Skip to content

A Study of Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin in Combination With Pre-operative Pelvic Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer

A Phase II Study of Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin in Combination With Pre-operative Pelvic Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02694718
Enrollment
60
Registered
2016-02-29
Start date
2005-03-31
Completion date
2006-11-30
Last updated
2017-01-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rectal Cancer

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the pathological complete tumor response rate.

Interventions

DRUGCapecitabine

Capecitabine is available as 50 mg and 500 mg tablets. It will be administered as a 1000mg/m\^2 bid orally on Days 1-14, and at a dose of 825mg/m\^2 bid on Days 22-35 and 43-56.

DRUGOxaliplatin

Oxaliplatin is available in vials containing 50 mg or 100 mg. It will be administered as a oxaliplatin 130mg/m\^2/d intravenously on Day 1 and 50mg/m\^2/d on Days 22, 29, 43 and 50 prior to radiotherapy up to Week 9 followed by surgery period.

Sponsors

Sanofi-Synthélabo (Schweiz) AG
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically confirmed locally advanced T3/T4 rectal carcinoma with or without nodal involvement requiring surgery of the primary tumor * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2 * Adequate values of laboratory parameters

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of distant metastases * Previous Chemotherapy or immunotherapy for colorectal cancer * Previous radiotherapy to the pelvis * Pre-existing condition which would deter radiotherapy * Malignancy within last 5 years, except cured basal cell cancer of the skin and in situ cancer of the cervix * Clinically significant cardiac disease or myocardial infarction within the last 12 months * Lack of physical integrity of the upper gastrointestinal tract or those who have malabsorption syndrome * Organ allografts * Concomitant treatment with brivudine, lamivudine, ribavirin or any other nucleoside analogues * Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency * History of uncontrolled seizures, central nervous system disorders, or psychiatric disability judged by the investigator to be clinically significant, precluding informed consent or interfering with compliance for oral drug intake

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Tumor ResponseUp to Week 16Pathological complete tumor response was defined as grade 3 or 4 in the histological grading of regression according to Dworak classification. Grade 0 is no regression; Grade 1 is dominant tumor mass with obvious fibrosis and/or vasculopathy; Grade 2 is dominantly fibrotic changes with few tumor cells or groups; Grade 3 is defined as very few (difficult to find microscopically) tumor cells in fibrotic tissue with or without mucous substance; Grade 4 is defined as no tumor cells, only fibrotic mass (total regression or response).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesUp to Week 16Number of participants with marked laboratory abnormalities is reported.
Percentage of Participants With Resection (R0) in Participants With T4 Rectal CancerUp to Week 16R0 resection was defined as complete resection of the tumor with adequate tumor-free margins and regional lymph node extirpation as confirmed by pathology after pre-operative chemotherapy plus capecitabine + oxaliplatin therapy.
Percentage of Participants With Sphincter-preservationUp to Week 16Percentage of participants with sphincter-preservation is reported.
Percentage of Participants With Pathological Incomplete Tumor ResponseUp to Week 16Pathological incomplete tumor response was defined as grade 1 or 2 in the histological grading of regression according to Dworak grading of regression. Pathological incomplete tumor response rate, Grade 1: dominant tumor mass with obvious fibrosis and/or vasculopathy; Grade 2: dominantly fibrotic changes with few tumor cells or groups (easy to find) were assessed.
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventsUp to Week 16An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participants or clinical investigation participants administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, are life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or results in disability/incapacity, and congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Percentage of Participants With Downstaging of Primary Tumor and/or Lymph NodesFrom screening to Week 16Downstaging of primary tumor (T) and/or lymph nodes (N) was defined as decrease by 1 point in T-value and/or N-value (comparing at screening and after treatment). It was assessed by colonoscopy, pathology, endosonography of rectum, chest X-ray, abdominopelvic Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Staging for tumor are: TX (primary tumor cannot be assessed), T0 (no evidence of primary tumor), Tis (carcinoma in situ), T1 (tumor invades submucosa), T2 (tumor invades muscularis propria), T3 (tumor invades through muscularis propria into subserosa/into non-peritonealized pericolic/perirectal tissues, T4 (tumor directly invades other organs or structures). Staging for lymph nodes are: NX (regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed), N0 (no regional lymph node metastasis), N1 (metastasis in 1 to 3 regional lymph nodes), N2 (metastasis in 4 or more regional lymph nodes).

Countries

Switzerland

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 60 participants were enrolled in this study conducted from 30 March 2005 to 28 November 2006 at 6 centers in Switzerland.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin
Eligible participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 on Days 1-14, and 825 mg/m\^2 on Days 22-35 and 43-56 bid orally, along with oxaliplatin as a 2-hour iv infusion of 130 mg/m\^2/once a day (d) on Day 1 and 50 mg/m\^2/d on Days 22, 29, 43 and 50 prior to radiotherapy. Participants received radiation therapy having a fraction dose of 1.8 Gy/day, 5 days a week, for five consecutive weeks starting on Day 22 of the treatment period. Participants, who completed the treatment period, underwent surgery at Week 14.
60
Total60

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCapecitabine + Oxaliplatin
Age, Continuous61 years
Gender
Female
14 Participants
Gender
Male
46 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
57 / 60
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 60

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Tumor Response

Pathological complete tumor response was defined as grade 3 or 4 in the histological grading of regression according to Dworak classification. Grade 0 is no regression; Grade 1 is dominant tumor mass with obvious fibrosis and/or vasculopathy; Grade 2 is dominantly fibrotic changes with few tumor cells or groups; Grade 3 is defined as very few (difficult to find microscopically) tumor cells in fibrotic tissue with or without mucous substance; Grade 4 is defined as no tumor cells, only fibrotic mass (total regression or response).

Time frame: Up to Week 16

Population: The intent to treat (ITT) population included all participants, who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Capecitabine + OxaliplatinPercentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Tumor Response23 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participants or clinical investigation participants administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, are life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or results in disability/incapacity, and congenital anomaly/birth defect.

Time frame: Up to Week 16

Population: Safety population included all the participants who received at least one dose of any of the study treatments and who had a baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Capecitabine + OxaliplatinNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventsAny AEs59 Participants
Capecitabine + OxaliplatinNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventsAny SAEs8 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities

Number of participants with marked laboratory abnormalities is reported.

Time frame: Up to Week 16

Population: Safety population included all the participants who received at least one dose of any of the study treatments and who had a baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Capecitabine + OxaliplatinNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesHemoglobin7 Participants
Capecitabine + OxaliplatinNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematocrit7 Participants
Capecitabine + OxaliplatinNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesErythrocytes16 Participants
Capecitabine + OxaliplatinNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesLeucocytes total8 Participants
Capecitabine + OxaliplatinNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesNeutrophils9 Participants
Capecitabine + OxaliplatinNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesBasophils1 Participants
Capecitabine + OxaliplatinNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesEosinophils2 Participants
Capecitabine + OxaliplatinNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesMonocytes2 Participants
Capecitabine + OxaliplatinNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesLymphocytes42 Participants
Capecitabine + OxaliplatinNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesPlatelets13 Participants
Capecitabine + OxaliplatinNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesASAT/SGOT2 Participants
Capecitabine + OxaliplatinNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesALAT/SGPT10 Participants
Capecitabine + OxaliplatinNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesSerum albumin3 Participants
Capecitabine + OxaliplatinNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesTotal protein2 Participants
Capecitabine + OxaliplatinNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesSerum creatinine2 Participants
Capecitabine + OxaliplatinNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesGlucose13 Participants
Capecitabine + OxaliplatinNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesSodium2 Participants
Capecitabine + OxaliplatinNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesPotassium2 Participants
Capecitabine + OxaliplatinNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesCalcium2 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Downstaging of Primary Tumor and/or Lymph Nodes

Downstaging of primary tumor (T) and/or lymph nodes (N) was defined as decrease by 1 point in T-value and/or N-value (comparing at screening and after treatment). It was assessed by colonoscopy, pathology, endosonography of rectum, chest X-ray, abdominopelvic Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Staging for tumor are: TX (primary tumor cannot be assessed), T0 (no evidence of primary tumor), Tis (carcinoma in situ), T1 (tumor invades submucosa), T2 (tumor invades muscularis propria), T3 (tumor invades through muscularis propria into subserosa/into non-peritonealized pericolic/perirectal tissues, T4 (tumor directly invades other organs or structures). Staging for lymph nodes are: NX (regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed), N0 (no regional lymph node metastasis), N1 (metastasis in 1 to 3 regional lymph nodes), N2 (metastasis in 4 or more regional lymph nodes).

Time frame: From screening to Week 16

Population: ITT population included all participants, who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Capecitabine + OxaliplatinPercentage of Participants With Downstaging of Primary Tumor and/or Lymph NodesT stage47 Percentage of participants
Capecitabine + OxaliplatinPercentage of Participants With Downstaging of Primary Tumor and/or Lymph NodesN stage48 Percentage of participants
Capecitabine + OxaliplatinPercentage of Participants With Downstaging of Primary Tumor and/or Lymph NodesOverall65 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Pathological Incomplete Tumor Response

Pathological incomplete tumor response was defined as grade 1 or 2 in the histological grading of regression according to Dworak grading of regression. Pathological incomplete tumor response rate, Grade 1: dominant tumor mass with obvious fibrosis and/or vasculopathy; Grade 2: dominantly fibrotic changes with few tumor cells or groups (easy to find) were assessed.

Time frame: Up to Week 16

Population: ITT population included all participants, who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Capecitabine + OxaliplatinPercentage of Participants With Pathological Incomplete Tumor Response72 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Resection (R0) in Participants With T4 Rectal Cancer

R0 resection was defined as complete resection of the tumor with adequate tumor-free margins and regional lymph node extirpation as confirmed by pathology after pre-operative chemotherapy plus capecitabine + oxaliplatin therapy.

Time frame: Up to Week 16

Population: The ITT consists of all included participants, who received at least one dose of study drug. Five participants from ITT population with T4 rectal cancer underwent surgery.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Capecitabine + OxaliplatinPercentage of Participants With Resection (R0) in Participants With T4 Rectal Cancer100 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Sphincter-preservation

Percentage of participants with sphincter-preservation is reported.

Time frame: Up to Week 16

Population: ITT population included all participants, who received at least one dose of study drug. Two participants from the ITT population did not undergo surgery (one died, one withdrew consent).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Capecitabine + OxaliplatinPercentage of Participants With Sphincter-preservation84.48 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026