Endoleak, Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Conditions
Brief summary
A single site cross-sectional comparison of paired diagnostic imaging modalities. This study will show the sensitivity and specificity of CEUS in detecting the various types of endoleaks, in comparison to tCTA, following EVAR. It will collect data to allow comparison of diagnostic accuracy across modalities including CDU, CEUS and tCTA. It will collect time taken to perform the various types of scan, to allow healthcare costs to be calculated for each imaging modality.
Detailed description
This study will show the sensitivity and specificity of CEUS in detecting the various types of endoleaks, in comparison to tCTA, following EVAR. It will collect data to allow comparison of diagnostic accuracy across modalities including CDU, CEUS and tCTA. It will collect time taken to perform the various types of scan, to allow healthcare costs to be calculated for each imaging modality. Collected data will be analysed regarding two novel hypothesised methods of using CEUS information: The first is recording temporal delay between contrast in graft and contrast in endoleak to define endoleak type. Potentially this could be used as a faster method of defining endoleak type in a surveillance programme. The second is to identify/refute correlation between CEUS contrast to appear in endoleak vs tCTA contrast to appear in endoleak. If an association can be established, CEUS timings could potentially then be used to time 'standard' CTA phases to improve CTAs diagnostic accuracy.
Interventions
A multi-phase contrast CT
A ultrasound scan with micro bubble contrast injection
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Aged 18 or over 2. Able to give informed consent 3. Undergone an EVAR of infra-renal abdominal aortic aneurysm 4. Planned for CTA of EVAR
Exclusion criteria
1. Unable to receive CTA Contrast Allergy, Insufficient renal function for standard outpatient contrast study (eGFR \<45) Overactive thyroid gland 2. Unable to receive CEUS contrast Previous reaction to Sonovue (Ultrasound Contrast) Allergy to sulphur hexafluoride (used in electrical industry in circuit breakers, switch gears & electrical equipment) Recent acute coronary syndrome or unstable angina, typical angina at rest or frequent or repeated angina/chest pain - all within previous 7 days Recent coronary intervention 3. Previous embolization of artery in region of EVAR (affects imaging quality) 4. BMI \>30 (affects imaging quality)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Ability to detect type I/III endoleak on CEUS as defined by presence/absence on tCTA | Immediate | Will be presented as a Sensitivity & specificity |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Ability to predict secondary intervention on CEUS as defined by patients proceeding to secondary intervention | Immediate | Will be presented as a Sensitivity & specificity |
| Confirm / refute association between temporal delay measured on CEUS and endoleak type as defined by tCTA, using the framework of general linear regression. | Immediate | Temporal delay is the time difference between contrast arriving in the stent graft and contrast arriving in the endoleak on CEUS |
| Ability to detect type II endoleak on CEUS as defined by presence/absence on tCTA | Immediate | Will be presented as a Sensitivity & specificity |
| Ability to predict secondary intervention of CDU, CEUS and tCTAas defined by patients proceeding to secondary intervention | 6 months | Will be presented as a Sensitivity & specificity |
| Time taken for CDU, CEUS & tCTA scans to be performed as measured by observer. | Immediate | Used to calculate total resource utilisation by individual scan types. |
| Establish association between CEUS contrast in endoleak to tCTA contrast in endoleak by general linear regression analysis of timings recorded during CEUS & tCTA. | Immediate | — |
Countries
United Kingdom