Induction of Labor
Conditions
Brief summary
Induction of labor is one of the most common obstetrical medical procedures performed today. Iatrogenic stimulation of uterine contractions prior to the onset of spontaneous labor is undertaken for various maternal and fetal indications and spans 20% of deliveries today. 1. During the past years there has been an additional rise due to elective inductions 2. Induction is undertaken when potential risks of prolonging pregnancy outweigh the risks of induced delivery, particularly those associated with post-term pregnancy, rupture of membranes, oligohydramnios and additional fetal and maternal conditions that pose risks to mother and fetus. In many circumstances of women with an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score of 7 or less) sequential induction with more than one agent is necessary. To date, no trial has compared the optimal subsequent ripening method after the preliminary use of dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2). In this trial investigators aim to compare the obstetrical outcomes of subsequent induction in women admitted for induction of labor with Bishop score \<7 or less 24 hours after the insertion of vaginal prostaglandin insert (Propess). Two methods of routine induction of labor will be compared: An additional Propess induction for another 24 hours vs. intravenous oxytocin infusion combined with intra-cervical balloon insertion.
Detailed description
Induction of labor is one of the most common obstetrical medical procedures performed today. Iatrogenic stimulation of uterine contractions prior to the onset of spontaneous labor is undertaken for various maternal and fetal indications and spans 20% of deliveries today 1. During the past years there has been an additional rise due to elective inductions 2. Induction is undertaken when potential risks of prolonging pregnancy outweigh the risks of induced delivery, particularly those associated with post-term pregnancy, rupture of membranes, oligohydramnios and additional fetal and maternal conditions that pose risks to mother and fetus. In many circumstances of women with an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score of 7 or less) sequential induction with more than one agent is necessary. To date, no trial has compared the optimal subsequent ripening method after the preliminary use of dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2). In this trial investigators aim to compare the obstetrical outcomes of subsequent induction in women admitted for induction of labor with Bishop score \<7 or less 24 hours after the insertion of vaginal prostaglandin insert (Propess). Two methods of routine induction of labor will be compared: An additional Propess induction for another 24 hours vs. intravenous oxytocin infusion combined with intra-cervical balloon insertion.
Interventions
DRUGAdministration of Propess
1. History taking and physical examination including cervical length 2. Eligibility assessment 3. Explanation regarding the study protocol 4. Signed informed consent (at VAS\<3) 5. Women agreeing to continued induction of labor 24 hours after insertion of Propess, will be randomized using sealed envelopes to the subsequent method of induction of labor (additional vaginal insert vs. oxytocin infusion with intracervical balloon insertion with 60ml saline). Treatment will be given according to the pre-existing and approved departmental protocol. The protocol for oxytocin infusion is 4 units of Pitocin in 10 cc 0.9% NaCl, infused at a rate of 0.4 ml/hour. Infusion rate will be increased every 20 minutes until 3-4 contractions every 10 minutes are produced. Follow up on all women will be performed from the time of second agent induction until discharge from hospital postpartum.
DEVICEballoon
1. History taking and physical examination including cervical length 2. Eligibility assessment 3. Explanation regarding the study protocol 4. Signed informed consent (at VAS\<3) 5. Women agreeing to continued induction of labor 24 hours after insertion of Propess, will be randomized using sealed envelopes to the subsequent method of induction of labor (additional vaginal insert vs. oxytocin infusion with intracervical balloon insertion with 60ml saline). Treatment will be given according to the pre-existing and approved departmental protocol. The protocol for oxytocin infusion is 4 units of Pitocin in 10 cc 0.9% NaCl, infused at a rate of 0.4 ml/hour. Infusion rate will be increased every 20 minutes until 3-4 contractions every 10 minutes are produced. Follow up on all women will be performed from the time of second agent induction until discharge from hospital postpartum.
DRUGIntravenous oxytocin infusion
1. History taking and physical examination including cervical length 2. Eligibility assessment 3. Explanation regarding the study protocol 4. Signed informed consent (at VAS\<3) 5. Women agreeing to continued induction of labor 24 hours after insertion of Propess, will be randomized using sealed envelopes to the subsequent method of induction of labor (additional vaginal insert vs. oxytocin infusion with intracervical balloon insertion with 60ml saline). Treatment will be given according to the pre-existing and approved departmental protocol. The protocol for oxytocin infusion is 4 units of Pitocin in 10 cc 0.9% NaCl, infused at a rate of 0.4 ml/hour. Infusion rate will be increased every 20 minutes until 3-4 contractions every 10 minutes are produced. Follow up on all women will be performed from the time of second agent induction until discharge from hospital postpartum.
Sponsors
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
1. Maternal age of 18 years or greater 2. Singleton gestation 3. Bishop score of 7 or less 24 hours after the insertion of Propess 4. Pregnancies at 36+0/7 weeks of gestation and beyond 5. Normal fetal heart rate tracings and normal sonogram at admission (ie Vertex, appropriate for gestational age, biophysical score of 8/8, normal amniotic fluid index) 6. No contraindication for prolongation of pregnancy (e.g. intrauterine infection, placental abruption, etc.)
Exclusion criteria
1. Situations preventing continuation of induction process in any arm - patient refusal, maternal of fetal conditions necessitating prompt delivery. 2. Rupture of membranes (ROM) after initial Propess insertion.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time from second agent induction to delivery | 48 hours | Time from second agent induction to active labor |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of failed induction defined as 5 cm dilatation | 48 hours | Defined as 5 cm dilatation with regular contractions |
| Rate of failed induction defined as regular contractions | 48 hours | Rate of failed induction defined as regular contractions (over 3 contractions in 30 min) |
| cesarean sections rate | 48 hours | Number of cesarean sections rate due to tachysystole and non-reassuring fetal heart rate. |
Contacts
Primary Contactyariv yogev, professor
Outcome results
None listed