Skip to content

Chiropractic Treatment for Headache Among Children Aged 7-14

Effectiveness of Chiropractic Manipulation Treatment Versus Placebo Manipulation on Children Aged 7-14 Years With Headache and Musculoskeletal Problems. A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02684916
Enrollment
200
Registered
2016-02-18
Start date
2015-10-31
Completion date
2019-10-31
Last updated
2020-03-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Headache

Keywords

Chiropractic spinal manipulation, Children, Pediatric, Headache

Brief summary

The primary aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation treatment versus placebo treatment in children suffering from headache for more than six months.

Detailed description

The study is a two-armed parallel, randomized controlled clinical trial where children suffering from chronic headache and at the same time having one or more biomechanical dysfunctions of the spine are randomized to either chiropractic manipulation treatment or placebo manipulation treatment. The outcome is based on weekly sms responses collecting the number of days with headache the past week, intensity of headache and use of medication for headache. These are answered four weeks prior to initiation of treatment and 16 weeks thereafter. After the 16 weeks follow-up, a final questionnaire is completed including information about the course and the present headache status. The primary outcome is the number of days with headache. Secondary outcomes are intensity of headaches and use of medication for headache. Covariates are collected via baseline questionnaires on patient demographics; medical history; factors known to initiate, worsen or ease the headache; prevalence of headache in the nearest family; and behavioral patterns known to influence headache.

Interventions

The child receives chiropractic manipulation treatment in the neck and in the spine and pelvis according to individual needs. They also receive a written list of general advice regarding lifestyle and habits. The parents and the child are unaware of group allocation.

PROCEDUREPlacebo

Non-therapeutic placebo treatment: a broad non-specific contact outside the spinal column is taken on subject's scapula and gluteal region lying in a side posture position, on the scapulae in a prone position and on trapezius muscles in a sitting position. In those positions the chiropractor pushes in a non-intentional and non- therapeutic directional line with a low-amplitude, low velocity push maneuver. All contacts are performed without soft tissue pre-tension and gentle contact, to insure that no joint cavitation occurs. To obtain a noise that many people associate with a chiropractic spinal adjustment, a de-activated Activator Instrument is used on the arm of the chiropractor to give a click-sound. General advice on lifestyle and habits is handed out to the placebo group as well.

Sponsors

University of Southern Denmark
CollaboratorOTHER
Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
7 Years to 14 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Headaches for at least half a year. * Headache for at least 4 days pr. month. * At least one musculoskeletal dysfunction as identified by an experienced chiropractor as a movement restriction in one or more of the spinal joints and painful on manual palpation suitable for chiropractic manipulation treatment at the time of the initial screening. * Able to report information on headache via cell phone either by him- or herself or with help from the parents.

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications for chiropractic treatment * Ongoing treatment for headache at another practitioner, except medical treatment 3 months prior to inclusion. * Lack of reporting baseline data via sms 4 weeks prior to inclusion. * Acute neck or head trauma during the trial period which is estimated to influence the headache

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in number of days per week with headache over four months analyzed as repeated measures with end-point at four months.Assessed weekly for a period of four months.Patient or parent reported via sms-service.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intensity of headache, graded on a 0-10 scale, where 10 is the worst, over four months analyzed as repeated measures with end-point at four months.Assessed weekly for a period of four months.Patient or parent reported via sms-service.
Use of medicine the past week due to headache over four months analyzed as repeated measures with end-point at four months.Assessed weekly for a period of four months.Patient or parent reported via sms-service.
Improvement on a seven point Likert scale (from 'totally recovered' to 'worse than ever') assessed at four months.Assessed at the end of four months follow-up.Patient or parent reported via sms-service.

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026