Skip to content

Progesterone Augmentation of Nicotine Replacement Therapy Study

Progesterone Augmentation of Nicotine Replacement Therapy Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02685072
Acronym
PANS
Enrollment
64
Registered
2016-02-18
Start date
2016-04-07
Completion date
2018-03-12
Last updated
2019-07-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Smoking Cessation

Keywords

Smoking Cessation, Nicotine Cessation

Brief summary

This will be a double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot, randomized clinical trial. A total of 50 women who smoke and have regular menstrual cycles will be randomized to either progesterone (200 mgs BID) + Transdermal Nicotine Patch (TNP) or placebo + TNP for 8 weeks. TNP will be tapered after 4-6 weeks. Progesterone or matching placebo will be discontinued at the end of Week 8. All participants will also be provided behavioral treatment for smoking cessation. Participants will be inducted onto progesterone (or placebo) + TNP over a one-week period (Week 1) during the mid luteal phase, within a week before menses and the target quit date will be set for the 5 (+/-2) days after onset of menses. Participants will have post-trial follow-up visits at 1 and 3 months.The main study outcomes will be self- report of smoking abstinence, biochemically verified smoking abstinence, measures of cigarette craving and nicotine withdrawal, and measures of response inhibition.

Detailed description

This study seeks to determine if modifying the hormonal milieu of the menstrual cycle, through administration of exogenous progesterone, will improve the effectiveness of treatments for smoking cessation in women. Progesterone, a gonadal hormone, is used clinically for treatment of endometrial hyperplasia, amenorrhea, dysfunctional uterine bleeding, and for assisted reproduction in women. Progesterone also shows promise for the treatment of multiple central nervous system disorders including cocaine addiction, seizure disorder, and traumatic brain injury. As the next step, the investigators seek to determine if progesterone augments standard smoking cessation treatments (e.g., NRT) in regularly cycling women. The investigators hypothesize that co-treatment with progesterone, compared to placebo, will enhance the effectiveness NRT for smoking cessation. To test this hypothesis, the investigators propose an 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, which will randomize 50 smokers using a 1:1 assignment ratio to 400 mg/day progesterone or placebo. Consistent with the Clinical Practice Guidelines, all participants will also receive transdermal nicotine patch (TNP) plus brief counseling for smoking cessation during the study participation. Specific Aim #1: To determine if progesterone +TNP is superior to placebo +TNP for prolonged and 7-day point prevalence of smoking abstinence rates at the end of 8 weeks of treatment and at 1 and 3 month follow-up time points. The investigators will also evaluate the safety and tolerability of progesterone treatment, compared to placebo. Our co-primary outcome measures will be 7-day point prevalence of smoking abstinence and breath CO at the end of treatment and 1- and 3-months after the end of the trial. Specific Aim #2: To determine if progesterone + TNP treatment, compared to placebo + TNP, improves response inhibitory function, as assessed by the Stroop, The Go/No Go task, and the Digit Symbol Task. Specific Aim # 3: To determine if progesterone + TNP treatment, compared to placebo + TNP, leads to a greater reduction in cigarette craving and nicotine withdrawal symptoms, as assessed by the Questionnaire on Smoking Urges-Brief (QSU-B) and the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS), respectively. Specific Aim #4: To evaluate with affective changes, as shown on the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, mediates the effects of progesterone on smoking abstinence.

Interventions

DRUGProgesterone (200 mgs BID)

Transdermal Nicotine Patch (TNP) + Progesterone

DRUGPlacebo

TNP + Placebo

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Yale University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 18 - 45 * Smoking at least 5 cigarettes/ day for at least one year * Regular menstrual cycles every 24-36 days for the previous 6 months * Motivated to quit smoking (i.e., a rating of at least 7 on a 10-point scale where 1 is not at all motivated and 10 is extremely motivated) * In good health * Using an acceptable, non-hormonal birth control

Exclusion criteria

A history of major medical or psychological illnesses including: * liver disease * heart disease * diabetes * malignancy including history of breast cancer * deep vein thrombosis * blood coagulation problems including a history or family history of thrombophilia * liver failure * cervical intra-epithelial lesions III or greater that are untreated * other medical conditions that the physician investigators deems will make study participation unsafe for the subject * current or past history bipolar disorder or schizophrenia * current diagnosis of major depression * panic disorder or post-traumatic stress disorder * active drug (non-nicotine) and/or alcohol dependence * currently undergoing treatment with another pharmacological agent for smoking cessation * regular use of sedating medications including sleeping aids, antihistamines, and others use of nicotine from cigars, pipes, chewing tobacco * pregnant * breast- feeding or intending to become pregnant within 6 months * allergy to nicotine patch or progesterone * allergy to peanuts or other nuts.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
7-day Point Prevalence of Smoking Abstinenceend of 8 weeks of treatmentThe 7-day point prevalence is defined by self-reported smoking abstinence for the last 7 days.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Stroop Measure of Inhibitory Functionbaseline and week 2The Stroop test assesses cognitive processing. The Level 3 Stroop Throughput score incorporates both accuracy and speed. In Level 3 of the Stroop test, a series of words representing colors are shown in a font color that is incongruent with the word (e.g. RED would be shown in blue font). Users are asked to press a response key associated with the color of the font, not the written word. Quicker and more accurate responses lead to higher scores. The lowest possible score is 0 (no correct responses). There is no defined maximum score, as the score depends upon both response time and number of correct responses. A Level 3 Stroop Throughput change score was calculated by subtracting baseline score from week 2 score. Higher positive scores represent greater improvement in scores at week 2 relative to baseline, and lower negative scores represent greater decline in scores from baseline to week 2.
Change in Go/No Go Task Measure of Inhibitory Functionbaseline and week 2Week 2 minus baseline. This task assesses the ability to withhold responses to an infrequently occurring target (No-Go trials). A total of 225 single digits (25 x 9 digits) are presented on a computer monitor for 250 ms each, immediately followed by a mask for 900 ms. Subjects must press a spacebar in response to every digit except the 3. Go/No Go score is calculated as separation between the means of the signal and the noise distributions and is reported in standard deviation units, representing an overall indicator of performance since it accounts for correct responses and incorrect responses. Higher scores represent a better outcome. For the change score, higher positive scores represent greater improvement in scores between baseline and week 2, and lower negative scores represent greater decline in scores between baseline and week 2.
Change in Digit Symbol Task Measure of Inhibitory Functionbaseline and week 2The Code Substitution Test (a computerized adaptation/variant of the Digit Symbol Substitution Test) is a test of psychomotor performance. The Code Substitution-Learning Throughput Score incorporates both accuracy and speed. During the learning phase of this test, users are continuously shown a row of 9 digits that are paired with a symbol (the pairings are constant). Users are presented with a series of individual pairings and are asked to press a response key to indicate if the pairing is correct or not. Quicker and more accurate responses lead to higher scores. The lowest possible score is 0 (no correct responses). There is no defined maximum score, as the score depends upon both response time and number of correct responses. A change score was calculated by subtracting baseline score from week 2 score. Higher positive scores represent greater improvement in scores at week 2 relative to baseline, and lower negative scores represent greater decline in scores from baseline to week 2.
Carbon Monoxide <10 Ppmend of 8 weeks of treatmentSmoking abstinence measured by breath CO
Prolonged Abstinence Post Trial1-month follow-up after end of treatmentAbstinence from 2 weeks post quit date to the one month follow up
Prolonged Abstinence Follow up3-month follow-up after end of treatmentAbstinence from 2 weeks post quit date to 3 month follow up (total of 6-8 weeks during the trial and 3 month follow up)
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScoreBaselineThe PANAS questionnaire consists of 20 items that describe different feelings and emotions. Participants are asked to what extent they feel this way right now on 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely). Separate Positive Affect Scores and Negative Affect Scores were calculated from 10 items each. Scores can range from 10 t0 50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect and with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
TNP + Progesterone
Transdermal Nicotine Patch + Progesterone (200 mgs BID) Progesterone (200 mgs BID): TNP + Progesterone
33
TNP + Placebo
Transdermal Nicotine Patch + Placebo (for Progesterone) Placebo: TNP + Placebo
31
Total64

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
1-Month Follow-UpWithdrawal by Subject10
Treatment PeriodLost to Follow-up126
Treatment PeriodWithdrawal by Subject13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalTNP + PlaceboTNP + Progesterone
Age, Continuous32.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
33.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
32.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
Cigarettes per day12.3 cigarettes per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
13.2 cigarettes per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3
11.4 cigarettes per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
51 Participants27 Participants24 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Lives with smoker
Does not live with smoker
26 Participants12 Participants14 Participants
Lives with smoker
Lives with smoker
38 Participants19 Participants19 Participants
Motivation to quit smoking8.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
8.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3
9.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
35 Participants21 Participants14 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
MIxed Race
7 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
unknown
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
21 Participants9 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
64 Participants31 Participants33 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 330 / 31
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 334 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 330 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

7-day Point Prevalence of Smoking Abstinence

The 7-day point prevalence is defined by self-reported smoking abstinence for the last 7 days.

Time frame: end of 8 weeks of treatment

Population: Participants (n=13 in TPN + Progesterone; n=9 in TPN + Placebo) missing outcome data were coded as not abstinent.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TNP + Progesterone7-day Point Prevalence of Smoking Abstinenceabstinent8 Participants
TNP + Progesterone7-day Point Prevalence of Smoking Abstinencenot abstinent25 Participants
TNP + Placebo7-day Point Prevalence of Smoking Abstinenceabstinent11 Participants
TNP + Placebo7-day Point Prevalence of Smoking Abstinencenot abstinent20 Participants
p-value: 0.325395% CI: [0.1968, 1.7202]Chi-squared
Secondary

Carbon Monoxide <10 Ppm

Smoking abstinence measured by breath CO

Time frame: 3 month follow up

Population: Participants (n=14 in TPN + progesterone; n=9 in TPN + placebo) missing breath CO data were coded as \> 10 ppm (positive for smoking).

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TNP + ProgesteroneCarbon Monoxide <10 PpmCO <10 ppm10 Participants
TNP + ProgesteroneCarbon Monoxide <10 PpmCO ≥ 10 ppm23 Participants
TNP + PlaceboCarbon Monoxide <10 PpmCO <10 ppm10 Participants
TNP + PlaceboCarbon Monoxide <10 PpmCO ≥ 10 ppm21 Participants
p-value: 0.866195% CI: [0.3171, 2.6287]Chi-squared
Secondary

Carbon Monoxide <10 Ppm

Smoking abstinence measured by breath CO

Time frame: 1 month follow up

Population: Participants (n=14 in TPN + progesterone; n=9 in TPN + placebo) missing breath CO data were coded as \> 10 ppm (positive for smoking).

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TNP + ProgesteroneCarbon Monoxide <10 PpmCO <10 ppm6 Participants
TNP + ProgesteroneCarbon Monoxide <10 PpmCO ≥ 10 ppm27 Participants
TNP + PlaceboCarbon Monoxide <10 PpmCO <10 ppm7 Participants
TNP + PlaceboCarbon Monoxide <10 PpmCO ≥ 10 ppm24 Participants
p-value: 0.66295% CI: [0.2247, 2.5838]Chi-squared
Secondary

Carbon Monoxide <10 Ppm

Smoking abstinence measured by breath CO

Time frame: end of 8 weeks of treatment

Population: Participants (n=13 in TPN + Progesterone; n=10 in TPN + Placebo) missing breath CO were coded as ≥ 10 ppm (positive for smoking).

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TNP + ProgesteroneCarbon Monoxide <10 PpmCO <10 ppm9 Participants
TNP + ProgesteroneCarbon Monoxide <10 PpmCO ≥ 10 ppm24 Participants
TNP + PlaceboCarbon Monoxide <10 PpmCO <10 ppm8 Participants
TNP + PlaceboCarbon Monoxide <10 PpmCO ≥ 10 ppm23 Participants
p-value: 0.894495% CI: [0.355, 3.2744]Chi-squared
Secondary

Change in Digit Symbol Task Measure of Inhibitory Function

The Code Substitution Test (a computerized adaptation/variant of the Digit Symbol Substitution Test) is a test of psychomotor performance. The Code Substitution-Learning Throughput Score incorporates both accuracy and speed. During the learning phase of this test, users are continuously shown a row of 9 digits that are paired with a symbol (the pairings are constant). Users are presented with a series of individual pairings and are asked to press a response key to indicate if the pairing is correct or not. Quicker and more accurate responses lead to higher scores. The lowest possible score is 0 (no correct responses). There is no defined maximum score, as the score depends upon both response time and number of correct responses. A change score was calculated by subtracting baseline score from week 2 score. Higher positive scores represent greater improvement in scores at week 2 relative to baseline, and lower negative scores represent greater decline in scores from baseline to week 2.

Time frame: baseline and week 2

Population: Includes participants who completed the Code Substitution-Learning Test.at both baseline and week 2 visits.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TNP + ProgesteroneChange in Digit Symbol Task Measure of Inhibitory Function-3.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.42
TNP + PlaceboChange in Digit Symbol Task Measure of Inhibitory Function5.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.59
p-value: 0.006595% CI: [2.71, 15.81]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Go/No Go Task Measure of Inhibitory Function

Week 2 minus baseline. This task assesses the ability to withhold responses to an infrequently occurring target (No-Go trials). A total of 225 single digits (25 x 9 digits) are presented on a computer monitor for 250 ms each, immediately followed by a mask for 900 ms. Subjects must press a spacebar in response to every digit except the 3. Go/No Go score is calculated as separation between the means of the signal and the noise distributions and is reported in standard deviation units, representing an overall indicator of performance since it accounts for correct responses and incorrect responses. Higher scores represent a better outcome. For the change score, higher positive scores represent greater improvement in scores between baseline and week 2, and lower negative scores represent greater decline in scores between baseline and week 2.

Time frame: baseline and week 2

Population: Includes participants who completed the Go/No Go task at both baseline and week 2 visits.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TNP + ProgesteroneChange in Go/No Go Task Measure of Inhibitory Function0.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.33
TNP + PlaceboChange in Go/No Go Task Measure of Inhibitory Function0.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.45
p-value: 0.79195% CI: [-0.9747, 1.2707]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Stroop Measure of Inhibitory Function

The Stroop test assesses cognitive processing. The Level 3 Stroop Throughput score incorporates both accuracy and speed. In Level 3 of the Stroop test, a series of words representing colors are shown in a font color that is incongruent with the word (e.g. RED would be shown in blue font). Users are asked to press a response key associated with the color of the font, not the written word. Quicker and more accurate responses lead to higher scores. The lowest possible score is 0 (no correct responses). There is no defined maximum score, as the score depends upon both response time and number of correct responses. A Level 3 Stroop Throughput change score was calculated by subtracting baseline score from week 2 score. Higher positive scores represent greater improvement in scores at week 2 relative to baseline, and lower negative scores represent greater decline in scores from baseline to week 2.

Time frame: baseline and week 2

Population: Includes people who completed Stroop Test at both baseline and Week 2 visits.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TNP + ProgesteroneChange in Stroop Measure of Inhibitory Function4.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.7
TNP + PlaceboChange in Stroop Measure of Inhibitory Function-5.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.7
p-value: 0.3195% CI: [-27.1, 9]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total Score

The PANAS questionnaire consists of 20 items that describe different feelings and emotions. Participants are asked to what extent they feel this way right now on 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely). Separate Positive Affect Scores and Negative Affect Scores were calculated from 10 items each. Scores can range from 10 t0 50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect and with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect.

Time frame: Week 8

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TNP + ProgesteronePositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScorePositive Affect Score25.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.4
TNP + ProgesteronePositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScoreNegative Affect Score11.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
TNP + PlaceboPositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScorePositive Affect Score26.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.3
TNP + PlaceboPositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScoreNegative Affect Score10.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Secondary

Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total Score

The PANAS questionnaire consists of 20 items that describe different feelings and emotions. Participants are asked to what extent they feel this way right now on 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely). Separate Positive Affect Scores and Negative Affect Scores were calculated from 10 items each. Scores can range from 10 t0 50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect and with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect.

Time frame: 1 month follow up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TNP + ProgesteronePositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScorePositive Affect Score26.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7
TNP + ProgesteronePositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScoreNegative Affect Score10.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
TNP + PlaceboPositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScorePositive Affect Score26.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7
TNP + PlaceboPositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScoreNegative Affect Score11.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Secondary

Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total Score

The PANAS questionnaire consists of 20 items that describe different feelings and emotions. Participants are asked to what extent they feel this way right now on 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely). Separate Positive Affect Scores and Negative Affect Scores were calculated from 10 items each. Scores can range from 10 t0 50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect and with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect.

Time frame: 3 month follow up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TNP + ProgesteronePositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScorePositive Affect Score24.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
TNP + ProgesteronePositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScoreNegative Affect Score11.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
TNP + PlaceboPositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScorePositive Affect Score27.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.2
TNP + PlaceboPositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScoreNegative Affect Score11.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Secondary

Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total Score

The PANAS questionnaire consists of 20 items that describe different feelings and emotions. Participants are asked to what extent they feel this way right now on 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely). Separate Positive Affect Scores and Negative Affect Scores were calculated from 10 items each. Scores can range from 10 t0 50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect and with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect.

Time frame: Week 3

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TNP + ProgesteronePositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScorePositive Affect Score23.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.6
TNP + ProgesteronePositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScoreNegative Affect Score11.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
TNP + PlaceboPositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScorePositive Affect Score27.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
TNP + PlaceboPositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScoreNegative Affect Score12.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Secondary

Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total Score

The PANAS questionnaire consists of 20 items that describe different feelings and emotions. Participants are asked to what extent they feel this way right now on 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely). Separate Positive Affect Scores and Negative Affect Scores were calculated from 10 items each. Scores can range from 10 t0 50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect and with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TNP + ProgesteronePositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScoreNegative Affect Score11.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
TNP + ProgesteronePositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScorePositive Affect Score29.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7
TNP + PlaceboPositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScorePositive Affect Score25.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.7
TNP + PlaceboPositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScoreNegative Affect Score11.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Secondary

Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total Score

The PANAS questionnaire consists of 20 items that describe different feelings and emotions. Participants are asked to what extent they feel this way right now on 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely). Separate Positive Affect Scores and Negative Affect Scores were calculated from 10 items each. Scores can range from 10 t0 50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect and with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect.

Time frame: Week 2

Population: Note: numbered analyzed does not equal 24

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TNP + ProgesteronePositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScorePositive Affect Score27.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
TNP + ProgesteronePositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScoreNegative Affect Score11.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
TNP + PlaceboPositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScorePositive Affect Score24.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
TNP + PlaceboPositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScoreNegative Affect Score11.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Secondary

Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total Score

The PANAS questionnaire consists of 20 items that describe different feelings and emotions. Participants are asked to what extent they feel this way right now on 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely). Separate Positive Affect Scores and Negative Affect Scores were calculated from 10 items each. Scores can range from 10 t0 50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect and with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect.

Time frame: Week 4

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TNP + ProgesteronePositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScorePositive Affect Score28.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.4
TNP + ProgesteronePositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScoreNegative Affect Score10.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
TNP + PlaceboPositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScorePositive Affect Score26.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.1
TNP + PlaceboPositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScoreNegative Affect Score11.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Secondary

Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total Score

The PANAS questionnaire consists of 20 items that describe different feelings and emotions. Participants are asked to what extent they feel this way right now on 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely). Separate Positive Affect Scores and Negative Affect Scores were calculated from 10 items each. Scores can range from 10 t0 50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect and with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect.

Time frame: Week 5

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TNP + ProgesteronePositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScorePositive Affect Score24.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.6
TNP + ProgesteronePositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScoreNegative Affect Score10.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
TNP + PlaceboPositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScorePositive Affect Score27.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.1
TNP + PlaceboPositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScoreNegative Affect Score10.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Secondary

Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total Score

The PANAS questionnaire consists of 20 items that describe different feelings and emotions. Participants are asked to what extent they feel this way right now on 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely). Separate Positive Affect Scores and Negative Affect Scores were calculated from 10 items each. Scores can range from 10 t0 50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect and with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect.

Time frame: Week 6

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TNP + ProgesteronePositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScorePositive Affect Score25.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
TNP + ProgesteronePositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScoreNegative Affect Score10.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
TNP + PlaceboPositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScorePositive Affect Score25.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
TNP + PlaceboPositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScoreNegative Affect Score11.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Secondary

Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total Score

The PANAS questionnaire consists of 20 items that describe different feelings and emotions. Participants are asked to what extent they feel this way right now on 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely). Separate Positive Affect Scores and Negative Affect Scores were calculated from 10 items each. Scores can range from 10 t0 50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect and with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect.

Time frame: Week 7

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TNP + ProgesteronePositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScorePositive Affect Score24.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.1
TNP + ProgesteronePositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScoreNegative Affect Score11.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
TNP + PlaceboPositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScorePositive Affect Score24.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.9
TNP + PlaceboPositive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total ScoreNegative Affect Score10.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Secondary

Prolonged Abstinence Follow up

Abstinence from 2 weeks post quit date to 3 month follow up (total of 6-8 weeks during the trial and 3 month follow up)

Time frame: 3-month follow-up after end of treatment

Population: Participants (n=14 in TPN + progesterone; n=9 in TPN + placebo) missing breath CO data were coded as \> 10 ppm (positive for smoking).

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TNP + ProgesteroneProlonged Abstinence Follow upabstinent4 Participants
TNP + ProgesteroneProlonged Abstinence Follow upnot abstienent29 Participants
TNP + PlaceboProlonged Abstinence Follow upabstinent5 Participants
TNP + PlaceboProlonged Abstinence Follow upnot abstienent26 Participants
p-value: 0.644995% CI: [0.1738, 2.9594]Chi-squared
Secondary

Prolonged Abstinence Post Trial

Abstinence from 2 weeks post quit date to the one month follow up

Time frame: 1-month follow-up after end of treatment

Population: Participants (n=14 in TPN + progesterone; n=9 in TPN + placebo) missing breath CO data were coded as \> 10 ppm (positive for smoking).

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TNP + ProgesteroneProlonged Abstinence Post Trialabstinent4 Participants
TNP + ProgesteroneProlonged Abstinence Post Trialnot abstinent29 Participants
TNP + PlaceboProlonged Abstinence Post Trialabstinent5 Participants
TNP + PlaceboProlonged Abstinence Post Trialnot abstinent26 Participants
p-value: 0.644995% CI: [0.1738, 2.9594]Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026