Skip to content

Protection Against Potential Brain Injury During Competitive Football

Novel Protection Against Potential Brain Injury During Competitive Football Head Impacts

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02696200
Enrollment
62
Registered
2016-03-02
Start date
2015-05-31
Completion date
2017-06-30
Last updated
2020-12-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Concussion

Keywords

Concussion

Brief summary

Significant morbidity, mortality, and related costs are caused by traumatic brain injury (TBI). An externally-worn medical device that applies mild jugular compression according to the principle of the Queckenstedt Maneuver (the Device). Preliminary research suggests that the Device has the potential to reduce the likelihood of TBI. The currently developed collar has been approved for studies in humans and the results indicate safety for use during high demand and maximal exertion activities, This study will investigate the effectiveness of this device in high school athletes playing a collision sport such as football. The use of helmets during such a high-risk sport will allow for collision measurement devices to be embedded in the helmet and will not affect play or fit of equipment. Athletes participating in this study will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: 1) Device wearing during the season or 2) Non-device wearing during the season. The helmets of all participants will be outfitted with an accelerometer which will measure the magnitude of every impact to the head sustained by the athlete. Effectiveness of the device will be determined via differences in longitudinal brain imaging and functional testing following competitive football participation. A subset of athletes who report a diagnosed concussion will also receive additional brain neuroanatomical and neurophysiological testing within a week following the diagnosed concussive event. The purpose of the study is to monitor longitudinal changes in brain structure and function between the preseason and postseason, in a population of football playing athletes wearing the Device and compared to a similar population not wearing the device. Secondly, the purpose is to determine the protection of the device relative to amount and magnitude of sustained head impacts.

Detailed description

The Device has the promise of providing a novel mechanism for reducing or preventing the likelihood of TBI, and may be used in conjunction with other protective equipment. TBI is the leading cause of death in individuals under age 45. The cost of TBI in the U.S. is estimated at anywhere from $50 to $150 billion, annually. The January, 2008 New England Journal of Medicine reports, Head and neck injuries, including severe brain trauma, have been reported in one quarter of service members who have been evacuated from Iraq and Afghanistan. The vast majority of these injuries have resulted from exposure to improvised explosive device (IED) blast waves. Head injuries, concussions and the resulting trauma have been in public discussion recently as the National Football League (NFL) deals with a lawsuit regarding head injuries by about one-third of living former NFL players. According to NASA, The oscillation of a fluid caused by an external force, called sloshing, occurs in moving vehicles containing liquid masses, such as trucks, etc. This oscillation occurs when a vessel is only partially filled. It is hypothesized that the brain faces similar slosh energy absorption during external force impartation. Slosh permits external energies to be absorbed by the contents of a partially filled vessel or container by means of inelastic collisions. Tissues of differing densities can decelerate at different rates creating shear and cavitation. If the collisions between objects or molecules are elastic, the transfer of energies to those objects diminishes, minimizing the energies imparted by slosh. Woodpeckers, head ramming sheep and all mammals (including humans) have small, little known and misunderstood muscles in their necks called the omohyoid muscles. Highly G-tolerant creatures of the forest have utilized these muscles to gently restrict outflow of the internal jugular veins thereby taking up the excess compliance of the cranial space and ultimately protecting themselves from TBI like tiny airbags in a motor vehicle. Rat studies by have demonstrated that we can easily and safely facilitate this muscle's actions by a well-engineered gentle compression over those muscles. The medical Queckenstedt Maneuver devised to detect spinal cord compression, gently places pressure over the external jugular veins to increase cerebral spinal volume and pressure. In this maneuver, the veins are compressed while a lumbar puncture monitors the intracranial pressure. Normally, the pressure rise to the higher 'plateau' level occurs instantly upon jugular compression to fall again equally fast upon release of the compression. This incredibly simple principle can be employed to protect soldiers and athletes from TBI by safely, and reversibly, increasing intracranial volume and pressure. The neck collar device is made of Outer collar - hytrel (thermoplastic elastomer), Inner collar - TPSiV (thermoplastic elastomer), metal insert (stainless steel), and is fitted to the neck to provide a comfortable and precise jugular compression that potentially mitigates cerebral slosh. Although the skull, blood, and brain are almost incompressible, the vasculature tree of the cerebrum is quite reactive and compressible. As volume is added to the cranium, eventually the compensatory reserve volume is surpassed and the intracranial pressure increases slightly. Increasing cerebral blood volume by just 1-3% safely and reversibly reduces compliance of the cerebral vascular tree and diminishes absorption of slosh energies. Jugular compression increases cerebral blood volume almost instantaneously. As mentioned, this degree of increase has significantly mitigated slosh and TBI in laboratory animals and mimics the highly concussion resistant wild animals that are able to reflexively increase cerebral blood volume through natural jugular compression. A landmark article, published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, used a standard acceleration-deceleration impact laboratory model of mild TBI. The study showed a successful and marked reduction of axonal injury following Internal Jugular Vein (IJV) compression as indicated by immunohistochemical staining of Amyloid Precursor Proteins (APP). It is argued that IJV compression reduces slosh-mediated brain injury by increasing intracranial blood volume and reducing the compliance and potential for brain movement within the confines of the skull. The potential for such technique to mitigate both linear and rotational brain injury in humans by internal protection represents the most novel approach to mitigating TBI. The current project will be designed following a prospective longitudinal study design. All MRI scanning will be performed on a 3 Tesla Philips Achieva MRI scanner located in Imaging Research Center (IRC) in the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Research Foundation (CCHRF). Sedation will not be used for any of the test visits. The entire MRI series, including anatomical imaging, DTI, resting state fMRI, SWI, HARDI, ASL and BOLD will be completed in 65 minutes or less (see Table 1 for detailed specifications). All functional and neurocognitive testing will be performed at the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Human Performance Laboratory.

Interventions

DEVICEQ Collar

The device is fitted to the neck to provide a comfortable and precise jugular compression that potentially mitigates cerebral slosh. The device will be worn inside the collar of an athletic compression shirt.

Sponsors

Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 19 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Normal healthy volunteer * Able to provide written consent * Must be 14 years or older and a participant on varsity level high school football team

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to provide written consent * History of neurological deficits, previous cerebral infarction, or severe head trauma as indicated through pre-season screening: * Medical contraindications to restriction of venous outflow via the internal jugular veins (known increased intracerebral pressure, metabolic acidosis or alkalosis) * Glaucoma (Narrow Angle or Normal Tension) * Hydrocephalus * Recent penetrating brain trauma (within 6 months) * Known carotid hypersensitivity * Known increased intracranial pressure * Central vein thrombosis * Any known airway obstruction * Any known seizure disorder

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Determine Average Number of Hits Between Groups5 monthsmonitor the differences in average number of hits between the group wearing the collar and the group not wearing the collar
Number of Participants Undergoing EEG Assessment5 monthsdetermine the number of subjects in the collar group and the non collar group that underwent EEG assessment
Change in Fractional Anisotropy (FA)6 monthsChange in fractional anisotropy (FA) from Pre to Post season

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Subjects Wearing the Q Collar
Subjects wearing the Q collar throughout the football season Q Collar: The device is fitted to the neck to provide a comfortable and precise jugular compression that potentially mitigates cerebral slosh. The device will be worn inside the collar of an athletic compression shirt.
32
Subjects Not Wearing the Q Collar
Control group of subjects not wearing the q collar
30
Total62

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSubjects Not Wearing the Q CollarTotalSubjects Wearing the Q Collar
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
30 Participants62 Participants32 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
30 participants62 participants32 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
30 Participants62 Participants32 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 320 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 320 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 320 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Fractional Anisotropy (FA)

Change in fractional anisotropy (FA) from Pre to Post season

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Subjects Wearing the Q CollarChange in Fractional Anisotropy (FA)0.03 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 1.24
Subjects Not Wearing the Q CollarChange in Fractional Anisotropy (FA)2.43 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 1.01
Primary

Determine Average Number of Hits Between Groups

monitor the differences in average number of hits between the group wearing the collar and the group not wearing the collar

Time frame: 5 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Subjects Wearing the Q CollarDetermine Average Number of Hits Between GroupsAvg # of hits >50g144.67 number of hitsStandard Deviation 106.55
Subjects Wearing the Q CollarDetermine Average Number of Hits Between GroupsAvg # of hits >150g2.43 number of hitsStandard Deviation 3.11
Subjects Wearing the Q CollarDetermine Average Number of Hits Between GroupsAvg # of hits >100g14.38 number of hitsStandard Deviation 11.29
Subjects Wearing the Q CollarDetermine Average Number of Hits Between GroupsAvg # of hits >200g0.43 number of hitsStandard Deviation 1.17
Subjects Wearing the Q CollarDetermine Average Number of Hits Between GroupsAvg # of hits >20g896.43 number of hitsStandard Deviation 600.03
Subjects Not Wearing the Q CollarDetermine Average Number of Hits Between GroupsAvg # of hits >200g0.30 number of hitsStandard Deviation 0.73
Subjects Not Wearing the Q CollarDetermine Average Number of Hits Between GroupsAvg # of hits >20g795.40 number of hitsStandard Deviation 508.92
Subjects Not Wearing the Q CollarDetermine Average Number of Hits Between GroupsAvg # of hits >50g145.85 number of hitsStandard Deviation 109.98
Subjects Not Wearing the Q CollarDetermine Average Number of Hits Between GroupsAvg # of hits >100g18.3 number of hitsStandard Deviation 20.85
Subjects Not Wearing the Q CollarDetermine Average Number of Hits Between GroupsAvg # of hits >150g1.8 number of hitsStandard Deviation 2.04
Primary

Number of Participants Undergoing EEG Assessment

determine the number of subjects in the collar group and the non collar group that underwent EEG assessment

Time frame: 5 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Subjects Wearing the Q CollarNumber of Participants Undergoing EEG Assessment32 Participants
Subjects Not Wearing the Q CollarNumber of Participants Undergoing EEG Assessment30 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026