Skip to content

Accuracy of Commercially Available Heart Rate Monitors

Accuracy of Commercially Available Heart Rate Monitors: A Prospective Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02697214
Acronym
HRM
Enrollment
50
Registered
2016-03-03
Start date
2015-08-31
Completion date
2016-01-31
Last updated
2019-02-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Keywords

commercial heart rate monitors, accuracy, ECG, varying degrees of exertion

Brief summary

Over the last two decades, there has been a proliferation of commercially available heart rate monitors. Recognizing that elite athletes often use heart rate to monitor training and assess aerobic fitness, fitness companies have offered a variety of heart rate monitoring systems to the general public. Recently, there has been a move from monitors that rely on chest straps to measure electrical activity toward more convenient, wrist-worn monitors that employ optical sensing technology similar to that used for pulse oximetry. While the accuracy of chest strap monitors has been assessed in a variety of studies, there is no data concerning the accuracy of wrist-worn heart rate monitors. Assessment of the monitors' accuracy is important both for the subjects who rely upon these monitors to guide their athletic activity and for the physicians to whom these individuals report their heart rate readings.

Detailed description

Physicians have long-used heart rate as an index of aerobic fitness and cardiovascular health. Resting heart rate has been linked to longevity and freedom from cardiovascular morbidity, and heart rate during exercise serves as a measure of aerobic capacity. In addition, heart rate recovery after exercise carries implications for an individuals' health. Like physicians, coaches and athletic trainers employ heart rate measurement on a daily basis. In the athletic setting, heart rate during exercise is used as an indication of aerobic exertion. Elite athletes and their coaches often design workouts based upon achieved and targeted heart rates. Once the province of physicians and elite athletes, heart rate monitoring has become widespread among the general public. In the nineteen eighties, fitness companies added heart rate monitors to their product lines. Systems employing a chest strap to monitor electrical activity, telemetry and a wrist-borne receiver became popular, and several controlled, scientific studies confirmed their accuracy. More recently, manufacturers have marketed a new class of heart rate monitors that consist solely of wristwatch-style devices. These heart rate monitors use optical sensing technology to measure heart rate. While they offer convenience, their accuracy, particularly during exercise, is uncertain. A recent article in USA Today suggests that these wrist-worn monitors fail to provide accurate readings during exercise; however, to date there has been no rigorous scientific inquiry addressing this question. The purpose of this study is to assess the accuracy of four popular, commercially available wrist-worn heart rate monitors under conditions of varying physical exertion.

Interventions

Fitbit Charge HR heart rate monitoring device compared to ECG and Polar H7

Apple Watch heart rate monitoring device compared to ECG and Polar H7

DEVICEMio Fuse

Mio Fuse heart rate monitoring device compared to ECG and Polar H7

DEVICEBasis Peak

Basis Peak heart rate monitoring device compared to ECG and Polar H7

Sponsors

The Cleveland Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age \> 18 years * Able and willing to exercise (walk/jog) for a total of fifteen minutes

Exclusion criteria

* Health issues that preclude or contraindicate walking and/or jogging, including cardiovascular, orthopedic, pulmonary and other conditions * Presence of a cardiac pacemaker * Known cardiovascular disease * Known heart rhythm disorders * Use of Beta-blockers or antiarrhythmic medications * Tattoos around the wrist area

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measuring the Accuracy of Commercial Heart Rate Monitors.20 minutesThe purpose of this study is to assess the accuracy of four popular, commercially available wrist-worn heart rate monitors compared to the current gold standard of a ECG using Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient.

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

All 50 subjects wore 4 monitors each. i.e. EKG, H7 polar monitor, and 2 other randomly assigned heart rate monitors.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Apple Watch
Apple Watch heart rate monitoring device. Apple Watch: Apple Watch heart rate monitoring device.
26
Apple Watch
Apple Watch heart rate monitoring device. Apple Watch: Apple Watch heart rate monitoring device.
26
Fitbit Charge HR
Fitbit Charge HR heart rate monitoring device. Fitbit Charge HR: Fitbit Charge HR heart rate monitoring device.
25
Fitbit Charge HR
Fitbit Charge HR heart rate monitoring device. Fitbit Charge HR: Fitbit Charge HR heart rate monitoring device.
25
Mio Fuse
Mio Fuse heart rate monitoring device. Mio Fuse: Mio Fuse heart rate monitoring device.
25
Mio Fuse
Mio Fuse heart rate monitoring device. Mio Fuse: Mio Fuse heart rate monitoring device.
25
Basis Peak
Basis Peak heart rate monitoring device. Basis Peak: Basis Peak heart rate monitoring device.
24
Basis Peak
Basis Peak heart rate monitoring device. Basis Peak: Basis Peak heart rate monitoring device.
24
Total200

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicApple WatchFitbit Charge HRMio FuseBasis PeakTotal
Age, Customized
<=18 years
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Age, Customized
>=65 years
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Age, Customized
Between 18 and 65 years
26 participants25 participants25 participants24 participants50 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
26 participants25 participants25 participants24 participants50 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
19 participants12 participants14 participants13 participants29 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
7 participants13 participants11 participants11 participants21 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 260 / 250 / 250 / 24
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 260 / 250 / 250 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 260 / 250 / 250 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Measuring the Accuracy of Commercial Heart Rate Monitors.

The purpose of this study is to assess the accuracy of four popular, commercially available wrist-worn heart rate monitors compared to the current gold standard of a ECG using Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient.

Time frame: 20 minutes

Population: All participants are represented in the analysis population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Apple WatchMeasuring the Accuracy of Commercial Heart Rate Monitors..91 Correlation Coefficient
Fitbit Charge HRMeasuring the Accuracy of Commercial Heart Rate Monitors..84 Correlation Coefficient
Mio FuseMeasuring the Accuracy of Commercial Heart Rate Monitors..91 Correlation Coefficient
Basis PeakMeasuring the Accuracy of Commercial Heart Rate Monitors..83 Correlation Coefficient

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026