Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Lanreotide Autogel/ Depot 120 mg vs. Placebo in Subjects With Lung Neuroendocrine Tumours

A Phase 3, Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Lanreotide Autogel®/Depot 120 mg Plus BSC vs. Placebo Plus BSC for Tumour Control in Subjects With Well Differentiated, Metastatic and/or Unresectable, Typical or Atypical, Lung Neuroendocrine Tumours

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02683941
Acronym
SPINET
Enrollment
77
Registered
2016-02-17
Start date
2017-03-06
Completion date
2020-02-28
Last updated
2022-07-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neuroendocrine Tumors in Lung

Brief summary

This is a Phase 3, prospective, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, study evaluating the efficacy and safety of LAN plus BSC versus placebo plus BSC for the treatment of well-differentiated, metastatic and/or unresectable, typical or atypical bronchopulmonary NETs. This study contains two phases: the Double-Blind (DB) Phase, and the Open Label (OL) Phase. The DB Phase includes: Screening, Baseline and Treatment period. The OL Phase will consist of two periods: Treatment Period and Follow-Up Period. The primary objective will be to describe the antitumour efficacy of Lanreotide Autogel/Depot 120 mg (LAN) plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) every 28 days, in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), measured by central review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) v1.1 criteria, every 12 weeks, in subjects randomized to LAN with unresectable and/or metastatic well differentiated, typical or atypical bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumours. Recent updates of National Cancer Institute Cancer Network (NCCN) & European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) guidelines recommend SSA in first line for the treatment of locoregional unresectable or metastatic bronchopulmonary NETs as an option beyond 'observation' leading to slow and difficult recruitment in SPINET study. Consequently, it was decided to prematurely stop the recruitment in the SPINET study and to transition all subjects still treated in the double-blind phase to the open label (OL) treatment and follow-up phases following respective country approvals of Amendment #5. The new aim of this Phase 3, multicenter, prospective, randomized placebo-controlled clinical study is to describe the antitumor efficacy and safety of Lanreotide Autogel/Depot 120 mg (LAN) plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) in subjects with well-differentiated, metastatic and/or unresectable, typical or atypical, bronchopulmonary NETs.

Detailed description

As planned initially, a total of 216 eligible patients with well-differentiated typical or atypical, metastatic and/or unresectable bronchopulmonary NETs, and a positive somatostatin receptor imaging (SRI) (Octreoscan® ≥ grade 2 Krenning scale; Ga-PET scan: uptake greater than liver background), were to be randomized 2:1 to either LAN plus BSC (120mg/28 days) or placebo plus BSC following the stratification of 1) typical versus atypical and 2) prior chemotherapy versus no prior chemotherapy\*. \* cytotoxic chemotherapy or molecular targeted therapy or interferon. At the time of the premature stop of the recruitment (as per Protocol Amendment #5), 77 patients were enrolled. All patients still treated in the DB Phase were entered into the OL Phase (either for Follow up or for OL treatment periods). The transition to the OL periods was done on a country-basis and per patient, at the following planned scheduled visit (i.e. approximately 28 days from the last injection). Patients enrolled into the study not progressing at the time of study stop, and who agree to stay on LAN therapy (i.e. OL Treatment Period) receive the study active treatment until evidence of disease progression (based on local radiological assessment then confirmed centrally), development of unacceptable toxicity, or premature withdrawal for any reason or up a maximum of 18 months after the last patient randomized. After disease progression patients are followed for survival, QoL and all subsequent anticancer treatments in the OL Follow-up period up to the end of the study (i.e up to 18 months after the last patient randomized).

Interventions

DRUGBest Supportive Care

Best Supportive Care is best available therapy at the choice of the investigator

DRUGPlacebo

Saline solution 0.9% administered via deep subcutaneous injection every 28 days until disease progression.

120mg every 28 days until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity

Sponsors

Ipsen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have metastatic and/or unresectable pathologically confirmed well-differentiated, typical or atypical neuroendocrine tumor of the bronchopulmonary * Histologic evidence of Well differentiated Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the bronchopulmonary (typical and atypical according to the World Health Organisation (WHO criteria), evaluated locally) * Has a mitotic index \<2 mitoses/2 mm2 for typical carcinoid (TC) and \<10 mitoses/2 mm2 and/or foci of necrosis for atypical carcinoid (AC) * At least one measurable lesion of the disease on imaging (CT or MRI; RECIST 1.1) * Positive Somatostatin receptors (SSTR) imaging

Exclusion criteria

* Poorly differentiated or high grade carcinoma, or patients with neuroendocrine tumors not of bronchopulmonary origin * Has been treated with a Somatostatin analog (SSA) at any time prior to randomization, except if that treatment was for less than 15 days (e.g. peri-operatively) of short acting SSA or one dose of long acting SSA and the treatment was received more than 6 weeks prior to randomization * Has been treated with Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) at any time prior to randomization * Has been treated with more than two lines of cytotoxic chemotherapy or molecular targeted therapy or interferon for bronchopulmonary NET

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time in Subjects Randomised to Lanreotide in the Double-Blind Phase or Open-Label Treatment Phase, Assessed by Central ReviewUp to a maximum of 33 monthsPFS for subjects randomised in the lanreotide group, assessed by central review using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) criteria every 12 weeks, defined as the time from randomisation to disease progression or death from any causes during either the double-blind phase, or the open-label treatment phase. The distribution of PFS times were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Median PFS Time in the Double-Blind Phase, Assessed by Local ReviewUp to a maximum of 15 monthsPFS was assessed by local review using RECIST v1.1 criteria every 12 weeks, defined as the time from randomisation to disease progression or death from any causes during the double-blind phase. The distribution of PFS times were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method.
Objective Response Rate (ORR) in the Double-Blind PhaseUp to a maximum of 15 monthsORR was assessed by central review and local review using RECIST v1.1 criteria every 12 weeks, defined as the percentage of subjects who achieved a best overall response of complete response or partial response in the double-blind phase.
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) in the Double-Blind PhaseUp to a maximum of 15 monthsTTF was defined as the time from randomisation to disease progression using RECIST v1.1, death, consent withdrawn, an adverse event, protocol deviations, lost to follow-up, the appearance of carcinoid syndrome or other hormone related syndrome necessitating the initiation of SSAs (rescue octreotide and/or long-acting release SSA), or initiation of anticancer treatment in the double-blind phase. The distribution of TTF times were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Biomarker Chromogranin A (CgA) in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhaseBaseline, Weeks 8, 12, 24, and 48, and post-treatment in the double-blind phase (a maximum of 15 months); Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, and 48, and post-treatment in the the open-label treatment phase (a maximum of 33 months)Blood samples were collected to determine plasma CgA. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement collected prior to the first dose of study treatment (lanreotide). The x of upper limit of normal (ULN) was calculated as raw value/ULN.
Median PFS Time in the Double-Blind Phase, Assessed by Central ReviewUp to a maximum of 15 monthsPFS was assessed by central review using RECIST v1.1 criteria every 12 weeks, defined as the time from randomisation to disease progression or death from any causes during the double-blind phase. The distribution of PFS times were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method.
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL), as Assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/QoL ScoreBaseline and post-treatment in the double-blind phase (a maximum of 15 months); Baseline and post-treatment in the open-label treatment phase (a maximum of 33 months)The EORTC QLQ-C30 (V3.0) consisted of 30 questions. The final 2 questions were related to global health status/QoL, with responses requested on a 7-point scale from 1 ('Very poor') to 7 ('Excellent'). The global health status/QoL scale ranges in score from 0 to 100. A high score for the global health status/QoL scale represents a high QoL, thus, an increase in score represents an increase in QoL. 95% Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals were estimated using the exact method for binomial distributions. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement collected prior to the first dose of study treatment (lanreotide).
Percentage of Subjects Who Experienced QoL DeteriorationBaseline and post-treatment in the double-blind phase (a maximum of 15 months); Baseline and post-treatment in the open-label treatment phase (a maximum of 33 months)QoL deterioration was defined by a decrease from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QoL Score of at least 10 points. The EORTC QLQ-C30 (V3.0) consisted of 30 questions. The final 2 questions were related to global health status/QoL, with responses requested on a 7-point scale from 1 ('Very poor') to 7 ('Excellent'). The global health status/QoL scale ranges in score from 0 to 100. A high score for the global health status/QoL scale represents a high QoL, thus, an increase in score represents an increase in QoL. 95% Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals were estimated using the exact method for binomial distributions. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement collected prior to the first dose of study treatment (lanreotide).
Mean Changes From Baseline in Urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic Acid (5-HIAA) Levels in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhaseBaseline, Weeks 8, 12, 24, and 48, and post-treatment in the double-blind phase (a maximum of 15 months); Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, and 48, and post-treatment in the the open-label treatment phase (a maximum of 33 months)Measured in subjects with an elevated 5-HIAA at baseline (≥2 x ULN). The assessment of urinary 5-HIAA required subjects to collect their urine for the 24 hour period prior to the study visit. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement collected prior to the first dose of study treatment (lanreotide). The x of ULN was calculated as raw value/ULN.
Percentage of Subjects With a Decrease of CgA ≥30% From Baseline at Week 8 in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhaseBaseline and Week 8 in the double-blind phase; Baseline and Week 8 in the open-label treatment phaseMeasured in subjects with an elevated CgA at baseline (≥2 x ULN). Blood samples were collected to determine plasma CgA. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement collected prior to the first dose of study treatment (lanreotide).

Countries

Austria, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 37 investigation sites in 10 countries in North America and Europe between 06 March 2017 and 28 February 2020 in adult subjects with well differentiated, metastatic and/or unresectable, typical or atypical bronchopulmonary (BP) neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) who did not require somatostatin analogue (SSA) treatment for symptom control.

Pre-assignment details

This study consisted of two phases: the double-blind phase, and the open-label phase. 77 subjects were randomised to receive study treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal for any reason, or up to 18 months after the last subject was randomised. Subjects were randomised 2:1 to either lanreotide autogel/depot 120 milligrams (mg) plus best supportive care (BSC) every 28 days (Q4 weeks) or placebo plus BSC Q4 weeks.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lanreotide
Subjects received deep SC injections of lanreotide autogel/depot 120 mg Q4 weeks plus BSC. Following protocol amendment #5 (28 Jan 2019), all ongoing subjects in the double-blind phase, who had not yet progressed (assessed locally and confirmed centrally) were offered to enter the open-label treatment phase and receive deep SC injections of lanreotide autogel/depot 120 mg Q4 weeks plus BSC. If a subject progressed during the double-blind phase or open-label treatment phase they entered the open-label follow-up phase. The follow-up phase ended at the same time as the open-label treatment phase (18 months after the last subject randomised).
51
Placebo
Subjects received deep SC injections of placebo (saline solution 0.9%) Q4 weeks plus BSC in the double-blind phase. Following protocol amendment #5 (28 Jan 2019), all ongoing subjects in the double-blind phase, who had not yet progressed (assessed locally and confirmed centrally) were offered to enter the open-label treatment phase and receive deep SC injections of lanreotide autogel/depot 120 mg Q4 weeks plus BSC. If a subject progressed during the open-label treatment phase they entered the open-label follow-up phase. The follow-up phase ended at the same time as the open-label treatment phase (18 months after the last subject randomised).
26
Total77

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Double-blind PhaseAdverse Event01
Double-blind PhaseDisease Progression52
Double-blind PhaseLost to Follow-up10
Double-blind PhaseWithdrawal by Subject42
Open-label Follow-up PhaseLost to Follow-up10
Open-label Follow-up PhaseOther81
Open-label Follow-up PhaseStudy Termination by the Sponsor64
Open-label Follow-up PhaseWithdrawal by Subject33
Open-label Treatment PhaseDisease Progression12
Open-label Treatment PhaseOther10
Open-label Treatment PhaseStudy Termination by the Sponsor189
Open-label Treatment PhaseWithdrawal by Subject02

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLanreotidePlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous66.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.94
65.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.89
66.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.54
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Missing
42 Participants22 Participants64 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Not Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants4 Participants13 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black or African American
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Missing
12 Participants7 Participants19 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
35 Participants19 Participants54 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants12 Participants35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
28 Participants14 Participants42 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 510 / 260 / 407 / 26
other
Total, other adverse events
48 / 5125 / 2626 / 400 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 517 / 261 / 400 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time in Subjects Randomised to Lanreotide in the Double-Blind Phase or Open-Label Treatment Phase, Assessed by Central Review

PFS for subjects randomised in the lanreotide group, assessed by central review using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) criteria every 12 weeks, defined as the time from randomisation to disease progression or death from any causes during either the double-blind phase, or the open-label treatment phase. The distribution of PFS times were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method.

Time frame: Up to a maximum of 33 months

Population: The ITT population included all randomised subjects. Subjects were analysed as randomised, regardless of the treatment received. One subject randomised to lanreotide should have been censored in the PFS analysis treatment for discontinuation for toxicity or other reasons, however the baseline central radiological assessment was performed prior to the randomisation date, therefore the subject was excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Overall Study: LanreotideMedian Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time in Subjects Randomised to Lanreotide in the Double-Blind Phase or Open-Label Treatment Phase, Assessed by Central Review16.6 months
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Biomarker Chromogranin A (CgA) in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment Phase

Blood samples were collected to determine plasma CgA. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement collected prior to the first dose of study treatment (lanreotide). The x of upper limit of normal (ULN) was calculated as raw value/ULN.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 8, 12, 24, and 48, and post-treatment in the double-blind phase (a maximum of 15 months); Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, and 48, and post-treatment in the the open-label treatment phase (a maximum of 33 months)

Population: Double-blind phase: The ITT population included all randomised subjects with non-missing measurements. Subjects were analysed as randomised, regardless of the treatment received. Open-label phase: The open-label ITT population included all ITT subjects with non-missing measurements entering the open-label phase who received at least one injection of lanreotide autogel/depot in the open-label phase.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Overall Study: LanreotideMean Change From Baseline in the Biomarker Chromogranin A (CgA) in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhaseWeek 24-3.42 x of ULNStandard Deviation 14.122
Overall Study: LanreotideMean Change From Baseline in the Biomarker Chromogranin A (CgA) in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhaseWeek 8-213.63 x of ULNStandard Deviation 1293.111
Overall Study: LanreotideMean Change From Baseline in the Biomarker Chromogranin A (CgA) in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhaseWeek 12-214.49 x of ULNStandard Deviation 1344.401
Overall Study: LanreotideMean Change From Baseline in the Biomarker Chromogranin A (CgA) in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhaseWeek 48-4.07 x of ULNStandard Deviation 8.066
Overall Study: LanreotideMean Change From Baseline in the Biomarker Chromogranin A (CgA) in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhasePost-treatment12.22 x of ULNStandard Deviation 64.053
Double-Blind Phase: PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Biomarker Chromogranin A (CgA) in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhaseWeek 481.24 x of ULNStandard Deviation 2.969
Double-Blind Phase: PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Biomarker Chromogranin A (CgA) in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhasePost-treatment160.11 x of ULNStandard Deviation 596.759
Double-Blind Phase: PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Biomarker Chromogranin A (CgA) in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhaseWeek 80.09 x of ULNStandard Deviation 2.578
Double-Blind Phase: PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Biomarker Chromogranin A (CgA) in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhaseWeek 2460.41 x of ULNStandard Deviation 193.327
Double-Blind Phase: PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Biomarker Chromogranin A (CgA) in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhaseWeek 125.73 x of ULNStandard Deviation 15.519
Open-Label Treatment Phase: All SubjectsMean Change From Baseline in the Biomarker Chromogranin A (CgA) in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhasePost-treatment-31.59 x of ULNStandard Deviation 167.515
Open-Label Treatment Phase: All SubjectsMean Change From Baseline in the Biomarker Chromogranin A (CgA) in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhaseWeek 12-28.27 x of ULNStandard Deviation 149.11
Open-Label Treatment Phase: All SubjectsMean Change From Baseline in the Biomarker Chromogranin A (CgA) in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhaseWeek 24-1.42 x of ULNStandard Deviation 8.338
Open-Label Treatment Phase: All SubjectsMean Change From Baseline in the Biomarker Chromogranin A (CgA) in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhaseWeek 48-1.66 x of ULNStandard Deviation 0.925
Secondary

Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL), as Assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/QoL Score

The EORTC QLQ-C30 (V3.0) consisted of 30 questions. The final 2 questions were related to global health status/QoL, with responses requested on a 7-point scale from 1 ('Very poor') to 7 ('Excellent'). The global health status/QoL scale ranges in score from 0 to 100. A high score for the global health status/QoL scale represents a high QoL, thus, an increase in score represents an increase in QoL. 95% Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals were estimated using the exact method for binomial distributions. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement collected prior to the first dose of study treatment (lanreotide).

Time frame: Baseline and post-treatment in the double-blind phase (a maximum of 15 months); Baseline and post-treatment in the open-label treatment phase (a maximum of 33 months)

Population: Double-blind phase: The ITT population included all randomised subjects with non-missing measurements. Subjects were analysed as randomised, regardless of the treatment received. Open-label phase: The open-label ITT population included all ITT subjects with non-missing measurements entering the open-label phase who received at least one injection of lanreotide autogel/depot in the open-label phase.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Overall Study: LanreotideMean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL), as Assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/QoL Score-2.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.27
Double-Blind Phase: PlaceboMean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL), as Assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/QoL Score-19.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.33
Open-Label Treatment Phase: All SubjectsMean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL), as Assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/QoL Score0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.67
Secondary

Mean Changes From Baseline in Urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic Acid (5-HIAA) Levels in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment Phase

Measured in subjects with an elevated 5-HIAA at baseline (≥2 x ULN). The assessment of urinary 5-HIAA required subjects to collect their urine for the 24 hour period prior to the study visit. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement collected prior to the first dose of study treatment (lanreotide). The x of ULN was calculated as raw value/ULN.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 8, 12, 24, and 48, and post-treatment in the double-blind phase (a maximum of 15 months); Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, and 48, and post-treatment in the the open-label treatment phase (a maximum of 33 months)

Population: Double-blind phase: The ITT population included all randomised subjects with non-missing measurements and elevated 5-HIAA at baseline. Subjects were analysed as randomised, regardless of the treatment received. Open-label phase: The open-label ITT population included all ITT subjects with non-missing measurements and elevated 5-HIAA at baseline entering the open-label phase who received at least one injection of lanreotide autogel/depot in the open-label phase.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Overall Study: LanreotideMean Changes From Baseline in Urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic Acid (5-HIAA) Levels in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhaseWeek 8-2.90 x of ULNStandard Deviation 5.368
Overall Study: LanreotideMean Changes From Baseline in Urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic Acid (5-HIAA) Levels in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhaseWeek 120.21 x of ULNStandard Deviation 1.904
Overall Study: LanreotideMean Changes From Baseline in Urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic Acid (5-HIAA) Levels in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhaseWeek 240.15 x of ULNStandard Deviation 3.041
Overall Study: LanreotideMean Changes From Baseline in Urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic Acid (5-HIAA) Levels in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhaseWeek 48-3.00 x of ULNStandard Deviation 8.9
Overall Study: LanreotideMean Changes From Baseline in Urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic Acid (5-HIAA) Levels in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhasePost-treatment-1.27 x of ULNStandard Deviation 7.007
Double-Blind Phase: PlaceboMean Changes From Baseline in Urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic Acid (5-HIAA) Levels in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhaseWeek 24-1.40 x of ULNStandard Deviation 2.734
Double-Blind Phase: PlaceboMean Changes From Baseline in Urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic Acid (5-HIAA) Levels in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhaseWeek 481.13 x of ULN
Double-Blind Phase: PlaceboMean Changes From Baseline in Urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic Acid (5-HIAA) Levels in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhaseWeek 82.78 x of ULNStandard Deviation 4.215
Double-Blind Phase: PlaceboMean Changes From Baseline in Urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic Acid (5-HIAA) Levels in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhaseWeek 125.38 x of ULNStandard Deviation 4.342
Double-Blind Phase: PlaceboMean Changes From Baseline in Urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic Acid (5-HIAA) Levels in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhasePost-treatment-5.13 x of ULNStandard Deviation 11.597
Open-Label Treatment Phase: All SubjectsMean Changes From Baseline in Urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic Acid (5-HIAA) Levels in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhaseWeek 24-4.84 x of ULNStandard Deviation 10.019
Open-Label Treatment Phase: All SubjectsMean Changes From Baseline in Urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic Acid (5-HIAA) Levels in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhasePost-treatment0.60 x of ULNStandard Deviation 3.583
Open-Label Treatment Phase: All SubjectsMean Changes From Baseline in Urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic Acid (5-HIAA) Levels in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhaseWeek 12-0.47 x of ULNStandard Deviation 1.886
Open-Label Treatment Phase: All SubjectsMean Changes From Baseline in Urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic Acid (5-HIAA) Levels in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment PhaseWeek 48-2.47 x of ULN
Secondary

Median PFS Time in the Double-Blind Phase, Assessed by Central Review

PFS was assessed by central review using RECIST v1.1 criteria every 12 weeks, defined as the time from randomisation to disease progression or death from any causes during the double-blind phase. The distribution of PFS times were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method.

Time frame: Up to a maximum of 15 months

Population: The ITT population included all randomised subjects. Subjects were analysed as randomised, regardless of the treatment received. One subject in the double-blind phase: lanreotide arm should have been censored in the PFS analysis for treatment discontinuation for toxicity or other reasons, however the baseline central radiological assessment was performed prior to the randomisation date, therefore the subject was excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Overall Study: LanreotideMedian PFS Time in the Double-Blind Phase, Assessed by Central Review16.6 months
Double-Blind Phase: PlaceboMedian PFS Time in the Double-Blind Phase, Assessed by Central Review13.6 months
Comparison: The hazard ratio and the 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model, stratified for interactive web response system (IWRS) tumour subtype (typical versus \[vs\] atypical) using the exact method for ties. P-value of stratified log rank test comparing lanreotide to placebo with strata based on the IWRS tumour subtype (typical vs atypical) stratification factor.p-value: 0.86695% CI: [0.48, 1.95]Log Rank
Secondary

Median PFS Time in the Double-Blind Phase, Assessed by Local Review

PFS was assessed by local review using RECIST v1.1 criteria every 12 weeks, defined as the time from randomisation to disease progression or death from any causes during the double-blind phase. The distribution of PFS times were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method.

Time frame: Up to a maximum of 15 months

Population: The ITT population included all randomised subjects. Subjects were analysed as randomised, regardless of the treatment received. Two subjects should have been censored in the PFS analysis, however the baseline central radiological assessment was performed prior to the randomisation date, therefore the subjects were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Overall Study: LanreotideMedian PFS Time in the Double-Blind Phase, Assessed by Local Review14.1 months
Double-Blind Phase: PlaceboMedian PFS Time in the Double-Blind Phase, Assessed by Local Review13.6 months
Comparison: The hazard ratio and the 95% CI were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model, stratified for IWRS tumour subtype (typical vs atypical) using the exact method for ties. P-value of stratified log rank test comparing lanreotide to placebo with strata based on the IWRS tumour subtype (typical vs atypical) stratification factor.p-value: 0.83795% CI: [0.48, 1.88]Log Rank
Secondary

Objective Response Rate (ORR) in the Double-Blind Phase

ORR was assessed by central review and local review using RECIST v1.1 criteria every 12 weeks, defined as the percentage of subjects who achieved a best overall response of complete response or partial response in the double-blind phase.

Time frame: Up to a maximum of 15 months

Population: The ITT population included all randomised subjects. Subjects were analysed as randomised, regardless of the treatment received. Two subjects were excluded from the analysis as they had no best response recorded in the raw data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Overall Study: LanreotideObjective Response Rate (ORR) in the Double-Blind PhaseCentral review14.00 Percentage of subjects
Overall Study: LanreotideObjective Response Rate (ORR) in the Double-Blind PhaseLocal review6.00 Percentage of subjects
Double-Blind Phase: PlaceboObjective Response Rate (ORR) in the Double-Blind PhaseCentral review0.00 Percentage of subjects
Double-Blind Phase: PlaceboObjective Response Rate (ORR) in the Double-Blind PhaseLocal review4.00 Percentage of subjects
Comparison: The treatment difference compares lanreotide to placebo (central review). The 95% exact unconditional CI was used for ORR difference.95% CI: [-10.97, 37.86]
Comparison: The treatment difference compares lanreotide to placebo (local review). The 95% exact unconditional CI was used for ORR difference.95% CI: [-22.69, 26.53]
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects Who Experienced QoL Deterioration

QoL deterioration was defined by a decrease from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QoL Score of at least 10 points. The EORTC QLQ-C30 (V3.0) consisted of 30 questions. The final 2 questions were related to global health status/QoL, with responses requested on a 7-point scale from 1 ('Very poor') to 7 ('Excellent'). The global health status/QoL scale ranges in score from 0 to 100. A high score for the global health status/QoL scale represents a high QoL, thus, an increase in score represents an increase in QoL. 95% Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals were estimated using the exact method for binomial distributions. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement collected prior to the first dose of study treatment (lanreotide).

Time frame: Baseline and post-treatment in the double-blind phase (a maximum of 15 months); Baseline and post-treatment in the open-label treatment phase (a maximum of 33 months)

Population: Double-blind phase: The ITT population included all randomised subjects with non-missing measurements. Subjects were analysed as randomised, regardless of the treatment received. Open-label phase: The open-label ITT population included all ITT subjects with non-missing measurements entering the open-label phase who received at least one injection of lanreotide autogel/depot in the open-label phase.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Overall Study: LanreotidePercentage of Subjects Who Experienced QoL Deterioration32.0 percentage of subjects
Double-Blind Phase: PlaceboPercentage of Subjects Who Experienced QoL Deterioration66.7 percentage of subjects
Open-Label Treatment Phase: All SubjectsPercentage of Subjects Who Experienced QoL Deterioration23.5 percentage of subjects
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With a Decrease of CgA ≥30% From Baseline at Week 8 in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment Phase

Measured in subjects with an elevated CgA at baseline (≥2 x ULN). Blood samples were collected to determine plasma CgA. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement collected prior to the first dose of study treatment (lanreotide).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 8 in the double-blind phase; Baseline and Week 8 in the open-label treatment phase

Population: Double-blind phase: The ITT population included all randomised subjects with non-missing measurements and elevated CgA at Baseline. Subjects were analysed as randomised, regardless of the treatment received. Open-label phase: The open-label ITT population included all ITT subjects with non-missing measurements and elevated CgA at Baseline entering the open-label phase who received at least one injection of lanreotide autogel/depot in the open-label phase.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Overall Study: LanreotidePercentage of Subjects With a Decrease of CgA ≥30% From Baseline at Week 8 in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment Phase63.3 percentage of subjects
Double-Blind Phase: PlaceboPercentage of Subjects With a Decrease of CgA ≥30% From Baseline at Week 8 in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment Phase7.7 percentage of subjects
Open-Label Treatment Phase: All SubjectsPercentage of Subjects With a Decrease of CgA ≥30% From Baseline at Week 8 in the Double-Blind Phase and Open-Label Treatment Phase73.7 percentage of subjects
Secondary

Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) in the Double-Blind Phase

TTF was defined as the time from randomisation to disease progression using RECIST v1.1, death, consent withdrawn, an adverse event, protocol deviations, lost to follow-up, the appearance of carcinoid syndrome or other hormone related syndrome necessitating the initiation of SSAs (rescue octreotide and/or long-acting release SSA), or initiation of anticancer treatment in the double-blind phase. The distribution of TTF times were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method.

Time frame: Up to a maximum of 15 months

Population: The ITT population included all randomised subjects. Subjects were analysed as randomised, regardless of the treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Overall Study: LanreotideTime to Treatment Failure (TTF) in the Double-Blind Phase13.3 months
Double-Blind Phase: PlaceboTime to Treatment Failure (TTF) in the Double-Blind Phase9.8 months
Comparison: The hazard ratio and the 95% CI were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model, stratified for IWRS tumour subtype (typical vs atypical) using the exact method for ties. P-value of stratified log rank test comparing lanreotide to placebo with strata based on the IWRS tumour subtype (typical vs atypical) stratification factor.p-value: 0.58295% CI: [0.5, 1.5]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026