Skip to content

Is Chronic Whiplash-associated Pain of Neurogenic Origin?

Is Chronic Whiplash-associated Pain of Neurogenic Origin? A Study Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Neurolysis of Peripheral Nerves With Traditional Neck-specific Exercise

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02692937
Enrollment
60
Registered
2016-02-26
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2017-09-30
Last updated
2020-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Whiplash Injuries

Keywords

Neurosurgical Procedures, Nerve Block, Exercise therapy, Physical Therapy Specialty

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of neurolysis with the effects of a exercise program on pain and other symptoms in individuals with chronic whiplash (WAD II-III).

Detailed description

People with whiplash associated disorders (WAD) grade II-III have chronic severe pain and symptoms and reduced quality of life. The origin of the symptoms is still unknown, and there are to date no available guidelines for treatment of this condition. The lack of effective treatment leads to high costs for the patients, and to society, due to considerable medical care and work loss. After providing a written consent, the patients will be randomized to either surgical treatment with neurolysis of peripheral nerve/s in the back of the head and/or neck plus physiotherapy or to physiotherapy (care-as-usual) only. Both groups will be treated with the same traditional neck-specific exercise program for 12 months. All participants will be evaluated with patient-reported outcomes and clinical examination at baseline, and at 6, 12 and 24 months after inclusion. The main outcome will be change in NDI from baseline to the 2-year follow-up. A preliminary sample-size calculation shows that 27 patients are needed for each treatment arm to detect a clinically important change of 10 points in NDI, with a between-group standard deviation of 13 point (statistical power of 80 % and a 5% significance level). To account for a 20% drop-out rate, 32 patients will be included per arm. Because this is the first RCT on neurolysis vs care-as-usual treatment, a second sample-size calculation including empirical data will performed by an independent statistician, without breaking the code, when 30 patients in each group have been included. Secondary outcomes include VAS (average pain including pain in the head, neck and face), symptom index, self-efficacy, HDI, WAD-DI, psychosomatic aspects, quality of life and clinical examination. Data will be performed with parametric, or non-parametric statistics, as appropriate, in IBM SPSS Statistics version 22 for Mac (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Analysis will be performed according to both intention-to-treat and per protocol. To account for missing data, the previous group means value will be considered to remain form the last occasion and used as carry forward. For continuous data, differences in mean change (baseline vs follow-up) will be compared between groups and adjusted in relation to baseline values. For categorical data, differences in median change (baseline vs follow-up) will be compared between groups and adjusted in relation to baseline values. Effect sizes will be calculated for all measures. This Randomized Controlled Study is approved and funded by the National Board of Health and Welfare in Sweden (project no 6168/2007).

Interventions

PROCEDURENeurolysis
OTHERTraditional neck-specific exercise program

Sponsors

Lund University
CollaboratorOTHER
Region Skane
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* trauma that has caused a whiplash injury * at least one year of incapacitating chronic neck pain/headache related to the injury (WAD II-III) * typical trigger points in the back of the head or in the neck and significant pain relief with local anesthesia towards the painful areas

Exclusion criteria

* mental illness * abuse of drugs/alcohol * not understanding or reading the Swedish language * previous surgery in the back of the head

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Neck Disability Index (NDI)24 monthsQuestionnaire

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-Efficacy Scale (SES)24 monthsQuestionnaire
Headache Disability Index (HDI)24 monthsQuestionnaire
Whiplash Associated Disorders - Disability Index (WAD-DI)24 monthsQuestionnaire
Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (Zung)24 monthsQuestionnaire
Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ)24 monthsQuestionnaire
The Symptom index24 monthsRelated symptoms (pain) psychosomatic aspects and any disability due to the neck complaint. Questionnaire.
EuroQol thermometer (EQ-VAS)24 monthsQuestionnaire
Cervical range of motion (CROM)12 months
Pain drawing, perceived face and body sensations12 monthsThe characteristics of the patients sensations/pain are described on two different charts.
Exploratory outcome. Perceived pain on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for 14 specific trigger points in the muscles of the occipital region, neck and shoulder.12 monthsThe physiotherapist palpates each trigger point, according to a detailed protocol developed for the present study.
EuroQol questionnaire (EQ-5D)24 monthsQuestionnaire

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026