Skip to content

Xen Matrix™ AB Surgical Graft in Ventral or Incisional Midline Hernias

A Post-Market, Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm Trial of XenMatrix™ AB Surgical Graft in All Wound Classes Ventral or Incisional Midline Hernias

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02691962
Enrollment
75
Registered
2016-02-25
Start date
2016-05-31
Completion date
2020-05-31
Last updated
2021-10-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Incisional Hernia

Brief summary

This study aims to prospectively explore the use of XenMatrix™ AB Surgical Graft for ventral or incisional midline hernia repair in patients across all wound classes (All Comers) through 24 months post repair.

Detailed description

This is a post-market, on-label study to understand the performance of the graft in the US.

Interventions

DEVICEXen Matrix AB

Xen Matrix™ AB Surgical Graft is an acellular, sterile, non-pyrogenic porcine dermal matrix packed dry for use in the reconstruction of soft tissue deficiencies. The device surfaces are coated with the antibacterial agents Rifampin and Minocycline in a bioresorbable L-Tyrosine succinate polymer carrier.

Sponsors

C. R. Bard
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject must be willing and able to give written informed consent. * Subject must be diagnosed with a ventral or incisional midline hernia. * Mesh must be placed in the retro-rectus or intraperitoneal plane. * Subject must be willing to undergo open hernia repair and be able to undergo all other study procedures as outlined in this protocol.

Exclusion criteria

* The use of surgical graft as a bridge repair. * The subject has more than 4 prior recurrences. * Subject has a contraindication for the placement of surgical graft. * Complete removal of existing mesh from a prior hernia repair (in the same affected area) is not possible. * The study hernia repair requires more than a single piece mesh (including sufficient overlap beyond margins of the defect on all sides). * Subject has intact permanent mesh adjacent to the current hernia to be repaired. * Subject has peritonitis at the time of surgery. * The subject is an active smoker within the last 2 weeks prior to surgery. * Clinically significant Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease or heart failure, defined as marked limitation in ability or inability to perform activities of daily living. * Subject had chemotherapy within the last 12 months, is on or suspected to be placed on chemotherapy medications during any part of the study. * Chronic steroid use (\>6 months) or immunosuppression drugs. * Subject's body mass index (BMI) \>45 kg/m2. * Subject has cirrhosis, and/or ascites. * Subject has a defined collagen disorder. * Known to be infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). * Subject has clinically significant (not based solely on creatinine levels) kidney disease that limits Activities of Daily Living, is on hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. * Subject is American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) Class 4 or 5. * Subject has a life expectancy \< 2 years at the time of enrollment. * Subject is pregnant, breastfeeding or planning on becoming pregnant during the course of the study. * Subjects with known sensitivity to porcine products. * Subjects with allergy, history of allergy or hypersensitivity to tetracyclines (including minocycline) or rifamycins (including rifampin). * Subject has any condition in the opinion of the Investigator that would preclude the use of the study device, or preclude the subject from completing the follow-up requirements.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Wound Occurrences Up to 45 Days Post ImplantationUp to 45 days post implantationWound occurrences were defined as surgical site infection, seroma, wound dehiscence, skin necrosis and fistulas requiring intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Hernia Recurrence Within 6 Months and 24 Months of Implantation ProcedureWithin 6 months and 24 months of implantation procedure
Number of Participants With Reoperation Due to Index Hernia Repair24 months post implantation procedure
Total Score on the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) at Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 Months Post Implantation ProcedureBaseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post implantation procedureThe Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) quality of life questionnaire aimed for patients who have had hernia repair surgery. Symptoms in the CCS are rated by the participants on a scale of 0 to 5, with a score of 0 suggesting no symptoms and a score of 5, disabling symptoms. A lower score on the questionnaire compared to baseline would indicate a better outcome.
Number of Participants With Wound Occurrences > 45 Days Post ImplantationDay 45 and up to 2 years post implantationWound occurrences was defined as surgical site infection, seroma, wound dehiscence, skin necrosis and fistulas requiring intervention.
Number of Participants Who Returned to Work Post Implantation ProcedureUp to 2 years following implantation procedure
Duration of Participants Stay in Hospital Following Implantation ProcedureFrom index procedure day to discharge from hospital day
General Health Score on the Short Form 12 (SF-12) Questionnaire at Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 Months Post Implantation.Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post implantationThe Short Form 12 (SF-12) is a self-reported 12-item questionnaire that evaluates general health and well-being (overall quality of life of an individual). The SF-12 includes questions on physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of functioning.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Subjects Treated With XenMatrix AB
This group includes participants with a diagnosis of ventral or incisional midline hernia who have undergone the hernia surgical repair with the use of the XenMatrix AB.
75
Total75

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSubjects Treated With XenMatrix AB
Age, Continuous58.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.74
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
60 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
75 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
39 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
36 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 75
other
Total, other adverse events
55 / 75
serious
Total, serious adverse events
31 / 75

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Wound Occurrences Up to 45 Days Post Implantation

Wound occurrences were defined as surgical site infection, seroma, wound dehiscence, skin necrosis and fistulas requiring intervention.

Time frame: Up to 45 days post implantation

Population: The primary endpoint was wound occurrence within 45 days post implantation that required intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Xen Matrix ABNumber of Participants With Wound Occurrences Up to 45 Days Post Implantation11 Participants
Secondary

Duration of Participants Stay in Hospital Following Implantation Procedure

Time frame: From index procedure day to discharge from hospital day

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Xen Matrix ABDuration of Participants Stay in Hospital Following Implantation Procedure6.7 DaysStandard Deviation 6.13
Secondary

General Health Score on the Short Form 12 (SF-12) Questionnaire at Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 Months Post Implantation.

The Short Form 12 (SF-12) is a self-reported 12-item questionnaire that evaluates general health and well-being (overall quality of life of an individual). The SF-12 includes questions on physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of functioning.

Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post implantation

Population: The number of participants (n) varies from the total number of participants (N) in the study as n depends on the number of participants for which data was available at the given time-point analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Xen Matrix ABGeneral Health Score on the Short Form 12 (SF-12) Questionnaire at Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 Months Post Implantation.Baseline47.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.14
Xen Matrix ABGeneral Health Score on the Short Form 12 (SF-12) Questionnaire at Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 Months Post Implantation.1 month47.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.3
Xen Matrix ABGeneral Health Score on the Short Form 12 (SF-12) Questionnaire at Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 Months Post Implantation.3 months48.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.28
Xen Matrix ABGeneral Health Score on the Short Form 12 (SF-12) Questionnaire at Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 Months Post Implantation.6 months48.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.77
Xen Matrix ABGeneral Health Score on the Short Form 12 (SF-12) Questionnaire at Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 Months Post Implantation.12 months48.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.06
Xen Matrix ABGeneral Health Score on the Short Form 12 (SF-12) Questionnaire at Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 Months Post Implantation.18 months49.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.17
Xen Matrix ABGeneral Health Score on the Short Form 12 (SF-12) Questionnaire at Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 Months Post Implantation.24 months47.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.49
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Returned to Work Post Implantation Procedure

Time frame: Up to 2 years following implantation procedure

Population: The overall number of participants (21) for this endpoint reflects the number of participants who were employed at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Xen Matrix ABNumber of Participants Who Returned to Work Post Implantation Procedure17 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Hernia Recurrence Within 6 Months and 24 Months of Implantation Procedure

Time frame: Within 6 months and 24 months of implantation procedure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Xen Matrix ABNumber of Participants With Hernia Recurrence Within 6 Months and 24 Months of Implantation ProcedureWithin 6 Months0 Participants
Xen Matrix ABNumber of Participants With Hernia Recurrence Within 6 Months and 24 Months of Implantation ProcedureWithin 24 Months4 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Reoperation Due to Index Hernia Repair

Time frame: 24 months post implantation procedure

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Xen Matrix ABNumber of Participants With Reoperation Due to Index Hernia Repair8 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Wound Occurrences > 45 Days Post Implantation

Wound occurrences was defined as surgical site infection, seroma, wound dehiscence, skin necrosis and fistulas requiring intervention.

Time frame: Day 45 and up to 2 years post implantation

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Xen Matrix ABNumber of Participants With Wound Occurrences > 45 Days Post Implantation15 Participants
Secondary

Total Score on the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) at Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 Months Post Implantation Procedure

The Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) quality of life questionnaire aimed for patients who have had hernia repair surgery. Symptoms in the CCS are rated by the participants on a scale of 0 to 5, with a score of 0 suggesting no symptoms and a score of 5, disabling symptoms. A lower score on the questionnaire compared to baseline would indicate a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post implantation procedure

Population: The number of participants (n) varies from the total number of participants (N) in the study as n depends on the number of participants for which data was available at the given time-point analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Xen Matrix ABTotal Score on the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) at Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 Months Post Implantation ProcedureBaseline1.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.65
Xen Matrix ABTotal Score on the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) at Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 Months Post Implantation Procedure1 month1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.42
Xen Matrix ABTotal Score on the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) at Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 Months Post Implantation Procedure3 months1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.37
Xen Matrix ABTotal Score on the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) at Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 Months Post Implantation Procedure6 months0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.18
Xen Matrix ABTotal Score on the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) at Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 Months Post Implantation Procedure12 months0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.06
Xen Matrix ABTotal Score on the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) at Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 Months Post Implantation Procedure18 months0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Xen Matrix ABTotal Score on the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) at Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 Months Post Implantation Procedure24 months0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026