Skip to content

A Study of Durvalumab in Combination With Lenalidomide With and Without Dexamethasone in Adults With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

A Phase 1/2 Multicenter, Open-label Study to Determine the Recommended Dose and Regimen of Durvalumab (MEDI4736) in Combination With Lenalidomide (LEN) With and Without Dexamethasone (DEX)in Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02685826
Enrollment
56
Registered
2016-02-19
Start date
2016-04-25
Completion date
2022-09-06
Last updated
2023-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Myeloma

Keywords

Open-label, Phase 1/2, Durvalumab, MEDI4736, Lenalidomide (Len), Dexamethasone (dex), Multiple Myeloma, Newly-Diagnosed (NDMM), Transplant Non-eligible (TNE), PD-L1, Durvalumab (DURVA)

Brief summary

This is a multicenter, open-label, Phase 1/2 study to determine the recommended dose and regimen of durvalumab in combination with lenalidomide (LEN) with and without dexamethasone (dex) in adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). The study will consist of a dose-finding phase as well as a parallel dose-expansion phase to determine the optimal regimen. \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* The study was placed on full clinical hold by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on 05 Sep 2017. The decision by the FDA was based on data from non-Celgene-sponsored studies related to risks of anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), pembrolizumab, in combination with immunomodulatory agents. As the result, the study was closed for further enrollment, and all subjects were discontinued from all study treatments (durvalumab, lenalidomide and dexamethasone). All subjects are being followed for second primary malignancies (SPMs), every 6 months for 5 years after the last subject has been enrolled as per protocol. After stopping data collection in the clinical database, any SPM events will continue to be recorded in the subject's source documents, and reported to Celgene Drug Safety.

Detailed description

The dose-finding phase will determine recommended dose (RD) for durvalumab in combination with lenalidomide (LEN) with and without dexamethasone (dex) in a 28-day treatment cycle. Three treatment Cohorts (A, B, and C) will be enrolled in parallel: * Cohort A: durvalumab + LEN + dex in high risk transplant non-eligible (TNE) newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) participants; * Cohort B: durvalumab + LEN + dex (dex for up to 12 cycles) in ≥ 65 years old TNE NDMM participants who are not high risk; * Cohort C: durvalumab + LEN as maintenance in post-transplant high risk NDMM participants. Based on experience with durvalumab for other indications, the initial dose of durvalumab will be 1500 mg for each treatment cohort. The dose of durvalumab might be de-escalated to 750 mg level. The dose of LEN will be 25 mg (adjustable per the creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] value) on Days 1 to 21 of each 28-day treatment cycle for participants in Cohort A and B. The dose of LEN will be 10 mg on Days 1 to 21 of each 28-day treatment cycle for participants in Cohort C. The dose of dex will be 40 mg/day (for participants ≤ 75 years old) or 20 mg/day (for participants \> 75 years old) on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 28-day cycle for Cohort A and Cohort B (for up to 12 cycles). Initially, 6 participants will be enrolled into each cohort and each will receive 1500 mg durvalumab. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) evaluation period will be the first treatment cycle. * If ≤ 1 of the 6 initial participants experience a DLT within the first cycle, then the dose expansion phase may be initiated with durvalumab 1500 mg as the recommended dose (RD); * If 2 or more of the 6 initial participants experience a DLT within the first cycle, then the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) has been exceeded and de-escalation to durvalumab 750 mg level after review of safety and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/Pd) of the initial 6 participants by the Dose Review Team (DRT). Any of the cohorts may be removed from the study based on emerging PK, Pd, efficacy or safety data. Dose de-escalation will only occur after review of safety (DLT) and possibly PK/Pd data by the Dose Review Team ( DRT). Note: In the US, two treatment arms (A and B) will be enrolled in parallel. Cohort C will enroll upon completion of at least 4 cycles of follow-up for safety assessment of Cohorts A and B.

Interventions

DRUGDurvalumab

single use vials administered via intravenous infusion

DRUGLenalidomide

capsules for oral administration

DRUGDexamethasone

tablets for oral administration

Sponsors

Celgene
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects must satisfy the following criteria to be enrolled into the study: 1. Subject is ≥ 18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent form (ICF) 2. Subject must understand and voluntarily sign an ICF prior to any study-related assessments/procedures being conducted 3. Subject is willing and able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements 4. Subject must have documented diagnosis with previously untreated (for cohort C, the induction and consolidation treatment along with the first autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) are allowed), symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) as defined by the criteria below: MM diagnostic criteria (all 3 required); \- Monoclonal protein present in the serum and/or urine * Clonal bone marrow plasma cells ≥10% or biopsy-proven bony or extramedullary plasmacytoma * Any one or more of the following myeloma defining events: 1\. one or more of the following Myeloma-related organ dysfunction (at least one of the following); * (C) Calcium elevation (serum calcium \>11.5 mg/dl )(\>2.65 mmol/L) * (R) Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine \>2 mg/dl)(177 µmol/L or more) or creatinine clearance \< 40 ml/min * (A) Anemia (hemoglobin \<10 g/dL or \>2 g/dL below the lower limit of laboratory normal) * (B) Bone lesions (lytic or osteopenic) one or more bone lesions on skeletal radiography, computed tomography (CT), or positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) 2\. one or more of the following biomarkers of malignancy: * Clonal bone marrow plasma cell percentage ≥60% * Abnormal serum free light-chain ratio ≥100 (involved kappa) or \< 0.01 (involved lambda) * \>1 focal lesions detected by functional imaging including PET/CT and/or whole body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) AND have measurable disease by protein electrophoresis analyses as defined by the following: * Immunoglobulin G (IgG) MM: Serum monoclonal paraprotein (M-protein) level ≥ 1.0 g/dl or urine Mprotein level ≥ 200 mg/24 hours * Immunoglobulin A (IgA) MM: Serum M-protein level ≥ 0.5 g/dl or urine M-protein level ≥ 200 mg/24 hours * Immunoglobulin M (IgM) MM (IgM M-protein plus lytic bone disease documented by skeletal survey plain films): Serum M-protein level ≥ 1.0 g/dl or urine M-protein level ≥ 200 mg/24 hours * Immunoglobulin D (IgD) MM: Serum M-protein level ≥ 0.05 g/dl or urine M-protein level ≥ 200 mg/24 hours * Light chain MM: Serum M-protein level ≥ 1.0 g/dl or urine M-protein level ≥ 200 mg/24 hours 5\. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, or 2 6\. Females of childbearing potential (FCBP) must: a. Have two negative pregnancy tests as verified by the investigator prior to starting study treatment. She must agree to ongoing pregnancy testing during the course of the study, and after end of study treatment. This applies even if the subject practices true abstinence from heterosexual contact. b. She must either commit to true abstinence from heterosexual contact (which must be reviewed on a monthly basis and be source documented) or agree to use, and be able to comply with, effective contraception without interruption, 28 days prior to starting study treatment, during the study therapy (including dose interruptions), and for 90 days after discontinuation of study treatment. c. Refrain from egg cell and blood donation for 90 days after the final dose of durvalumab. 7\. Male subjects must : a. Practice true abstinence (which must be reviewed on a monthly basis) or agree to use a condom during sexual contact with a pregnant female or a FCBP while participating in the study, during dose interruptions and for at least 90 days following study treatment discontinuation, even if he has undergone a successful vasectomy. b. Refrain from sperm and blood donation for at least 90 days after the final dose of durvalumab. 8\. For Cohort A subject must be transplant non-eligible (TNE) and meet at least one of the following high risk factors: a. Cytogenetic abnormalities finding in malignant myeloma clone with t(4; 14); and / or del(17p); and / or 1q amplification; and / or t(14:16); or b. International Staging System (ISS) Stage III; or c. Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) \> 2\*ULN (upper limit of normal). 9\. For Cohort B subject must be ≥ 65 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent form (ICF) and transplant non-eligible (TNE); excluding the subjects who meet the Cohort A criteria. 10\. For Cohort C subject must be after first autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for NDMM and meet the following criteria: 1. Have a post-transplant response as Partial response (PR) or better at the time of enrollment to this study; 2. Have one of the following high risk factors at the time of NDMM diagnosis; * Cytogenetic abnormalities finding in malignant myeloma clone with t(4; 14); and / or del(17p); and / or 1q amplification; and / or t(14; 16); or * ISS stage III; or * Serum LDH \> 2\*ULN; c. Minimal residual disease (MRD) positive (defined as more than 1 malignant cell in 105 cells) measured by ClonoSIGHT™NGS assay of a BMA sample) at the time of enrollment to this study; BMA sample collected at the time of multiple myeloma diagnosis, prior to induction therapy available for central MRD assessment by ClonoSIGHT™NGS assay

Exclusion criteria

* The presence of any of the following will exclude a subject from enrollment: 1. Previous treatment with anti-myeloma therapy (does not include radiotherapy, bisphosphonates, or a single short course of steroid (ie, less than or equal to the equivalent of dexamethasone 40 mg/day for 4 days; such a short course of steroid treatment must not have been given within 14 days of Cycle 1 Day 1), for Cohort C, the induction and consolidation treatment along with the first Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) are allowed) 2. Any of the following laboratory abnormalities: 1. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \< 1,000/μL 2. Untransfused platelet count \< 75,000 cells/μL 3. Serum aspartate aminotransferase/serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT/AST) or alanine aminotransferase (SGPT/ALT) \> 2.5\*upper limit of normal (ULN) 4. Serum total bilirubin \> 1.5\*ULN or \> 3.0 mg/dL for subjects with documented Gilbert's syndrome 5. Corrected serum calcium \>13.5 mg/dL (\> 3.4 mmol/L) 3. Renal failure requiring hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis 4. Any serious medical condition that places the subject at an unacceptable risk if he or she participates in this study. Examples of such a medical condition are, but are not limited to, subject with unstable cardiac disease as defined by: cardiac events such as myocardial infarction (MI) within the past 6 months, NYHA (New York Heart Association) heart failure class III-IV, uncontrolled atrial fibrillation or hypertension; subjects with conditions requiring chronic steroid or immunosuppressive treatment, such as rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis and lupus, that likely need additional steroid or immunosuppressive treatments in addition to the study treatment 5. Peripheral neuropathy ≥ Grade 2 6. Primary AL (immunoglobulin light-chain) amyloidosis and myeloma complicated by amyloidosis 7. Prior history of malignancies, other than MM, unless the subject has been free of the disease for ≥ 5 years with the exception of the following non-invasive malignancies: 1. Basal cell carcinoma of the skin 2. Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin 3. Carcinoma in situ of the cervix 4. Carcinoma in situ of the breast 5. Incidental histologic finding of prostate cancer (T1a or T1b using the TNM \[tumor, nodes, metastasis\] clinical staging system) or prostate cancer that is curative 8. Subjects is positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); chronic or active hepatitis B or active hepatitis A, or C 9. Subject had prior exposure to immunotherapy, including, but not limited to, other anti- CTLA-4,anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody or inhibitor, cell-based therapies, or cancer vaccines 10. Subjects has history of organ or allogeneic stem cell transplantation 11. Subjects who have had clinical evidence of central nervous system (CNS) or pulmonary leukostasis, disseminated intravascular coagulation, or CNS multiple myeloma, or plasma cell leukemia 12. Known or suspected hypersensitivity to the excipients contained in the formulation of durvalumab, lenalidomide, or dexamethasone 13. Major surgery (as defined by the investigator) within the 28 days prior to the first dose of study treatment 14. Received prior treatment (for any reason)with a monoclonal antibody within 5 half-lives of initiating study treatment 15. Use of any investigational agents within 28 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) of initiating study treatment 16. Current or prior use of immunosuppressive medication within 14 days prior to the first dose of study treatment. The following are exceptions to this criterion: 1. Intranasal, inhaled, topical or local steroid injections (eg, intra-articular injection); 2. Systemic corticosteroids at physiologic doses not to exceed 10 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent; 3. Steroids as premedication for hypersensitivity reactions (eg, computed tomography (CT) scan premedication); 17. Active or prior documented autoimmune or inflammatory disorders (including inflammatory bowel disease (eg, colitis, Crohn's disease\], diverticulitis with the exception of a prior episode that has resolved or diverticulosis, celiac disease, irritable bowel disease, or other serious gastrointestinal chronic conditions associated with diarrhea; systemic lupus erythematosus; Wegener's syndrome \[granulomatosis with polyangiitis); myasthenia gravis; Graves' disease; rheumatoid arthritis; hypophysitis, uveitis) within the past 3 years prior to the start of treatment. The following are exceptions to this criterion: 1. Subjects with vitiligo or alopecia; 2. Subjects with hypothyroidism (eg, following Hashimoto syndrome) stable on hormone replacement; or 3. Subjects with psoriasis not requiring systemic treatment; 18. History of primary immunodeficiency 19. Subject has incidence of gastrointestinal disease that may significantly alter the absorption of LEN 20. Receipt of live, attenuated vaccine within 30 days prior to the first dose of durvalumab 21. Unable or unwilling to undergo protocol required thromboembolism prophylaxis(for Cohort C, this will be only for the subjects who have a history of VTE) 22. Females who are pregnant, nursing or breastfeeding, or intend to become pregnant during the participation to the study 23. Any significant medical condition, laboratory abnormality, or psychiatric illness that would prevent the subject from participating in the study 24. Any condition including the presence of laboratory abnormalities, which places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study 25. Any condition that confounds the ability to interpret data from the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) During the Dose-Determining Timeframe (Day 1 - Day 28)First treatment cycle: Day 1 to Day 28A Dose Review Team (DRT) evaluated DLTs to determine the recommended dose (RD) of Durvalumab to use in the Expansion Period. A DLT was defined as: a. Grade 4 neutropenia for \>= 5 days. b. Grade 3 neutropenia associated with fever (≥ 38.5°C / 101.3°F) of any duration. c. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia or Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding, or platelets transfusion. d. Grade 4 hematologic toxicity that does not resolve to baseline level \<=72 hours. e. Grade 4 anemia, unexplained by underlying disease. f. Any nonhematologic toxicity Grade ≥ 3 except for alopecia and nausea. g. Treatment interruption \>= 2 weeks due to AE. If ≤ 1 of the 6 initial participants in each cohort experience a DLT during cycle 1, the RD was Durvalumab 1500 mg; If \>=2 of the 6 initial participants in any cohort experience a DLT during cycle 1, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was exceeded and the dose level of Durvalumab was de-escalated to 750 mg

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Response Rate (ORR) for Cohorts A and B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Partial Response or Better According to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response CriteriaDay 1 of each cycle starting with Cycle 2 up to Cycle 17 plus one week for the end of treatment visit (Day 29 up to Week 73)Tumor response, including progressive disease, was assessed by the investigators and captured the best assessment of response during the treatment period. ORR was defined as partial response (PR) or better which includes PR, very good partial response (VGPR), complete response (CR), or stringent complete response (sCR). A PR required ≥ 50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by ≥ 90% or to \< 200 mg per 24 hours. If present at baseline, a ≥ 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas was also required. sCR required - a negative immunofixation of serum and urine and - disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and - ≤ 5% plasma cells in bone marrow and normal free light-chain (FLC) ratio and - absence of clonal plasma cells by immunohistochemistry or 2- to 4-color flow cytometry.
Response Improvement Rate (RIR) for Cohort C: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Response Improved From Cycle 1 Day 1 as Assessed by the Investigators Using the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response CriteriaBaseline (Cycle 1 Day 1); Treatment: Day 1 of each cycle starting with Cycle 2 up to Cycle 15 plus one week for the end of treatment visit (Day 29 up to Week 61)Response Improvement Rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a response from treatment as compared to the pre-autologous stem cell transplantation \[ASCT\] diseases measurement used as baseline for response assessment. IMWG response categories could be stable disease (SD), partial response (PR), very good partial response (VGPR), complete response (CR), or stringent complete response (sCR), as long as it represented an improvement compared to prior to transplant.
Time to Response (for Cohorts A and B)Day 1 of each cycle starting with Cycle 2 up to Cycle 17 plus one week for the end of treatment visit (Day 29 up to Week 73)Time to response (for responders only, per IMWG Uniform Response Criteria) is calculated as the time from the first date of dosing of study medication to the first date of documented response (PR or better).
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Duration of Response (for Cohort A and B)Day 1 of each cycle starting with Cycle 2 up to Cycle 17 plus one week for the end of treatment visit (Day 29 up to Week 73)Duration of response (for responders only) was defined as the time from earliest date of documented response (PR or better) to the earliest date of disease progression (DP) as determined by the investigator per IMWG Uniform Response criteria or death during study treatment, whichever occurred first.
Durvalumab (DURVA) Serum Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measured Time Point (AUC0-last)pre-infusion (-60 to -5 minutes prior to dose), end of infusion (EOI), 4 hours, 168 hours (Day 8), 336 hours (Day 15) and 504 hours (Day 22) after administration of DURVA on Day 1Geometric mean was obtained by computing the arithmetic mean of the logarithm-transformed values of concentration/PK parameters and then using the exponentiation to return the computation to the original scales. Geometric CV% was calculated as follows: CV% = 100\*SQRT(EXP(σ2)-1), where σ2 denotes the variance of the log-transformed values.
Durvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf)pre-infusion (-60 to -5 minutes prior to dose), end of infusion (EOI), 4 hours, 168 hours (Day 8), 336 hours (Day 15) and 504 hours (Day 22) after administration of DURVA on Day 1Geometric mean was obtained by computing the arithmetic mean of the logarithm-transformed values of concentration/PK parameters and then using the exponentiation to return the computation to the original scales. Geometric CV% was calculated as follows: CV% = 100\*SQRT(EXP(σ2)-1), where σ2 denotes the variance of the log-transformed values.
Durvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax)pre-infusion (-60 to -5 minutes prior to dose), end of infusion (EOI), 4 hours, 168 hours (Day 8), 336 hours (Day 15) and 504 hours (Day 22) after administration of DURVA on Day 1Geometric mean was obtained by computing the arithmetic mean of the logarithm-transformed values of concentration/PK parameters and then using the exponentiation to return the computation to the original scales. Geometric CV% was calculated as follows: CV% = 100\*SQRT(EXP(σ2)-1), where σ2 denotes the variance of the log-transformed values.
Durvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax)pre-infusion (-60 to -5 minutes prior to dose), end of infusion (EOI), 4 hours, 168 hours (Day 8), 336 hours (Day 15) and 504 hours (Day 22) after administration of DURVA on Day 1Time to maximum observed concentration of Durvalumab (DURVA) after multiple doses on day 1 obtained from the observed concentration versus time data
Durvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2)pre-infusion (-60 to -5 minutes prior to dose), end of infusion (EOI), 4 hours, 168 hours (Day 8), 336 hours (Day 15) and 504 hours (Day 22) after administration of DURVA on Day 1Geometric mean was obtained by computing the arithmetic mean of the logarithm-transformed values of concentration/PK parameters and then using the exponentiation to return the computation to the original scales. Geometric CV% was calculated as follows: CV% = 100\*SQRT(EXP(σ2)-1), where σ2 denotes the variance of the log-transformed values.
Durvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Clearance (CL)pre-infusion (-60 to -5 minutes prior to dose), end of infusion (EOI), 4 hours, 168 hours (Day 8), 336 hours (Day 15) and 504 hours (Day 22) after administration of DURVA on Day 1Geometric mean was obtained by computing the arithmetic mean of the logarithm-transformed values of concentration/PK parameters and then using the exponentiation to return the computation to the original scales. Geometric CV% was calculated as follows: CV% = 100\*SQRT(EXP(σ2)-1), where σ2 denotes the variance of the log-transformed values.
Durvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Volume of Distribution (Vz)pre-infusion (-60 to -5 minutes prior to dose), end of infusion (EOI), 4 hours, 168 hours (Day 8), 336 hours (Day 15) and 504 hours (Day 22) after administration of DURVA on Day 1Geometric mean was obtained by computing the arithmetic mean of the logarithm-transformed values of concentration/PK parameters and then using the exponentiation to return the computation to the original scales. Geometric CV% was calculated as follows: CV% = 100\*SQRT(EXP(σ2)-1), where σ2 denotes the variance of the log-transformed values.
Lenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measured Time Point (AUC0-last)Cycle 1 Day 1: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post LEN doseGeometric mean was obtained by computing the arithmetic mean of the logarithm-transformed values of concentration/PK parameters and then using the exponentiation to return the computation to the original scales. Geometric CV% was calculated as follows: CV% = 100\*SQRT(EXP(σ2)-1), where σ2 denotes the variance of the log-transformed values.
Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Day 1 up to Week 84 (the longer of 90 days after discontinuing treatment with DURVA, or 28 days after the last dose of LEN or dex)An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during the course of a study. A TEAE includes AEs between the first dose date of either study drug and 90 days after the last dose of study drug. A serious AE is any AE occurring at any dose that: • Results in death; • Is life-threatening; • Requires or prolongs existing inpatient hospitalization; • Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; • Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; • Constitutes an important medical event. The Investigator assessed the relationship of each AE to study drug and graded the severity according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.03): - Grade 1 = Mild - Grade 2 = Moderate (some limitation in activity; no/minimal medical intervention required) - Grade 3 = Severe (limitation in activity; medical intervention required) - Grade 4 = Life-threatening - Grade 5 = Death
Lenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax)Cycle 1 Day 1: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post LEN doseGeometric mean was obtained by computing the arithmetic mean of the logarithm-transformed values of concentration/PK parameters and then using the exponentiation to return the computation to the original scales. Geometric CV% was calculated as follows: CV% = 100\*SQRT(EXP(σ2)-1), where σ2 denotes the variance of the log-transformed values.
Lenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax)Cycle 1 Day 1: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post LEN doseTime to maximum observed concentration of Lenalidomide (LEN) after multiple doses on day 1 obtained from the observed concentration versus time data
Lenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2)Cycle 1 Day 1: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post LEN doseGeometric mean was obtained by computing the arithmetic mean of the logarithm-transformed values of concentration/PK parameters and then using the exponentiation to return the computation to the original scales. Geometric CV% was calculated as follows: CV% = 100\*SQRT(EXP(σ2)-1), where σ2 denotes the variance of the log-transformed values.
Lenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Apparent Clearance (CL/F)Cycle 1 Day 1: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post LEN doseGeometric mean was obtained by computing the arithmetic mean of the logarithm-transformed values of concentration/PK parameters and then using the exponentiation to return the computation to the original scales. Geometric CV% was calculated as follows: CV% = 100\*SQRT(EXP(σ2)-1), where σ2 denotes the variance of the log-transformed values.
Lenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F)Cycle 1 Day 1: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post LEN doseGeometric mean was obtained by computing the arithmetic mean of the logarithm-transformed values of concentration/PK parameters and then using the exponentiation to return the computation to the original scales. Geometric CV% was calculated as follows: CV% = 100\*SQRT(EXP(σ2)-1), where σ2 denotes the variance of the log-transformed values.
Lenalidomide (LEN) Plasma PK Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 15: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measured Time Point (AUC0-last)Cycle 1 Day 15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post LEN doseGeometric mean was obtained by computing the arithmetic mean of the logarithm-transformed values of concentration/PK parameters and then using the exponentiation to return the computation to the original scales. Geometric CV% was calculated as follows: CV% = 100\*SQRT(EXP(σ2)-1), where σ2 denotes the variance of the log-transformed values.
Lenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 15: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax)Cycle 1 Day 15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post LEN doseGeometric mean was obtained by computing the arithmetic mean of the logarithm-transformed values of concentration/PK parameters and then using the exponentiation to return the computation to the original scales. Geometric CV% was calculated as follows: CV% = 100\*SQRT(EXP(σ2)-1), where σ2 denotes the variance of the log-transformed values.
Lenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 15: Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax)Cycle 1 Day 15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post LEN doseTime to maximum observed concentration of Lenalidomide (LEN) after multiple doses on day 15 obtained from the observed concentration versus time data
Participants Who Developed Anti-drug Antibody Against DurvalumabPre-dose samples on Day 1 of cycles 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 14 (study days 1, 29, 85, 141, 253, 393)The number of participants who develop antidrug antibody against durvalumab at any of the sampling timepoints during the study.
Participants Who Had Either Disease Progression or DeathDay 1 up to Week 84This outcome was originally defined as a Kaplan-Meier estimate of progression-free survival (PFS) which estimated the time between first date of dosing of study medication and disease progression, as determined by the investigator using the IMWG Uniform Response Criteria, or death during study treatment, whichever occurred earlier. However due to the early study termination and limited follow-up time, the majority of participants were censored for PFS analysis. Data reported instead represent the number of participants who died during study treatment or had disease progression within 90 days of the last dose of durvalumab.
Participants Who Died Up To Data Cut-off Date (15 December 2017)Day 1 up to Week 87This outcome was originally defined as a Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival (OS) and was defined as the time between first date of dosing of study medication and death due to any cause. However due to the early study termination and limited follow-up time, the majority of participants were censored for OS analysis. Data reported instead represent the number of participants who died due to any cause from Day 1 up to data cut-off.
Lenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf)Cycle 1 Day 1: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post LEN doseGeometric mean was obtained by computing the arithmetic mean of the logarithm-transformed values of concentration/PK parameters and then using the exponentiation to return the computation to the original scales. Geometric CV% was calculated as follows: CV% = 100\*SQRT(EXP(σ2)-1), where σ2 denotes the variance of the log-transformed values.

Countries

Canada, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort A: High Risk, TNE
High risk, transplant non-eligible \[TNE\], newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) participants who were administered • Intravenous (IV) durvalumab at 1500 mg on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle • Oral lenalidomide (LEN) 25 mg/day (adjust per the creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] value) on Days 1 to 21 of each 28-day treatment cycle • Oral dexamethasone (dex) 40 mg/day (≤ 75 years old) or 20 mg/day (\> 75 years old) on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each 28-day cycle.
25
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNE
\>= 65 years old, transplant non-eligible \[TNE\], newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) participants who were not high risk were administered • Intravenous (IV) durvalumab at 1500 mg on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle • Oral lenalidomide (LEN) 25 mg/day (adjust per the creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] value) on Days 1 to 21 of each 28-day treatment cycle • Oral dexamethasone (dex) 40 mg/day (≤ 75 years old) or 20 mg/day (\> 75 years old) on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each 28-day cycle, up to 12 cycles.
10
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplant
High risk, post-transplant NDMM participants were administered the following as maintenance therapy: • Intravenous (IV) durvalumab at 1500 mg on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle • Oral lenalidomide (LEN) 10 mg/day on Days 1 to 21 of each 28-day treatment cycle.
21
Total56

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event201
Overall StudyFull Clinical Hold by FDA19920
Overall StudyProgressive Disease210
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject200

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort A: High Risk, TNECohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNECohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantTotal
Age, Continuous75.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.17
72.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.25
59.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.52
68.98 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.33
Age, Customized
<=65 years
0 participants0 participants17 participants17 participants
Age, Customized
>65 years
25 participants10 participants4 participants39 participants
Age, Customized
<=75 years
12 participants7 participants20 participants39 participants
Age, Customized
>75 years
13 participants3 participants1 participants17 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
0 = Fully Active
7 Participants5 Participants13 Participants25 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
1 = Restrictive but ambulatory
14 Participants5 Participants8 Participants27 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
2 = ambulatory but unable to work
4 Participants0 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
High-Risk Cytogenetic Abnormalities at Baseline
No
8 Participants10 Participants19 Participants37 Participants
High-Risk Cytogenetic Abnormalities at Baseline
Yes
17 Participants0 Participants2 Participants19 Participants
International Staging System (ISS) for MM at Diagnosis
Missing
3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
International Staging System (ISS) for MM at Diagnosis
Stage I
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants10 Participants
International Staging System (ISS) for MM at Diagnosis
Stage II
7 Participants5 Participants7 Participants19 Participants
International Staging System (ISS) for MM at Diagnosis
Stage III
13 Participants0 Participants11 Participants24 Participants
Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Status
Negative
0 Participants0 Participants
Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Status
Positive
21 Participants21 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants0 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
21 Participants9 Participants17 Participants47 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants0 Participants4 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants10 Participants17 Participants37 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
9 / 253 / 105 / 21
other
Total, other adverse events
24 / 259 / 1018 / 21
serious
Total, serious adverse events
12 / 256 / 104 / 21

Outcome results

Primary

Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) During the Dose-Determining Timeframe (Day 1 - Day 28)

A Dose Review Team (DRT) evaluated DLTs to determine the recommended dose (RD) of Durvalumab to use in the Expansion Period. A DLT was defined as: a. Grade 4 neutropenia for \>= 5 days. b. Grade 3 neutropenia associated with fever (≥ 38.5°C / 101.3°F) of any duration. c. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia or Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding, or platelets transfusion. d. Grade 4 hematologic toxicity that does not resolve to baseline level \<=72 hours. e. Grade 4 anemia, unexplained by underlying disease. f. Any nonhematologic toxicity Grade ≥ 3 except for alopecia and nausea. g. Treatment interruption \>= 2 weeks due to AE. If ≤ 1 of the 6 initial participants in each cohort experience a DLT during cycle 1, the RD was Durvalumab 1500 mg; If \>=2 of the 6 initial participants in any cohort experience a DLT during cycle 1, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was exceeded and the dose level of Durvalumab was de-escalated to 750 mg

Time frame: First treatment cycle: Day 1 to Day 28

Population: Dose-Determining Population consists of all participants from the Safety Population of the Dose Determining Period who received at least one dose of Durvalumab. Cohort B's Dose-Determining Population was 7 participants as one was considered non-evaluable and was therefore replaced per protocol

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) During the Dose-Determining Timeframe (Day 1 - Day 28)1 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) During the Dose-Determining Timeframe (Day 1 - Day 28)1 Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) During the Dose-Determining Timeframe (Day 1 - Day 28)0 Participants
Secondary

Durvalumab (DURVA) Serum Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measured Time Point (AUC0-last)

Geometric mean was obtained by computing the arithmetic mean of the logarithm-transformed values of concentration/PK parameters and then using the exponentiation to return the computation to the original scales. Geometric CV% was calculated as follows: CV% = 100\*SQRT(EXP(σ2)-1), where σ2 denotes the variance of the log-transformed values.

Time frame: pre-infusion (-60 to -5 minutes prior to dose), end of infusion (EOI), 4 hours, 168 hours (Day 8), 336 hours (Day 15) and 504 hours (Day 22) after administration of DURVA on Day 1

Population: The PK Population included participants who received \>=1 dose of study treatment and had \>=1 measurable PK assessment. If participants were noncompliant with respect to dosing, had incomplete data, or other circumstances that would affect PK evaluation, inclusion was made on a case-by-case basis.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEDurvalumab (DURVA) Serum Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measured Time Point (AUC0-last)3535033.014 day*µg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 39.8
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEDurvalumab (DURVA) Serum Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measured Time Point (AUC0-last)3582905.960 day*µg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 21
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantDurvalumab (DURVA) Serum Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measured Time Point (AUC0-last)4026520.655 day*µg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 39.1
Secondary

Durvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf)

Geometric mean was obtained by computing the arithmetic mean of the logarithm-transformed values of concentration/PK parameters and then using the exponentiation to return the computation to the original scales. Geometric CV% was calculated as follows: CV% = 100\*SQRT(EXP(σ2)-1), where σ2 denotes the variance of the log-transformed values.

Time frame: pre-infusion (-60 to -5 minutes prior to dose), end of infusion (EOI), 4 hours, 168 hours (Day 8), 336 hours (Day 15) and 504 hours (Day 22) after administration of DURVA on Day 1

Population: The PK Population included participants who received \>=1 dose of study treatment and had \>=1 measurable PK assessment. If participants were noncompliant with respect to dosing, had incomplete data, or other circumstances that would affect PK evaluation, inclusion was made on a case-by-case basis.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEDurvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf)4944601.671 day*µg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 60.9
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEDurvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf)5532568.144 day*µg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 62.5
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantDurvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf)6531541.670 day*µg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 36.4
Secondary

Durvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Clearance (CL)

Geometric mean was obtained by computing the arithmetic mean of the logarithm-transformed values of concentration/PK parameters and then using the exponentiation to return the computation to the original scales. Geometric CV% was calculated as follows: CV% = 100\*SQRT(EXP(σ2)-1), where σ2 denotes the variance of the log-transformed values.

Time frame: pre-infusion (-60 to -5 minutes prior to dose), end of infusion (EOI), 4 hours, 168 hours (Day 8), 336 hours (Day 15) and 504 hours (Day 22) after administration of DURVA on Day 1

Population: The PK Population included participants who received \>=1 dose of study treatment and had \>=1 measurable PK assessment. If participants were noncompliant with respect to dosing, had incomplete data, or other circumstances that would affect PK evaluation, inclusion was made on a case-by-case basis.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEDurvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Clearance (CL)0.303 L/dayGeometric Coefficient of Variation 60.9
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEDurvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Clearance (CL)0.271 L/dayGeometric Coefficient of Variation 62.5
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantDurvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Clearance (CL)0.230 L/dayGeometric Coefficient of Variation 36.4
Secondary

Durvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax)

Geometric mean was obtained by computing the arithmetic mean of the logarithm-transformed values of concentration/PK parameters and then using the exponentiation to return the computation to the original scales. Geometric CV% was calculated as follows: CV% = 100\*SQRT(EXP(σ2)-1), where σ2 denotes the variance of the log-transformed values.

Time frame: pre-infusion (-60 to -5 minutes prior to dose), end of infusion (EOI), 4 hours, 168 hours (Day 8), 336 hours (Day 15) and 504 hours (Day 22) after administration of DURVA on Day 1

Population: The PK Population included participants who received \>=1 dose of study treatment and had \>=1 measurable PK assessment. If participants were noncompliant with respect to dosing, had incomplete data, or other circumstances that would affect PK evaluation, inclusion was made on a case-by-case basis.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEDurvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax)449280.231 µg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 36.7
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEDurvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax)452827.419 µg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 25.5
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantDurvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax)482602.748 µg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 39.9
Secondary

Durvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2)

Geometric mean was obtained by computing the arithmetic mean of the logarithm-transformed values of concentration/PK parameters and then using the exponentiation to return the computation to the original scales. Geometric CV% was calculated as follows: CV% = 100\*SQRT(EXP(σ2)-1), where σ2 denotes the variance of the log-transformed values.

Time frame: pre-infusion (-60 to -5 minutes prior to dose), end of infusion (EOI), 4 hours, 168 hours (Day 8), 336 hours (Day 15) and 504 hours (Day 22) after administration of DURVA on Day 1

Population: The PK Population included participants who received \>=1 dose of study treatment and had \>=1 measurable PK assessment. If participants were noncompliant with respect to dosing, had incomplete data, or other circumstances that would affect PK evaluation, inclusion was made on a case-by-case basis.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEDurvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2)10.984 dayGeometric Coefficient of Variation 52.1
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEDurvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2)13.376 dayGeometric Coefficient of Variation 90.9
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantDurvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2)15.844 dayGeometric Coefficient of Variation 29.8
Secondary

Durvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax)

Time to maximum observed concentration of Durvalumab (DURVA) after multiple doses on day 1 obtained from the observed concentration versus time data

Time frame: pre-infusion (-60 to -5 minutes prior to dose), end of infusion (EOI), 4 hours, 168 hours (Day 8), 336 hours (Day 15) and 504 hours (Day 22) after administration of DURVA on Day 1

Population: The PK Population included participants who received \>=1 dose of study treatment and had \>=1 measurable PK assessment. If participants were noncompliant with respect to dosing, had incomplete data, or other circumstances that would affect PK evaluation, inclusion was made on a case-by-case basis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEDurvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax)0.051 day
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEDurvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax)0.106 day
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantDurvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax)0.180 day
Secondary

Durvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Volume of Distribution (Vz)

Geometric mean was obtained by computing the arithmetic mean of the logarithm-transformed values of concentration/PK parameters and then using the exponentiation to return the computation to the original scales. Geometric CV% was calculated as follows: CV% = 100\*SQRT(EXP(σ2)-1), where σ2 denotes the variance of the log-transformed values.

Time frame: pre-infusion (-60 to -5 minutes prior to dose), end of infusion (EOI), 4 hours, 168 hours (Day 8), 336 hours (Day 15) and 504 hours (Day 22) after administration of DURVA on Day 1

Population: The PK Population included participants who received \>=1 dose of study treatment and had \>=1 measurable PK assessment. If participants were noncompliant with respect to dosing, had incomplete data, or other circumstances that would affect PK evaluation, inclusion was made on a case-by-case basis.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEDurvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Volume of Distribution (Vz)4.244 litersGeometric Coefficient of Variation 33.5
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEDurvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Volume of Distribution (Vz)4.582 litersGeometric Coefficient of Variation 33.3
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantDurvalumab (DURVA) Serum PK Parameters in Cycle 1: Volume of Distribution (Vz)4.563 litersGeometric Coefficient of Variation 42.9
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Duration of Response (for Cohort A and B)

Duration of response (for responders only) was defined as the time from earliest date of documented response (PR or better) to the earliest date of disease progression (DP) as determined by the investigator per IMWG Uniform Response criteria or death during study treatment, whichever occurred first.

Time frame: Day 1 of each cycle starting with Cycle 2 up to Cycle 17 plus one week for the end of treatment visit (Day 29 up to Week 73)

Population: Efficacy Evaluable Population: Participants in Cohorts A + B who had a response.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEKaplan-Meier Estimates for Duration of Response (for Cohort A and B)10.3 months
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEKaplan-Meier Estimates for Duration of Response (for Cohort A and B)NA months
Secondary

Lenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 15: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax)

Geometric mean was obtained by computing the arithmetic mean of the logarithm-transformed values of concentration/PK parameters and then using the exponentiation to return the computation to the original scales. Geometric CV% was calculated as follows: CV% = 100\*SQRT(EXP(σ2)-1), where σ2 denotes the variance of the log-transformed values.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post LEN dose

Population: The PK Population included participants who received \>=1 dose of study treatment and had \>=1 measurable PK assessment. If participants were noncompliant with respect to dosing, had incomplete data, or other circumstances that would affect PK evaluation, inclusion was made on a case-by-case basis.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: High Risk, TNELenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 15: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax)409.764 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 66
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNELenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 15: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax)452.850 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 31.7
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantLenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 15: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax)171.235 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 33.6
Secondary

Lenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 15: Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax)

Time to maximum observed concentration of Lenalidomide (LEN) after multiple doses on day 15 obtained from the observed concentration versus time data

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post LEN dose

Population: The PK Population included participants who received \>=1 dose of study treatment and had \>=1 measurable PK assessment. If participants were noncompliant with respect to dosing, had incomplete data, or other circumstances that would affect PK evaluation, inclusion was made on a case-by-case basis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort A: High Risk, TNELenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 15: Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax)2.000 hour
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNELenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 15: Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax)1.000 hour
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantLenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 15: Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax)1.042 hour
Secondary

Lenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Apparent Clearance (CL/F)

Geometric mean was obtained by computing the arithmetic mean of the logarithm-transformed values of concentration/PK parameters and then using the exponentiation to return the computation to the original scales. Geometric CV% was calculated as follows: CV% = 100\*SQRT(EXP(σ2)-1), where σ2 denotes the variance of the log-transformed values.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post LEN dose

Population: The PK Population included participants who received \>=1 dose of study treatment and had \>=1 measurable PK assessment. If participants were noncompliant with respect to dosing, had incomplete data, or other circumstances that would affect PK evaluation, inclusion was made on a case-by-case basis.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: High Risk, TNELenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Apparent Clearance (CL/F)8.838 L/hourGeometric Coefficient of Variation 52.7
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNELenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Apparent Clearance (CL/F)12.426 L/hourGeometric Coefficient of Variation 26.8
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantLenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Apparent Clearance (CL/F)13.019 L/hourGeometric Coefficient of Variation 33.5
Secondary

Lenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F)

Geometric mean was obtained by computing the arithmetic mean of the logarithm-transformed values of concentration/PK parameters and then using the exponentiation to return the computation to the original scales. Geometric CV% was calculated as follows: CV% = 100\*SQRT(EXP(σ2)-1), where σ2 denotes the variance of the log-transformed values.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post LEN dose

Population: The PK Population included participants who received \>=1 dose of study treatment and had \>=1 measurable PK assessment. If participants were noncompliant with respect to dosing, had incomplete data, or other circumstances that would affect PK evaluation, inclusion was made on a case-by-case basis.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: High Risk, TNELenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F)44.329 litersGeometric Coefficient of Variation 25.4
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNELenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F)54.689 litersGeometric Coefficient of Variation 29.7
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantLenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F)54.157 litersGeometric Coefficient of Variation 22.3
Secondary

Lenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf)

Geometric mean was obtained by computing the arithmetic mean of the logarithm-transformed values of concentration/PK parameters and then using the exponentiation to return the computation to the original scales. Geometric CV% was calculated as follows: CV% = 100\*SQRT(EXP(σ2)-1), where σ2 denotes the variance of the log-transformed values.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post LEN dose

Population: The PK Population included participants who received \>=1 dose of study treatment and had \>=1 measurable PK assessment. If participants were noncompliant with respect to dosing, had incomplete data, or other circumstances that would affect PK evaluation, inclusion was made on a case-by-case basis.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: High Risk, TNELenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf)2534.684 hour*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 48.6
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNELenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf)2011.889 hour*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 26.8
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantLenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf)768.104 hour*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 33.5
Secondary

Lenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measured Time Point (AUC0-last)

Geometric mean was obtained by computing the arithmetic mean of the logarithm-transformed values of concentration/PK parameters and then using the exponentiation to return the computation to the original scales. Geometric CV% was calculated as follows: CV% = 100\*SQRT(EXP(σ2)-1), where σ2 denotes the variance of the log-transformed values.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post LEN dose

Population: The PK Population included participants who received \>=1 dose of study treatment and had \>=1 measurable PK assessment. If participants were noncompliant with respect to dosing, had incomplete data, or other circumstances that would affect PK evaluation, inclusion was made on a case-by-case basis.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: High Risk, TNELenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measured Time Point (AUC0-last)1468.102 hour*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 78.6
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNELenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measured Time Point (AUC0-last)1442.549 hour*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 29.9
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantLenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measured Time Point (AUC0-last)591.085 hour*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 22.3
Secondary

Lenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax)

Geometric mean was obtained by computing the arithmetic mean of the logarithm-transformed values of concentration/PK parameters and then using the exponentiation to return the computation to the original scales. Geometric CV% was calculated as follows: CV% = 100\*SQRT(EXP(σ2)-1), where σ2 denotes the variance of the log-transformed values.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post LEN dose

Population: The PK Population included participants who received \>=1 dose of study treatment and had \>=1 measurable PK assessment. If participants were noncompliant with respect to dosing, had incomplete data, or other circumstances that would affect PK evaluation, inclusion was made on a case-by-case basis.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: High Risk, TNELenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax)395.774 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 56.2
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNELenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax)354.018 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 34.7
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantLenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax)161.372 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 33.9
Secondary

Lenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2)

Geometric mean was obtained by computing the arithmetic mean of the logarithm-transformed values of concentration/PK parameters and then using the exponentiation to return the computation to the original scales. Geometric CV% was calculated as follows: CV% = 100\*SQRT(EXP(σ2)-1), where σ2 denotes the variance of the log-transformed values.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post LEN dose

Population: The PK Population included participants who received \>=1 dose of study treatment and had \>=1 measurable PK assessment. If participants were noncompliant with respect to dosing, had incomplete data, or other circumstances that would affect PK evaluation, inclusion was made on a case-by-case basis.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: High Risk, TNELenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2)3.477 hourGeometric Coefficient of Variation 61.3
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNELenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2)3.051 hourGeometric Coefficient of Variation 16.8
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantLenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2)2.883 hourGeometric Coefficient of Variation 29.2
Secondary

Lenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax)

Time to maximum observed concentration of Lenalidomide (LEN) after multiple doses on day 1 obtained from the observed concentration versus time data

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post LEN dose

Population: The PK Population included participants who received \>=1 dose of study treatment and had \>=1 measurable PK assessment. If participants were noncompliant with respect to dosing, had incomplete data, or other circumstances that would affect PK evaluation, inclusion was made on a case-by-case basis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort A: High Risk, TNELenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax)1.050 hour
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNELenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax)1.925 hour
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantLenalidomide (LEN) Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 1: Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax)1.150 hour
Secondary

Lenalidomide (LEN) Plasma PK Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 15: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measured Time Point (AUC0-last)

Geometric mean was obtained by computing the arithmetic mean of the logarithm-transformed values of concentration/PK parameters and then using the exponentiation to return the computation to the original scales. Geometric CV% was calculated as follows: CV% = 100\*SQRT(EXP(σ2)-1), where σ2 denotes the variance of the log-transformed values.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post LEN dose

Population: The PK Population included participants who received \>=1 dose of study treatment and had \>=1 measurable PK assessment. If participants were noncompliant with respect to dosing, had incomplete data, or other circumstances that would affect PK evaluation, inclusion was made on a case-by-case basis.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: High Risk, TNELenalidomide (LEN) Plasma PK Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 15: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measured Time Point (AUC0-last)1911.739 hour*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 65.5
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNELenalidomide (LEN) Plasma PK Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 15: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measured Time Point (AUC0-last)1754.349 hour*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 34.3
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantLenalidomide (LEN) Plasma PK Parameters in Cycle 1 Day 15: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measured Time Point (AUC0-last)629.151 hour*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 16.8
Secondary

Overall Response Rate (ORR) for Cohorts A and B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Partial Response or Better According to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria

Tumor response, including progressive disease, was assessed by the investigators and captured the best assessment of response during the treatment period. ORR was defined as partial response (PR) or better which includes PR, very good partial response (VGPR), complete response (CR), or stringent complete response (sCR). A PR required ≥ 50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by ≥ 90% or to \< 200 mg per 24 hours. If present at baseline, a ≥ 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas was also required. sCR required - a negative immunofixation of serum and urine and - disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and - ≤ 5% plasma cells in bone marrow and normal free light-chain (FLC) ratio and - absence of clonal plasma cells by immunohistochemistry or 2- to 4-color flow cytometry.

Time frame: Day 1 of each cycle starting with Cycle 2 up to Cycle 17 plus one week for the end of treatment visit (Day 29 up to Week 73)

Population: Efficacy Evaluable Population which consisted of enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study medications and had at least 1 evaluable postbaseline response assessment. See the Response Improvement Rate outcome for an efficacy measure for Cohort C.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEOverall Response Rate (ORR) for Cohorts A and B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Partial Response or Better According to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria66.7 percentage of participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEOverall Response Rate (ORR) for Cohorts A and B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Partial Response or Better According to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria50.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Participants Who Developed Anti-drug Antibody Against Durvalumab

The number of participants who develop antidrug antibody against durvalumab at any of the sampling timepoints during the study.

Time frame: Pre-dose samples on Day 1 of cycles 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 14 (study days 1, 29, 85, 141, 253, 393)

Population: The Safety Population was defined as all enrolled participants who receive at least 1 dose of the study medications.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants Who Developed Anti-drug Antibody Against Durvalumab0 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants Who Developed Anti-drug Antibody Against Durvalumab1 Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants Who Developed Anti-drug Antibody Against Durvalumab0 Participants
Secondary

Participants Who Died Up To Data Cut-off Date (15 December 2017)

This outcome was originally defined as a Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival (OS) and was defined as the time between first date of dosing of study medication and death due to any cause. However due to the early study termination and limited follow-up time, the majority of participants were censored for OS analysis. Data reported instead represent the number of participants who died due to any cause from Day 1 up to data cut-off.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 87

Population: Safety population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants Who Died Up To Data Cut-off Date (15 December 2017)2 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants Who Died Up To Data Cut-off Date (15 December 2017)0 Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants Who Died Up To Data Cut-off Date (15 December 2017)1 Participants
Secondary

Participants Who Had Either Disease Progression or Death

This outcome was originally defined as a Kaplan-Meier estimate of progression-free survival (PFS) which estimated the time between first date of dosing of study medication and disease progression, as determined by the investigator using the IMWG Uniform Response Criteria, or death during study treatment, whichever occurred earlier. However due to the early study termination and limited follow-up time, the majority of participants were censored for PFS analysis. Data reported instead represent the number of participants who died during study treatment or had disease progression within 90 days of the last dose of durvalumab.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 84

Population: Safety population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants Who Had Either Disease Progression or Death4 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants Who Had Either Disease Progression or Death1 Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants Who Had Either Disease Progression or Death3 Participants
Secondary

Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during the course of a study. A TEAE includes AEs between the first dose date of either study drug and 90 days after the last dose of study drug. A serious AE is any AE occurring at any dose that: • Results in death; • Is life-threatening; • Requires or prolongs existing inpatient hospitalization; • Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; • Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; • Constitutes an important medical event. The Investigator assessed the relationship of each AE to study drug and graded the severity according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.03): - Grade 1 = Mild - Grade 2 = Moderate (some limitation in activity; no/minimal medical intervention required) - Grade 3 = Severe (limitation in activity; medical intervention required) - Grade 4 = Life-threatening - Grade 5 = Death

Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 84 (the longer of 90 days after discontinuing treatment with DURVA, or 28 days after the last dose of LEN or dex)

Population: Safety population. The Safety Population is defined as all enrolled subjects who receive at least 1 dose of the study medications.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 leading to dose reduction of LEN2 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Grade 5 TEAE related to study drug0 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Grade 5 TEAE related to LEN0 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Serious TEAE related to dex5 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 TEAE leading to discontinuation of study drug3 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 leading to dose delay of DURVA10 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 leading to infusion interruption of DURVA0 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 treatment-related TEAE22 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 leading to interruption of LEN13 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>= 1 TEAE24 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 related to DURVA16 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 related to LEN22 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 related to dex16 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 TEAE of severity grade 3 or 419 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 severity 3/4, related to study drug13 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 severity 3/4, related to DURVA7 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 severity 3/4, related to LEN11 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 severity 3/4, related to dex5 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Grade 5 TEAE (Death)1 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Grade 5 TEAE related to DURVA0 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Grade 5 TEAE related to dex0 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Serious TEAE12 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Serious TEAE related to study drug8 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Serious TEAE related to DURVA5 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Serious TEAE related to LEN6 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>= TEAE leading to discontinuation of DURVA2 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>= TEAE leading to discontinuation of LEN3 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>= TEAE leading to discontinuation of dex2 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 leading to delay/reduction/interruption drug14 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 leading to dose reduction of dex1 Participants
Cohort A: High Risk, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 leading to interruption of dex9 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 related to dex6 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 treatment-related TEAE8 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 severity 3/4, related to LEN8 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 severity 3/4, related to DURVA4 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 leading to dose reduction of dex3 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 leading to interruption of LEN5 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Grade 5 TEAE related to dex0 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 related to LEN8 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 TEAE of severity grade 3 or 48 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>= TEAE leading to discontinuation of DURVA0 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Serious TEAE related to dex1 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Serious TEAE6 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>= TEAE leading to discontinuation of LEN0 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 severity 3/4, related to dex2 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>= TEAE leading to discontinuation of dex0 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 related to DURVA4 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Grade 5 TEAE (Death)0 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 TEAE leading to discontinuation of study drug0 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Grade 5 TEAE related to study drug0 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 leading to delay/reduction/interruption drug7 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 leading to infusion interruption of DURVA0 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 severity 3/4, related to study drug8 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Serious TEAE related to study drug4 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 leading to dose reduction of LEN2 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 leading to interruption of dex3 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 leading to dose delay of DURVA3 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Grade 5 TEAE related to DURVA0 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Serious TEAE related to DURVA1 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>= 1 TEAE9 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Serious TEAE related to LEN3 Participants
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNEParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Grade 5 TEAE related to LEN0 Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 treatment-related TEAE17 Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 related to DURVA15 Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 related to LEN15 Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 related to dexNA Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Serious TEAE related to dexNA Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 TEAE of severity grade 3 or 47 Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 severity 3/4, related to study drug6 Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 TEAE leading to discontinuation of study drug1 Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 severity 3/4, related to DURVA4 Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 leading to interruption of LEN5 Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 severity 3/4, related to LEN4 Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>= TEAE leading to discontinuation of DURVA1 Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Grade 5 TEAE (Death)1 Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Grade 5 TEAE related to study drug1 Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Grade 5 TEAE related to DURVA1 Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Grade 5 TEAE related to LEN0 Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 severity 3/4, related to dexNA Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Grade 5 TEAE related to dexNA Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Serious TEAE related to study drug4 Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Serious TEAE related to LEN2 Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 leading to dose reduction of dexNA Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>= TEAE leading to discontinuation of LEN0 Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>= TEAE leading to discontinuation of dexNA Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 leading to delay/reduction/interruption drug6 Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Serious TEAE4 Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 leading to dose delay of DURVA4 Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 leading to infusion interruption of DURVA1 Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 leading to dose reduction of LEN3 Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 leading to interruption of dexNA Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>= 1 TEAE18 Participants
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)>=1 Serious TEAE related to DURVA4 Participants
Secondary

Response Improvement Rate (RIR) for Cohort C: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Response Improved From Cycle 1 Day 1 as Assessed by the Investigators Using the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria

Response Improvement Rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a response from treatment as compared to the pre-autologous stem cell transplantation \[ASCT\] diseases measurement used as baseline for response assessment. IMWG response categories could be stable disease (SD), partial response (PR), very good partial response (VGPR), complete response (CR), or stringent complete response (sCR), as long as it represented an improvement compared to prior to transplant.

Time frame: Baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1); Treatment: Day 1 of each cycle starting with Cycle 2 up to Cycle 15 plus one week for the end of treatment visit (Day 29 up to Week 61)

Population: Efficacy Evaluable Population which consists of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study medications and had at least 1 evaluable postbaseline response assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort C: High Risk, Post-transplantResponse Improvement Rate (RIR) for Cohort C: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Response Improved From Cycle 1 Day 1 as Assessed by the Investigators Using the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Time to Response (for Cohorts A and B)

Time to response (for responders only, per IMWG Uniform Response Criteria) is calculated as the time from the first date of dosing of study medication to the first date of documented response (PR or better).

Time frame: Day 1 of each cycle starting with Cycle 2 up to Cycle 17 plus one week for the end of treatment visit (Day 29 up to Week 73)

Population: Efficacy Evaluable Population: Participants in Cohorts A + B who had a response

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort A: High Risk, TNETime to Response (for Cohorts A and B)4.20 weeks
Cohort B: >=65 Years Old, TNETime to Response (for Cohorts A and B)4.10 weeks

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026