Skip to content

Potential Benefit of the Combination of Metamizole and Ibuprofen After Third Lower Molar Extraction

Potential Benefit of the Combination of Metamizole and Ibuprofen After Third Lower Molar Extraction

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02686021
Acronym
NovIbu
Enrollment
36
Registered
2016-02-19
Start date
2016-02-15
Completion date
2021-04-28
Last updated
2021-05-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Brief summary

Postoperative pain is common and particularly outpatients may experience unsatisfactory pain relief. This randomized, double-blind, crossover study of postoperative pain in outpatients undergoing split-mouth, third lower molar extraction aims to examine whether or not the combination of metamizole and ibuprofen is superior to either drug alone.

Interventions

DRUGMetamizole and Ibuprofen

Metamizole (1000mg) plus Ibuprofen (400mg) 15 minutes prior to surgery, at 6 postoperative hours, and at 12 postoperative hours

DRUGMetamizole and Placebo

Metamizole (1000mg) plus placebo 15 minutes prior to surgery, at 6 postoperative hours, and at 12 postoperative hours

Ibuprofen (400mg) plus placebo 15 minutes prior to surgery, at 6 postoperative hours, and at 12 postoperative hours

Sponsors

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* planned sequential both-sided lower third molar extraction (split-mouth) with osteotomy (with or without upper molar extraction in local anesthesia) * able to understand the study and the NRS scale

Exclusion criteria

* simultaneous both sided extraction or only upper third molar extraction * general anesthesia * known or presumed abnormal coagulation status * known or presumed liver or renal dysfunction * contraindication against metamizole known or suspected (known or suspected allergy against novalgin or other pyrazolones, anaphylactic reaction against NSAIDS, decreased bone marrow function or hematopoesis, hepatic porphyria, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, and pregnancy/breastfeeding) * contraindication against ibuprofen (known or suspected allergy against ibuprofen, anaphylactic reaction against Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), active or recurrent stomach or duodenal ulcera or bleeding, severe liver or renal insufficiency, inflammatory bowel syndrome, and pregnancy/breastfeeding) * pregnancy and breast feeding mothers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
area under the curve for pain in the first 12 postoperative hoursfirst 12 postoperative hoursThe primary outcome is the area under the curve for pain in the first 12 postoperative hours, as assessed by the numeric rating scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
area under the curve for pain in the first 18 postoperative hoursfirst 18 postoperative hoursThis secondary outcome is the area under the curve for pain in the first 18 postoperative hours, as assessed by the numeric rating scale (NRS)
highest pain scoretotal observation period (maximum 18 hours)This secondary outcome is the highest pain score registered during the observation period, as assessed by the numeric rating scale
night time painfirst night after the interventionThis secondary outcome is the overall pain during the first night after the intervention, as assessed by the numeric rating scale
need for and timing of rescue medicationtotal observation period (maximum 18 hours)This secondary outcome is the marked yes or no, depending on whether a rescue medication (extra pain medication) was needed or not
haemorrhage requiring interventiontotal observation period (maximum 18 hours)This secondary outcome is the marked yes or no, depending on whether an intervention to stop haemorrhage was needed or not

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026