Skip to content

A Trial of Lidocaine Patch for Lower Limb Amputation Pain

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Lidocaine Patch for Lower Limb Amputation Pain

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02696720
Enrollment
0
Registered
2016-03-02
Start date
2016-05-13
Completion date
2017-06-13
Last updated
2018-01-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Phantom Limb Pain (PLP), Primary/Secondary Scar Hyperalgesia

Keywords

lidocaine, phantom limb pain (PLP), Primary/secondary scar hyperalgesia

Brief summary

Phantom limb pain (PLP) and scar hyperalgesia (SH) are frequent problems after amputation; in particular most persons who undergo limb amputation will experience phantom pain. The neuropathic nature of PLP suggests the involvement of both peripheral and central neurological mechanisms, including neuroplastic changes in the central nervous system. PLP as other central nervous system-related pain syndromes remains a challenge for treatment. Scar hyperalgesia involves peripheral mechanisms and results frim the production of substances liberated by damaged skin cells. These inflammatory substances lower the pain threshold by altering the chemical environment of skin nerve endings. Scan hyperalgesia is associated with secondary mechanical hyperalgesia in the skin area around the scar. The lidocaine patch 5% is a topical analgesic acting by blocking sodium channels of peripheral nerve endings and by inhibiting ectopic discharges in sensitized and hyperactive cutaneous nociceptors. The patch is noninvasive, with minimal systemic absorption resulting in a reduced risk of drug-drug interaction. In addition, a central analgesic effect of lidocaine has been suggested. The lidocaine patch 5% is currently licensed for the treatment of symptomatic postherpetic neuralgia. It also has been successfully used in patients with other neuropathic pain states, such as entrapment neuropathies, painful idiopathic distal sensory polyneuropathies and postoperative/post traumatic neuropathic chronic cutaneous pain. The lidocaine patch has not been studied for the management and prevention of phantom limb pain. The aim of the present research is to investigate if a lidocaine patch 5% is effective for reducing PLP and primary/secondary scar hyperalgesia. The hypothesis is that persistent peripheral nociceptive input from the stump after surgery may drive maladaptive cortical reorganization leading to chronic central pain and thus promote chronic phantom limb pain. Treating scar hyperalgesia on the stump with topical lidocaine may reduce the activity of peripheral nociceptive afferents and thus decrease the likelihood of developing persistent phantom limb pain. This study is designed as a randomized controlled multicentric double blind trial, in which the effectiveness of applying a 5% lidocaine patch for 6 weeks will be compared with a sham.

Interventions

DRUGLidocaine
OTHERSham

Sponsors

Brugmann University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All above or below knee amputations , two months or more after surgery, after complete wound healing (no clips, no stitches, no seepage)

Exclusion criteria

* History of central nervous system disease * History of major psychiatric disease (MMS\<23/30, HADS\>8/21) * Pregnancy * Known hypersensitivity to local anesthetics (lidocaine, bupivacaine, etidocaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine) * skin irritation on the stump

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient-reported overall daily pain intensityDaily, starting seven days before patch placement (baseline) till six weeks after patch placementThe overall daily pain intensity (stump, scar and phantom pain combined) will be rated on a 0 to 100 visual analogue scale with anchors of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain ever experienced).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neuropathic painat baseline - 7 days before patch placementRated with the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory
Pain (McGill)at baseline - 7 days before patch placementRated by the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, sensitive to the effects of pain treatment.
Quality of lifeat baseline -7 days before patch placementRated by the SF36 questionnaire
Neuropathic Pain (DN4)at baseline - 7 days before patch placementScreening for neuropathic pain, by using the DN4 questionnaire
Delay of dress of provisory prosthesisFrom the day of the surgery till the day of the delivery of temporary prosthesis, for a maximum of 6 monthsNumber of days between surgery and delivery of temporary prosthesis
Cumulative analgesic consumption (morphine equivalents)baseline -7 days before patch placementRated by the cumulative analgesic consumption score (CACS)
Phantom Limb Pain occurence6 months after patch placementoccurence of phantom limb pain
Sleep qualitybaseline -7 days before patch placementwill be assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality index

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026