obesity, body mass index \> 25 kg/m2, tobacco use, hyperlipidemia LDL-c \> 130 mg/dL)

Exclusion criteria

* Hospitalization in the past 3 months for cardiovascular-related conditions (IHD, Cerebral Vascular Accident \[CVA\], PVD) * Severe illness that precludes lifestyle program, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on dialysis * Nursing home resident, homeless * Severe cognitive impairment * Receiving home-based primary care (including VA Home Tele-Health and patients who received palliative care or are enrolled in hospice care)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Baseline to follow-up at 1 yearChange in systolic blood pressure (SBP) from baseline to 12-months. Blood pressure readings were obtained using standard procedures with a blood pressure monitor to obtain a mean SBP score of 3 blood pressure measurements. An increased reduction in mean SBP indicates a better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Emergency Room (ER) VisitsBaseline to follow-up at 1 yearHealth care emergency room (ER) utilization are measured using VA administrative data.
Framingham Cardiovascular Risk Score (FRS)Baseline to follow-up at 1 yearFramingham Cardiovascular risk score (FRS) indicates/measures mean risk of a cardiovascular event in the next 10 years (CVD risk). A subscale range of a minimum score of 0% and maximum score of 30% were used to measure a reduction in FRS scores. FRS algorithms include age, total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, treatment for hypertension, diabetes, and cigarette smoking. (Risk is considered low if the FRS is less than 10% (indicating a better outcome), moderate if it is between 10% -19%, and high if it is 20% or higher indicating a worse outcome).
Body Mass Index (BMI)Baseline to follow-up at 1 yearBody Mass Index (BMI) are measured as an individual cardiovascular risk. Measurements will be initially recorded in height (feet/inches), and weight (pounds/ ounces, which will be converted to weight in kilograms and height in meters. BMI is calculated as kg/m\^2.
Current Tobacco UseCurrent tobacco use measured at Baseline and Follow up at one yearCurrent tobacco use was reported as a binary (YES/NO) outcome based on responses from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) measured tobacco use. Current cigarette smoking status and tobacco use (chewing tobacco, snuff or snus) and frequency of use were measured on a three point scale: Every day (worse outcome); Some days, and Not at all (better outcome). Current tobacco use included individuals who reported having smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their entire life (Yes or No) and reported smoking cigarettes now (Every day or Some days). Differences in primary and secondary outcomes between intervention and control groups were calculated using logistic regression.
Number of Outpatient Clinic/Primary Care VisitsBaseline to follow-up at 1 yearOutpatient clinic/primary care utilization are measured using VA administrative data.
Change in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), Mental Component Summary ScoreBaseline to follow-up at 1 year12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Mental Component Summary: Summary scores for vitality, mental health, social functioning, and role-emotional. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning Scaling scores are assessed using published standardized scoring system procedures for the SF-12.
Change in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), Physical Component Summary Score (PCS)Baseline to follow-up at 1 year12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Physical Component Summary: Summary scores for general health, physical functioning, role-physical, and bodily pain. Scores range from a minimum score of 0 to a maximum score of 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning Scaling scores are assessed using published standardized scoring system for the SF-12.
Number of HospitalizationsBaseline to follow-up at 1 yearHealth care hospitalization utilization are measured using VA administrative data.
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-c).Baseline to follow-up at 1 yearLow density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) is measured as mg/dL. Lipoprotein cholesterol will be assessed as an individual cardiovascular risk and is based laboratory data of blood tests from VA CPRS medical records (when taken within 6 months of baseline and/or 1 year follow up appointment). If no lab data exits within this timeframe, blood was drawn.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Peer Health Coach Intervention Group
Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to receive a home-visit peer health coach intervention to promote health outcomes and behavior change among Veterans with multiple cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. Community-based peer health coach intervention: The focus of the peer health coach intervention will be to deliver brief health messages, discuss goal setting, and action planning around health behavior changes shown to decrease CVD risk (for instance, healthy diet, regular to moderate-intensity physical activity, and quitting smoking).
134
Control Group
Participants who meet the same eligibility criteria as participants in the intervention group will be randomly assigned to receive no intervention. Participants will continue to receive their regular, usual primary care.
130
Total264

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath21
Overall StudyDeclined exit survey92
Overall StudyExit survey data lost10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up138
Overall StudyPhysician Decision11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl GroupPeer Health Coach Intervention GroupTotal
Age, Continuous60.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
60.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
60.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
Body Mass Index (BMI)31.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3
31.7 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8
31.8 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
CVD Risk: BMI category
Obese (BMI>= 30 kg/m2)
76 Participants73 Participants149 Participants
CVD Risk: BMI category
Overweight (BMI>= 25 kg/m2)
119 Participants125 Participants244 Participants
CVD Risk: Current Smoker Status29 Participants21 Participants50 Participants
CVD Risk: Low density lipoprotein (LDL-c) cholesterol112.4 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 38.7
107.0 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 38.6
109.6 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 38.7
Diastolic blood pressure81.3 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
80.9 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
81.1 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.48
Framingham risk score.26 percentage of CVD risk
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.17
.22 percentage of CVD risk
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.16
.24 percentage of CVD risk
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.17
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) mental health mental health component summary (MCS)47.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
46.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
47.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) physical health component summary (PCS)38.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
39.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
39.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
Hypertension Stage
Elevated (>=120/80 mmHg)
16 Participants24 Participants40 Participants
Hypertension Stage
Normal (<120/80 mmHg)
28 Participants13 Participants41 Participants
Hypertension Stage
Stage 1 (>=130/90 mmHg)
52 Participants65 Participants117 Participants
Hypertension Stage
Stage 2 (>=140/90 mmHg)
34 Participants32 Participants66 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black, non-Hispanic
36 participants37 participants73 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
10 participants7 participants17 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiracial
17 participants13 participants30 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White, non-Hispanic
56 participants67 participants123 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants21 Participants35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
116 Participants113 Participants229 Participants
Systolic blood pressure135.1 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.6
137.1 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.4
136 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 1341 / 130
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1340 / 130
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1340 / 130

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)

Change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) from baseline to 12-months. Blood pressure readings were obtained using standard procedures with a blood pressure monitor to obtain a mean SBP score of 3 blood pressure measurements. An increased reduction in mean SBP indicates a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline to follow-up at 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Peer Health Coach Intervention GroupChange in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)-3.32 mm Hg
Control GroupChange in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)-0.40 mm Hg
p-value: 0.05Regression, Linear
Secondary

Body Mass Index (BMI)

Body Mass Index (BMI) are measured as an individual cardiovascular risk. Measurements will be initially recorded in height (feet/inches), and weight (pounds/ ounces, which will be converted to weight in kilograms and height in meters. BMI is calculated as kg/m\^2.

Time frame: Baseline to follow-up at 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Peer Health Coach Intervention GroupBody Mass Index (BMI)-0.04 kg/m^2
Control GroupBody Mass Index (BMI)0.10 kg/m^2
p-value: 0.05Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), Mental Component Summary Score

12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Mental Component Summary: Summary scores for vitality, mental health, social functioning, and role-emotional. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning Scaling scores are assessed using published standardized scoring system procedures for the SF-12.

Time frame: Baseline to follow-up at 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Peer Health Coach Intervention GroupChange in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), Mental Component Summary Score2.19 points
Control GroupChange in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), Mental Component Summary Score-1.01 points
p-value: 0.05Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), Physical Component Summary Score (PCS)

12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Physical Component Summary: Summary scores for general health, physical functioning, role-physical, and bodily pain. Scores range from a minimum score of 0 to a maximum score of 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning Scaling scores are assessed using published standardized scoring system for the SF-12.

Time frame: Baseline to follow-up at 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Peer Health Coach Intervention GroupChange in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), Physical Component Summary Score (PCS)1.02 points on a 0-100 scale
Control GroupChange in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), Physical Component Summary Score (PCS)0.72 points on a 0-100 scale
p-value: 0.05Regression, Linear
Secondary

Current Tobacco Use

Current tobacco use was reported as a binary (YES/NO) outcome based on responses from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) measured tobacco use. Current cigarette smoking status and tobacco use (chewing tobacco, snuff or snus) and frequency of use were measured on a three point scale: Every day (worse outcome); Some days, and Not at all (better outcome). Current tobacco use included individuals who reported having smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their entire life (Yes or No) and reported smoking cigarettes now (Every day or Some days). Differences in primary and secondary outcomes between intervention and control groups were calculated using logistic regression.

Time frame: Current tobacco use measured at Baseline and Follow up at one year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Peer Health Coach Intervention GroupCurrent Tobacco Use21 Participants
Control GroupCurrent Tobacco Use29 Participants
Comparison: Smoker/tobacco use results were calculated using logistic regression. A P value of .90 was found comparing smoking/tobacco use in intervention vs control participants. A difference was not reported between intervention and control because smoking/ tobacco use was a binary variable.p-value: 0.9Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Framingham Cardiovascular Risk Score (FRS)

Framingham Cardiovascular risk score (FRS) indicates/measures mean risk of a cardiovascular event in the next 10 years (CVD risk). A subscale range of a minimum score of 0% and maximum score of 30% were used to measure a reduction in FRS scores. FRS algorithms include age, total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, treatment for hypertension, diabetes, and cigarette smoking. (Risk is considered low if the FRS is less than 10% (indicating a better outcome), moderate if it is between 10% -19%, and high if it is 20% or higher indicating a worse outcome).

Time frame: Baseline to follow-up at 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Peer Health Coach Intervention GroupFramingham Cardiovascular Risk Score (FRS)-0.01 percentage of CVD risk
Control GroupFramingham Cardiovascular Risk Score (FRS)-0.01 percentage of CVD risk
p-value: 0.05Regression, Linear
Secondary

Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-c).

Low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) is measured as mg/dL. Lipoprotein cholesterol will be assessed as an individual cardiovascular risk and is based laboratory data of blood tests from VA CPRS medical records (when taken within 6 months of baseline and/or 1 year follow up appointment). If no lab data exits within this timeframe, blood was drawn.

Time frame: Baseline to follow-up at 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Peer Health Coach Intervention GroupLow Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-c).-3.12 mg/dL
Control GroupLow Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-c).-4.24 mg/dL
p-value: 0.05Regression, Linear
Secondary

Number of Emergency Room (ER) Visits

Health care emergency room (ER) utilization are measured using VA administrative data.

Time frame: Baseline to follow-up at 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Peer Health Coach Intervention GroupNumber of Emergency Room (ER) Visits0.86 visitsStandard Deviation 1.37
Control GroupNumber of Emergency Room (ER) Visits0.86 visitsStandard Deviation 1.66
p-value: 0.05Regression, Linear
Secondary

Number of Hospitalizations

Health care hospitalization utilization are measured using VA administrative data.

Time frame: Baseline to follow-up at 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Peer Health Coach Intervention GroupNumber of Hospitalizations0.16 visitsStandard Deviation 0.53
Control GroupNumber of Hospitalizations0.13 visitsStandard Deviation 0.47
p-value: 0.05Regression, Linear
Secondary

Number of Outpatient Clinic/Primary Care Visits

Outpatient clinic/primary care utilization are measured using VA administrative data.

Time frame: Baseline to follow-up at 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Peer Health Coach Intervention GroupNumber of Outpatient Clinic/Primary Care Visits0.40 visitsStandard Deviation 0.89
Control GroupNumber of Outpatient Clinic/Primary Care Visits0.55 visitsStandard Deviation 1.35
p-value: 0.05Regression, Linear

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026