Skip to content

A Study of Ixekizumab (LY2439821) in TNF Inhibitor Experienced Participants With Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- Controlled 16-Week Study Followed by Long-Term Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Ixekizumab (LY2439821) in TNFi-Experienced Patients With Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02696798
Acronym
COAST-W
Enrollment
316
Registered
2016-03-02
Start date
2016-04-12
Completion date
2019-05-03
Last updated
2020-06-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spondyloarthritis

Keywords

Ankylosing Spondylitis

Brief summary

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab in tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor-experienced participants with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (rad-axSpA).

Interventions

DRUGIxekizumab

Administered SC

DRUGPlacebo

Administered SC

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Are ambulatory. * Have an established diagnosis of radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (rad-xSpA) with sacroiliitis defined radiographically according to the modified New York criteria. * Participants have a history of back pain ≥3 months with age at onset \<45 years. * Have had prior treatment with at least 1 and not more than 2 TNF inhibitors. * Must have had an inadequate response to 2 or more NSAIDs at the therapeutic dose range for a total duration of at least 4 weeks OR have a history of intolerance to NSAIDs. * Have a history of prior therapy for axSpa for at least 12 weeks prior to screening.

Exclusion criteria

* Have total ankylosis of the spine. * Have never taken a TNF inhibitor medication or have taken more than 2. * Have recently received a live vaccine within 12 weeks or have had a vaccination with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) within the past year. * Have an ongoing or serious infection within the last 12 weeks or evidence of active tuberculosis. * Have a compromised immune system. * Have any other serious and/or uncontrolled diseases. * Have either a current diagnosis or a recent history of malignant disease. * Have had major surgery within 8 weeks of baseline, or will require surgery during the study. * Are pregnant or breastfeeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) ResponseWeek 16ASAS40 is defined as improvement from baseline of greater than or equal to (\>=) 40 % and absolute improvement from baseline of at least 2 units (range of 0 to 10) in at least 3 of the following 4 domains without any worsening in the remaining domain. 1. Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis on average during the last week? score ranges 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). 2. Spinal Pain: How much Pain of your spine due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). 3. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI): Participant asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participant response was captured using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. 4. Inflammation based on Q5 & Q6 mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) (mean of intensity & duration of stiffness): Score ranges from 0 (none) and 10 (very severe).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)Baseline, Week 16ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are 1. Total back pain 2. Patient global 3. Peripheral pain/swelling 4. Duration of morning stiffness and 5. CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness+0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. Least Square (LS) mean was determined by mixed-model repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) ResponseWeek 16The BASDAI is a participant-reported assessment consisting of 6 questions that relate to 5 major symptoms relevant to radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (rad-axSpA): 1) Fatigue, 2) Spinal pain, 3) Peripheral arthritis, 4) Enthesitis, 5) Intensity, and 6) Duration of morning stiffness. Participants need to score each item with a score from 0 to 10 (NRS). Total score is obtained from the average of symptom scores ranging 0 (no problem) to 10 (worst problem), with a higher score indicating more severe AS symptom. BASDAI50 represents an improvement of ≥50% of the BASDAI score from baseline.
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)Baseline, Week 16The BASDAI is a participant-reported assessment consisting of 6 questions that relate to 5 major symptoms relevant to radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (rad-axSpA): 1) Fatigue, 2) Spinal pain, 3) Peripheral arthritis, 4) Enthesitis, 5) Intensity, and 6) Duration of morning stiffness. Participants need to score each item with a score from 0 to 10 (NRS). Total score is obtained from the average of symptom scores ranging 0 (no problem) to 10 (worst problem), with a higher score indicating more severe AS symptom. LSmean was determined by MMRM with factors for treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)Baseline, Week 16The BASFI is a participant-reported assessment that establishes a participant's functional baseline and subsequent response to treatment. The BASFI is composed with 10 questions to assess the disease severity, including the first 8 questions regarding to functional anatomy related activities and the remaining 2 questions related to daily activities of AS participants. Participants respond to each question using an NRS scale (range 0 to 10). The BASFI score is the average of the 10 responses and has a possible minimum value of 0 and a possible maximum value of 10, with a higher score indicating worse function. LS mean was determined by MMRM with factors for treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Inactive DiseaseWeek 16ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. ASDAS Inactive Disease is defined as a score of \<1.3. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are 1. Total back pain 2. Patient global 3. Peripheral pain/swelling 4. Duration of morning stiffness and 5. CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness+0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher the score worse the disease activity.
Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS <2.1Week 16ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. ASDAS \<2.1 defines moderate disease activity. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are 1. Total back pain 2. Patient global 3. Peripheral pain/swelling 4. Duration of morning stiffness and 5. CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness+0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher the score worse the disease activity.
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) ScoresBaseline, Week 16The SF-36 is a 36-item participant administered measure designed to be a short, multipurpose assessment of health in the areas of physical functioning, role - physical, role - emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. The 2 overarching domains of mental well- being and physical well-being are captured by the Mental Component Summary and Physical Component Summary scores. T-scores are used for analysis. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. LSmean was determined by MMRM with factors for treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI)Baseline, Week 16The ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI) is a disease specific health-index instrument designed to assess the impact of interventions for SpA, including axSpA. The 17 item instrument has scores ranging from 0 (good Health) to 17 (poor Health). Each item consists of 1 question that the patient needs to respond to with either I agree (score 1) or I do not agree (score 0). A score of 1 is given where the item is affirmed, indicating adverse health. All item scores are summed to give a total score or index. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging [ASSpiMRI] - Berlin Score)Baseline, Week 16The study used MRI with fat-saturating techniques such as short tau inversion recovery (STIR) to look for the presence of bone marrow edema. The Berlin modification of Ankylosing Spondylitis spine MRI score for activity (ASspiMRI) scoring technique assesses inflammation in each of the 23 disco-vertebral units (DVU) of the spine (from C2 to S1), capturing bone marrow edema. Scores for each DVU range from 0-3 (0=normal; 1=minor bone marrow edema \[less than or equal to 25% of DVU; 3=severe bone marrow edema (more that 50% of DVU)\]. The composite score ranges from 0 to 69, with higher scores reflecting worse disease.LS mean was determined by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNF inhibitors used and baseline value as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] Score)Baseline, Week 16MRI score of spine was assessed using SPARCC method. All 23 disco-vertebral units (DVU) of the spine (from C2 to S1) were scored for bone marrow edema. A single DVU has 18 scoring units, and each has score of 0 or 1, bringing the maximum total score to 414, the sum ranges from 0 to 414 with higher scores reflecting worse disease. Scoring was performed by central readers. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with factors for treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNF inhibitors used and baseline value.
Change From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP)Baseline, Week 16High sensitivity CRP is the measure of acute phase reactant. It was measured with a high sensitivity assay at the central laboratory to help assess the effect of ixekizumab on disease activity. High sensitivity CRP is a sensitive laboratory assay for serum levels of C-Reactive Protein, which is a biomarker of inflammation. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)Baseline, Week 16BASMI is a combined index comprising of 5 clinical measurements of spinal mobility in patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (rad-axSpA). 1. Lateral Spinal Flexion 2. Tragus-to-wall distance 3. Lumbar Flexion (modified Schober) 4. Maximal intermalleolar distance and 5. Cervical rotation. The BASMI linear result is the average of the 5 assessments and ranges from 0 to 10. The higher the BASMI score the more severe the patient's limitation of movement due to their AS. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS20 ResponseWeek 16ASAS20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement and an absolute improvement from baseline of ≥1 units (range 0 to 10) in ≥3 of 4 domains, and no worsening of ≥20% and ≥1 unit (range 0 to 10) in the remaining domain. 1. Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis on average during the last week? score ranges 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). 2. Spinal Pain: How much Pain of your spine due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). 3. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI): Participant asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participant response was captured using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. 4. Inflammation based on Q5 & Q6 mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) (mean of intensity & duration of stiffness): Score ranges from 0 (none) and 10 (very severe).
Change From Baseline in Occiput to Wall DistanceBaseline, Week 16The participant is to make a maximum effort to touch the head against the wall when standing with heels and back against the wall (occiput). Then the distance from occiput to wall is measured. Two tries will be recorded. The better (smaller) measurement of 2 tries (in centimeters) will be used for analyses. LS mean was determined by MMRM with factors for treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES)Baseline, Week 16The MASES is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis. The MASES assesses 13 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include costochondral 1 (right/left), costochondral 7 (right/left), spinal iliaca anterior superior (right/left), crista iliaca (right/left), spina iliaca posterior (right/left), processus spinosus L5, and Achilles tendon proximal insertion (right/left). The MASES is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 13); higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis ScoreBaseline, Week 16The SPARCC enthesitis is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis. The SPARCC assesses 16 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include Medial epicondyle (left/right \[L/R\]), Lateral epicondyle (L/R), Supraspinatus insertion into greater tuberosity of humerus (L/R), Greater trochanter (L/R), Quadriceps insertion into superior border of patella (L/R), Patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tubercle (L/R), Achilles tendon insertion into calcaneum (L/R), and Plantar fascia insertion into calcaneum (L/R). The SPARCC is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 16). Higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender Joint Count (TJC) ScoresBaseline, Week 16The number of tender and painful joints was determined by examination of 46 joints (23 joints on each side of the body). The 46 joints were assessed and classified as tender or not tender. Sum of all joints checked to be tender/painful divided by number of evaluable joints which was multiplied by 46 to obtain TJC score. The scores ranges from 0 (no tender/painful joints) to 46 (all joints tender/painful). LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC) ScoresBaseline, Week 16The number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 44 joints (22 joints on each side of the body). The 44 joints were assessed and classified as swollen or not swollen. Sum of all joints checked to be swollen divided by number of evaluable joints which was multiplied by 44 to obtain SJC score. The SJC score ranges from 0 (no swollen joints) to 44 (all joints swollen). LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.
Percentage of Participants With Anterior UveitisWeek 16Anterior uveitis is an inflammation of the middle layer of the eye. which includes the iris (colored part of the eye) and the adjacent tissue, known as the ciliary body.
Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ScoreBaseline, Week 16The fatigue severity NRS is a participant administered single-item 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no fatigue and 10 representing as bad as you can imagine. Participants rate their fatigue (feeling tired or worn out) by circling the 1 number that describes their worst level of fatigue during the previous 24 hours. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ)Baseline, Week 16The Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ) is a 4 item scale designed to estimate sleep problems in clinical research. The JSEQ assesses the frequency of sleep disturbance in 4 categories: 1) trouble falling asleep, 2) waking up several times during the night, 3) having trouble staying asleep (including waking up far too early), and 4) waking up after the usual amount of sleep feeling tired and worn out. Patients report the numbers of days they experience each of these problems in the past month on a 6 point Likert Scale ranging from 0 = no days to 5 = 22-30 days. The total JSEQ score ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater sleep disturbance. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresBaseline, Week 16The WPAI-SpA consists of 6 questions to determine employment status, hours missed from work because of SpA, hours missed from work for other reasons, hours actually worked, the degree to which SpA affected work productivity while at work, and the degree to which SpA affected activities outside of work. The WPAI-SpA has been validated in the rad-axSpA patient population. Four scores are derived: percentage of absenteeism, percentage of presenteeism (reduced productivity while at work), an overall work impairment score that combines absenteeism and presenteeism, and percentage of impairment in activities performed outside of work. The computed percentage range for each sub-scale was from 0-100, with higher scores indicating greater impairment and less productivity. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi and baseline value as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in ASAS-Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) ScoreBaseline, Week 52ASAS-NSAID score is used to present the NSAID intake by considering the type of NSAID, the total dose, & the number of days taking NSAID during a period of interest (PI). For NSAID equivalent scoring system, range is from 0 to 100, higher the score greated the NSAID intake. ASAS-NSAID score= (equivalent NSAID score) x (days of intake during PI) x (days per week)/(PI in days).
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Ixekizumab AntibodiesWeek 16A treatment emergent - antidrug antibody (TE-ADA) positive patient is defined as: a) a patient with a \>= 4-fold increase over a positive baseline antibody titer; or b) for a negative baseline titer, a patient with an increase from the baseline to a level of \>= 1:10. Percentage was calculated based on the number of evaluable participants and was calculated by number of participants with treatment-emergent positive anti-ixekizumab antibodies / number of evaluable participants \* 100%.
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Ixekizumab Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)Week 16Pharmacokinetics (PK): Steady-state trough serum concentration of Ixekizumab at week 16.
Change From Baseline in Chest ExpansionBaseline, Week 16Chest expansion is the difference, in centimeter (cm), between the circumference of the chest in maximal inspiration and maximal expiration. While patients have their hands resting on or behind the head, the assessor will measure the chest encircled length by centimeter (cm) at the fourth intercostal level anteriorly. Two tries were recorded. The better measurement (larger difference) of 2 tries (in centimeters) was used for analyses. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Countries

Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Puerto Rico, South Korea, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Blinded Treatment Dosing Period (Week 0 to Week 16), Extended Treatment Period (Week 16 to Week 52) followed by post-treatment follow-up period occurring from last treatment visit (week 52), or Early Termination Visit (ETV) up to a minimum of 12 weeks following that visit.

Pre-assignment details

Participants who completed study were eligible to enroll into a long-term study (I1F-MC-RHBY \[NCT03129100\]) for up to 2 additional years. Participants who terminate study RHBW early or who do not enroll into Study RHBY will complete the Post-Treatment Follow-Up (PTFU) Period in study RHBW.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PBO/IXE
Blinded Treatment Dosing Period: Participants received placebo every two weeks (Q2W) by subcutaneous (SC) injection during Week 0 to 16. Extended Treatment Period: Participants who received Placebo in blinded treatment period were re-randomized to receive ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W or 80 mg Q2W at a 1:1 ratio with starting dose of 160 mg. Post-treatment Follow-up Period: Participants did not receive any intervention during Follow-up period Participants did not receive any intervention during Follow-up period
104
IXE80Q4W/IXE80Q4W
Blinded Treatment Dosing Period: Participants received starting dose of 80 or 160 mg ixekizumab given SC at baseline followed by 80 mg ixekizumab given SC every four weeks (Q4W) up to week 16. Extended Treatment Period: Participants received 80 mg ixekizumab given SC Q4W from week 16 to week 52. Post-treatment Follow-up Period: Participants did not receive any intervention during Follow-up period Participants did not receive any intervention during Follow-up period
114
IXE80Q2W/IXE80Q2W
Blinded Treatment Dosing Period: Participants received starting dose of 80 or 160 milligrams (mg) ixekizumab given subcutaneously (SC) at baseline followed by 80 mg ixekizumab given SC every two weeks (Q2W) up to week 16. Extended Treatment Period: Participants received 80 mg ixekizumab given SC Q2W from week 16 to week 52. Post-treatment Follow-up Period: Participants did not receive any intervention during Follow-up period Participants did not receive any intervention during Follow-up period
98
Total316

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Blinded Treatment Dosing PeriodAdverse Event292
Blinded Treatment Dosing PeriodDeath001
Blinded Treatment Dosing PeriodLack of Efficacy211
Blinded Treatment Dosing PeriodLost to Follow-up010
Blinded Treatment Dosing PeriodPhysician Decision010
Blinded Treatment Dosing PeriodWithdrawal by Subject734
Extended Treatment PeriodAdverse Event145
Extended Treatment PeriodLack of Efficacy722
Extended Treatment PeriodLost to Follow-up100
Extended Treatment PeriodPhysician Decision010
Extended Treatment PeriodWithdrawal by Subject323
Post-treatment Follow-up PeriodAdverse Event2126
Post-treatment Follow-up PeriodLack of Efficacy120
Post-treatment Follow-up PeriodLost to Follow-up011
Post-treatment Follow-up PeriodNo progressive improvement010
Post-treatment Follow-up PeriodPhysician Decision020
Post-treatment Follow-up PeriodWithdrawal by Subject2812

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPBO/IXEIXE80Q4W/IXE80Q4WIXE80Q2W/IXE80Q2WTotal
Age, Continuous46.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.72
47.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.36
44.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.79
46.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.43
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
33 Participants32 Participants35 Participants100 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
63 Participants70 Participants53 Participants186 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
8 Participants12 Participants10 Participants30 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
4 Participants4 Participants4 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
13 Participants14 Participants13 Participants40 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants2 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
85 Participants91 Participants78 Participants254 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
6 Participants7 Participants5 Participants18 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
10 Participants8 Participants10 Participants28 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
1 Participants5 Participants0 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Finland
0 Participants3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
7 Participants5 Participants5 Participants17 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
5 Participants5 Participants6 Participants16 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
13 Participants13 Participants13 Participants39 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
22 Participants24 Participants20 Participants66 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Puerto Rico
1 Participants2 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
12 Participants11 Participants11 Participants34 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
3 Participants7 Participants4 Participants14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
9 Participants6 Participants5 Participants20 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
14 Participants14 Participants12 Participants40 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants23 Participants23 Participants63 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
87 Participants91 Participants75 Participants253 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 980 / 1140 / 1040 / 900 / 980 / 930 / 220 / 340 / 5
other
Total, other adverse events
25 / 9825 / 11412 / 10426 / 9019 / 9819 / 931 / 223 / 341 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 984 / 1145 / 1041 / 902 / 986 / 931 / 222 / 340 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) Response

ASAS40 is defined as improvement from baseline of greater than or equal to (\>=) 40 % and absolute improvement from baseline of at least 2 units (range of 0 to 10) in at least 3 of the following 4 domains without any worsening in the remaining domain. 1. Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis on average during the last week? score ranges 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). 2. Spinal Pain: How much Pain of your spine due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). 3. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI): Participant asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participant response was captured using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. 4. Inflammation based on Q5 & Q6 mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) (mean of intensity & duration of stiffness): Score ranges from 0 (none) and 10 (very severe).

Time frame: Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) Response12.5 Percentage of participants
80 mg Q4W IxekizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) Response25.4 Percentage of participants
80 mg Q2W IxekizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) Response30.6 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.01795% CI: [1.17, 4.95]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.00395% CI: [1.48, 6.33]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores

The SF-36 is a 36-item participant administered measure designed to be a short, multipurpose assessment of health in the areas of physical functioning, role - physical, role - emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. The 2 overarching domains of mental well- being and physical well-being are captured by the Mental Component Summary and Physical Component Summary scores. T-scores are used for analysis. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. LSmean was determined by MMRM with factors for treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) ScoresSF-36 MCS2.7410 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.9452
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) ScoresSF-36 PCS1.3638 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8146
80 mg Q4W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) ScoresSF-36 PCS6.5785 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7763
80 mg Q4W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) ScoresSF-36 MCS3.5099 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.9074
80 mg Q2W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) ScoresSF-36 PCS6.1223 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8465
80 mg Q2W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) ScoresSF-36 MCS3.6514 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.9921
Comparison: MCSp-value: 0.5595% CI: [-1.7629, 3.3007]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: MCSp-value: 0.49595% CI: [-1.7151, 3.536]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: PCSp-value: <0.00195% CI: [3.0204, 7.409]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: PCSp-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.494, 7.023]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)

ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are 1. Total back pain 2. Patient global 3. Peripheral pain/swelling 4. Duration of morning stiffness and 5. CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness+0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. Least Square (LS) mean was determined by mixed-model repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)-0.11 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.099
80 mg Q4W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)-1.16 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.094
80 mg Q2W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)-1.13 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.103
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.32, -0.79]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.3, -0.75]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI)

The ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI) is a disease specific health-index instrument designed to assess the impact of interventions for SpA, including axSpA. The 17 item instrument has scores ranging from 0 (good Health) to 17 (poor Health). Each item consists of 1 question that the patient needs to respond to with either I agree (score 1) or I do not agree (score 0). A score of 1 is given where the item is affirmed, indicating adverse health. All item scores are summed to give a total score or index. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI)-0.89 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.338
80 mg Q4W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI)-1.92 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.322
80 mg Q2W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI)-1.58 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.352
p-value: 0.02695% CI: [-1.94, -0.13]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.14995% CI: [-1.63, 0.25]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in ASAS-Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Score

ASAS-NSAID score is used to present the NSAID intake by considering the type of NSAID, the total dose, & the number of days taking NSAID during a period of interest (PI). For NSAID equivalent scoring system, range is from 0 to 100, higher the score greated the NSAID intake. ASAS-NSAID score= (equivalent NSAID score) x (days of intake during PI) x (days per week)/(PI in days).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Participants from extended treatment period who had NSAID Intake at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in ASAS-Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Score-9.84 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.435
80 mg Q4W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in ASAS-Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Score-5.52 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.553
80 mg Q2W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in ASAS-Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Score-2.33 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.019
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)

The BASDAI is a participant-reported assessment consisting of 6 questions that relate to 5 major symptoms relevant to radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (rad-axSpA): 1) Fatigue, 2) Spinal pain, 3) Peripheral arthritis, 4) Enthesitis, 5) Intensity, and 6) Duration of morning stiffness. Participants need to score each item with a score from 0 to 10 (NRS). Total score is obtained from the average of symptom scores ranging 0 (no problem) to 10 (worst problem), with a higher score indicating more severe AS symptom. LSmean was determined by MMRM with factors for treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)-0.92 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.212
80 mg Q4W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)-2.17 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.202
80 mg Q2W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)-2.09 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.221
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.81, -0.67]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.76, -0.57]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)

The BASFI is a participant-reported assessment that establishes a participant's functional baseline and subsequent response to treatment. The BASFI is composed with 10 questions to assess the disease severity, including the first 8 questions regarding to functional anatomy related activities and the remaining 2 questions related to daily activities of AS participants. Participants respond to each question using an NRS scale (range 0 to 10). The BASFI score is the average of the 10 responses and has a possible minimum value of 0 and a possible maximum value of 10, with a higher score indicating worse function. LS mean was determined by MMRM with factors for treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)-0.64 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.215
80 mg Q4W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)-1.69 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.205
80 mg Q2W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)-1.92 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.225
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.63, -0.47]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.89, -0.68]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)

BASMI is a combined index comprising of 5 clinical measurements of spinal mobility in patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (rad-axSpA). 1. Lateral Spinal Flexion 2. Tragus-to-wall distance 3. Lumbar Flexion (modified Schober) 4. Maximal intermalleolar distance and 5. Cervical rotation. The BASMI linear result is the average of the 5 assessments and ranges from 0 to 10. The higher the BASMI score the more severe the patient's limitation of movement due to their AS. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)-0.046 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0939
80 mg Q4W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)-0.349 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0897
80 mg Q2W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)-0.217 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0981
p-value: 0.01895% CI: [-0.555, -0.053]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.19495% CI: [-0.431, 0.088]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion

Chest expansion is the difference, in centimeter (cm), between the circumference of the chest in maximal inspiration and maximal expiration. While patients have their hands resting on or behind the head, the assessor will measure the chest encircled length by centimeter (cm) at the fourth intercostal level anteriorly. Two tries were recorded. The better measurement (larger difference) of 2 tries (in centimeters) was used for analyses. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Chest Expansion0.04 centimeter(cm)Standard Error 0.644
80 mg Q4W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Chest Expansion1.27 centimeter(cm)Standard Error 0.618
80 mg Q2W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Chest Expansion0.27 centimeter(cm)Standard Error 0.655
p-value: 0.1795% CI: [-0.53, 2.99]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.895% CI: [-1.57, 2.04]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES)

The MASES is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis. The MASES assesses 13 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include costochondral 1 (right/left), costochondral 7 (right/left), spinal iliaca anterior superior (right/left), crista iliaca (right/left), spina iliaca posterior (right/left), processus spinosus L5, and Achilles tendon proximal insertion (right/left). The MASES is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 13); higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants with baseline MASES score \> 0.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES)-1.9 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
80 mg Q4W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES)-1.8 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
80 mg Q2W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES)-2.2 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.42
p-value: 0.86195% CI: [-1, 1.3]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.62695% CI: [-1.4, 0.9]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging [ASSpiMRI] - Berlin Score)

The study used MRI with fat-saturating techniques such as short tau inversion recovery (STIR) to look for the presence of bone marrow edema. The Berlin modification of Ankylosing Spondylitis spine MRI score for activity (ASspiMRI) scoring technique assesses inflammation in each of the 23 disco-vertebral units (DVU) of the spine (from C2 to S1), capturing bone marrow edema. Scores for each DVU range from 0-3 (0=normal; 1=minor bone marrow edema \[less than or equal to 25% of DVU; 3=severe bone marrow edema (more that 50% of DVU)\]. The composite score ranges from 0 to 69, with higher scores reflecting worse disease.LS mean was determined by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNF inhibitors used and baseline value as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants with baseline and week 16 ASSpiMRI score.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging [ASSpiMRI] - Berlin Score)1.03 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.379
80 mg Q4W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging [ASSpiMRI] - Berlin Score)-0.92 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.373
80 mg Q2W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging [ASSpiMRI] - Berlin Score)-1.14 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.414
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-3, -0.9]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-3.2, -1.1]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] Score)

MRI score of spine was assessed using SPARCC method. All 23 disco-vertebral units (DVU) of the spine (from C2 to S1) were scored for bone marrow edema. A single DVU has 18 scoring units, and each has score of 0 or 1, bringing the maximum total score to 414, the sum ranges from 0 to 414 with higher scores reflecting worse disease. Scoring was performed by central readers. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with factors for treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNF inhibitors used and baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants with baseline and week 16 SPARCC MRI score.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] Score)3.29 Units on a scaleStandard Error 1.402
80 mg Q4W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] Score)-2.99 Units on a scaleStandard Error 1.384
80 mg Q2W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] Score)-3.97 Units on a scaleStandard Error 1.534
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-10, -2.5]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-11.2, -3.4]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance

The participant is to make a maximum effort to touch the head against the wall when standing with heels and back against the wall (occiput). Then the distance from occiput to wall is measured. Two tries will be recorded. The better (smaller) measurement of 2 tries (in centimeters) will be used for analyses. LS mean was determined by MMRM with factors for treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance0.35 cmStandard Error 0.384
80 mg Q4W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance0.03 cmStandard Error 0.365
80 mg Q2W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance-0.65 cmStandard Error 0.399
p-value: 0.54795% CI: [-1.34, 0.71]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.06495% CI: [-2.06, 0.06]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Scores

The number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 44 joints (22 joints on each side of the body). The 44 joints were assessed and classified as swollen or not swollen. Sum of all joints checked to be swollen divided by number of evaluable joints which was multiplied by 44 to obtain SJC score. The SJC score ranges from 0 (no swollen joints) to 44 (all joints swollen). LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants with baseline SJC \> 0.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Scores-2.4 Swollen Joint CountStandard Error 0.51
80 mg Q4W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Scores-2.6 Swollen Joint CountStandard Error 0.49
80 mg Q2W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Scores-3.0 Swollen Joint CountStandard Error 0.54
p-value: 0.81395% CI: [-1.5, 1.2]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.4195% CI: [-2, 0.8]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender Joint Count (TJC) Scores

The number of tender and painful joints was determined by examination of 46 joints (23 joints on each side of the body). The 46 joints were assessed and classified as tender or not tender. Sum of all joints checked to be tender/painful divided by number of evaluable joints which was multiplied by 46 to obtain TJC score. The scores ranges from 0 (no tender/painful joints) to 46 (all joints tender/painful). LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants with baseline TJC \> 0.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender Joint Count (TJC) Scores-3.9 Tender Joint CountStandard Error 0.79
80 mg Q4W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender Joint Count (TJC) Scores-4.8 Tender Joint CountStandard Error 0.69
80 mg Q2W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender Joint Count (TJC) Scores-5.0 Tender Joint CountStandard Error 0.79
p-value: 0.36295% CI: [-3, 1.1]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.30395% CI: [-3.3, 1]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Score

The SPARCC enthesitis is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis. The SPARCC assesses 16 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include Medial epicondyle (left/right \[L/R\]), Lateral epicondyle (L/R), Supraspinatus insertion into greater tuberosity of humerus (L/R), Greater trochanter (L/R), Quadriceps insertion into superior border of patella (L/R), Patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tubercle (L/R), Achilles tendon insertion into calcaneum (L/R), and Plantar fascia insertion into calcaneum (L/R). The SPARCC is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 16). Higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants with baseline SPARCC Enthesitis score \> 0.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Score-1.9 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.44
80 mg Q4W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Score-2.3 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
80 mg Q2W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Score-1.8 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
p-value: 0.50495% CI: [-1.6, 0.8]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.8695% CI: [-1.1, 1.3]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score

The fatigue severity NRS is a participant administered single-item 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no fatigue and 10 representing as bad as you can imagine. Participants rate their fatigue (feeling tired or worn out) by circling the 1 number that describes their worst level of fatigue during the previous 24 hours. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score-0.7 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
80 mg Q4W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score-2.0 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
80 mg Q2W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score-1.7 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.9, -0.6]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.00595% CI: [-1.6, -0.3]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ)

The Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ) is a 4 item scale designed to estimate sleep problems in clinical research. The JSEQ assesses the frequency of sleep disturbance in 4 categories: 1) trouble falling asleep, 2) waking up several times during the night, 3) having trouble staying asleep (including waking up far too early), and 4) waking up after the usual amount of sleep feeling tired and worn out. Patients report the numbers of days they experience each of these problems in the past month on a 6 point Likert Scale ranging from 0 = no days to 5 = 22-30 days. The total JSEQ score ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater sleep disturbance. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ)-1.8 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
80 mg Q4W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ)-3.0 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.48
80 mg Q2W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ)-2.4 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.52
p-value: 0.08895% CI: [-2.5, 0.2]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.36695% CI: [-2, 0.7]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

High sensitivity CRP is the measure of acute phase reactant. It was measured with a high sensitivity assay at the central laboratory to help assess the effect of ixekizumab on disease activity. High sensitivity CRP is a sensitive laboratory assay for serum levels of C-Reactive Protein, which is a biomarker of inflammation. LS mean was determined by MMRM with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP)9.719 milligram per liter (mg/L)Standard Error 2.7383
80 mg Q4W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP)-11.096 milligram per liter (mg/L)Standard Error 2.619
80 mg Q2W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP)-8.121 milligram per liter (mg/L)Standard Error 2.8829
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-28.187, -13.444]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-25.518, -10.163]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores

The WPAI-SpA consists of 6 questions to determine employment status, hours missed from work because of SpA, hours missed from work for other reasons, hours actually worked, the degree to which SpA affected work productivity while at work, and the degree to which SpA affected activities outside of work. The WPAI-SpA has been validated in the rad-axSpA patient population. Four scores are derived: percentage of absenteeism, percentage of presenteeism (reduced productivity while at work), an overall work impairment score that combines absenteeism and presenteeism, and percentage of impairment in activities performed outside of work. The computed percentage range for each sub-scale was from 0-100, with higher scores indicating greater impairment and less productivity. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, number of prior TNFi and baseline value as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants with baseline and week 16 WPAI-SpA score.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresOverall Work Impairment Score-9.84 Units on a scaleStandard Error 3.733
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresPercentage of Activity Impairment-10.1 Units on a scaleStandard Error 2.6
80 mg Q4W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresOverall Work Impairment Score-20.97 Units on a scaleStandard Error 4.016
80 mg Q4W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresPercentage of Activity Impairment-16.5 Units on a scaleStandard Error 2.44
80 mg Q2W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresPercentage of Activity Impairment-18.4 Units on a scaleStandard Error 2.74
80 mg Q2W IxekizumabChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresOverall Work Impairment Score-23.50 Units on a scaleStandard Error 4.225
Comparison: Overall Work Impairment Scorep-value: 0.03895% CI: [-21.65, -0.6]ANCOVA
Comparison: Overall Work Impairment Scorep-value: 0.01295% CI: [-24.23, -3.1]ANCOVA
Comparison: Percentage of Activity Impairmentp-value: 0.07195% CI: [-13.2, 0.5]ANCOVA
Comparison: Percentage of Activity Impairmentp-value: 0.02495% CI: [-15.5, -1.1]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS20 Response

ASAS20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement and an absolute improvement from baseline of ≥1 units (range 0 to 10) in ≥3 of 4 domains, and no worsening of ≥20% and ≥1 unit (range 0 to 10) in the remaining domain. 1. Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis on average during the last week? score ranges 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). 2. Spinal Pain: How much Pain of your spine due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). 3. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI): Participant asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participant response was captured using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. 4. Inflammation based on Q5 & Q6 mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) (mean of intensity & duration of stiffness): Score ranges from 0 (none) and 10 (very severe).

Time frame: Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS20 Response29.8 Percentage of Participants
80 mg Q4W IxekizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS20 Response48.2 Percentage of Participants
80 mg Q2W IxekizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS20 Response46.9 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.00695% CI: [1.26, 3.84]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.01395% CI: [1.16, 3.73]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS <2.1

ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. ASDAS \<2.1 defines moderate disease activity. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are 1. Total back pain 2. Patient global 3. Peripheral pain/swelling 4. Duration of morning stiffness and 5. CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness+0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher the score worse the disease activity.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS <2.14.8 Percentage of Participants
80 mg Q4W IxekizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS <2.117.5 Percentage of Participants
80 mg Q2W IxekizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS <2.116.3 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.00695% CI: [1.5, 11.86]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.00695% CI: [1.55, 13.18]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Inactive Disease

ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. ASDAS Inactive Disease is defined as a score of \<1.3. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are 1. Total back pain 2. Patient global 3. Peripheral pain/swelling 4. Duration of morning stiffness and 5. CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness+0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher the score worse the disease activity.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Inactive Disease1.0 Percentage of Participants
80 mg Q4W IxekizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Inactive Disease3.5 Percentage of Participants
80 mg Q2W IxekizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Inactive Disease5.1 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.24295% CI: [0.41, 33.98]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.12795% CI: [0.62, 47.54]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) Response

The BASDAI is a participant-reported assessment consisting of 6 questions that relate to 5 major symptoms relevant to radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (rad-axSpA): 1) Fatigue, 2) Spinal pain, 3) Peripheral arthritis, 4) Enthesitis, 5) Intensity, and 6) Duration of morning stiffness. Participants need to score each item with a score from 0 to 10 (NRS). Total score is obtained from the average of symptom scores ranging 0 (no problem) to 10 (worst problem), with a higher score indicating more severe AS symptom. BASDAI50 represents an improvement of ≥50% of the BASDAI score from baseline.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) Response9.6 Percentage of Participants
80 mg Q4W IxekizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) Response21.9 Percentage of Participants
80 mg Q2W IxekizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) Response23.5 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.01595% CI: [1.21, 5.84]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.0195% CI: [1.29, 6.49]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Anterior Uveitis

Anterior uveitis is an inflammation of the middle layer of the eye. which includes the iris (colored part of the eye) and the adjacent tissue, known as the ciliary body.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Anterior Uveitis0 Percentage of Participants
80 mg Q4W IxekizumabPercentage of Participants With Anterior Uveitis1.8 Percentage of Participants
80 mg Q2W IxekizumabPercentage of Participants With Anterior Uveitis3.1 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies

A treatment emergent - antidrug antibody (TE-ADA) positive patient is defined as: a) a patient with a \>= 4-fold increase over a positive baseline antibody titer; or b) for a negative baseline titer, a patient with an increase from the baseline to a level of \>= 1:10. Percentage was calculated based on the number of evaluable participants and was calculated by number of participants with treatment-emergent positive anti-ixekizumab antibodies / number of evaluable participants \* 100%.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies2.9 Percentage of Participants
80 mg Q4W IxekizumabPercentage of Participants With Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies7.1 Percentage of Participants
80 mg Q2W IxekizumabPercentage of Participants With Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies4.1 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Ixekizumab Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Steady-state trough serum concentration of Ixekizumab at week 16.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: All randomized participants who received study drug and have evaluable PK data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Ixekizumab Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)2.10 Microgram per milliliters (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 106
80 mg Q4W IxekizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Ixekizumab Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)2.47 Microgram per milliliters (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 101
80 mg Q2W IxekizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Ixekizumab Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)6.27 Microgram per milliliters (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 158
80 mg Q2W Ixekizumab (Starting Dose 160 mg)Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Ixekizumab Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)8.52 Microgram per milliliters (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 50

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026