Spondyloarthritis
Conditions
Keywords
Ankylosing Spondylitis
Brief summary
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab in tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor-experienced participants with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (rad-axSpA).
Interventions
Administered SC
Administered SC
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Are ambulatory. * Have an established diagnosis of radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (rad-xSpA) with sacroiliitis defined radiographically according to the modified New York criteria. * Participants have a history of back pain ≥3 months with age at onset \<45 years. * Have had prior treatment with at least 1 and not more than 2 TNF inhibitors. * Must have had an inadequate response to 2 or more NSAIDs at the therapeutic dose range for a total duration of at least 4 weeks OR have a history of intolerance to NSAIDs. * Have a history of prior therapy for axSpa for at least 12 weeks prior to screening.
Exclusion criteria
* Have total ankylosis of the spine. * Have never taken a TNF inhibitor medication or have taken more than 2. * Have recently received a live vaccine within 12 weeks or have had a vaccination with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) within the past year. * Have an ongoing or serious infection within the last 12 weeks or evidence of active tuberculosis. * Have a compromised immune system. * Have any other serious and/or uncontrolled diseases. * Have either a current diagnosis or a recent history of malignant disease. * Have had major surgery within 8 weeks of baseline, or will require surgery during the study. * Are pregnant or breastfeeding.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) Response | Week 16 | ASAS40 is defined as improvement from baseline of greater than or equal to (\>=) 40 % and absolute improvement from baseline of at least 2 units (range of 0 to 10) in at least 3 of the following 4 domains without any worsening in the remaining domain. 1. Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis on average during the last week? score ranges 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). 2. Spinal Pain: How much Pain of your spine due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). 3. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI): Participant asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participant response was captured using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. 4. Inflammation based on Q5 & Q6 mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) (mean of intensity & duration of stiffness): Score ranges from 0 (none) and 10 (very severe). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) | Baseline, Week 16 | ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are 1. Total back pain 2. Patient global 3. Peripheral pain/swelling 4. Duration of morning stiffness and 5. CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness+0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. Least Square (LS) mean was determined by mixed-model repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) Response | Week 16 | The BASDAI is a participant-reported assessment consisting of 6 questions that relate to 5 major symptoms relevant to radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (rad-axSpA): 1) Fatigue, 2) Spinal pain, 3) Peripheral arthritis, 4) Enthesitis, 5) Intensity, and 6) Duration of morning stiffness. Participants need to score each item with a score from 0 to 10 (NRS). Total score is obtained from the average of symptom scores ranging 0 (no problem) to 10 (worst problem), with a higher score indicating more severe AS symptom. BASDAI50 represents an improvement of ≥50% of the BASDAI score from baseline. |
| Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) | Baseline, Week 16 | The BASDAI is a participant-reported assessment consisting of 6 questions that relate to 5 major symptoms relevant to radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (rad-axSpA): 1) Fatigue, 2) Spinal pain, 3) Peripheral arthritis, 4) Enthesitis, 5) Intensity, and 6) Duration of morning stiffness. Participants need to score each item with a score from 0 to 10 (NRS). Total score is obtained from the average of symptom scores ranging 0 (no problem) to 10 (worst problem), with a higher score indicating more severe AS symptom. LSmean was determined by MMRM with factors for treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) | Baseline, Week 16 | The BASFI is a participant-reported assessment that establishes a participant's functional baseline and subsequent response to treatment. The BASFI is composed with 10 questions to assess the disease severity, including the first 8 questions regarding to functional anatomy related activities and the remaining 2 questions related to daily activities of AS participants. Participants respond to each question using an NRS scale (range 0 to 10). The BASFI score is the average of the 10 responses and has a possible minimum value of 0 and a possible maximum value of 10, with a higher score indicating worse function. LS mean was determined by MMRM with factors for treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Inactive Disease | Week 16 | ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. ASDAS Inactive Disease is defined as a score of \<1.3. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are 1. Total back pain 2. Patient global 3. Peripheral pain/swelling 4. Duration of morning stiffness and 5. CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness+0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher the score worse the disease activity. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS <2.1 | Week 16 | ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. ASDAS \<2.1 defines moderate disease activity. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are 1. Total back pain 2. Patient global 3. Peripheral pain/swelling 4. Duration of morning stiffness and 5. CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness+0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher the score worse the disease activity. |
| Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores | Baseline, Week 16 | The SF-36 is a 36-item participant administered measure designed to be a short, multipurpose assessment of health in the areas of physical functioning, role - physical, role - emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. The 2 overarching domains of mental well- being and physical well-being are captured by the Mental Component Summary and Physical Component Summary scores. T-scores are used for analysis. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. LSmean was determined by MMRM with factors for treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI) | Baseline, Week 16 | The ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI) is a disease specific health-index instrument designed to assess the impact of interventions for SpA, including axSpA. The 17 item instrument has scores ranging from 0 (good Health) to 17 (poor Health). Each item consists of 1 question that the patient needs to respond to with either I agree (score 1) or I do not agree (score 0). A score of 1 is given where the item is affirmed, indicating adverse health. All item scores are summed to give a total score or index. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging [ASSpiMRI] - Berlin Score) | Baseline, Week 16 | The study used MRI with fat-saturating techniques such as short tau inversion recovery (STIR) to look for the presence of bone marrow edema. The Berlin modification of Ankylosing Spondylitis spine MRI score for activity (ASspiMRI) scoring technique assesses inflammation in each of the 23 disco-vertebral units (DVU) of the spine (from C2 to S1), capturing bone marrow edema. Scores for each DVU range from 0-3 (0=normal; 1=minor bone marrow edema \[less than or equal to 25% of DVU; 3=severe bone marrow edema (more that 50% of DVU)\]. The composite score ranges from 0 to 69, with higher scores reflecting worse disease.LS mean was determined by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNF inhibitors used and baseline value as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] Score) | Baseline, Week 16 | MRI score of spine was assessed using SPARCC method. All 23 disco-vertebral units (DVU) of the spine (from C2 to S1) were scored for bone marrow edema. A single DVU has 18 scoring units, and each has score of 0 or 1, bringing the maximum total score to 414, the sum ranges from 0 to 414 with higher scores reflecting worse disease. Scoring was performed by central readers. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with factors for treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNF inhibitors used and baseline value. |
| Change From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP) | Baseline, Week 16 | High sensitivity CRP is the measure of acute phase reactant. It was measured with a high sensitivity assay at the central laboratory to help assess the effect of ixekizumab on disease activity. High sensitivity CRP is a sensitive laboratory assay for serum levels of C-Reactive Protein, which is a biomarker of inflammation. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) | Baseline, Week 16 | BASMI is a combined index comprising of 5 clinical measurements of spinal mobility in patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (rad-axSpA). 1. Lateral Spinal Flexion 2. Tragus-to-wall distance 3. Lumbar Flexion (modified Schober) 4. Maximal intermalleolar distance and 5. Cervical rotation. The BASMI linear result is the average of the 5 assessments and ranges from 0 to 10. The higher the BASMI score the more severe the patient's limitation of movement due to their AS. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS20 Response | Week 16 | ASAS20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement and an absolute improvement from baseline of ≥1 units (range 0 to 10) in ≥3 of 4 domains, and no worsening of ≥20% and ≥1 unit (range 0 to 10) in the remaining domain. 1. Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis on average during the last week? score ranges 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). 2. Spinal Pain: How much Pain of your spine due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). 3. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI): Participant asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participant response was captured using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. 4. Inflammation based on Q5 & Q6 mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) (mean of intensity & duration of stiffness): Score ranges from 0 (none) and 10 (very severe). |
| Change From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance | Baseline, Week 16 | The participant is to make a maximum effort to touch the head against the wall when standing with heels and back against the wall (occiput). Then the distance from occiput to wall is measured. Two tries will be recorded. The better (smaller) measurement of 2 tries (in centimeters) will be used for analyses. LS mean was determined by MMRM with factors for treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) | Baseline, Week 16 | The MASES is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis. The MASES assesses 13 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include costochondral 1 (right/left), costochondral 7 (right/left), spinal iliaca anterior superior (right/left), crista iliaca (right/left), spina iliaca posterior (right/left), processus spinosus L5, and Achilles tendon proximal insertion (right/left). The MASES is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 13); higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Score | Baseline, Week 16 | The SPARCC enthesitis is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis. The SPARCC assesses 16 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include Medial epicondyle (left/right \[L/R\]), Lateral epicondyle (L/R), Supraspinatus insertion into greater tuberosity of humerus (L/R), Greater trochanter (L/R), Quadriceps insertion into superior border of patella (L/R), Patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tubercle (L/R), Achilles tendon insertion into calcaneum (L/R), and Plantar fascia insertion into calcaneum (L/R). The SPARCC is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 16). Higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender Joint Count (TJC) Scores | Baseline, Week 16 | The number of tender and painful joints was determined by examination of 46 joints (23 joints on each side of the body). The 46 joints were assessed and classified as tender or not tender. Sum of all joints checked to be tender/painful divided by number of evaluable joints which was multiplied by 46 to obtain TJC score. The scores ranges from 0 (no tender/painful joints) to 46 (all joints tender/painful). LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Scores | Baseline, Week 16 | The number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 44 joints (22 joints on each side of the body). The 44 joints were assessed and classified as swollen or not swollen. Sum of all joints checked to be swollen divided by number of evaluable joints which was multiplied by 44 to obtain SJC score. The SJC score ranges from 0 (no swollen joints) to 44 (all joints swollen). LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction. |
| Percentage of Participants With Anterior Uveitis | Week 16 | Anterior uveitis is an inflammation of the middle layer of the eye. which includes the iris (colored part of the eye) and the adjacent tissue, known as the ciliary body. |
| Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score | Baseline, Week 16 | The fatigue severity NRS is a participant administered single-item 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no fatigue and 10 representing as bad as you can imagine. Participants rate their fatigue (feeling tired or worn out) by circling the 1 number that describes their worst level of fatigue during the previous 24 hours. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ) | Baseline, Week 16 | The Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ) is a 4 item scale designed to estimate sleep problems in clinical research. The JSEQ assesses the frequency of sleep disturbance in 4 categories: 1) trouble falling asleep, 2) waking up several times during the night, 3) having trouble staying asleep (including waking up far too early), and 4) waking up after the usual amount of sleep feeling tired and worn out. Patients report the numbers of days they experience each of these problems in the past month on a 6 point Likert Scale ranging from 0 = no days to 5 = 22-30 days. The total JSEQ score ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater sleep disturbance. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores | Baseline, Week 16 | The WPAI-SpA consists of 6 questions to determine employment status, hours missed from work because of SpA, hours missed from work for other reasons, hours actually worked, the degree to which SpA affected work productivity while at work, and the degree to which SpA affected activities outside of work. The WPAI-SpA has been validated in the rad-axSpA patient population. Four scores are derived: percentage of absenteeism, percentage of presenteeism (reduced productivity while at work), an overall work impairment score that combines absenteeism and presenteeism, and percentage of impairment in activities performed outside of work. The computed percentage range for each sub-scale was from 0-100, with higher scores indicating greater impairment and less productivity. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi and baseline value as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in ASAS-Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Score | Baseline, Week 52 | ASAS-NSAID score is used to present the NSAID intake by considering the type of NSAID, the total dose, & the number of days taking NSAID during a period of interest (PI). For NSAID equivalent scoring system, range is from 0 to 100, higher the score greated the NSAID intake. ASAS-NSAID score= (equivalent NSAID score) x (days of intake during PI) x (days per week)/(PI in days). |
| Percentage of Participants With Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies | Week 16 | A treatment emergent - antidrug antibody (TE-ADA) positive patient is defined as: a) a patient with a \>= 4-fold increase over a positive baseline antibody titer; or b) for a negative baseline titer, a patient with an increase from the baseline to a level of \>= 1:10. Percentage was calculated based on the number of evaluable participants and was calculated by number of participants with treatment-emergent positive anti-ixekizumab antibodies / number of evaluable participants \* 100%. |
| Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Ixekizumab Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss) | Week 16 | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Steady-state trough serum concentration of Ixekizumab at week 16. |
| Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion | Baseline, Week 16 | Chest expansion is the difference, in centimeter (cm), between the circumference of the chest in maximal inspiration and maximal expiration. While patients have their hands resting on or behind the head, the assessor will measure the chest encircled length by centimeter (cm) at the fourth intercostal level anteriorly. Two tries were recorded. The better measurement (larger difference) of 2 tries (in centimeters) was used for analyses. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors. |
Countries
Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Puerto Rico, South Korea, Spain, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Blinded Treatment Dosing Period (Week 0 to Week 16), Extended Treatment Period (Week 16 to Week 52) followed by post-treatment follow-up period occurring from last treatment visit (week 52), or Early Termination Visit (ETV) up to a minimum of 12 weeks following that visit.
Pre-assignment details
Participants who completed study were eligible to enroll into a long-term study (I1F-MC-RHBY \[NCT03129100\]) for up to 2 additional years. Participants who terminate study RHBW early or who do not enroll into Study RHBY will complete the Post-Treatment Follow-Up (PTFU) Period in study RHBW.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| PBO/IXE Blinded Treatment Dosing Period: Participants received placebo every two weeks (Q2W) by subcutaneous (SC) injection during Week 0 to 16.
Extended Treatment Period: Participants who received Placebo in blinded treatment period were re-randomized to receive ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W or 80 mg Q2W at a 1:1 ratio with starting dose of 160 mg.
Post-treatment Follow-up Period: Participants did not receive any intervention during Follow-up period
Participants did not receive any intervention during Follow-up period | 104 |
| IXE80Q4W/IXE80Q4W Blinded Treatment Dosing Period: Participants received starting dose of 80 or 160 mg ixekizumab given SC at baseline followed by 80 mg ixekizumab given SC every four weeks (Q4W) up to week 16.
Extended Treatment Period: Participants received 80 mg ixekizumab given SC Q4W from week 16 to week 52.
Post-treatment Follow-up Period: Participants did not receive any intervention during Follow-up period
Participants did not receive any intervention during Follow-up period | 114 |
| IXE80Q2W/IXE80Q2W Blinded Treatment Dosing Period: Participants received starting dose of 80 or 160 milligrams (mg) ixekizumab given subcutaneously (SC) at baseline followed by 80 mg ixekizumab given SC every two weeks (Q2W) up to week 16.
Extended Treatment Period: Participants received 80 mg ixekizumab given SC Q2W from week 16 to week 52.
Post-treatment Follow-up Period: Participants did not receive any intervention during Follow-up period
Participants did not receive any intervention during Follow-up period | 98 |
| Total | 316 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blinded Treatment Dosing Period | Adverse Event | 2 | 9 | 2 |
| Blinded Treatment Dosing Period | Death | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Blinded Treatment Dosing Period | Lack of Efficacy | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Blinded Treatment Dosing Period | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Blinded Treatment Dosing Period | Physician Decision | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Blinded Treatment Dosing Period | Withdrawal by Subject | 7 | 3 | 4 |
| Extended Treatment Period | Adverse Event | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Extended Treatment Period | Lack of Efficacy | 7 | 2 | 2 |
| Extended Treatment Period | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Extended Treatment Period | Physician Decision | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Extended Treatment Period | Withdrawal by Subject | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| Post-treatment Follow-up Period | Adverse Event | 2 | 12 | 6 |
| Post-treatment Follow-up Period | Lack of Efficacy | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Post-treatment Follow-up Period | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Post-treatment Follow-up Period | No progressive improvement | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Post-treatment Follow-up Period | Physician Decision | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Post-treatment Follow-up Period | Withdrawal by Subject | 2 | 8 | 12 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | PBO/IXE | IXE80Q4W/IXE80Q4W | IXE80Q2W/IXE80Q2W | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 46.6 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.72 | 47.4 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.36 | 44.2 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.79 | 46.1 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.43 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 33 Participants | 32 Participants | 35 Participants | 100 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 63 Participants | 70 Participants | 53 Participants | 186 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 8 Participants | 12 Participants | 10 Participants | 30 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 4 Participants | 4 Participants | 4 Participants | 12 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 13 Participants | 14 Participants | 13 Participants | 40 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 85 Participants | 91 Participants | 78 Participants | 254 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Argentina | 6 Participants | 7 Participants | 5 Participants | 18 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Brazil | 10 Participants | 8 Participants | 10 Participants | 28 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Canada | 1 Participants | 5 Participants | 0 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Finland | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment France | 7 Participants | 5 Participants | 5 Participants | 17 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Germany | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Israel | 5 Participants | 5 Participants | 6 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Italy | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Mexico | 13 Participants | 13 Participants | 13 Participants | 39 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Netherlands | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Poland | 22 Participants | 24 Participants | 20 Participants | 66 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Puerto Rico | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment South Korea | 12 Participants | 11 Participants | 11 Participants | 34 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Spain | 3 Participants | 7 Participants | 4 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United Kingdom | 9 Participants | 6 Participants | 5 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 14 Participants | 14 Participants | 12 Participants | 40 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 17 Participants | 23 Participants | 23 Participants | 63 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 87 Participants | 91 Participants | 75 Participants | 253 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk | EG005 affected / at risk | EG006 affected / at risk | EG007 affected / at risk | EG008 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 98 | 0 / 114 | 0 / 104 | 0 / 90 | 0 / 98 | 0 / 93 | 0 / 22 | 0 / 34 | 0 / 5 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 25 / 98 | 25 / 114 | 12 / 104 | 26 / 90 | 19 / 98 | 19 / 93 | 1 / 22 | 3 / 34 | 1 / 5 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 3 / 98 | 4 / 114 | 5 / 104 | 1 / 90 | 2 / 98 | 6 / 93 | 1 / 22 | 2 / 34 | 0 / 5 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) Response
ASAS40 is defined as improvement from baseline of greater than or equal to (\>=) 40 % and absolute improvement from baseline of at least 2 units (range of 0 to 10) in at least 3 of the following 4 domains without any worsening in the remaining domain. 1. Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis on average during the last week? score ranges 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). 2. Spinal Pain: How much Pain of your spine due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). 3. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI): Participant asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participant response was captured using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. 4. Inflammation based on Q5 & Q6 mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) (mean of intensity & duration of stiffness): Score ranges from 0 (none) and 10 (very severe).
Time frame: Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) Response | 12.5 Percentage of participants |
| 80 mg Q4W Ixekizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) Response | 25.4 Percentage of participants |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) Response | 30.6 Percentage of participants |
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores
The SF-36 is a 36-item participant administered measure designed to be a short, multipurpose assessment of health in the areas of physical functioning, role - physical, role - emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. The 2 overarching domains of mental well- being and physical well-being are captured by the Mental Component Summary and Physical Component Summary scores. T-scores are used for analysis. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. LSmean was determined by MMRM with factors for treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores | SF-36 MCS | 2.7410 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.9452 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores | SF-36 PCS | 1.3638 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.8146 |
| 80 mg Q4W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores | SF-36 PCS | 6.5785 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.7763 |
| 80 mg Q4W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores | SF-36 MCS | 3.5099 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.9074 |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores | SF-36 PCS | 6.1223 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.8465 |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores | SF-36 MCS | 3.6514 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.9921 |
Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)
ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are 1. Total back pain 2. Patient global 3. Peripheral pain/swelling 4. Duration of morning stiffness and 5. CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness+0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. Least Square (LS) mean was determined by mixed-model repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) | -0.11 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.099 |
| 80 mg Q4W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) | -1.16 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.094 |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) | -1.13 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.103 |
Change From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI)
The ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI) is a disease specific health-index instrument designed to assess the impact of interventions for SpA, including axSpA. The 17 item instrument has scores ranging from 0 (good Health) to 17 (poor Health). Each item consists of 1 question that the patient needs to respond to with either I agree (score 1) or I do not agree (score 0). A score of 1 is given where the item is affirmed, indicating adverse health. All item scores are summed to give a total score or index. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI) | -0.89 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.338 |
| 80 mg Q4W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI) | -1.92 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.322 |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI) | -1.58 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.352 |
Change From Baseline in ASAS-Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Score
ASAS-NSAID score is used to present the NSAID intake by considering the type of NSAID, the total dose, & the number of days taking NSAID during a period of interest (PI). For NSAID equivalent scoring system, range is from 0 to 100, higher the score greated the NSAID intake. ASAS-NSAID score= (equivalent NSAID score) x (days of intake during PI) x (days per week)/(PI in days).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Population: Participants from extended treatment period who had NSAID Intake at baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in ASAS-Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Score | -9.84 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 34.435 |
| 80 mg Q4W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in ASAS-Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Score | -5.52 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.553 |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in ASAS-Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Score | -2.33 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.019 |
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)
The BASDAI is a participant-reported assessment consisting of 6 questions that relate to 5 major symptoms relevant to radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (rad-axSpA): 1) Fatigue, 2) Spinal pain, 3) Peripheral arthritis, 4) Enthesitis, 5) Intensity, and 6) Duration of morning stiffness. Participants need to score each item with a score from 0 to 10 (NRS). Total score is obtained from the average of symptom scores ranging 0 (no problem) to 10 (worst problem), with a higher score indicating more severe AS symptom. LSmean was determined by MMRM with factors for treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) | -0.92 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.212 |
| 80 mg Q4W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) | -2.17 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.202 |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) | -2.09 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.221 |
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)
The BASFI is a participant-reported assessment that establishes a participant's functional baseline and subsequent response to treatment. The BASFI is composed with 10 questions to assess the disease severity, including the first 8 questions regarding to functional anatomy related activities and the remaining 2 questions related to daily activities of AS participants. Participants respond to each question using an NRS scale (range 0 to 10). The BASFI score is the average of the 10 responses and has a possible minimum value of 0 and a possible maximum value of 10, with a higher score indicating worse function. LS mean was determined by MMRM with factors for treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) | -0.64 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.215 |
| 80 mg Q4W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) | -1.69 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.205 |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) | -1.92 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.225 |
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)
BASMI is a combined index comprising of 5 clinical measurements of spinal mobility in patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (rad-axSpA). 1. Lateral Spinal Flexion 2. Tragus-to-wall distance 3. Lumbar Flexion (modified Schober) 4. Maximal intermalleolar distance and 5. Cervical rotation. The BASMI linear result is the average of the 5 assessments and ranges from 0 to 10. The higher the BASMI score the more severe the patient's limitation of movement due to their AS. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) | -0.046 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0939 |
| 80 mg Q4W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) | -0.349 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0897 |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) | -0.217 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0981 |
Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion
Chest expansion is the difference, in centimeter (cm), between the circumference of the chest in maximal inspiration and maximal expiration. While patients have their hands resting on or behind the head, the assessor will measure the chest encircled length by centimeter (cm) at the fourth intercostal level anteriorly. Two tries were recorded. The better measurement (larger difference) of 2 tries (in centimeters) was used for analyses. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion | 0.04 centimeter(cm) | Standard Error 0.644 |
| 80 mg Q4W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion | 1.27 centimeter(cm) | Standard Error 0.618 |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion | 0.27 centimeter(cm) | Standard Error 0.655 |
Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES)
The MASES is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis. The MASES assesses 13 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include costochondral 1 (right/left), costochondral 7 (right/left), spinal iliaca anterior superior (right/left), crista iliaca (right/left), spina iliaca posterior (right/left), processus spinosus L5, and Achilles tendon proximal insertion (right/left). The MASES is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 13); higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants with baseline MASES score \> 0.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) | -1.9 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.43 |
| 80 mg Q4W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) | -1.8 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.4 |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) | -2.2 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.42 |
Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging [ASSpiMRI] - Berlin Score)
The study used MRI with fat-saturating techniques such as short tau inversion recovery (STIR) to look for the presence of bone marrow edema. The Berlin modification of Ankylosing Spondylitis spine MRI score for activity (ASspiMRI) scoring technique assesses inflammation in each of the 23 disco-vertebral units (DVU) of the spine (from C2 to S1), capturing bone marrow edema. Scores for each DVU range from 0-3 (0=normal; 1=minor bone marrow edema \[less than or equal to 25% of DVU; 3=severe bone marrow edema (more that 50% of DVU)\]. The composite score ranges from 0 to 69, with higher scores reflecting worse disease.LS mean was determined by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNF inhibitors used and baseline value as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants with baseline and week 16 ASSpiMRI score.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging [ASSpiMRI] - Berlin Score) | 1.03 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.379 |
| 80 mg Q4W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging [ASSpiMRI] - Berlin Score) | -0.92 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.373 |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging [ASSpiMRI] - Berlin Score) | -1.14 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.414 |
Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] Score)
MRI score of spine was assessed using SPARCC method. All 23 disco-vertebral units (DVU) of the spine (from C2 to S1) were scored for bone marrow edema. A single DVU has 18 scoring units, and each has score of 0 or 1, bringing the maximum total score to 414, the sum ranges from 0 to 414 with higher scores reflecting worse disease. Scoring was performed by central readers. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with factors for treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNF inhibitors used and baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants with baseline and week 16 SPARCC MRI score.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] Score) | 3.29 Units on a scale | Standard Error 1.402 |
| 80 mg Q4W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] Score) | -2.99 Units on a scale | Standard Error 1.384 |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] Score) | -3.97 Units on a scale | Standard Error 1.534 |
Change From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance
The participant is to make a maximum effort to touch the head against the wall when standing with heels and back against the wall (occiput). Then the distance from occiput to wall is measured. Two tries will be recorded. The better (smaller) measurement of 2 tries (in centimeters) will be used for analyses. LS mean was determined by MMRM with factors for treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance | 0.35 cm | Standard Error 0.384 |
| 80 mg Q4W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance | 0.03 cm | Standard Error 0.365 |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance | -0.65 cm | Standard Error 0.399 |
Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Scores
The number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 44 joints (22 joints on each side of the body). The 44 joints were assessed and classified as swollen or not swollen. Sum of all joints checked to be swollen divided by number of evaluable joints which was multiplied by 44 to obtain SJC score. The SJC score ranges from 0 (no swollen joints) to 44 (all joints swollen). LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants with baseline SJC \> 0.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Scores | -2.4 Swollen Joint Count | Standard Error 0.51 |
| 80 mg Q4W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Scores | -2.6 Swollen Joint Count | Standard Error 0.49 |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Scores | -3.0 Swollen Joint Count | Standard Error 0.54 |
Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender Joint Count (TJC) Scores
The number of tender and painful joints was determined by examination of 46 joints (23 joints on each side of the body). The 46 joints were assessed and classified as tender or not tender. Sum of all joints checked to be tender/painful divided by number of evaluable joints which was multiplied by 46 to obtain TJC score. The scores ranges from 0 (no tender/painful joints) to 46 (all joints tender/painful). LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants with baseline TJC \> 0.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender Joint Count (TJC) Scores | -3.9 Tender Joint Count | Standard Error 0.79 |
| 80 mg Q4W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender Joint Count (TJC) Scores | -4.8 Tender Joint Count | Standard Error 0.69 |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender Joint Count (TJC) Scores | -5.0 Tender Joint Count | Standard Error 0.79 |
Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Score
The SPARCC enthesitis is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis. The SPARCC assesses 16 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include Medial epicondyle (left/right \[L/R\]), Lateral epicondyle (L/R), Supraspinatus insertion into greater tuberosity of humerus (L/R), Greater trochanter (L/R), Quadriceps insertion into superior border of patella (L/R), Patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tubercle (L/R), Achilles tendon insertion into calcaneum (L/R), and Plantar fascia insertion into calcaneum (L/R). The SPARCC is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 16). Higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants with baseline SPARCC Enthesitis score \> 0.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Score | -1.9 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.44 |
| 80 mg Q4W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Score | -2.3 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.4 |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Score | -1.8 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.45 |
Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score
The fatigue severity NRS is a participant administered single-item 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no fatigue and 10 representing as bad as you can imagine. Participants rate their fatigue (feeling tired or worn out) by circling the 1 number that describes their worst level of fatigue during the previous 24 hours. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score | -0.7 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.24 |
| 80 mg Q4W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score | -2.0 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.23 |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score | -1.7 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.25 |
Change From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ)
The Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ) is a 4 item scale designed to estimate sleep problems in clinical research. The JSEQ assesses the frequency of sleep disturbance in 4 categories: 1) trouble falling asleep, 2) waking up several times during the night, 3) having trouble staying asleep (including waking up far too early), and 4) waking up after the usual amount of sleep feeling tired and worn out. Patients report the numbers of days they experience each of these problems in the past month on a 6 point Likert Scale ranging from 0 = no days to 5 = 22-30 days. The total JSEQ score ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater sleep disturbance. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ) | -1.8 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.5 |
| 80 mg Q4W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ) | -3.0 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.48 |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ) | -2.4 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.52 |
Change From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
High sensitivity CRP is the measure of acute phase reactant. It was measured with a high sensitivity assay at the central laboratory to help assess the effect of ixekizumab on disease activity. High sensitivity CRP is a sensitive laboratory assay for serum levels of C-Reactive Protein, which is a biomarker of inflammation. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP) | 9.719 milligram per liter (mg/L) | Standard Error 2.7383 |
| 80 mg Q4W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP) | -11.096 milligram per liter (mg/L) | Standard Error 2.619 |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP) | -8.121 milligram per liter (mg/L) | Standard Error 2.8829 |
Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores
The WPAI-SpA consists of 6 questions to determine employment status, hours missed from work because of SpA, hours missed from work for other reasons, hours actually worked, the degree to which SpA affected work productivity while at work, and the degree to which SpA affected activities outside of work. The WPAI-SpA has been validated in the rad-axSpA patient population. Four scores are derived: percentage of absenteeism, percentage of presenteeism (reduced productivity while at work), an overall work impairment score that combines absenteeism and presenteeism, and percentage of impairment in activities performed outside of work. The computed percentage range for each sub-scale was from 0-100, with higher scores indicating greater impairment and less productivity. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi and baseline value as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants with baseline and week 16 WPAI-SpA score.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores | Overall Work Impairment Score | -9.84 Units on a scale | Standard Error 3.733 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores | Percentage of Activity Impairment | -10.1 Units on a scale | Standard Error 2.6 |
| 80 mg Q4W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores | Overall Work Impairment Score | -20.97 Units on a scale | Standard Error 4.016 |
| 80 mg Q4W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores | Percentage of Activity Impairment | -16.5 Units on a scale | Standard Error 2.44 |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores | Percentage of Activity Impairment | -18.4 Units on a scale | Standard Error 2.74 |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab | Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores | Overall Work Impairment Score | -23.50 Units on a scale | Standard Error 4.225 |
Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS20 Response
ASAS20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement and an absolute improvement from baseline of ≥1 units (range 0 to 10) in ≥3 of 4 domains, and no worsening of ≥20% and ≥1 unit (range 0 to 10) in the remaining domain. 1. Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis on average during the last week? score ranges 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). 2. Spinal Pain: How much Pain of your spine due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). 3. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI): Participant asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participant response was captured using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. 4. Inflammation based on Q5 & Q6 mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) (mean of intensity & duration of stiffness): Score ranges from 0 (none) and 10 (very severe).
Time frame: Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS20 Response | 29.8 Percentage of Participants |
| 80 mg Q4W Ixekizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS20 Response | 48.2 Percentage of Participants |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS20 Response | 46.9 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS <2.1
ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. ASDAS \<2.1 defines moderate disease activity. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are 1. Total back pain 2. Patient global 3. Peripheral pain/swelling 4. Duration of morning stiffness and 5. CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness+0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher the score worse the disease activity.
Time frame: Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS <2.1 | 4.8 Percentage of Participants |
| 80 mg Q4W Ixekizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS <2.1 | 17.5 Percentage of Participants |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS <2.1 | 16.3 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Inactive Disease
ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. ASDAS Inactive Disease is defined as a score of \<1.3. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are 1. Total back pain 2. Patient global 3. Peripheral pain/swelling 4. Duration of morning stiffness and 5. CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness+0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher the score worse the disease activity.
Time frame: Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Inactive Disease | 1.0 Percentage of Participants |
| 80 mg Q4W Ixekizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Inactive Disease | 3.5 Percentage of Participants |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Inactive Disease | 5.1 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) Response
The BASDAI is a participant-reported assessment consisting of 6 questions that relate to 5 major symptoms relevant to radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (rad-axSpA): 1) Fatigue, 2) Spinal pain, 3) Peripheral arthritis, 4) Enthesitis, 5) Intensity, and 6) Duration of morning stiffness. Participants need to score each item with a score from 0 to 10 (NRS). Total score is obtained from the average of symptom scores ranging 0 (no problem) to 10 (worst problem), with a higher score indicating more severe AS symptom. BASDAI50 represents an improvement of ≥50% of the BASDAI score from baseline.
Time frame: Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) Response | 9.6 Percentage of Participants |
| 80 mg Q4W Ixekizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) Response | 21.9 Percentage of Participants |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) Response | 23.5 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Anterior Uveitis
Anterior uveitis is an inflammation of the middle layer of the eye. which includes the iris (colored part of the eye) and the adjacent tissue, known as the ciliary body.
Time frame: Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Anterior Uveitis | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| 80 mg Q4W Ixekizumab | Percentage of Participants With Anterior Uveitis | 1.8 Percentage of Participants |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab | Percentage of Participants With Anterior Uveitis | 3.1 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies
A treatment emergent - antidrug antibody (TE-ADA) positive patient is defined as: a) a patient with a \>= 4-fold increase over a positive baseline antibody titer; or b) for a negative baseline titer, a patient with an increase from the baseline to a level of \>= 1:10. Percentage was calculated based on the number of evaluable participants and was calculated by number of participants with treatment-emergent positive anti-ixekizumab antibodies / number of evaluable participants \* 100%.
Time frame: Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies | 2.9 Percentage of Participants |
| 80 mg Q4W Ixekizumab | Percentage of Participants With Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies | 7.1 Percentage of Participants |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab | Percentage of Participants With Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies | 4.1 Percentage of Participants |
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Ixekizumab Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Steady-state trough serum concentration of Ixekizumab at week 16.
Time frame: Week 16
Population: All randomized participants who received study drug and have evaluable PK data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Ixekizumab Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss) | 2.10 Microgram per milliliters (µg/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 106 |
| 80 mg Q4W Ixekizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Ixekizumab Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss) | 2.47 Microgram per milliliters (µg/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 101 |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Ixekizumab Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss) | 6.27 Microgram per milliliters (µg/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 158 |
| 80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab (Starting Dose 160 mg) | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Ixekizumab Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss) | 8.52 Microgram per milliliters (µg/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 50 |