Skip to content

TENS in Optimizer(R) Patients

Electromagnetic Interference by Transcutaneous Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Patients With Optimizer(R) - a Pilot Safety Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02692690
Enrollment
6
Registered
2016-02-26
Start date
2015-05-31
Completion date
2015-10-31
Last updated
2016-02-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Brief summary

Systemic skeletal muscle atrophy (cachexia) is a typical side effect of chronic heart failure. Patients with cachexia can benefit from transcutaneous electrical neuromuscular stimulation (TENS). It is applied to strengthen the musculature and improve exercise tolerance and quality of life. It is unclear if application of TENS can cause electromagnetic interference (EMI) in patients with Optimizer® pacemaker systems for improvement of heart failure. This pilot safety study enrolled 6 patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. All patients had an Optimizer® pacemaker system implanted for a minimum of 6 months, no patients had any ventricular arrhythmic episode 3 months prior to the study, and all were in clinically stable condition and willing to participate in this study. Neuromuscular stimulation was administered via TENS in 4 different modes (HF, LF, Burst, MF) on the right and left musculus trapezius and on both musculi quadriceps femoris. All patients were tested for EMI without or with cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) delivery of the Optimizer®-system respectively.

Interventions

DEVICEStimulette r4x

Sponsors

Medical University of Vienna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* \>18 years, with implantation of the Optimizer ® \>6 months ago, clinically stable condition and without any ventricular arrhythmic episode in the last 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

* Local swelling or edema at the site of stimulation, intolerance to electrical stimulation, or presence of other metallic implants at the site of stimulation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The patients with CCM-system are assessed for EMI during TENS-application6 monthsElectromagnetic interference can cause artificial sensing in pacemaker or ICD system. These artefacts may have the effect of suppressing the pacemaker pulses sensing of tachycardia in ICD. The patients will be exposed to electrical stimulations, which will be of different forces on the neck and the upper thigh with r4x. These impulses and the effects will be noted down. It will be investigated if there is an interference with the optimizer ® depending on the different sites of the electrical stimulations and the different impulse forces. Many patients with an Optimizer ® have simultaneously a pacemaker - or ICD implant. A special extra monitor will note if there are probable interferences with these pacemaker- or ICD implants.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026