Skip to content

Evaluation of Potential Screening Tools for Metabolic Body Odor and Halitosis

Evaluation of Gastrointestinal and Nutritional Diagnostic Tests as Potential Screening Tools for Metabolic Body Odor and Halitosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02692495
Enrollment
16
Registered
2016-02-26
Start date
2009-04-30
Completion date
2016-02-29
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases

Keywords

body odor, halitosis, dysbiosis, leaky gut, microbiome, PATM, breath odor

Brief summary

This study is designed as a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the potential of diagnostic procedures in defining populations of patients self-reporting unexpected and uncontrollable episodes of body odor and/or halitosis. The cohort - generally healthy individuals who had underwent multiple diagnostic tests recommended by their physicians and had not been diagnosed with any known medical condition - expressed their interest in trying gastrointestinal and nutritional diagnostic tests offered by Biolab Medical Unit. Our retrospective analysis will determine if these tests were useful as potential screening tools for metabolic body odor and halitosis.

Detailed description

Many yet uncharacterized medical conditions including inborn and acquired errors of metabolism or skewed microbiome could be responsible for unpredictable and uncontrollable episodes of body odor and halitosis. These conditions have dramatic impact on the quality of life and socioeconomic outcomes of sufferers. Yet clinics and specialized malodor centers do not provide tests for diagnosing malodor other than trimethylaminuria (TMAU). Self-reported odor problems are often dismissed if are not organoleptically evaluated by trained odor judges that are not readily available during malodor flare-ups. The aim of this study is to analyze effectiveness of existing gastrointestinal and nutritional tests for the assessment and investigation of self-reported malodors. Diagnostic tests included: * Gut Permeability Profile. PEG 400 is used as a probe and measured in urine passed for the following 6 hours at 11 different molecular weights to establish the quantity of each absorbed through the gut wall. Extraction and separation of PEG from urine is done by ion exchange chromatography and capillary GLC. * Gut Fermentation Profile. Blood alcohols - ethanol, methanol, butanol, propanol and short chain fatty acids - are measured by gas-liquid chromatography. * D-lactate test. D-lactate is measured by centrifugal analysis using the specific enzyme D-lactate dehydrogenase, which does not react with L-lactate * The urine indicans (Obermeyer) test. Detection of indican in the urine depends upon its decomposition and subsequent oxidation of indoxyl to indigo blue and its absorption into a chloroform layer * Breath test for small intestinal dysbiosis. Breath hydrogen and methane are measured by gas-liquid chromatography. The patient is given 10 gm of lactulose in 200 ml of water and alveolar air samples are collected every 20 minutes for 3 hours * Functional B vitamins profile, by measuring the activation of a red cell enzyme that is dependent upon an adequate concentration of a particular vitamin for full activity. The assay relies on normal metabolism of the vitamin to its native form and the presence of other non-vitamin cofactors.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Mebo Research, Inc.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* idiopathic malodor experienced over a period of several months or years * willing and able to complete the study * good general health

Exclusion criteria

* elect not to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Test Results Outside the Normal Rangefour yearsThe investigators would like to evaluate the strength of evidence in diagnostic accuracy of laboratory tests taken by participants (listed in the detailed description of the study), for diagnosing malodor syndromes. Values measured by the laboratory (Biolab Medical Unit) will be compared against the reference range specific to that laboratory.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Discriminative Biomarkers in the Subgroups of Malodorthree yearsThe investigators have comprehensively analyzed diagnostic ability of tests taken by participants to correlate with their symptoms using several statistical techniques known to bring out strong patterns in a dataset. Principal component analysis (PCA) allowed to clearly separate data into two clusters (Sour and Sweet) shown below along with the Lactic subgroup from the Sour group.
Number of Test Results Outside the Normal Range in Different Subgroups of MalodorThree yearsDisciminative biomarkers for groups of malodor discovered using PCA, compared to control group
Average Daily Added Sugar Intake Inferred From Self-reported Dietary Data in the Subgroups of MalodorThree yearsThe measurement of dietary intake of selected nutrients from self-reported food intakes and diet history questionnaires. Correlation of symptoms with added sugar in the diet were noted independently on the source of malodor.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Body Odor
individuals self-reporting recurrent episodes of uncontrollable body odor with or without halitosis
12
Halitosis
individuals with halitosis, not complaining of body odors
4
Total16

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHalitosisTotalBody Odor
Age, Continuous37.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9
32.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
30.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
Duration of condition
Age at onset of symptoms
29 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
23 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
21 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
Duration of condition
Duration of symptoms
9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
4 participants16 participants12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants11 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 4
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 120 / 4
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 4

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Test Results Outside the Normal Range

The investigators would like to evaluate the strength of evidence in diagnostic accuracy of laboratory tests taken by participants (listed in the detailed description of the study), for diagnosing malodor syndromes. Values measured by the laboratory (Biolab Medical Unit) will be compared against the reference range specific to that laboratory.

Time frame: four years

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Body OdorNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeElevated 2,3-butylene glycol4 participants
Body OdorNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeElevated 1-butanol1 participants
Body OdorNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeIncreased blood acetate0 participants
Body OdorNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeElevated 1-propanol8 participants
Body OdorNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeDecreased blood acetate4 participants
Body OdorNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeElevated 2-butanol2 participants
Body OdorNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeDecreased blood propionate4 participants
Body OdorNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeElevated 2-methyl-1-propanol6 participants
Body OdorNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeDecreased blood butyrate5 participants
Body OdorNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeElevated 2-methyl-1-butanol6 participants
Body OdorNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeBlood Succinate out of range0 participants
Body OdorNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeElevated blood methanol0 participants
Body OdorNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeBlood Valerate out of range0 participants
Body OdorNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeElevated 2-methyl-2-butanol0 participants
Body OdorNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeIncreased gut permeability9 participants
Body OdorNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeElevated 2-methyl-2-propanol0 participants
Body OdorNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeDecreased gut permeability0 participants
Body OdorNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeElevated 2-ethyl-1-butanol0 participants
Body OdorNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal Rangeincreased blood D-lactate3 participants
Body OdorNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeElevated 2-propanol3 participants
Body OdorNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal Rangeincreased urine Indicans5 participants
Body OdorNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeElevated blood ethanol6 participants
HalitosisNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal Rangeincreased urine Indicans1 participants
HalitosisNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeElevated blood ethanol3 participants
HalitosisNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeElevated blood methanol0 participants
HalitosisNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeElevated 1-propanol3 participants
HalitosisNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeElevated 2-propanol3 participants
HalitosisNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeElevated 2-methyl-1-propanol2 participants
HalitosisNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeElevated 2-methyl-2-propanol1 participants
HalitosisNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeElevated 1-butanol0 participants
HalitosisNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeElevated 2-butanol0 participants
HalitosisNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeElevated 2-methyl-1-butanol1 participants
HalitosisNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeElevated 2-methyl-2-butanol0 participants
HalitosisNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeElevated 2-ethyl-1-butanol1 participants
HalitosisNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeElevated 2,3-butylene glycol0 participants
HalitosisNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeIncreased blood acetate1 participants
HalitosisNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeDecreased blood acetate0 participants
HalitosisNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeDecreased blood propionate0 participants
HalitosisNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeDecreased blood butyrate0 participants
HalitosisNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeBlood Succinate out of range0 participants
HalitosisNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeBlood Valerate out of range0 participants
HalitosisNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeIncreased gut permeability0 participants
HalitosisNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal RangeDecreased gut permeability2 participants
HalitosisNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal Rangeincreased blood D-lactate0 participants
Secondary

Average Daily Added Sugar Intake Inferred From Self-reported Dietary Data in the Subgroups of Malodor

The measurement of dietary intake of selected nutrients from self-reported food intakes and diet history questionnaires. Correlation of symptoms with added sugar in the diet were noted independently on the source of malodor.

Time frame: Three years

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Body OdorAverage Daily Added Sugar Intake Inferred From Self-reported Dietary Data in the Subgroups of Malodor5 grams per dayStandard Deviation 5
HalitosisAverage Daily Added Sugar Intake Inferred From Self-reported Dietary Data in the Subgroups of Malodor25 grams per dayStandard Deviation 10
Lactic SubgroupAverage Daily Added Sugar Intake Inferred From Self-reported Dietary Data in the Subgroups of Malodor20 grams per dayStandard Deviation 10
Secondary

Discriminative Biomarkers in the Subgroups of Malodor

The investigators have comprehensively analyzed diagnostic ability of tests taken by participants to correlate with their symptoms using several statistical techniques known to bring out strong patterns in a dataset. Principal component analysis (PCA) allowed to clearly separate data into two clusters (Sour and Sweet) shown below along with the Lactic subgroup from the Sour group.

Time frame: three years

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Body OdorDiscriminative Biomarkers in the Subgroups of Malodor2,3-butylene glycol2.6 umol/LStandard Deviation 1.4
Body OdorDiscriminative Biomarkers in the Subgroups of MalodorButyrate5 umol/LStandard Deviation 6
Body OdorDiscriminative Biomarkers in the Subgroups of MalodorD-lactate7 umol/LStandard Deviation 5
Body OdorDiscriminative Biomarkers in the Subgroups of Malodor2- butanol1.3 umol/LStandard Deviation 0.8
Body OdorDiscriminative Biomarkers in the Subgroups of MalodorAcetate60.6 umol/LStandard Deviation 16.9
HalitosisDiscriminative Biomarkers in the Subgroups of MalodorButyrate11 umol/LStandard Deviation 3
HalitosisDiscriminative Biomarkers in the Subgroups of MalodorD-lactate29 umol/LStandard Deviation 39
HalitosisDiscriminative Biomarkers in the Subgroups of Malodor2- butanol0.9 umol/LStandard Deviation 0.7
HalitosisDiscriminative Biomarkers in the Subgroups of Malodor2,3-butylene glycol1.6 umol/LStandard Deviation 1.5
HalitosisDiscriminative Biomarkers in the Subgroups of MalodorAcetate68.7 umol/LStandard Deviation 22.5
Lactic SubgroupDiscriminative Biomarkers in the Subgroups of MalodorAcetate55.5 umol/LStandard Deviation 37.5
Lactic SubgroupDiscriminative Biomarkers in the Subgroups of Malodor2,3-butylene glycol6.0 umol/LStandard Deviation 0
Lactic SubgroupDiscriminative Biomarkers in the Subgroups of MalodorD-lactate330 umol/LStandard Deviation 245
Lactic SubgroupDiscriminative Biomarkers in the Subgroups of MalodorButyrate6 umol/LStandard Deviation 6
Lactic SubgroupDiscriminative Biomarkers in the Subgroups of Malodor2- butanol3.2 umol/LStandard Deviation 1.2
p-value: <0.01t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Number of Test Results Outside the Normal Range in Different Subgroups of Malodor

Disciminative biomarkers for groups of malodor discovered using PCA, compared to control group

Time frame: Three years

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Body OdorNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal Range in Different Subgroups of MalodorB2 vitamin, blood (EGFR activation)1 Participants
Body OdorNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal Range in Different Subgroups of MalodorIndicans, urine1 Participants
Body OdorNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal Range in Different Subgroups of MalodorEthanol, blood0 Participants
Body OdorNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal Range in Different Subgroups of MalodorD lactate, plasma0 Participants
HalitosisNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal Range in Different Subgroups of MalodorIndicans, urine4 Participants
HalitosisNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal Range in Different Subgroups of MalodorD lactate, plasma0 Participants
HalitosisNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal Range in Different Subgroups of MalodorEthanol, blood7 Participants
HalitosisNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal Range in Different Subgroups of MalodorB2 vitamin, blood (EGFR activation)5 Participants
Lactic SubgroupNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal Range in Different Subgroups of MalodorEthanol, blood1 Participants
Lactic SubgroupNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal Range in Different Subgroups of MalodorD lactate, plasma2 Participants
Lactic SubgroupNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal Range in Different Subgroups of MalodorB2 vitamin, blood (EGFR activation)0 Participants
Lactic SubgroupNumber of Test Results Outside the Normal Range in Different Subgroups of MalodorIndicans, urine1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026