Skip to content

Investigating Transcranial Ultrasound as a Potential Intervention for Depression

A Pilot Study: Investigating Transcranial Ultrasound as a Potential Intervention for Mild to Moderate Depression

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02685488
Enrollment
26
Registered
2016-02-18
Start date
2015-10-31
Completion date
2016-05-31
Last updated
2018-01-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anxiety Disorders, Depression

Brief summary

Depression is the leading cause of disability worldwide. Because a significant number of people with depression do not respond to medication or therapy, alternative treatment options are greatly needed. Recent research has focused on brain stimulation methods due to their therapeutic utility for treating depression. Yet, current brain stimulation methods have drawbacks, including invasive surgery and limited precision in targeting specific areas. A novel brain stimulation method, transcranial ultrasound (TUS), is noninvasive, has greater spatial precision than most existing methods, and is proven safe for humans. TUS has been found to increase positive mood in chronic pain patients. In a double blind study, TUS increased positive mood in over 140 healthy undergraduates at the University of Arizona. Despite evidence that TUS can increase positive mood in humans, it has yet to be investigated whether TUS can increase positive mood in humans who are experiencing chronic low mood or depression. The present study will, for the first time, examine whether TUS can improve depressive symptoms. Twenty to thirty participants with mild to moderate depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory Score between 10 and 25) will be randomly assigned to a TUS sham or TUS activation condition. In the TUS activation condition, TUS will be used to stimulate the right fronto-temporal area, which has previously been shown to increase positive mood. Participants in the TUS sham condition will not receive any brain stimulation. Participants will attend five sessions within seven days or ten sessions within fourteen days. At each session, in addition to brain stimulation, self-reported mood and depressive symptoms will be recorded. Furthermore, the investigators will use electroencephalogram (EEG) to record changes in brain electrical signals during TUS stimulation. Based on prior research, the investigators predict that mood will increase and depressive symptoms will decrease with TUS stimulation.

Detailed description

Participants will first complete the online screening and those who qualify to complete the study will be contacted via telephone (see above for telephone recruitment and consent procedure). After providing informed consent, on the first day, participants will be randomly assigned to either a TUS treatment or a TUS sham condition (placebo), and the study will be double blind. Participants in the TUS treatment condition (with sham or treatment unknown to both participant and experimenter) will have TUS stimulation at the right fronto-temporal area five times within seven days or ten times within fourteen days. Participants will sign up for the first five sessions first but will be reminded participants may withdraw from the study at any time. Should participants choose to continue with the second week of treatment, participants will be scheduled for another five sessions. In other words, participants will have the option of completing 10 days of the procedure. The procedure does not differ between week 1 and week 2. However, participants will be compensated less for week 2. Participants will have the option to continue into week 2, as participants may find that the treatment is benefiting them. The first, fifth, and tenth days of the study will take approximately 2 hours and the second, third, fourth, sixth, seventh, eighth, and ninth will take only one hour. In the sham condition, the ultrasound probe will be placed at the right fronto-temporal area five times over the course of seven days or ten times over the course of fourteen days without the stimulation. Prior research has shown that stimulation at this area induces positive mood change and is implicated in positive mood. On the first, middle, and last day of the procedure (day 1, 5, 10), EEG data will be collected. On the second, third, and fourth day as well as sixth through ninth days of the procedure EEG data will not be collected and only TUS stimulation will occur. Collecting EEG data at these points will allow for comparison of resting electrical brain profiles from the beginning of the study to the end of the study. Additionally, the investigators will assess state mood and rumination before and after TUS, as well as depressive and anxiety symptoms at the end of each day. The state mood and rumination will allow us to examine the mood effects of TUS, whereas the depressive and anxiety symptoms questionnaires will allow us to examine any changes in these important profiles over the course of the study.

Interventions

DEVICETranscranial Ultrasound Power

Transcranial ultrasound will be to stimulate at the right fronto-temporal cortex. 30 seconds of stimulation at 500 kHZ with duty cycle 0.24% and pulse rate frequency at 40 Hz.

DEVICETranscranial Ultrasound Sham

Transcranial ultrasound will be used without power for a sham condition.

Sponsors

University of Arizona
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Beck Depression Inventory score between 10 and 25

Exclusion criteria

* left-handedness * prior serious head-related injury * any medical condition that would impact EEG profiles * chronic migraines or other severe headaches * pregnancy * lack of proficiency in English * lack of secure housing * current confounding treatment (including any psychotropic medication or psychotherapy) * current active suicidal potential necessitating immediate treatment, as such participants will be referred for immediate treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Depressive Symptoms Assessed With the Beck Depression Inventory-IIOnce on day 1 & day 5The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) is one of the most widely used self-report measures for assessing depression. It includes 21 self-report items. Scores range from 0 to 63, and higher scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms. In this study, the BDI-II was used to monitor depressive symptoms each day. The outcome is the change in BDI-II score as measured by BDI-II on Day 5 minus BDI-II on Day 1.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rumination Symptoms Assessed With the Ruminative Responses ScaleOnce on day 1 & 5The Ruminative Responses scale (RRS) consists of 22 statements. It measures rumination, past-focused repetitive thinking that causes and maintains depression. Participants are asked to rate on a scale of 1 (almost never) to 4 (almost always) how much they think about various things (e.g. think about how alone you feel and think about all your shortcomings, failings, faults, mistakes). Scores range from 22 to 88 with higher scores indicating more rumination. The RRS was used in this study to measure symptoms of rumination on the first and fifth day of this study. The outcome is the difference from Day 5 to Day 1.
Worry Symptoms Assessed With the Penn State Worry QuestionnaireOnce on day 1 & day 5The PSWQ assesses trait worry, a key component of Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Participants rate themselves on a scale of 1 (not at all typical of me) to 5 (very typical of me) for sixteen different statements. Scores range from 16-80, and higher scores reflect higher levels of worry. This scale has been widely used to assess worry and will allow for assessment of worry in the present study (Brown et al., 1992). The PSWQ was used to monitor symptoms of worry on first and fifth day of this study. The outcome measure is difference from Day 5 to Day 1.
Anxiety Symptoms Assessed With the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment ScaleOnce on day 1 & day 5The Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) assesses severity of anxiety symptoms across anxiety disorders and with subsyndromal symptoms. Participants rate five items on a scale from 0 (indicating no anxiety or impairment) to 4 (indicating severe or extreme anxiety or impairment). Scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety and impairment from anxiety (Norman et al., 2006). The OASIS was used to monitor overall severity of anxiety on each day of the study. The outcome measure is difference from Day 5 to Day 1.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Transcranial Ultrasound
Active stimulation with the transcranial ultrasound at 500 kHz with a duty cycle of 0.24 and pulse repetition frequency of 40 Hz. Transcranial Ultrasound: Transcranial ultrasound will be to stimulate at the right fronto-temporal cortex. 30 seconds of stimulation at 500 kHZ with duty cycle 0.24% and pulse rate frequency at 40 Hz.
12
Transcranial Ultrasound Sham
Stimulation with the transcranial ultrasound will be on sham mode. Unknown to both participants and experimenters, the ultrasound will not stimulate. Transcranial Ultrasound: Transcranial ultrasound will be to stimulate at the right fronto-temporal cortex. 30 seconds of stimulation at 500 kHZ with duty cycle 0.24% and pulse rate frequency at 40 Hz.
14
Total26

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTranscranial UltrasoundTranscranial Ultrasound ShamTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
12 Participants14 Participants26 Participants
Age, Continuous18.58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.669
19.14 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.292
18.88 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.071
Beck Depression Inventory II17.33 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.207
16.57 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.36
16.92 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.783
Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale5.75 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.415
5.79 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.392
5.77 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.847
Penn State Worry Questionnaire57.75 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.555
50.71 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.709
53.96 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.611
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
8 Participants7 Participants15 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants14 participants26 participants
Ruminative Responses Scale49.92 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.764
43.29 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.98
46.35 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.847
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants10 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 14
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 120 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Depressive Symptoms Assessed With the Beck Depression Inventory-II

The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) is one of the most widely used self-report measures for assessing depression. It includes 21 self-report items. Scores range from 0 to 63, and higher scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms. In this study, the BDI-II was used to monitor depressive symptoms each day. The outcome is the change in BDI-II score as measured by BDI-II on Day 5 minus BDI-II on Day 1.

Time frame: Once on day 1 & day 5

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Transcranial UltrasoundDepressive Symptoms Assessed With the Beck Depression Inventory-II-4.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.621
Transcranial Ultrasound ShamDepressive Symptoms Assessed With the Beck Depression Inventory-II-.650 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.249
Secondary

Anxiety Symptoms Assessed With the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale

The Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) assesses severity of anxiety symptoms across anxiety disorders and with subsyndromal symptoms. Participants rate five items on a scale from 0 (indicating no anxiety or impairment) to 4 (indicating severe or extreme anxiety or impairment). Scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety and impairment from anxiety (Norman et al., 2006). The OASIS was used to monitor overall severity of anxiety on each day of the study. The outcome measure is difference from Day 5 to Day 1.

Time frame: Once on day 1 & day 5

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Transcranial UltrasoundAnxiety Symptoms Assessed With the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale-1.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.723
Transcranial Ultrasound ShamAnxiety Symptoms Assessed With the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale-2.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.24
Secondary

Rumination Symptoms Assessed With the Ruminative Responses Scale

The Ruminative Responses scale (RRS) consists of 22 statements. It measures rumination, past-focused repetitive thinking that causes and maintains depression. Participants are asked to rate on a scale of 1 (almost never) to 4 (almost always) how much they think about various things (e.g. think about how alone you feel and think about all your shortcomings, failings, faults, mistakes). Scores range from 22 to 88 with higher scores indicating more rumination. The RRS was used in this study to measure symptoms of rumination on the first and fifth day of this study. The outcome is the difference from Day 5 to Day 1.

Time frame: Once on day 1 & 5

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Transcranial UltrasoundRumination Symptoms Assessed With the Ruminative Responses Scale-1.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.67
Transcranial Ultrasound ShamRumination Symptoms Assessed With the Ruminative Responses Scale-2.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.045
Secondary

Worry Symptoms Assessed With the Penn State Worry Questionnaire

The PSWQ assesses trait worry, a key component of Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Participants rate themselves on a scale of 1 (not at all typical of me) to 5 (very typical of me) for sixteen different statements. Scores range from 16-80, and higher scores reflect higher levels of worry. This scale has been widely used to assess worry and will allow for assessment of worry in the present study (Brown et al., 1992). The PSWQ was used to monitor symptoms of worry on first and fifth day of this study. The outcome measure is difference from Day 5 to Day 1.

Time frame: Once on day 1 & day 5

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Transcranial UltrasoundWorry Symptoms Assessed With the Penn State Worry Questionnaire-1.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.732
Transcranial Ultrasound ShamWorry Symptoms Assessed With the Penn State Worry Questionnaire3.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.677
Post Hoc

State Anxiety Assessed With Two Items From the Visual Analogue Mood Scale

The Visual Analog Mood Scale (VAMS) asks patients to rate how much they are experiencing eight mood categories on a scale of 0-100. Global Affect and Global Vigor are subscales. The Global Vigor scale includes a number of items related to anxiety (calm, tense) as well as fatigue (alert, weary). Based on decreases that were seen in global vigor, we create a sum variable of only calm & tense items on the VAMS to examine whether state anxiety decreased. Scores range from 0-20, with higher scores indicating more anxiety. This sum variable served as a post-hoc measures of anxiety each day of the study before stimulation/sham, 10 minutes after stimulation/sham, and 30 minutes after stimulation/sham. Outcome is the difference between measure taken 10 minutes after Stim/Sham and measure taken before Stim/Sham. This measure was taken each of the five days and outcome represents the average over all five days from after to before Stim/Sham.

Time frame: Assessed before Stim/Sham and 10 minutes after every day for five days; scores represent change from after to before stim/sham averaged across all five days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Transcranial UltrasoundState Anxiety Assessed With Two Items From the Visual Analogue Mood Scale-11.9833 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.24018
Transcranial Ultrasound ShamState Anxiety Assessed With Two Items From the Visual Analogue Mood Scale-.6082 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.90624

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026