Spondyloarthritis
Conditions
Keywords
Ankylosing Spondylitis
Brief summary
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the study drug known as ixekizumab in biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs)-naive participants with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (rad-axSpA).
Interventions
Administered SC
Administered SC
Administered SC
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Are ambulatory. * Diagnosis of radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (rad-xSpA) with sacroiliitis defined radiographically according to the modified New York criteria. * Participants have a history of back pain ≥3 months with age at onset \<45 years. * In the past had an inadequate response to at least 2 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (for duration 4 weeks) or cannot tolerate NSAIDS. * If taking NSAIDS be on a stable dose for at least 2 weeks prior to randomization. * Have a history of prior therapy for axSpa for at least 12 weeks prior to screening.
Exclusion criteria
* Have total ankylosis of the spine. * Have received any prior, or are currently receiving, treatment with biologics, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors or other immunomodulatory agents. * Have recently received a live vaccine within 12 weeks or have had a vaccination with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) within the past year. * Have an ongoing or serious infection within the last 12 weeks or evidence of active tuberculosis. * Have a compromised immune system. * Have any other serious and/or uncontrolled diseases. * Have either a current diagnosis or a recent history of malignant disease. * Have had major surgery within 8 weeks of baseline, or will require surgery during the study. * Are pregnant or breastfeeding.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) Response | Week 16 | ASAS40 is defined as improvement from baseline of greater than or equal to (\>=) 40% and absolute improvement from baseline of at least 2 units in at least 3 of the following 4 domains without any worsening in the remaining domains. 1. Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis on average during the last week? score range 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). 2. Spinal Pain: How much Pain of your spine due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). 3. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index: Participant is asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participants response is captured using numeric rating scale (NRS) scale (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. 4. Inflammation based on Q5 & Q6 mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) (mean of intensity & duration of stiffness): Score ranges from 0 (none) and 10 (very severe). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) | Baseline, Week 16 | ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are the following: 1. Total back pain 2. Patient global 3. Peripheral pain/swelling 4. Duration of morning stiffness 5. CRP in mg/L The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121 × total back pain + 0.110 × patient global + 0.073 × peripheral pain/swelling + 0.058 × duration of morning stiffness + 0.579 × Ln(CRP+1). CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0 to 10.Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. Ln represents the natural logarithm. Least Square (LS) Mean was calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) Response | Week 16 | The BASDAI is a participant-reported assessment consisting of 6 questions that relate to 5 major symptoms relevant to radiographic axial spondyloarthritis measuring discomfort, pain, and fatigue. 1) Fatigue, 2) Spinal pain, 3) Peripheral arthritis, 4) Enthesitis, 5) Intensity, and 6) Duration of morning stiffness. participants need to score each item with a score from 0 to 10 (NRS). total score is obtained from the average of symptom scores ranging 0 (no problem) to 10 (worst problem). BASDAI50 represents an improvement of ≥50% of the BASDAI score from baseline. |
| Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) | Baseline, Week 16 | The BASFI is a participant-reported assessment that establishes a participants functional baseline and subsequent response to treatment. To complete the BASFI, a participant is asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participants respond to each question using an NRS scale (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. The participants final BASFI score is the mean of the 10 item scores has a possible minimum value of 0 and a possible maximum value of 10, with a higher score indicating worse function. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Inactive Disease | Week 16 | ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are the following: 1. Total back pain 2. Patient global 3. Peripheral pain/swelling 4. Duration of morning stiffness 5. CRP in mg/L The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121 × total back pain + 0.110 × patient global + 0.073 × peripheral pain/swelling + 0.058 × duration of morning stiffness + 0.579 × Ln(CRP+1). CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0 to 10.Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. Ln represents the natural logarithm. ASDAS Inactive Disease is defined as a score of \<1.3. |
| Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging [ASSpiMRI] - Berlin Score) | Baseline, Week 16 | The Berlin modification of Ankylosing Spondylitis spine MRI score for activity (ASspiMRI) scoring technique assesses inflammation in each of 23 disco-vertebral units (DVU). All 23 disco-vertebral units (DVU) of the spine (from C2 to S1) are scored for bone marrow edema. Scores for each DVU range from 0-3 (0=normal; 1=minor bone marrow edema \[less than or equal to 25% of DVU; 3=severe bone marrow edema (more that 50% of DVU)\]. The composite score ranges from 0 to 69, with higher scores reflecting worse disease. Least Squares (LS) Mean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status and baseline value as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores | Baseline, Week 16 | The SF-36 is a 36-item participant administered measure designed to be a short, multipurpose assessment of health in the areas of physical functioning, role - physical, role - emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. The 2 overarching domains of mental well- being and physical well-being are captured by the Mental Component Summary and Physical Component Summary scores. T-scores are used for analysis. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI) | Baseline, Week 16 | ASAS HI is a disease-specific health-index instrument designed to assess the impact of interventions for SpA, including axSpA. The 17-item instrument has scores ranging from 0 (good health) to 17 (poor health). Each item consists of one question that the participant needs to respond to with either I agree (score of 1) or I do not agree (score of 0). A score of 1 is given where the item is affirmed, indicating adverse health. All item scores are summed to give a total score or index. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors |
| Change From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP) | Baseline, Week 16 | High sensitivity CRP is the measure of acute phase reactant. It will be measured with a high sensitivity assay at the central laboratory to help assess the effect of Ixekizumab on disease activity. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in Mobility on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) | Baseline, Week 16 | The BASMI is a combined index comprising the following 5 clinical measurements of spinal mobility in participants with rad-axSpA. 1. Lateral spinal flexion 2. Tragus-to-wall distance 3. Lumbar flexion (modified Schrober) 4. Maximal intermalleolar distance 5. Cervical rotation. The BASMI includes these 5 measurements that are each scaled to a score of 0 to 10 depending on the result of the assessment (BASMI linear function). The average score of the 5 assessments gives the BASMI linear result. The higher the BASMI score the more severe the participants limitation of movement due to their AS. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion | Baseline, Week 16 | While participants have their hands resting on or behind the head, the assessor has measured the chest's encircled length by centimeter at the fourth intercostal level anteriorly. The difference between maximal inspiration and expiration in centimeters was recorded. Two tries were recorded. The better measurement (larger difference) of 2 tries (in centimeters) was used for analyses. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance | Baseline, Week 16 | The participant is to make a maximum effort to touch the head against the wall when standing with heels and back against the wall (occiput). Then the distance from occiput to wall is measured. Two tries will be recorded. The better (smaller) measurement of 2 tries (in centimeters) will be used for analyses. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in MRI Sacroiliac Joint(s) (SIJ) Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Score | Baseline, Week 16 | Both left and right SIJ are scored for bone marrow edema.Each side has 6 slices and each slice has 6 scoring units, and each scoring unit has a score of 0 or 1. Total SIJ SPARCC scores can range from 0 to 72 with higher scores reflecting worse disease. LSMean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status and baseline value as fixed factors. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS20 Response | Week 16 | ASAS20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement and an absolute improvement from baseline of ≥1 units in ≥3 of 4 following domains and no worsening of ≥20% and ≥1 unit (range 0 to 10) in the remaining domain. 1. Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis on average during the last week? score range 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). 2. Spinal Pain: How much Pain of your spine due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). 3. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index: Participant is asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participants response is captured using NRS scale (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. 4. Inflammation based on Q5 & Q6 mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) (mean of intensity & duration of stiffness): Score ranges from 0 (none) and 10 (very severe). |
| Change From Baseline in SPARCC Enthesitis Score | Baseline, Week 16 | The SPARCC enthesitis is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis. The SPARCC assesses 16 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include Medial epicondyle (left/right \[L/R\]), Lateral epicondyle (L/R), Supraspinatus insertion into greater tuberosity of humerus (L/R), Greater trochanter (L/R), Quadriceps insertion into superior border of patella (L/R), Patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tubercle (L/R), Achilles tendon insertion into calcaneum (L/R), and Plantar fascia insertion into calcaneum (L/R). The SPARCC is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 16). Higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender (TJC) | Baseline, Week 16 | The number of tender and painful joints was determined by examination of 46 joints (23 joints on each side of the participants body. The 46 joints are assessed and classified as tender or not tender. sum of all joints checked to be tender/painful divided by number of evaluable joints which is multiplied by 46 to obtain TJC score. The scores ranges from 0 (no tender/painful joints) to 46 (all joints tender/painful). LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors. |
| Number of Participants With Anterior Uveitis or Uveitis Flares | Baseline through Week 16 | Anterior uveitis is an inflammation of the middle layer of the eye which includes the iris (colored part of the eye) and the adjacent tissue, known as the ciliary body. |
| Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score | Baseline, Week 16 | The Fatigue Severity NRS is a participant-administered, single-item, 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no fatigue and 10 representing as bad as you can imagine. Participants rate their fatigue (feeling tired or worn out) by circling the one number that describes their worst level of fatigue during the previous 24 hours. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ) | Baseline, Week 16 | The JSEQ is a 4-item scale designed to estimate sleep problems in clinical research. The JSEQ assesses the frequency of sleep disturbance in 4 categories: 1) trouble falling asleep, 2) waking up several times during the night, 3) having trouble staying asleep (including waking up far too early), and 4) waking up after the usual amount of sleep feeling tired and worn out. Participants report the number of days they experience each of these problems in the past month on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = no days to 5 = 22-30 days. The total JSEQ score ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater sleep disturbance. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores | Baseline, Week 16 | The WPAI-SpA consists of 6 questions to determine employment status, hours missed from work because of SpA, hours missed from work for other reasons, hours actually worked, the degree to which SpA affected work productivity while at work, and the degree to which SpA affected activities outside of work. The WPAI-SpA has been validated in the rad-axSpA patient population. Four scores are derived: percentage of absenteeism, percentage of presenteeism (reduced productivity while at work), an overall work impairment score that combines absenteeism and presenteeism, and percentage of impairment in activities performed outside of work. The computed percentage range for each sub-scale was from 0-100. Greater scores indicate greater impairment and less productivity. LSMean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status and baseline value as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in ASAS-Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Score | Baseline, Week 52 | ASAS-NSAID score is used to present the NSAID intake by considering the type of NSAID, the total dose, & the number of days taking NSAID during a period of interest (PI).. ASAS-NSAID score=(equivalent NSAID score)x(days of intake during PI)x(days per week)/(PI in days). Higher scores indicate greater NSAIDs intake. 0= no intake, 100 = equivalent NSAID intake. |
| Number of Participants With Anti Ixekizumab Antibodies | Week 16 | A treatment emergent - antidrug antibody (TE-ADA) positive patient is defined as: a) a patient with a \>= 4-fold increase over a positive baseline antibody titer; or b) for a negative baseline titer, a patient with an increase from the baseline to a level of \>= 1:10. |
| Pharmacokinetics: Trough Ixekizumab Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss) | Week 16 | — |
| Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC) | Baseline, Week 16 | The number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 44 joints (22 joints on each side of the participants body. The 44 joints are assessed and classified as swollen or not swollen. sum of all joints checked to be swollen divided by number of evaluable joints and then multiplied by 44 to obtain SJC score. The SJC score ranges from 0 (no swollen joints) to 44 (all joints swollen). LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] Score) | Baseline, Week 16 | MRI score of spine was assessed using SPARCC method. All 23 disco-vertebral units (DVUs) of the spine (from C2 to S1) are scored for bone marrow edema. A single DVU has a scoring range of 0 to 18, bringing the maximum total score to 414, with higher scores reflecting worse disease. Scoring was performed by central readers. LSMean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status and baseline value as fixed factors |
| Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) | Baseline, Week 16 | The MASES is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis .The MASES assesses 13 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include costochondral 1 (right/left), costochondral 7 (right/left), spinal iliaca anterior superior (right/left), crista iliaca (right/left), spina iliaca posterior (right/left), processus spinosus L5, and Achilles tendon proximal insertion (right/left). The MASES is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 13); higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors. |
Countries
Czechia, Germany, Japan, Netherlands, South Korea, Taiwan, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Blinded treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16), followed by extended treatment period (Week 16 to Week 52), followed by post treatment period for a maximum of 24 weeks. Washout period occurred for only Adalimumab group for 6 weeks (Week 14 to Week 20).
Pre-assignment details
Participants who completed study were eligible to enroll into a long-term study (Study I1F-MC-RHBY \[RHBY\]) for up to 2 additional years. Participants that do not enroll into study RHBY will complete the Post-Treatment Follow-Up Period.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| PBO/IXE Participants received placebo every two weeks by subcutaneous injection during blinded treatment period and 80mg Ixekizumab either Q2W or Q4W by subcutaneous injection during extension treatment period. | 86 |
| ADA/IXE Participants received 40mg Adalimumab every two weeks by SC injection during blinded treatment period and 80mg Ixekizumab either Q2W or Q4W by SC injection during extension treatment period. | 90 |
| IXE80Q2W/IXE80Q2W Participants received starting dose of either 80 milligrams (mg) or 160mg Ixekizumab at week 0 followed by 80mg Ixekizumab every two weeks by subcutaneous injection during blinded & extension treatment period. | 83 |
| IXE80Q4W/IXE80Q4W Participants received starting dose of either 80 milligrams (mg) or 160mg Ixekizumab at week 0 followed by 80mg Ixekizumab every four weeks by subcutaneous injection during blinded & extension treatment period. | 81 |
| Total | 340 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blinded Treatment Period | Adverse Event | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| Blinded Treatment Period | Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Blinded Treatment Period | Screen Failure | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Blinded Treatment Period | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Extended Treatment Period | Adverse Event | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Extended Treatment Period | Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Extended Treatment Period | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Follow-up Period | Adverse Event | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2 |
| Follow-up Period | Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Follow-up Period | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Follow-up Period | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4 |
| Washout Period | Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Washout Period | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | PBO/IXE | Total | IXE80Q4W/IXE80Q4W | IXE80Q2W/IXE80Q2W | ADA/IXE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 42.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.01 | 41.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.66 | 41.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.13 | 41.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.17 | 41.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.44 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 11 Participants | 34 Participants | 8 Participants | 8 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 67 Participants | 275 Participants | 66 Participants | 68 Participants | 74 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 8 Participants | 31 Participants | 7 Participants | 7 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 4 Participants | 14 Participants | 4 Participants | 4 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 28 Participants | 107 Participants | 25 Participants | 25 Participants | 29 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 2 Participants | 6 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 52 Participants | 213 Participants | 52 Participants | 52 Participants | 57 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Canada | 2 Participants | 9 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Czechia | 14 Participants | 54 Participants | 13 Participants | 13 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Germany | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Hungary | 3 Participants | 10 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Japan | 3 Participants | 7 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Mexico | 8 Participants | 30 Participants | 7 Participants | 8 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Netherlands | 0 Participants | 4 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Poland | 16 Participants | 62 Participants | 16 Participants | 15 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Russia | 12 Participants | 48 Participants | 12 Participants | 11 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment South Korea | 10 Participants | 47 Participants | 11 Participants | 12 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Taiwan | 13 Participants | 51 Participants | 13 Participants | 13 Participants | 12 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 5 Participants | 15 Participants | 3 Participants | 4 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 15 Participants | 64 Participants | 13 Participants | 19 Participants | 17 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 71 Participants | 276 Participants | 68 Participants | 64 Participants | 73 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk | EG005 affected / at risk | EG006 affected / at risk | EG007 affected / at risk | EG008 affected / at risk | EG009 affected / at risk | EG010 affected / at risk | EG011 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 86 | 0 / 90 | 0 / 83 | 0 / 81 | 0 / 88 | 0 / 86 | 0 / 86 | 0 / 79 | 0 / 78 | 0 / 1 | 0 / 24 | 0 / 16 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 12 / 86 | 16 / 90 | 18 / 83 | 11 / 81 | 8 / 88 | 26 / 86 | 20 / 86 | 21 / 79 | 14 / 78 | 1 / 1 | 2 / 24 | 2 / 16 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 86 | 3 / 90 | 1 / 83 | 1 / 81 | 0 / 88 | 4 / 86 | 7 / 86 | 3 / 79 | 4 / 78 | 0 / 1 | 0 / 24 | 0 / 16 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) Response
ASAS40 is defined as improvement from baseline of greater than or equal to (\>=) 40% and absolute improvement from baseline of at least 2 units in at least 3 of the following 4 domains without any worsening in the remaining domains. 1. Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis on average during the last week? score range 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). 2. Spinal Pain: How much Pain of your spine due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). 3. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index: Participant is asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participants response is captured using numeric rating scale (NRS) scale (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. 4. Inflammation based on Q5 & Q6 mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) (mean of intensity & duration of stiffness): Score ranges from 0 (none) and 10 (very severe).
Time frame: Week 16
Population: All Randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) Response | 18.4 percentage of participants |
| Adalimumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) Response | 35.6 percentage of participants |
| IXE80Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) Response | 48.1 percentage of participants |
| IXE80Q2W | Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) Response | 51.8 percentage of participants |
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores
The SF-36 is a 36-item participant administered measure designed to be a short, multipurpose assessment of health in the areas of physical functioning, role - physical, role - emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. The 2 overarching domains of mental well- being and physical well-being are captured by the Mental Component Summary and Physical Component Summary scores. T-scores are used for analysis. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores | PCS | 3.6432 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.753 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores | MCS | 2.1229 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.8431 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores | MCS | 2.5550 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.8225 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores | PCS | 6.9005 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.731 |
| IXE80Q4W | Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores | PCS | 7.6952 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.7768 |
| IXE80Q4W | Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores | MCS | 2.7502 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.8763 |
| IXE80Q2W | Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores | PCS | 7.9686 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.7665 |
| IXE80Q2W | Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores | MCS | 2.5696 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.865 |
Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)
ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are the following: 1. Total back pain 2. Patient global 3. Peripheral pain/swelling 4. Duration of morning stiffness 5. CRP in mg/L The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121 × total back pain + 0.110 × patient global + 0.073 × peripheral pain/swelling + 0.058 × duration of morning stiffness + 0.579 × Ln(CRP+1). CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0 to 10.Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. Ln represents the natural logarithm. Least Square (LS) Mean was calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) | -0.46 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.099 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) | -1.30 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.096 |
| IXE80Q4W | Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) | -1.43 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.102 |
| IXE80Q2W | Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) | -1.37 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.101 |
Change From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI)
ASAS HI is a disease-specific health-index instrument designed to assess the impact of interventions for SpA, including axSpA. The 17-item instrument has scores ranging from 0 (good health) to 17 (poor health). Each item consists of one question that the participant needs to respond to with either I agree (score of 1) or I do not agree (score of 0). A score of 1 is given where the item is affirmed, indicating adverse health. All item scores are summed to give a total score or index. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI) | -1.25 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.3 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI) | -2.30 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.292 |
| IXE80Q4W | Change From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI) | -2.36 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.311 |
| IXE80Q2W | Change From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI) | -2.74 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.306 |
Change From Baseline in ASAS-Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Score
ASAS-NSAID score is used to present the NSAID intake by considering the type of NSAID, the total dose, & the number of days taking NSAID during a period of interest (PI).. ASAS-NSAID score=(equivalent NSAID score)x(days of intake during PI)x(days per week)/(PI in days). Higher scores indicate greater NSAIDs intake. 0= no intake, 100 = equivalent NSAID intake.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Population: Participants in Extended Treatment Period Population Who had NSAID Intake at Baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in ASAS-Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Score | -10.28 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.472 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in ASAS-Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Score | -5.91 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.861 |
| IXE80Q4W | Change From Baseline in ASAS-Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Score | -7.62 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.43 |
| IXE80Q2W | Change From Baseline in ASAS-Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Score | -9.91 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.94 |
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)
The BASFI is a participant-reported assessment that establishes a participants functional baseline and subsequent response to treatment. To complete the BASFI, a participant is asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participants respond to each question using an NRS scale (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. The participants final BASFI score is the mean of the 10 item scores has a possible minimum value of 0 and a possible maximum value of 10, with a higher score indicating worse function. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) | -1.16 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.215 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) | -2.14 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.209 |
| IXE80Q4W | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) | -2.39 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.222 |
| IXE80Q2W | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) | -2.43 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.219 |
Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion
While participants have their hands resting on or behind the head, the assessor has measured the chest's encircled length by centimeter at the fourth intercostal level anteriorly. The difference between maximal inspiration and expiration in centimeters was recorded. Two tries were recorded. The better measurement (larger difference) of 2 tries (in centimeters) was used for analyses. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All Randomized Participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion | 0.06 Centimeters (cm) | Standard Error 0.152 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion | 0.70 Centimeters (cm) | Standard Error 0.148 |
| IXE80Q4W | Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion | 0.49 Centimeters (cm) | Standard Error 0.158 |
| IXE80Q2W | Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion | 0.67 Centimeters (cm) | Standard Error 0.155 |
Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES)
The MASES is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis .The MASES assesses 13 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include costochondral 1 (right/left), costochondral 7 (right/left), spinal iliaca anterior superior (right/left), crista iliaca (right/left), spina iliaca posterior (right/left), processus spinosus L5, and Achilles tendon proximal insertion (right/left). The MASES is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 13); higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants with baseline MASES score \> 0.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) | -2.1 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.34 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) | -2.6 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.34 |
| IXE80Q4W | Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) | -2.3 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.36 |
| IXE80Q2W | Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) | -2.4 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.35 |
Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging [ASSpiMRI] - Berlin Score)
The Berlin modification of Ankylosing Spondylitis spine MRI score for activity (ASspiMRI) scoring technique assesses inflammation in each of 23 disco-vertebral units (DVU). All 23 disco-vertebral units (DVU) of the spine (from C2 to S1) are scored for bone marrow edema. Scores for each DVU range from 0-3 (0=normal; 1=minor bone marrow edema \[less than or equal to 25% of DVU; 3=severe bone marrow edema (more that 50% of DVU)\]. The composite score ranges from 0 to 69, with higher scores reflecting worse disease. Least Squares (LS) Mean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status and baseline value as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants with baseline and week 16 Berlin score.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging [ASSpiMRI] - Berlin Score) | -0.15 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.323 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging [ASSpiMRI] - Berlin Score) | -2.92 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.314 |
| IXE80Q4W | Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging [ASSpiMRI] - Berlin Score) | -2.77 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.328 |
| IXE80Q2W | Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging [ASSpiMRI] - Berlin Score) | -2.54 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.33 |
Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] Score)
MRI score of spine was assessed using SPARCC method. All 23 disco-vertebral units (DVUs) of the spine (from C2 to S1) are scored for bone marrow edema. A single DVU has a scoring range of 0 to 18, bringing the maximum total score to 414, with higher scores reflecting worse disease. Scoring was performed by central readers. LSMean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status and baseline value as fixed factors
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants with baseline and week 16 SPARCC MRI score for spine.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] Score) | -1.51 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.147 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] Score) | -11.57 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.113 |
| IXE80Q4W | Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] Score) | -11.02 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.16 |
| IXE80Q2W | Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Spine (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] Score) | -9.58 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.168 |
Change From Baseline in Mobility on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)
The BASMI is a combined index comprising the following 5 clinical measurements of spinal mobility in participants with rad-axSpA. 1. Lateral spinal flexion 2. Tragus-to-wall distance 3. Lumbar flexion (modified Schrober) 4. Maximal intermalleolar distance 5. Cervical rotation. The BASMI includes these 5 measurements that are each scaled to a score of 0 to 10 depending on the result of the assessment (BASMI linear function). The average score of the 5 assessments gives the BASMI linear result. The higher the BASMI score the more severe the participants limitation of movement due to their AS. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Mobility on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) | -0.080 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.0826 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Mobility on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) | -0.447 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.08 |
| IXE80Q4W | Change From Baseline in Mobility on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) | -0.502 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.0858 |
| IXE80Q2W | Change From Baseline in Mobility on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) | -0.408 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.084 |
Change From Baseline in MRI Sacroiliac Joint(s) (SIJ) Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Score
Both left and right SIJ are scored for bone marrow edema.Each side has 6 slices and each slice has 6 scoring units, and each scoring unit has a score of 0 or 1. Total SIJ SPARCC scores can range from 0 to 72 with higher scores reflecting worse disease. LSMean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status and baseline value as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants with baseline and week 16 SPARCC score.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in MRI Sacroiliac Joint(s) (SIJ) Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Score | 0.92 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.582 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in MRI Sacroiliac Joint(s) (SIJ) Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Score | -4.21 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.568 |
| IXE80Q4W | Change From Baseline in MRI Sacroiliac Joint(s) (SIJ) Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Score | -3.97 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.59 |
| IXE80Q2W | Change From Baseline in MRI Sacroiliac Joint(s) (SIJ) Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Score | -4.25 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.591 |
Change From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance
The participant is to make a maximum effort to touch the head against the wall when standing with heels and back against the wall (occiput). Then the distance from occiput to wall is measured. Two tries will be recorded. The better (smaller) measurement of 2 tries (in centimeters) will be used for analyses. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance | -0.06 cm | Standard Error 0.232 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance | -0.72 cm | Standard Error 0.225 |
| IXE80Q4W | Change From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance | -0.69 cm | Standard Error 0.24 |
| IXE80Q2W | Change From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance | -0.73 cm | Standard Error 0.236 |
Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC)
The number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 44 joints (22 joints on each side of the participants body. The 44 joints are assessed and classified as swollen or not swollen. sum of all joints checked to be swollen divided by number of evaluable joints and then multiplied by 44 to obtain SJC score. The SJC score ranges from 0 (no swollen joints) to 44 (all joints swollen). LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants with baseline SJC \> 0.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC) | -1.7 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.55 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC) | -2.7 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.53 |
| IXE80Q4W | Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC) | -3.6 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.53 |
| IXE80Q2W | Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC) | -2.7 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.57 |
Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender (TJC)
The number of tender and painful joints was determined by examination of 46 joints (23 joints on each side of the participants body. The 46 joints are assessed and classified as tender or not tender. sum of all joints checked to be tender/painful divided by number of evaluable joints which is multiplied by 46 to obtain TJC score. The scores ranges from 0 (no tender/painful joints) to 46 (all joints tender/painful). LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants with baseline TJC \> 0.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender (TJC) | -2.0 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.53 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender (TJC) | -2.2 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.55 |
| IXE80Q4W | Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender (TJC) | -2.5 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.58 |
| IXE80Q2W | Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender (TJC) | -3.3 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.58 |
Change From Baseline in SPARCC Enthesitis Score
The SPARCC enthesitis is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis. The SPARCC assesses 16 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include Medial epicondyle (left/right \[L/R\]), Lateral epicondyle (L/R), Supraspinatus insertion into greater tuberosity of humerus (L/R), Greater trochanter (L/R), Quadriceps insertion into superior border of patella (L/R), Patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tubercle (L/R), Achilles tendon insertion into calcaneum (L/R), and Plantar fascia insertion into calcaneum (L/R). The SPARCC is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 16). Higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants with baseline SPARCC score \> 0.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in SPARCC Enthesitis Score | -2.1 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.4 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in SPARCC Enthesitis Score | -2.9 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.4 |
| IXE80Q4W | Change From Baseline in SPARCC Enthesitis Score | -2.7 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.4 |
| IXE80Q2W | Change From Baseline in SPARCC Enthesitis Score | -2.6 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.43 |
Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score
The Fatigue Severity NRS is a participant-administered, single-item, 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no fatigue and 10 representing as bad as you can imagine. Participants rate their fatigue (feeling tired or worn out) by circling the one number that describes their worst level of fatigue during the previous 24 hours. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score | -1.4 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.23 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score | -2.2 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.23 |
| IXE80Q4W | Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score | -2.5 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.24 |
| IXE80Q2W | Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score | -2.1 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.24 |
Change From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ)
The JSEQ is a 4-item scale designed to estimate sleep problems in clinical research. The JSEQ assesses the frequency of sleep disturbance in 4 categories: 1) trouble falling asleep, 2) waking up several times during the night, 3) having trouble staying asleep (including waking up far too early), and 4) waking up after the usual amount of sleep feeling tired and worn out. Participants report the number of days they experience each of these problems in the past month on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = no days to 5 = 22-30 days. The total JSEQ score ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater sleep disturbance. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ) | -1.5 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.41 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ) | -2.7 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.4 |
| IXE80Q4W | Change From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ) | -2.5 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.43 |
| IXE80Q2W | Change From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ) | -3.0 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.42 |
Change From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
High sensitivity CRP is the measure of acute phase reactant. It will be measured with a high sensitivity assay at the central laboratory to help assess the effect of Ixekizumab on disease activity. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP) | 1.426 Milliragm per Litre (mg/mL) | Standard Error 1.9244 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP) | -7.202 Milliragm per Litre (mg/mL) | Standard Error 1.8688 |
| IXE80Q4W | Change From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP) | -5.209 Milliragm per Litre (mg/mL) | Standard Error 1.9803 |
| IXE80Q2W | Change From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP) | -6.565 Milliragm per Litre (mg/mL) | Standard Error 1.9582 |
Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores
The WPAI-SpA consists of 6 questions to determine employment status, hours missed from work because of SpA, hours missed from work for other reasons, hours actually worked, the degree to which SpA affected work productivity while at work, and the degree to which SpA affected activities outside of work. The WPAI-SpA has been validated in the rad-axSpA patient population. Four scores are derived: percentage of absenteeism, percentage of presenteeism (reduced productivity while at work), an overall work impairment score that combines absenteeism and presenteeism, and percentage of impairment in activities performed outside of work. The computed percentage range for each sub-scale was from 0-100. Greater scores indicate greater impairment and less productivity. LSMean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status and baseline value as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores | Overall Work Impairment Score | -17.82 score on a scale | Standard Error 3.254 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores | Percentage of Activity Impairment | -14.1 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.28 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores | Percentage of Activity Impairment | -21.1 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.22 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores | Overall Work Impairment Score | -21.44 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.921 |
| IXE80Q4W | Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores | Overall Work Impairment Score | -21.36 score on a scale | Standard Error 3.061 |
| IXE80Q4W | Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores | Percentage of Activity Impairment | -23.0 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.35 |
| IXE80Q2W | Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores | Overall Work Impairment Score | -24.06 score on a scale | Standard Error 3.299 |
| IXE80Q2W | Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores | Percentage of Activity Impairment | -23.4 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.3 |
Number of Participants With Anterior Uveitis or Uveitis Flares
Anterior uveitis is an inflammation of the middle layer of the eye which includes the iris (colored part of the eye) and the adjacent tissue, known as the ciliary body.
Time frame: Baseline through Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Anterior Uveitis or Uveitis Flares | 0 Count of Participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Anterior Uveitis or Uveitis Flares | 0 Count of Participants |
| IXE80Q4W | Number of Participants With Anterior Uveitis or Uveitis Flares | 1 Count of Participants |
| IXE80Q2W | Number of Participants With Anterior Uveitis or Uveitis Flares | 0 Count of Participants |
Number of Participants With Anti Ixekizumab Antibodies
A treatment emergent - antidrug antibody (TE-ADA) positive patient is defined as: a) a patient with a \>= 4-fold increase over a positive baseline antibody titer; or b) for a negative baseline titer, a patient with an increase from the baseline to a level of \>= 1:10.
Time frame: Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Anti Ixekizumab Antibodies | 2 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Anti Ixekizumab Antibodies | 5 Participants |
| IXE80Q4W | Number of Participants With Anti Ixekizumab Antibodies | 2 Participants |
| IXE80Q2W | Number of Participants With Anti Ixekizumab Antibodies | 2 Participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS20 Response
ASAS20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement and an absolute improvement from baseline of ≥1 units in ≥3 of 4 following domains and no worsening of ≥20% and ≥1 unit (range 0 to 10) in the remaining domain. 1. Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis on average during the last week? score range 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). 2. Spinal Pain: How much Pain of your spine due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). 3. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index: Participant is asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participants response is captured using NRS scale (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. 4. Inflammation based on Q5 & Q6 mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) (mean of intensity & duration of stiffness): Score ranges from 0 (none) and 10 (very severe).
Time frame: Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS20 Response | 40.2 percentage of participants |
| Adalimumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS20 Response | 58.9 percentage of participants |
| IXE80Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS20 Response | 64.2 percentage of participants |
| IXE80Q2W | Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS20 Response | 68.7 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Inactive Disease
ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are the following: 1. Total back pain 2. Patient global 3. Peripheral pain/swelling 4. Duration of morning stiffness 5. CRP in mg/L The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121 × total back pain + 0.110 × patient global + 0.073 × peripheral pain/swelling + 0.058 × duration of morning stiffness + 0.579 × Ln(CRP+1). CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0 to 10.Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. Ln represents the natural logarithm. ASDAS Inactive Disease is defined as a score of \<1.3.
Time frame: Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Inactive Disease | 2.3 percentage of Participants |
| Adalimumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Inactive Disease | 15.6 percentage of Participants |
| IXE80Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Inactive Disease | 16.0 percentage of Participants |
| IXE80Q2W | Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Inactive Disease | 10.8 percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) Response
The BASDAI is a participant-reported assessment consisting of 6 questions that relate to 5 major symptoms relevant to radiographic axial spondyloarthritis measuring discomfort, pain, and fatigue. 1) Fatigue, 2) Spinal pain, 3) Peripheral arthritis, 4) Enthesitis, 5) Intensity, and 6) Duration of morning stiffness. participants need to score each item with a score from 0 to 10 (NRS). total score is obtained from the average of symptom scores ranging 0 (no problem) to 10 (worst problem). BASDAI50 represents an improvement of ≥50% of the BASDAI score from baseline.
Time frame: Week 16
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) Response | 17.2 percentage of participants |
| Adalimumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) Response | 32.2 percentage of participants |
| IXE80Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) Response | 42.0 percentage of participants |
| IXE80Q2W | Percentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) Response | 43.4 percentage of participants |
Pharmacokinetics: Trough Ixekizumab Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)
Time frame: Week 16
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of Ixekizumab.
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Pharmacokinetics: Trough Ixekizumab Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss) | 3.56 microgram per millilitre (μg/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 56 |
| Adalimumab | Pharmacokinetics: Trough Ixekizumab Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss) | 3.88 microgram per millilitre (μg/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 55 |
| IXE80Q4W | Pharmacokinetics: Trough Ixekizumab Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss) | 11.6 microgram per millilitre (μg/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 54 |
| IXE80Q2W | Pharmacokinetics: Trough Ixekizumab Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss) | 11.3 microgram per millilitre (μg/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 43 |