Skip to content

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound of the Kidney

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Complex Kidney Lesion Diagnosis in Patients With CKD (CEUS CKD)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02684435
Acronym
CEUS-CKD
Enrollment
63
Registered
2016-02-18
Start date
2016-02-29
Completion date
2018-07-09
Last updated
2019-09-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Kidney Disease, Cystic Kidney Disease

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to evaluate contrast-enhanced ultrasound for kidney malignancies

Detailed description

This is an investigator-initiated, prospective study designed to evaluate the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with microbubble contrast agent (perflutren lipid; Definity®) to identify malignancy in patients with kidney disease, a known risk factor for kidney malignancy, in whom a conventional ultrasound (US) shows an indeterminate cystic kidney lesion. The primary objective of the study is to estimate the sensitivity of CEUS in diagnosing kidney malignancy in patients with a risk factor for kidney malignancy and compare it to the current gold standard test in this patient population. Secondary analysis will include more optimal contrast-enhanced imaging with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a subset of patients who can receive these studies. The study outcome will lead to immediate clinical application in patients with chronic kidney disease. Given the cost-effectiveness and adverse event profile, it has excellent potential to become established as first line diagnostics in the general patient population as well.

Interventions

Dosing per approved package label

Sponsors

Vanderbilt University
CollaboratorOTHER
North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

To be eligible for the present study, patients must meet the following criteria: 1. Able to provide written informed consent 2. Willing to comply with protocol requirements 3. At least 18 years of age 4. Have kidney disease, defined as either CKD II-VI, determined by estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of \<90 and derived from serum creatinine measurements, or albuminuria/proteinuria, determined by albumin to creatinine ratio or protein to creatinine ratio of \>30mg/gm, or having received a kidney transplant 5. Have at least one kidney lesion identified but incompletely characterized on a non-contrasted US, CT, or MR exam for which the patient's provider recommends follow-up studies or further evaluation with an additional imaging tests.

Exclusion criteria

Patients who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded for enrollment: 1. Critically ill or medically unstable and whose critical course during the observation period would be unpredictable (e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring oxygen) 2. Known hypersensitivity to sulfur hexafluoride or to any component of perflutren lipid (Definity®) 3. Right to left shunt, severe pulmonary hypertension (Pulmonary artery pressure \>90mmHg), or adult respiratory distress syndrome 4. Active cardiac disease including any of the following: * Severe congestive heart failure (class IV in accordance with the classification of the New York Heart Association) * Unstable angina. * Severe arrhythmia (i.e. ventricular tachycardia, flutter fibrillation; ventricular premature complexes occurring close to the preceding T- wave, multifocal complexes). * Myocardial infarction within 14 days prior to the date of proposed Definity® administration. * Uncontrolled systemic hypertension (systolic blood pressure (BP) \>180 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP \>100 mm Hg despite optimal medical management 5. Is in an intensive care setting 6. Has an unstable neurological disease (e.g cerebrovascular accident (including transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) within the 3 months before signing of informed consent 7. Has undergone an invasive procedure on kidney lesion (e.g. tissue biopsy, surgery, nonsurgical cytoreductive procedure) since identification of lesion via US without contrast 8. Has any other medical condition or other circumstances that would significantly decrease the chances of obtaining reliable data or of achieving the study objectives such as: * Mental illness * Drug abuse 9. Female patient who is pregnant or lactating (the possibility of pregnancy has to be excluded by negative serum or urine beta human chorionic gonadotropin results, obtained within 24 hours before the perflutren lipid administration, or on the basis of patient history, e.g.: tubal ligation, hysterectomy or a minimum of 1 year without menses) 10. Obesity that limits obtainment of acceptable images \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Lesions With a Change in Radiologist's EvaluationBaseline, 1 yearLesions will be assessed for change in size, calcification, and septation based on Bosniak criteria (I, II, IIF, III, IV) to determine whether a lesion has progressed, regressed, or is stable.
Sensitivity of Qualitative Interpretations of CEUS in Diagnosing Kidney MalignancyBaseline, 1 yearPRELIMINARY RESULTS of sensitivity of qualitative interpretations of CEUS in diagnosing kidney malignancy in patients with CKD and a suspicious or indeterminate lesion on non-contrasted imaging compared to the truth standard
Specificity of Qualitative Interpretations of CEUSBaseline, 1 yearPRELIMINARY RESULTS of specificity of qualitative interpretations of CEUS in diagnosing kidney malignancy in patients with CKD and a suspicious or indeterminate lesion on non-contrasted imaging compared to the truth standard

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Specificity of Quantitative Metrics Generated From CEUS in Diagnosing Kidney Malignancy in Patients With CKD and a Suspicious or Indeterminate Lesion on Non-contrasted Imaging Compared to the Truth StandardBaseline, 1 YearSpecificity of Quantitative Metrics Generated From CEUS in Diagnosing Kidney Malignancy in Patients With CKD and a Suspicious or Indeterminate Lesion on Non-contrasted Imaging Compared to the Truth Standard
Sensitivity of Quantitative Metrics Generated From CEUS in Diagnosing Kidney Malignancy in Patients With CKD and a Suspicious or Indeterminate Lesion on Non-contrasted Imaging Compared to the Truth StandardBaseline, 1 YearSensitivity of Quantitative Metrics Generated From CEUS in Diagnosing Kidney Malignancy in Patients With CKD and a Suspicious or Indeterminate Lesion on Non-contrasted Imaging Compared to the Truth Standard

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Perflutren Lipid Microsphere
Activate by shaking for 45 seconds using VIALMIX. Use activated product within 5 minutes. Infusion: The recommended infusion dose for activated perflutren is via an IV infusion of 1.3 mL added to 50 mL of preservative-free saline. The rate of infusion should be initiated at 4.0 mL/minute, but titrated as necessary to achieve optimal image enhancement, not to exceed 10 mL/minute per P.I. approval Perflutren lipid microsphere: Dosing per approved package label
63
Total63

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPerflutren Lipid Microsphere
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
25 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
38 Participants
Age, Continuous59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
62 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
28 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
33 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
63 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
43 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 63
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 63
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 63

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Lesions With a Change in Radiologist's Evaluation

Lesions will be assessed for change in size, calcification, and septation based on Bosniak criteria (I, II, IIF, III, IV) to determine whether a lesion has progressed, regressed, or is stable.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Perflutren Lipid MicrosphereNumber of Lesions With a Change in Radiologist's Evaluation24 lesions
Primary

Sensitivity of Qualitative Interpretations of CEUS in Diagnosing Kidney Malignancy

PRELIMINARY RESULTS of sensitivity of qualitative interpretations of CEUS in diagnosing kidney malignancy in patients with CKD and a suspicious or indeterminate lesion on non-contrasted imaging compared to the truth standard

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Perflutren Lipid MicrosphereSensitivity of Qualitative Interpretations of CEUS in Diagnosing Kidney Malignancy75 percentage of positive scans
Primary

Specificity of Qualitative Interpretations of CEUS

PRELIMINARY RESULTS of specificity of qualitative interpretations of CEUS in diagnosing kidney malignancy in patients with CKD and a suspicious or indeterminate lesion on non-contrasted imaging compared to the truth standard

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Perflutren Lipid MicrosphereSpecificity of Qualitative Interpretations of CEUS71 percentage of negative scans
Secondary

Sensitivity of Quantitative Metrics Generated From CEUS in Diagnosing Kidney Malignancy in Patients With CKD and a Suspicious or Indeterminate Lesion on Non-contrasted Imaging Compared to the Truth Standard

Sensitivity of Quantitative Metrics Generated From CEUS in Diagnosing Kidney Malignancy in Patients With CKD and a Suspicious or Indeterminate Lesion on Non-contrasted Imaging Compared to the Truth Standard

Time frame: Baseline, 1 Year

Population: Quantitative analysis unable to be conducted on cystic lesions and required solid portions, so data was not collected

Secondary

Specificity of Quantitative Metrics Generated From CEUS in Diagnosing Kidney Malignancy in Patients With CKD and a Suspicious or Indeterminate Lesion on Non-contrasted Imaging Compared to the Truth Standard

Specificity of Quantitative Metrics Generated From CEUS in Diagnosing Kidney Malignancy in Patients With CKD and a Suspicious or Indeterminate Lesion on Non-contrasted Imaging Compared to the Truth Standard

Time frame: Baseline, 1 Year

Population: Quantitative analysis unable to be conducted on cystic lesions and required solid portions, so data was not collected

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026