Rectal Cancer
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the pathological complete tumor response rate.
Interventions
Capecitabine is available as 50 mg and 500 mg tablets. It will be administered as a 1000mg/m\^2 bid orally on Days 1-14, and at a dose of 825mg/m\^2 bid on Days 22-35 and 43-56.
Oxaliplatin is available in vials containing 50 mg or 100 mg. It will be administered as a oxaliplatin 130mg/m\^2/d intravenously on Day 1 and 50mg/m\^2/d on Days 22, 29, 43 and 50 prior to radiotherapy up to Week 9 followed by surgery period.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Histologically confirmed locally advanced T3/T4 rectal carcinoma with or without nodal involvement requiring surgery of the primary tumor * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2 * Adequate values of laboratory parameters
Exclusion criteria
* Evidence of distant metastases * Previous Chemotherapy or immunotherapy for colorectal cancer * Previous radiotherapy to the pelvis * Pre-existing condition which would deter radiotherapy * Malignancy within last 5 years, except cured basal cell cancer of the skin and in situ cancer of the cervix * Clinically significant cardiac disease or myocardial infarction within the last 12 months * Lack of physical integrity of the upper gastrointestinal tract or those who have malabsorption syndrome * Organ allografts * Concomitant treatment with brivudine, lamivudine, ribavirin or any other nucleoside analogues * Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency * History of uncontrolled seizures, central nervous system disorders, or psychiatric disability judged by the investigator to be clinically significant, precluding informed consent or interfering with compliance for oral drug intake
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Tumor Response | Up to Week 16 | Pathological complete tumor response was defined as grade 3 or 4 in the histological grading of regression according to Dworak classification. Grade 0 is no regression; Grade 1 is dominant tumor mass with obvious fibrosis and/or vasculopathy; Grade 2 is dominantly fibrotic changes with few tumor cells or groups; Grade 3 is defined as very few (difficult to find microscopically) tumor cells in fibrotic tissue with or without mucous substance; Grade 4 is defined as no tumor cells, only fibrotic mass (total regression or response). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities | Up to Week 16 | Number of participants with marked laboratory abnormalities is reported. |
| Percentage of Participants With Resection (R0) in Participants With T4 Rectal Cancer | Up to Week 16 | R0 resection was defined as complete resection of the tumor with adequate tumor-free margins and regional lymph node extirpation as confirmed by pathology after pre-operative chemotherapy plus capecitabine + oxaliplatin therapy. |
| Percentage of Participants With Sphincter-preservation | Up to Week 16 | Percentage of participants with sphincter-preservation is reported. |
| Percentage of Participants With Pathological Incomplete Tumor Response | Up to Week 16 | Pathological incomplete tumor response was defined as grade 1 or 2 in the histological grading of regression according to Dworak grading of regression. Pathological incomplete tumor response rate, Grade 1: dominant tumor mass with obvious fibrosis and/or vasculopathy; Grade 2: dominantly fibrotic changes with few tumor cells or groups (easy to find) were assessed. |
| Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events | Up to Week 16 | An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participants or clinical investigation participants administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, are life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or results in disability/incapacity, and congenital anomaly/birth defect. |
| Percentage of Participants With Downstaging of Primary Tumor and/or Lymph Nodes | From screening to Week 16 | Downstaging of primary tumor (T) and/or lymph nodes (N) was defined as decrease by 1 point in T-value and/or N-value (comparing at screening and after treatment). It was assessed by colonoscopy, pathology, endosonography of rectum, chest X-ray, abdominopelvic Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Staging for tumor are: TX (primary tumor cannot be assessed), T0 (no evidence of primary tumor), Tis (carcinoma in situ), T1 (tumor invades submucosa), T2 (tumor invades muscularis propria), T3 (tumor invades through muscularis propria into subserosa/into non-peritonealized pericolic/perirectal tissues, T4 (tumor directly invades other organs or structures). Staging for lymph nodes are: NX (regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed), N0 (no regional lymph node metastasis), N1 (metastasis in 1 to 3 regional lymph nodes), N2 (metastasis in 4 or more regional lymph nodes). |
Countries
Switzerland
Participant flow
Recruitment details
A total of 60 participants were enrolled in this study conducted from 30 March 2005 to 28 November 2006 at 6 centers in Switzerland.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin Eligible participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 on Days 1-14, and 825 mg/m\^2 on Days 22-35 and 43-56 bid orally, along with oxaliplatin as a 2-hour iv infusion of 130 mg/m\^2/once a day (d) on Day 1 and 50 mg/m\^2/d on Days 22, 29, 43 and 50 prior to radiotherapy. Participants received radiation therapy having a fraction dose of 1.8 Gy/day, 5 days a week, for five consecutive weeks starting on Day 22 of the treatment period. Participants, who completed the treatment period, underwent surgery at Week 14. | 60 |
| Total | 60 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 61 years |
| Gender Female | 14 Participants |
| Gender Male | 46 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 57 / 60 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 8 / 60 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Tumor Response
Pathological complete tumor response was defined as grade 3 or 4 in the histological grading of regression according to Dworak classification. Grade 0 is no regression; Grade 1 is dominant tumor mass with obvious fibrosis and/or vasculopathy; Grade 2 is dominantly fibrotic changes with few tumor cells or groups; Grade 3 is defined as very few (difficult to find microscopically) tumor cells in fibrotic tissue with or without mucous substance; Grade 4 is defined as no tumor cells, only fibrotic mass (total regression or response).
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Population: The intent to treat (ITT) population included all participants, who received at least one dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin | Percentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Tumor Response | 23 Percentage of participants |
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participants or clinical investigation participants administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, are life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or results in disability/incapacity, and congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Population: Safety population included all the participants who received at least one dose of any of the study treatments and who had a baseline assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin | Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events | Any AEs | 59 Participants |
| Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin | Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events | Any SAEs | 8 Participants |
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
Number of participants with marked laboratory abnormalities is reported.
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Population: Safety population included all the participants who received at least one dose of any of the study treatments and who had a baseline assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin | Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities | Hemoglobin | 7 Participants |
| Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin | Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities | Hematocrit | 7 Participants |
| Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin | Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities | Erythrocytes | 16 Participants |
| Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin | Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities | Leucocytes total | 8 Participants |
| Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin | Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities | Neutrophils | 9 Participants |
| Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin | Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities | Basophils | 1 Participants |
| Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin | Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities | Eosinophils | 2 Participants |
| Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin | Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities | Monocytes | 2 Participants |
| Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin | Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities | Lymphocytes | 42 Participants |
| Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin | Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities | Platelets | 13 Participants |
| Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin | Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities | ASAT/SGOT | 2 Participants |
| Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin | Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities | ALAT/SGPT | 10 Participants |
| Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin | Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities | Serum albumin | 3 Participants |
| Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin | Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities | Total protein | 2 Participants |
| Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin | Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities | Serum creatinine | 2 Participants |
| Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin | Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities | Glucose | 13 Participants |
| Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin | Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities | Sodium | 2 Participants |
| Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin | Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities | Potassium | 2 Participants |
| Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin | Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities | Calcium | 2 Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Downstaging of Primary Tumor and/or Lymph Nodes
Downstaging of primary tumor (T) and/or lymph nodes (N) was defined as decrease by 1 point in T-value and/or N-value (comparing at screening and after treatment). It was assessed by colonoscopy, pathology, endosonography of rectum, chest X-ray, abdominopelvic Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Staging for tumor are: TX (primary tumor cannot be assessed), T0 (no evidence of primary tumor), Tis (carcinoma in situ), T1 (tumor invades submucosa), T2 (tumor invades muscularis propria), T3 (tumor invades through muscularis propria into subserosa/into non-peritonealized pericolic/perirectal tissues, T4 (tumor directly invades other organs or structures). Staging for lymph nodes are: NX (regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed), N0 (no regional lymph node metastasis), N1 (metastasis in 1 to 3 regional lymph nodes), N2 (metastasis in 4 or more regional lymph nodes).
Time frame: From screening to Week 16
Population: ITT population included all participants, who received at least one dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin | Percentage of Participants With Downstaging of Primary Tumor and/or Lymph Nodes | T stage | 47 Percentage of participants |
| Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin | Percentage of Participants With Downstaging of Primary Tumor and/or Lymph Nodes | N stage | 48 Percentage of participants |
| Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin | Percentage of Participants With Downstaging of Primary Tumor and/or Lymph Nodes | Overall | 65 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Pathological Incomplete Tumor Response
Pathological incomplete tumor response was defined as grade 1 or 2 in the histological grading of regression according to Dworak grading of regression. Pathological incomplete tumor response rate, Grade 1: dominant tumor mass with obvious fibrosis and/or vasculopathy; Grade 2: dominantly fibrotic changes with few tumor cells or groups (easy to find) were assessed.
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Population: ITT population included all participants, who received at least one dose of study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin | Percentage of Participants With Pathological Incomplete Tumor Response | 72 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Resection (R0) in Participants With T4 Rectal Cancer
R0 resection was defined as complete resection of the tumor with adequate tumor-free margins and regional lymph node extirpation as confirmed by pathology after pre-operative chemotherapy plus capecitabine + oxaliplatin therapy.
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Population: The ITT consists of all included participants, who received at least one dose of study drug. Five participants from ITT population with T4 rectal cancer underwent surgery.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin | Percentage of Participants With Resection (R0) in Participants With T4 Rectal Cancer | 100 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Sphincter-preservation
Percentage of participants with sphincter-preservation is reported.
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Population: ITT population included all participants, who received at least one dose of study drug. Two participants from the ITT population did not undergo surgery (one died, one withdrew consent).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin | Percentage of Participants With Sphincter-preservation | 84.48 Percentage of participants |