Skip to content

A Study of Ixekizumab (LY2439821) in bDMARD-Naive Participants With Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active and Placebo-Controlled 16-Week Study Followed by Long-Term Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Ixekizumab (LY2439821) in bDMARD-Naive Patients With Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02696785
Acronym
COAST-V
Enrollment
341
Registered
2016-03-02
Start date
2016-05-02
Completion date
2018-10-17
Last updated
2019-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spondyloarthritis

Keywords

Ankylosing Spondylitis

Brief summary

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the study drug known as ixekizumab in biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs)-naive participants with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (rad-axSpA).

Interventions

DRUGIxekizumab

Administered SC

DRUGPlacebo

Administered SC

DRUGAdalimumab

Administered SC

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Are ambulatory. * Diagnosis of radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (rad-xSpA) with sacroiliitis defined radiographically according to the modified New York criteria. * Participants have a history of back pain ≥3 months with age at onset \<45 years. * In the past had an inadequate response to at least 2 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (for duration 4 weeks) or cannot tolerate NSAIDS. * If taking NSAIDS be on a stable dose for at least 2 weeks prior to randomization. * Have a history of prior therapy for axSpa for at least 12 weeks prior to screening.

Exclusion criteria

* Have total ankylosis of the spine. * Have received any prior, or are currently receiving, treatment with biologics, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors or other immunomodulatory agents. * Have recently received a live vaccine within 12 weeks or have had a vaccination with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) within the past year. * Have an ongoing or serious infection within the last 12 weeks or evidence of active tuberculosis. * Have a compromised immune system. * Have any other serious and/or uncontrolled diseases. * Have either a current diagnosis or a recent history of malignant disease. * Have had major surgery within 8 weeks of baseline, or will require surgery during the study. * Are pregnant or breastfeeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) ResponseWeek 16ASAS40 is defined as improvement from baseline of greater than or equal to (\>=) 40% and absolute improvement from baseline of at least 2 units in at least 3 of the following 4 domains without any worsening in the remaining domains. 1. Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis on average during the last week? score range 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). 2. Spinal Pain: How much Pain of your spine due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). 3. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index: Participant is asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participants response is captured using numeric rating scale (NRS) scale (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. 4. Inflammation based on Q5 & Q6 mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) (mean of intensity & duration of stiffness): Score ranges from 0 (none) and 10 (very severe).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)Baseline, Week 16ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are the following: 1. Total back pain 2. Patient global 3. Peripheral pain/swelling 4. Duration of morning stiffness 5. CRP in mg/L The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121 × total back pain + 0.110 × patient global + 0.073 × peripheral pain/swelling + 0.058 × duration of morning stiffness + 0.579 × Ln(CRP+1). CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0 to 10.Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. Ln represents the natural logarithm. Least Square (LS) Mean was calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) ResponseWeek 16The BASDAI is a participant-reported assessment consisting of 6 questions that relate to 5 major symptoms relevant to radiographic axial spondyloarthritis measuring discomfort, pain, and fatigue. 1) Fatigue, 2) Spinal pain, 3) Peripheral arthritis, 4) Enthesitis, 5) Intensity, and 6) Duration of morning stiffness. participants need to score each item with a score from 0 to 10 (NRS). total score is obtained from the average of symptom scores ranging 0 (no problem) to 10 (worst problem). BASDAI50 represents an improvement of ≥50% of the BASDAI score from baseline.
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)Baseline, Week 16The BASFI is a participant-reported assessment that establishes a participants functional baseline and subsequent response to treatment. To complete the BASFI, a participant is asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participants respond to each question using an NRS scale (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. The participants final BASFI score is the mean of the 10 item scores has a possible minimum value of 0 and a possible maximum value of 10, with a higher score indicating worse function. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Inactive DiseaseWeek 16ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are the following: 1. Total back pain 2. Patient global 3. Peripheral pain/swelling 4. Duration of morning stiffness 5. CRP in mg/L The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121 × total back pain + 0.110 × patient global + 0.073 × peripheral pain/swelling + 0.058 × duration of morning stiffness + 0.579 × Ln(CRP+1). CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0 to 10.Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. Ln represents the natural logarithm. ASDAS Inactive Disease is defined as a score of \<1.3.
Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging [ASSpiMRI] - Berlin Score)Baseline, Week 16The Berlin modification of Ankylosing Spondylitis spine MRI score for activity (ASspiMRI) scoring technique assesses inflammation in each of 23 disco-vertebral units (DVU). All 23 disco-vertebral units (DVU) of the spine (from C2 to S1) are scored for bone marrow edema. Scores for each DVU range from 0-3 (0=normal; 1=minor bone marrow edema \[less than or equal to 25% of DVU; 3=severe bone marrow edema (more that 50% of DVU)\]. The composite score ranges from 0 to 69, with higher scores reflecting worse disease. Least Squares (LS) Mean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status and baseline value as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) ScoresBaseline, Week 16The SF-36 is a 36-item participant administered measure designed to be a short, multipurpose assessment of health in the areas of physical functioning, role - physical, role - emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. The 2 overarching domains of mental well- being and physical well-being are captured by the Mental Component Summary and Physical Component Summary scores. T-scores are used for analysis. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI)Baseline, Week 16ASAS HI is a disease-specific health-index instrument designed to assess the impact of interventions for SpA, including axSpA. The 17-item instrument has scores ranging from 0 (good health) to 17 (poor health). Each item consists of one question that the participant needs to respond to with either I agree (score of 1) or I do not agree (score of 0). A score of 1 is given where the item is affirmed, indicating adverse health. All item scores are summed to give a total score or index. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors
Change From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP)Baseline, Week 16High sensitivity CRP is the measure of acute phase reactant. It will be measured with a high sensitivity assay at the central laboratory to help assess the effect of Ixekizumab on disease activity. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in Mobility on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)Baseline, Week 16The BASMI is a combined index comprising the following 5 clinical measurements of spinal mobility in participants with rad-axSpA. 1. Lateral spinal flexion 2. Tragus-to-wall distance 3. Lumbar flexion (modified Schrober) 4. Maximal intermalleolar distance 5. Cervical rotation. The BASMI includes these 5 measurements that are each scaled to a score of 0 to 10 depending on the result of the assessment (BASMI linear function). The average score of the 5 assessments gives the BASMI linear result. The higher the BASMI score the more severe the participants limitation of movement due to their AS. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in Chest ExpansionBaseline, Week 16While participants have their hands resting on or behind the head, the assessor has measured the chest's encircled length by centimeter at the fourth intercostal level anteriorly. The difference between maximal inspiration and expiration in centimeters was recorded. Two tries were recorded. The better measurement (larger difference) of 2 tries (in centimeters) was used for analyses. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in Occiput to Wall DistanceBaseline, Week 16The participant is to make a maximum effort to touch the head against the wall when standing with heels and back against the wall (occiput). Then the distance from occiput to wall is measured. Two tries will be recorded. The better (smaller) measurement of 2 tries (in centimeters) will be used for analyses. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in MRI Sacroiliac Joint(s) (SIJ) Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) ScoreBaseline, Week 16Both left and right SIJ are scored for bone marrow edema.Each side has 6 slices and each slice has 6 scoring units, and each scoring unit has a score of 0 or 1. Total SIJ SPARCC scores can range from 0 to 72 with higher scores reflecting worse disease. LSMean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status and baseline value as fixed factors.
Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS20 ResponseWeek 16ASAS20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement and an absolute improvement from baseline of ≥1 units in ≥3 of 4 following domains and no worsening of ≥20% and ≥1 unit (range 0 to 10) in the remaining domain. 1. Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis on average during the last week? score range 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). 2. Spinal Pain: How much Pain of your spine due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). 3. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index: Participant is asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participants response is captured using NRS scale (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. 4. Inflammation based on Q5 & Q6 mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) (mean of intensity & duration of stiffness): Score ranges from 0 (none) and 10 (very severe).
Change From Baseline in SPARCC Enthesitis ScoreBaseline, Week 16The SPARCC enthesitis is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis. The SPARCC assesses 16 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include Medial epicondyle (left/right \[L/R\]), Lateral epicondyle (L/R), Supraspinatus insertion into greater tuberosity of humerus (L/R), Greater trochanter (L/R), Quadriceps insertion into superior border of patella (L/R), Patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tubercle (L/R), Achilles tendon insertion into calcaneum (L/R), and Plantar fascia insertion into calcaneum (L/R). The SPARCC is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 16). Higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender (TJC)Baseline, Week 16The number of tender and painful joints was determined by examination of 46 joints (23 joints on each side of the participants body. The 46 joints are assessed and classified as tender or not tender. sum of all joints checked to be tender/painful divided by number of evaluable joints which is multiplied by 46 to obtain TJC score. The scores ranges from 0 (no tender/painful joints) to 46 (all joints tender/painful). LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Number of Participants With Anterior Uveitis or Uveitis FlaresBaseline through Week 16Anterior uveitis is an inflammation of the middle layer of the eye which includes the iris (colored part of the eye) and the adjacent tissue, known as the ciliary body.
Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ScoreBaseline, Week 16The Fatigue Severity NRS is a participant-administered, single-item, 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no fatigue and 10 representing as bad as you can imagine. Participants rate their fatigue (feeling tired or worn out) by circling the one number that describes their worst level of fatigue during the previous 24 hours. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ)Baseline, Week 16The JSEQ is a 4-item scale designed to estimate sleep problems in clinical research. The JSEQ assesses the frequency of sleep disturbance in 4 categories: 1) trouble falling asleep, 2) waking up several times during the night, 3) having trouble staying asleep (including waking up far too early), and 4) waking up after the usual amount of sleep feeling tired and worn out. Participants report the number of days they experience each of these problems in the past month on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = no days to 5 = 22-30 days. The total JSEQ score ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater sleep disturbance. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresBaseline, Week 16The WPAI-SpA consists of 6 questions to determine employment status, hours missed from work because of SpA, hours missed from work for other reasons, hours actually worked, the degree to which SpA affected work productivity while at work, and the degree to which SpA affected activities outside of work. The WPAI-SpA has been validated in the rad-axSpA patient population. Four scores are derived: percentage of absenteeism, percentage of presenteeism (reduced productivity while at work), an overall work impairment score that combines absenteeism and presenteeism, and percentage of impairment in activities performed outside of work. The computed percentage range for each sub-scale was from 0-100. Greater scores indicate greater impairment and less productivity. LSMean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status and baseline value as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in ASAS-Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) ScoreBaseline, Week 52ASAS-NSAID score is used to present the NSAID intake by considering the type of NSAID, the total dose, & the number of days taking NSAID during a period of interest (PI).. ASAS-NSAID score=(equivalent NSAID score)x(days of intake during PI)x(days per week)/(PI in days). Higher scores indicate greater NSAIDs intake. 0= no intake, 100 = equivalent NSAID intake.
Number of Participants With Anti Ixekizumab AntibodiesWeek 16A treatment emergent - antidrug antibody (TE-ADA) positive patient is defined as: a) a patient with a \>= 4-fold increase over a positive baseline antibody titer; or b) for a negative baseline titer, a patient with an increase from the baseline to a level of \>= 1:10.
Pharmacokinetics: Trough Ixekizumab Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)Week 16
Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC)Baseline, Week 16The number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 44 joints (22 joints on each side of the participants body. The 44 joints are assessed and classified as swollen or not swollen. sum of all joints checked to be swollen divided by number of evaluable joints and then multiplied by 44 to obtain SJC score. The SJC score ranges from 0 (no swollen joints) to 44 (all joints swollen). LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] Score)Baseline, Week 16MRI score of spine was assessed using SPARCC method. All 23 disco-vertebral units (DVUs) of the spine (from C2 to S1) are scored for bone marrow edema. A single DVU has a scoring range of 0 to 18, bringing the maximum total score to 414, with higher scores reflecting worse disease. Scoring was performed by central readers. LSMean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status and baseline value as fixed factors
Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES)Baseline, Week 16The MASES is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis .The MASES assesses 13 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include costochondral 1 (right/left), costochondral 7 (right/left), spinal iliaca anterior superior (right/left), crista iliaca (right/left), spina iliaca posterior (right/left), processus spinosus L5, and Achilles tendon proximal insertion (right/left). The MASES is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 13); higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Countries

Czechia, Germany, Japan, Netherlands, South Korea, Taiwan, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Blinded treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16), followed by extended treatment period (Week 16 to Week 52), followed by post treatment period for a maximum of 24 weeks. Washout period occurred for only Adalimumab group for 6 weeks (Week 14 to Week 20).

Pre-assignment details

Participants who completed study were eligible to enroll into a long-term study (Study I1F-MC-RHBY \[RHBY\]) for up to 2 additional years. Participants that do not enroll into study RHBY will complete the Post-Treatment Follow-Up Period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PBO/IXE
Participants received placebo every two weeks by subcutaneous injection during blinded treatment period and 80mg Ixekizumab either Q2W or Q4W by subcutaneous injection during extension treatment period.
86
ADA/IXE
Participants received 40mg Adalimumab every two weeks by SC injection during blinded treatment period and 80mg Ixekizumab either Q2W or Q4W by SC injection during extension treatment period.
90
IXE80Q2W/IXE80Q2W
Participants received starting dose of either 80 milligrams (mg) or 160mg Ixekizumab at week 0 followed by 80mg Ixekizumab every two weeks by subcutaneous injection during blinded & extension treatment period.
83
IXE80Q4W/IXE80Q4W
Participants received starting dose of either 80 milligrams (mg) or 160mg Ixekizumab at week 0 followed by 80mg Ixekizumab every four weeks by subcutaneous injection during blinded & extension treatment period.
81
Total340

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Blinded Treatment PeriodAdverse Event0130
Blinded Treatment PeriodLack of Efficacy0001
Blinded Treatment PeriodScreen Failure1000
Blinded Treatment PeriodWithdrawal by Subject0112
Extended Treatment PeriodAdverse Event2321
Extended Treatment PeriodLack of Efficacy0100
Extended Treatment PeriodWithdrawal by Subject1235
Follow-up PeriodAdverse Event0082
Follow-up PeriodLack of Efficacy0001
Follow-up PeriodLost to Follow-up0001
Follow-up PeriodWithdrawal by Subject1054
Washout PeriodLack of Efficacy0100
Washout PeriodWithdrawal by Subject0100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPBO/IXETotalIXE80Q4W/IXE80Q4WIXE80Q2W/IXE80Q2WADA/IXE
Age, Continuous42.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.01
41.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.66
41.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.13
41.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.17
41.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.44
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
11 Participants34 Participants8 Participants8 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
67 Participants275 Participants66 Participants68 Participants74 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
8 Participants31 Participants7 Participants7 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
4 Participants14 Participants4 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
28 Participants107 Participants25 Participants25 Participants29 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants6 Participants0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
52 Participants213 Participants52 Participants52 Participants57 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
2 Participants9 Participants2 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
14 Participants54 Participants13 Participants13 Participants14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
0 Participants3 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
3 Participants10 Participants3 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
3 Participants7 Participants1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
8 Participants30 Participants7 Participants8 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
0 Participants4 Participants0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
16 Participants62 Participants16 Participants15 Participants15 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
12 Participants48 Participants12 Participants11 Participants13 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
10 Participants47 Participants11 Participants12 Participants14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
13 Participants51 Participants13 Participants13 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
5 Participants15 Participants3 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants64 Participants13 Participants19 Participants17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
71 Participants276 Participants68 Participants64 Participants73 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
EG010
affected / at risk
EG011
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 860 / 900 / 830 / 810 / 880 / 860 / 860 / 790 / 780 / 10 / 240 / 16
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 8616 / 9018 / 8311 / 818 / 8826 / 8620 / 8621 / 7914 / 781 / 12 / 242 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 863 / 901 / 831 / 810 / 884 / 867 / 863 / 794 / 780 / 10 / 240 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) Response

ASAS40 is defined as improvement from baseline of greater than or equal to (\>=) 40% and absolute improvement from baseline of at least 2 units in at least 3 of the following 4 domains without any worsening in the remaining domains. 1. Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis on average during the last week? score range 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). 2. Spinal Pain: How much Pain of your spine due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). 3. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index: Participant is asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participants response is captured using numeric rating scale (NRS) scale (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. 4. Inflammation based on Q5 & Q6 mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) (mean of intensity & duration of stiffness): Score ranges from 0 (none) and 10 (very severe).

Time frame: Week 16

Population: All Randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) Response18.4 percentage of participants
AdalimumabPercentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) Response35.6 percentage of participants
IXE80Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) Response48.1 percentage of participants
IXE80Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) Response51.8 percentage of participants
Comparison: Overall Work Impairment Scorep-value: 0.00595% CI: [1.35, 5.52]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Overall Work Impairment Score.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.2, 9.03]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Overall Work Impairment Score.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.52, 10.28]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Percentage of Activity Impairmentp-value: <0.00195% CI: [-13.2, -0.7]ANCOVA
Comparison: Percentage of Activity Impairmentp-value: <0.00195% CI: [-15.5, -3]ANCOVA
Comparison: Percentage of Activity Impairmentp-value: <0.00195% CI: [-15.2, -2.5]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores

The SF-36 is a 36-item participant administered measure designed to be a short, multipurpose assessment of health in the areas of physical functioning, role - physical, role - emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. The 2 overarching domains of mental well- being and physical well-being are captured by the Mental Component Summary and Physical Component Summary scores. T-scores are used for analysis. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) ScoresPCS3.6432 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.753
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) ScoresMCS2.1229 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.8431
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) ScoresMCS2.5550 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.8225
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) ScoresPCS6.9005 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.731
IXE80Q4WChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) ScoresPCS7.6952 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.7768
IXE80Q4WChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) ScoresMCS2.7502 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.8763
IXE80Q2WChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) ScoresPCS7.9686 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.7665
IXE80Q2WChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) ScoresMCS2.5696 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.865
Comparison: PCSp-value: 0.00295% CI: [1.2041, 5.3106]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: PCSp-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.9432, 6.1608]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: PCSp-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.2321, 6.4186]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: MCSp-value: 0.71395% CI: [-1.8732, 2.7373]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: MCSp-value: 0.60295% CI: [-1.7387, 2.9934]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: MCSp-value: 0.70995% CI: [-1.9097, 2.803]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)

ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are the following: 1. Total back pain 2. Patient global 3. Peripheral pain/swelling 4. Duration of morning stiffness 5. CRP in mg/L The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121 × total back pain + 0.110 × patient global + 0.073 × peripheral pain/swelling + 0.058 × duration of morning stiffness + 0.579 × Ln(CRP+1). CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0 to 10.Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. Ln represents the natural logarithm. Least Square (LS) Mean was calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)-0.46 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.099
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)-1.30 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.096
IXE80Q4WChange From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)-1.43 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.102
IXE80Q2WChange From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)-1.37 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.101
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.11, -0.57]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.25, -0.7]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.18, -0.63]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI)

ASAS HI is a disease-specific health-index instrument designed to assess the impact of interventions for SpA, including axSpA. The 17-item instrument has scores ranging from 0 (good health) to 17 (poor health). Each item consists of one question that the participant needs to respond to with either I agree (score of 1) or I do not agree (score of 0). A score of 1 is given where the item is affirmed, indicating adverse health. All item scores are summed to give a total score or index. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI)-1.25 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI)-2.30 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.292
IXE80Q4WChange From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI)-2.36 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.311
IXE80Q2WChange From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI)-2.74 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.306
p-value: 0.01295% CI: [-1.87, -0.23]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.0195% CI: [-1.95, -0.27]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.32, -0.66]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in ASAS-Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Score

ASAS-NSAID score is used to present the NSAID intake by considering the type of NSAID, the total dose, & the number of days taking NSAID during a period of interest (PI).. ASAS-NSAID score=(equivalent NSAID score)x(days of intake during PI)x(days per week)/(PI in days). Higher scores indicate greater NSAIDs intake. 0= no intake, 100 = equivalent NSAID intake.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Participants in Extended Treatment Period Population Who had NSAID Intake at Baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in ASAS-Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Score-10.28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.472
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in ASAS-Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Score-5.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.861
IXE80Q4WChange From Baseline in ASAS-Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Score-7.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.43
IXE80Q2WChange From Baseline in ASAS-Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Score-9.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.94
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)

The BASFI is a participant-reported assessment that establishes a participants functional baseline and subsequent response to treatment. To complete the BASFI, a participant is asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participants respond to each question using an NRS scale (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. The participants final BASFI score is the mean of the 10 item scores has a possible minimum value of 0 and a possible maximum value of 10, with a higher score indicating worse function. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)-1.16 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.215
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)-2.14 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.209
IXE80Q4WChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)-2.39 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.222
IXE80Q2WChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)-2.43 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.219
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-1.56, -0.39]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.83, -0.62]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.86, -0.67]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion

While participants have their hands resting on or behind the head, the assessor has measured the chest's encircled length by centimeter at the fourth intercostal level anteriorly. The difference between maximal inspiration and expiration in centimeters was recorded. Two tries were recorded. The better measurement (larger difference) of 2 tries (in centimeters) was used for analyses. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All Randomized Participants.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Chest Expansion0.06 Centimeters (cm)Standard Error 0.152
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Chest Expansion0.70 Centimeters (cm)Standard Error 0.148
IXE80Q4WChange From Baseline in Chest Expansion0.49 Centimeters (cm)Standard Error 0.158
IXE80Q2WChange From Baseline in Chest Expansion0.67 Centimeters (cm)Standard Error 0.155
p-value: 0.00395% CI: [0.22, 1.05]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.05195% CI: [0, 0.86]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.00595% CI: [0.18, 1.03]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES)

The MASES is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis .The MASES assesses 13 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include costochondral 1 (right/left), costochondral 7 (right/left), spinal iliaca anterior superior (right/left), crista iliaca (right/left), spina iliaca posterior (right/left), processus spinosus L5, and Achilles tendon proximal insertion (right/left). The MASES is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 13); higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants with baseline MASES score \> 0.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES)-2.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES)-2.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
IXE80Q4WChange From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES)-2.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
IXE80Q2WChange From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES)-2.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
p-value: 0.31795% CI: [-1.4, 0.5]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.68395% CI: [-1.1, 0.8]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.595% CI: [-1.3, 0.6]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging [ASSpiMRI] - Berlin Score)

The Berlin modification of Ankylosing Spondylitis spine MRI score for activity (ASspiMRI) scoring technique assesses inflammation in each of 23 disco-vertebral units (DVU). All 23 disco-vertebral units (DVU) of the spine (from C2 to S1) are scored for bone marrow edema. Scores for each DVU range from 0-3 (0=normal; 1=minor bone marrow edema \[less than or equal to 25% of DVU; 3=severe bone marrow edema (more that 50% of DVU)\]. The composite score ranges from 0 to 69, with higher scores reflecting worse disease. Least Squares (LS) Mean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status and baseline value as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants with baseline and week 16 Berlin score.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging [ASSpiMRI] - Berlin Score)-0.15 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.323
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging [ASSpiMRI] - Berlin Score)-2.92 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.314
IXE80Q4WChange From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging [ASSpiMRI] - Berlin Score)-2.77 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.328
IXE80Q2WChange From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging [ASSpiMRI] - Berlin Score)-2.54 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-3.7, -1.9]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-3.5, -1.7]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-3.3, -1.5]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] Score)

MRI score of spine was assessed using SPARCC method. All 23 disco-vertebral units (DVUs) of the spine (from C2 to S1) are scored for bone marrow edema. A single DVU has a scoring range of 0 to 18, bringing the maximum total score to 414, with higher scores reflecting worse disease. Scoring was performed by central readers. LSMean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status and baseline value as fixed factors

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants with baseline and week 16 SPARCC MRI score for spine.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] Score)-1.51 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.147
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] Score)-11.57 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.113
IXE80Q4WChange From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] Score)-11.02 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.16
IXE80Q2WChange From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] Score)-9.58 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.168
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-13.2, -6.9]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-12.6, -6.4]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-11.2, -4.9]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mobility on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)

The BASMI is a combined index comprising the following 5 clinical measurements of spinal mobility in participants with rad-axSpA. 1. Lateral spinal flexion 2. Tragus-to-wall distance 3. Lumbar flexion (modified Schrober) 4. Maximal intermalleolar distance 5. Cervical rotation. The BASMI includes these 5 measurements that are each scaled to a score of 0 to 10 depending on the result of the assessment (BASMI linear function). The average score of the 5 assessments gives the BASMI linear result. The higher the BASMI score the more severe the participants limitation of movement due to their AS. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mobility on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)-0.080 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.0826
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Mobility on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)-0.447 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
IXE80Q4WChange From Baseline in Mobility on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)-0.502 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.0858
IXE80Q2WChange From Baseline in Mobility on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)-0.408 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.084
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-0.592, -0.142]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.655, -0.189]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.00595% CI: [-0.558, -0.099]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in MRI Sacroiliac Joint(s) (SIJ) Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Score

Both left and right SIJ are scored for bone marrow edema.Each side has 6 slices and each slice has 6 scoring units, and each scoring unit has a score of 0 or 1. Total SIJ SPARCC scores can range from 0 to 72 with higher scores reflecting worse disease. LSMean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status and baseline value as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants with baseline and week 16 SPARCC score.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in MRI Sacroiliac Joint(s) (SIJ) Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Score0.92 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.582
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in MRI Sacroiliac Joint(s) (SIJ) Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Score-4.21 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.568
IXE80Q4WChange From Baseline in MRI Sacroiliac Joint(s) (SIJ) Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Score-3.97 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.59
IXE80Q2WChange From Baseline in MRI Sacroiliac Joint(s) (SIJ) Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Score-4.25 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.591
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-6.7, -3.5]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-6.5, -3.3]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-6.8, -3.6]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance

The participant is to make a maximum effort to touch the head against the wall when standing with heels and back against the wall (occiput). Then the distance from occiput to wall is measured. Two tries will be recorded. The better (smaller) measurement of 2 tries (in centimeters) will be used for analyses. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance-0.06 cmStandard Error 0.232
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance-0.72 cmStandard Error 0.225
IXE80Q4WChange From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance-0.69 cmStandard Error 0.24
IXE80Q2WChange From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance-0.73 cmStandard Error 0.236
p-value: 0.03995% CI: [-1.3, -0.03]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.05795% CI: [-1.28, 0.02]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.04295% CI: [-1.31, -0.03]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC)

The number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 44 joints (22 joints on each side of the participants body. The 44 joints are assessed and classified as swollen or not swollen. sum of all joints checked to be swollen divided by number of evaluable joints and then multiplied by 44 to obtain SJC score. The SJC score ranges from 0 (no swollen joints) to 44 (all joints swollen). LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants with baseline SJC \> 0.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC)-1.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.55
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC)-2.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.53
IXE80Q4WChange From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC)-3.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.53
IXE80Q2WChange From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC)-2.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.57
p-value: 0.16695% CI: [-2.6, 0.4]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.01195% CI: [-3.4, -0.4]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.18295% CI: [-2.6, 0.5]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender (TJC)

The number of tender and painful joints was determined by examination of 46 joints (23 joints on each side of the participants body. The 46 joints are assessed and classified as tender or not tender. sum of all joints checked to be tender/painful divided by number of evaluable joints which is multiplied by 46 to obtain TJC score. The scores ranges from 0 (no tender/painful joints) to 46 (all joints tender/painful). LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants with baseline TJC \> 0.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender (TJC)-2.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.53
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender (TJC)-2.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.55
IXE80Q4WChange From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender (TJC)-2.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.58
IXE80Q2WChange From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender (TJC)-3.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.58
p-value: 0.78395% CI: [-1.7, 1.3]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.5595% CI: [-2, 1.1]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.09195% CI: [-2.8, 0.2]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in SPARCC Enthesitis Score

The SPARCC enthesitis is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis. The SPARCC assesses 16 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include Medial epicondyle (left/right \[L/R\]), Lateral epicondyle (L/R), Supraspinatus insertion into greater tuberosity of humerus (L/R), Greater trochanter (L/R), Quadriceps insertion into superior border of patella (L/R), Patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tubercle (L/R), Achilles tendon insertion into calcaneum (L/R), and Plantar fascia insertion into calcaneum (L/R). The SPARCC is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 16). Higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants with baseline SPARCC score \> 0.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in SPARCC Enthesitis Score-2.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in SPARCC Enthesitis Score-2.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
IXE80Q4WChange From Baseline in SPARCC Enthesitis Score-2.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
IXE80Q2WChange From Baseline in SPARCC Enthesitis Score-2.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
p-value: 0.15495% CI: [-1.9, 0.3]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: -0.695% CI: [-1.8, 0.5]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.39895% CI: [-1.6, 0.7]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score

The Fatigue Severity NRS is a participant-administered, single-item, 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no fatigue and 10 representing as bad as you can imagine. Participants rate their fatigue (feeling tired or worn out) by circling the one number that describes their worst level of fatigue during the previous 24 hours. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score-1.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score-2.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
IXE80Q4WChange From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score-2.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
IXE80Q2WChange From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score-2.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
p-value: 0.02795% CI: [-1.3, -0.1]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.00295% CI: [-1.7, -0.4]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.03595% CI: [-1.3, 0]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ)

The JSEQ is a 4-item scale designed to estimate sleep problems in clinical research. The JSEQ assesses the frequency of sleep disturbance in 4 categories: 1) trouble falling asleep, 2) waking up several times during the night, 3) having trouble staying asleep (including waking up far too early), and 4) waking up after the usual amount of sleep feeling tired and worn out. Participants report the number of days they experience each of these problems in the past month on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = no days to 5 = 22-30 days. The total JSEQ score ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater sleep disturbance. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ)-1.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ)-2.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
IXE80Q4WChange From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ)-2.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
IXE80Q2WChange From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ)-3.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.42
p-value: 0.04195% CI: [-2.3, 0]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.12595% CI: [-2.1, 0.3]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.01395% CI: [-2.6, -0.3]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

High sensitivity CRP is the measure of acute phase reactant. It will be measured with a high sensitivity assay at the central laboratory to help assess the effect of Ixekizumab on disease activity. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP)1.426 Milliragm per Litre (mg/mL)Standard Error 1.9244
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP)-7.202 Milliragm per Litre (mg/mL)Standard Error 1.8688
IXE80Q4WChange From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP)-5.209 Milliragm per Litre (mg/mL)Standard Error 1.9803
IXE80Q2WChange From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP)-6.565 Milliragm per Litre (mg/mL)Standard Error 1.9582
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-13.885, -3.371]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.01695% CI: [-12.033, -1.238]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.00495% CI: [-13.351, -2.631]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores

The WPAI-SpA consists of 6 questions to determine employment status, hours missed from work because of SpA, hours missed from work for other reasons, hours actually worked, the degree to which SpA affected work productivity while at work, and the degree to which SpA affected activities outside of work. The WPAI-SpA has been validated in the rad-axSpA patient population. Four scores are derived: percentage of absenteeism, percentage of presenteeism (reduced productivity while at work), an overall work impairment score that combines absenteeism and presenteeism, and percentage of impairment in activities performed outside of work. The computed percentage range for each sub-scale was from 0-100. Greater scores indicate greater impairment and less productivity. LSMean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status and baseline value as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresOverall Work Impairment Score-17.82 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.254
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresPercentage of Activity Impairment-14.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.28
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresPercentage of Activity Impairment-21.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.22
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresOverall Work Impairment Score-21.44 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.921
IXE80Q4WChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresOverall Work Impairment Score-21.36 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.061
IXE80Q4WChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresPercentage of Activity Impairment-23.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.35
IXE80Q2WChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresOverall Work Impairment Score-24.06 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.299
IXE80Q2WChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresPercentage of Activity Impairment-23.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.3
p-value: 0.98995% CI: [-6.03, 6.12]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.42995% CI: [-3.71, 8.7]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.09695% CI: [-11.92, 0.98]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Number of Participants With Anterior Uveitis or Uveitis Flares

Anterior uveitis is an inflammation of the middle layer of the eye which includes the iris (colored part of the eye) and the adjacent tissue, known as the ciliary body.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Anterior Uveitis or Uveitis Flares0 Count of Participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Anterior Uveitis or Uveitis Flares0 Count of Participants
IXE80Q4WNumber of Participants With Anterior Uveitis or Uveitis Flares1 Count of Participants
IXE80Q2WNumber of Participants With Anterior Uveitis or Uveitis Flares0 Count of Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Anti Ixekizumab Antibodies

A treatment emergent - antidrug antibody (TE-ADA) positive patient is defined as: a) a patient with a \>= 4-fold increase over a positive baseline antibody titer; or b) for a negative baseline titer, a patient with an increase from the baseline to a level of \>= 1:10.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Anti Ixekizumab Antibodies2 Participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Anti Ixekizumab Antibodies5 Participants
IXE80Q4WNumber of Participants With Anti Ixekizumab Antibodies2 Participants
IXE80Q2WNumber of Participants With Anti Ixekizumab Antibodies2 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS20 Response

ASAS20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement and an absolute improvement from baseline of ≥1 units in ≥3 of 4 following domains and no worsening of ≥20% and ≥1 unit (range 0 to 10) in the remaining domain. 1. Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis on average during the last week? score range 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). 2. Spinal Pain: How much Pain of your spine due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). 3. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index: Participant is asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participants response is captured using NRS scale (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. 4. Inflammation based on Q5 & Q6 mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) (mean of intensity & duration of stiffness): Score ranges from 0 (none) and 10 (very severe).

Time frame: Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS20 Response40.2 percentage of participants
AdalimumabPercentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS20 Response58.9 percentage of participants
IXE80Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS20 Response64.2 percentage of participants
IXE80Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS20 Response68.7 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.00795% CI: [1.25, 4.23]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [1.48, 5.24]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.79, 6.41]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Inactive Disease

ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are the following: 1. Total back pain 2. Patient global 3. Peripheral pain/swelling 4. Duration of morning stiffness 5. CRP in mg/L The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121 × total back pain + 0.110 × patient global + 0.073 × peripheral pain/swelling + 0.058 × duration of morning stiffness + 0.579 × Ln(CRP+1). CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0 to 10.Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. Ln represents the natural logarithm. ASDAS Inactive Disease is defined as a score of \<1.3.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Inactive Disease2.3 percentage of Participants
AdalimumabPercentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Inactive Disease15.6 percentage of Participants
IXE80Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Inactive Disease16.0 percentage of Participants
IXE80Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Inactive Disease10.8 percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.00995% CI: [1.67, 34.68]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.00795% CI: [1.75, 36.83]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.04195% CI: [1.07, 24.49]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) Response

The BASDAI is a participant-reported assessment consisting of 6 questions that relate to 5 major symptoms relevant to radiographic axial spondyloarthritis measuring discomfort, pain, and fatigue. 1) Fatigue, 2) Spinal pain, 3) Peripheral arthritis, 4) Enthesitis, 5) Intensity, and 6) Duration of morning stiffness. participants need to score each item with a score from 0 to 10 (NRS). total score is obtained from the average of symptom scores ranging 0 (no problem) to 10 (worst problem). BASDAI50 represents an improvement of ≥50% of the BASDAI score from baseline.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) Response17.2 percentage of participants
AdalimumabPercentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) Response32.2 percentage of participants
IXE80Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) Response42.0 percentage of participants
IXE80Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) Response43.4 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.01295% CI: [1.23, 5.21]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.82, 7.7]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.91, 7.98]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics: Trough Ixekizumab Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)

Time frame: Week 16

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of Ixekizumab.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPharmacokinetics: Trough Ixekizumab Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)3.56 microgram per millilitre (μg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 56
AdalimumabPharmacokinetics: Trough Ixekizumab Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)3.88 microgram per millilitre (μg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 55
IXE80Q4WPharmacokinetics: Trough Ixekizumab Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)11.6 microgram per millilitre (μg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 54
IXE80Q2WPharmacokinetics: Trough Ixekizumab Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)11.3 microgram per millilitre (μg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 43

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 3, 2026