Skip to content

Evaluation of SC Injected Tc 99m Tilmanocept Localization in Active RA Subjects by SPECT and SPECT/CT Imaging

Evaluation of Subcutaneous (SC) Injected Tc 99m Tilmanocept Localization in Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Subjects by SPECT and SPECT/CT Imaging

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02683421
Enrollment
18
Registered
2016-02-17
Start date
2016-07-31
Completion date
2016-12-31
Last updated
2019-11-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

Rheumatoid arthritis, Tilmanocept, Imaging

Brief summary

Determine the localization of Tc 99m tilmanocept by SPECT and SPECT/CT imaging in subjects with active RA and concordance with clinical symptomology.

Detailed description

While many types of cells, including T-cells, B-cells, dendritic cells and activated synovial fibroblasts contribute significantly to the establishment and maintenance of the pathology of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), (Ma et al., Noack et al., Bugatti et al., Boissier et al., Tran et al.) macrophages play a critical role in RA (Kinne et al.). They produce most of the tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) that drives and perpetuates the inflammatory cycle in RA (Leizer et al., Westra et al., Hamilton et al., Keffer et al., Noack et al., Bugatti et al., Boissier et al., Tran et al., Kinne et al., Zwerina et al., Feldman et al., Schett et al.). In the synovial sublining of a joint affected by RA, macrophages are the dominant cell type (Kraan et al., Cutolo et al.). In the inflamed joint as a whole, macrophages in RA patients make up at least 30%-40% of all cells (Kennedy et al.). Furthermore, macrophages participate directly in the destruction of bone and cartilage (Ma et al.). Activated macrophage populations and synoviocytes are the predominant cell types at the interface between pannus and cartilage and secrete destructive proteases in abundance (Bresnihan et al.). As a result, it may not be surprising that synovial macrophage numbers-but not the numbers of other immune cell types-correlate with radiographically determined joint destruction in RA (Mulherin et al., Yanni et al.). While macrophages may play a role in other pathologies that cause joint pain and inflammation, the degree to which macrophages are involved in the pathological process of RA and the sheer mass or volume of macrophages that infiltrate the joints inflamed due to RA differentiates RA from other rheumatic diseases. Therefore, detection of the density or numbers of macrophages in inflamed joints may permit differentiation of patients with RA from those with other causes of arthritis. In addition, it is known that the RA pathology begins significantly before, perhaps years before, the onset of symptoms (i.e., joint pain and inflammation) and well before the beginning of bone destruction (Deane et al., El-Gabalawy et al.). Macrophage infiltration of synovial tissues precedes development of clinical signs of RA in animal studies (Kraan et al.). In humans, macrophage infiltrations of synovial tissues are present when RA patients first develop clinical symptoms (Demoruelle et al., van de Sande et al.). Therefore, detection of the density or numbers of macrophages in inflamed joints may facilitate more sensitive and specific identification of RA patients as soon as they present with symptoms and early in the course of their illnesses when DMARDs are likely to be most effective. An interesting and important observation that has been made in many studies is that the number of macrophages in synovial tissue, and particularly in the synovial sublining, declines in RA patients when they are given DMARD therapy (Hamilton et al.). Furthermore, the degree to which synovial macrophage numbers decline is correlated with the magnitude of the DMARD (DAS28) with changes in sublining macrophage numbers as determined by biopsies and found a significant correlation between the change in the number of macrophages and the change in DAS28 (Pearson correlation 0.874, p \< 0.01) ( Haringman et al.). The authors of this study have confirmed these findings in two additional studies, which used slightly different methodologies (Bresnihan et al., Bresnihan et al.). This correlation between declining macrophage numbers and the efficacy of DMARD therapy appears to be largely independent of the kind of DMARD therapy being investigated (Hamilton et al., Kinne et al., Franz et al., Kraan et al., Catrina et al., Cunnane et al., Vieira-Sousa et al.). These findings indicate that assaying the number of macrophages in inflamed joints of patients with RA could be used as an objective measure of the efficacy of DMARD therapy. These findings further suggest that assaying the number of macrophages in inflamed joints of patients with RA could be used in clinical studies as a biomarker of clinical response for potential new RA therapeutics. The problem with current methodologies is that macrophage numbers and densities need to be determined with synovial biopsies. This is obviously an invasive procedure that samples only a small portion of the inflamed synovial tissue and is painful and unpleasant for the patient. What would be preferable and likely more accurate is an imaging protocol, such as the one proposed in this application, that can assay synovial macrophages more completely and less invasively.

Interventions

Sponsors

Navidea Biopharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* The subject has provided written informed consent with HIPPA authorization before the initiation of any study-related procedures. CONTROLS: * The subject is between 21-45 years of age at the time of consent. * The subject has not experienced joint pain for at least 4 weeks prior to the consent date and is deemed to be clinically free of any inflammatory disease(s). ACTIVE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS * The subject is at least 21 years of age at the time of consent. * The subject has moderate to severe RA, based on either the 1987American College of Rheumatology (ACR) score of ≥ 4/7 or the 2010 ACR/EULAR score of ≥ 6/10. * The subject has a DAS28 of \>4.4 (using the ESR). * If the subject is on methotrexate, they have been at a stable dose for \> 4 weeks prior to the screening visit. * If the subject is on biologic therapy, they have been at a stable dose \> 8 weeks prior to the screening visit. * If the subject is on non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NASIDS) or oral corticosteroids, it is ≤ 10mgmg/day or equivalent, and has been at a stable dose for \> 4 weeks prior to the screening visit.

Exclusion criteria

* The subject is pregnant or lactating. * BMI \>32.0. * The subject has had or is currently receiving chemotherapy for a non-inflammatory related condition or radiation therapy. Chronic or persistent infection or has any condition that would, in the opinion of the examining physician, preclude their participation. * The subject has a known allergy to or has had a reaction to dextran exposure. * The subject has received an investigational product within 30 days prior to he Tc99m tilmanocept administration. * The subject has received any radiopharmaceutical within 7 radioactive half-lives of that radiopharmaceutical prior to the administration of Tc 99m tilmanocept.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Localization of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging in Subjects With Active RA and Concordance With Swollen/Tender JointsSwollen/tender joints assessment at baseline and Tc 99m tilmanocept localization at 2-3 hours and 4-6 hours after administration on Day 1The primary endpoint was to compare the cumulative total of anatomical zones of active RA (which were clinically defined by a swollen/tender classification during the DAS28 joint count assessment performed at baseline) with Tc 99m tilmanocept localization observed at 2-3 hours and at 4-6 hours after administration on Day 1. Tc 99m tilmanocept localization is defined by accumulation of radioactivity at an intensity greater than background, which was qualitatively determined by the central reader's visual assessment of the acquired images .

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dose-dependent Tc 99m Tilmanocept Localization Intensity by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging2-4 hours and 4-6 hoursTc 99m tilmanocept localization intensity on planar imaging was compared among dose/disease groups. Localization intensity was quantitatively analyzed by observing average voxel intensity in regions of interest, which were drawn over areas of increased uptake in the RA-affected joints.
Localization Intensity of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar Imaging in Regions of Interest Relative to Background in All Dose Groups2-4 hours and 4-6 hoursTc 99m tilmanocept localization intensity on planar imaging relative to localization intensity in corresponding background regions was calculated (percent of background) for each region of interest and averaged for each dose/disease group.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control Subjects: 50 mcg/20 mCi Dose
Healthy Volunteers: 50 mcg tilmanocept with 2 mCi Tc 99m Tilmanocept
5
Control Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi Dose
Healthy Volunteers: 200 mcg tilmanocept with 2 mCi Tc 99m Tilmanocept
4
RA Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi Dose
RA Group: 50 mcg tilmanocept with 2 mCi Tc 99m Tilmanocept
4
RA Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi Dose
RA group:200 mcg tilmanocept with 2 mCi Tc 99m Tilmanocept
5
Total18

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl Subjects: 50 mcg/20 mCi DoseControl Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi DoseRA Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi DoseRA Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi DoseTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
5 Participants4 Participants4 Participants4 Participants17 Participants
Age, Continuous35.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.86
32.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.74
47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.33
56.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.54
43.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.88
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants1 Participants4 Participants4 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants1 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
2 Participants1 Participants4 Participants4 Participants11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
5 Participants4 Participants4 Participants5 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants2 Participants4 Participants4 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 50 / 40 / 40 / 5
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 51 / 41 / 41 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 50 / 40 / 40 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

Localization of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging in Subjects With Active RA and Concordance With Swollen/Tender Joints

The primary endpoint was to compare the cumulative total of anatomical zones of active RA (which were clinically defined by a swollen/tender classification during the DAS28 joint count assessment performed at baseline) with Tc 99m tilmanocept localization observed at 2-3 hours and at 4-6 hours after administration on Day 1. Tc 99m tilmanocept localization is defined by accumulation of radioactivity at an intensity greater than background, which was qualitatively determined by the central reader's visual assessment of the acquired images .

Time frame: Swollen/tender joints assessment at baseline and Tc 99m tilmanocept localization at 2-3 hours and 4-6 hours after administration on Day 1

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Control Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi DoseLocalization of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging in Subjects With Active RA and Concordance With Swollen/Tender JointsTotal swollen/tender regions at baseline0 Joints
Control Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi DoseLocalization of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging in Subjects With Active RA and Concordance With Swollen/Tender JointsTotal Tc localized regions at 4-6 hours0 Joints
Control Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi DoseLocalization of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging in Subjects With Active RA and Concordance With Swollen/Tender JointsTotal Tc localized regions at 2-3 hours0 Joints
Control Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi DoseLocalization of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging in Subjects With Active RA and Concordance With Swollen/Tender JointsTotal swollen/tender regions at baseline0 Joints
Control Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi DoseLocalization of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging in Subjects With Active RA and Concordance With Swollen/Tender JointsTotal Tc localized regions at 4-6 hours0 Joints
Control Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi DoseLocalization of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging in Subjects With Active RA and Concordance With Swollen/Tender JointsTotal Tc localized regions at 2-3 hours0 Joints
RA Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi DoseLocalization of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging in Subjects With Active RA and Concordance With Swollen/Tender JointsTotal Tc localized regions at 2-3 hours1 Joints
RA Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi DoseLocalization of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging in Subjects With Active RA and Concordance With Swollen/Tender JointsTotal swollen/tender regions at baseline30 Joints
RA Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi DoseLocalization of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging in Subjects With Active RA and Concordance With Swollen/Tender JointsTotal Tc localized regions at 4-6 hours2 Joints
RA Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi DoseLocalization of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging in Subjects With Active RA and Concordance With Swollen/Tender JointsTotal swollen/tender regions at baseline35 Joints
RA Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi DoseLocalization of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging in Subjects With Active RA and Concordance With Swollen/Tender JointsTotal Tc localized regions at 4-6 hours7 Joints
RA Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi DoseLocalization of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging in Subjects With Active RA and Concordance With Swollen/Tender JointsTotal Tc localized regions at 2-3 hours9 Joints
Secondary

Dose-dependent Tc 99m Tilmanocept Localization Intensity by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging

Tc 99m tilmanocept localization intensity on planar imaging was compared among dose/disease groups. Localization intensity was quantitatively analyzed by observing average voxel intensity in regions of interest, which were drawn over areas of increased uptake in the RA-affected joints.

Time frame: 2-4 hours and 4-6 hours

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi DoseDose-dependent Tc 99m Tilmanocept Localization Intensity by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging2-4 Hours0.96 Voxel IntensityStandard Deviation 0.483
Control Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi DoseDose-dependent Tc 99m Tilmanocept Localization Intensity by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging4-6 Hours0.97 Voxel IntensityStandard Deviation 0.442
Control Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi DoseDose-dependent Tc 99m Tilmanocept Localization Intensity by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging4-6 Hours1.00 Voxel IntensityStandard Deviation 0.742
Control Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi DoseDose-dependent Tc 99m Tilmanocept Localization Intensity by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging2-4 Hours0.97 Voxel IntensityStandard Deviation 0.685
RA Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi DoseDose-dependent Tc 99m Tilmanocept Localization Intensity by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging2-4 Hours1.17 Voxel IntensityStandard Deviation 0.52
RA Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi DoseDose-dependent Tc 99m Tilmanocept Localization Intensity by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging4-6 Hours1.21 Voxel IntensityStandard Deviation 0.422
RA Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi DoseDose-dependent Tc 99m Tilmanocept Localization Intensity by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging2-4 Hours1.16 Voxel IntensityStandard Deviation 0.694
RA Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi DoseDose-dependent Tc 99m Tilmanocept Localization Intensity by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging4-6 Hours1.13 Voxel IntensityStandard Deviation 0.648
Secondary

Localization Intensity of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar Imaging in Regions of Interest Relative to Background in All Dose Groups

Tc 99m tilmanocept localization intensity on planar imaging relative to localization intensity in corresponding background regions was calculated (percent of background) for each region of interest and averaged for each dose/disease group.

Time frame: 2-4 hours and 4-6 hours

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi DoseLocalization Intensity of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar Imaging in Regions of Interest Relative to Background in All Dose Groups2-3 hours-2.47 Percent difference from backgroundStandard Deviation 4.471
Control Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi DoseLocalization Intensity of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar Imaging in Regions of Interest Relative to Background in All Dose Groups4-6 hours-1.32 Percent difference from backgroundStandard Deviation 4.692
Control Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi DoseLocalization Intensity of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar Imaging in Regions of Interest Relative to Background in All Dose Groups4-6 hours-6.74 Percent difference from backgroundStandard Deviation 5.326
Control Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi DoseLocalization Intensity of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar Imaging in Regions of Interest Relative to Background in All Dose Groups2-3 hours-9.21 Percent difference from backgroundStandard Deviation 5.178
RA Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi DoseLocalization Intensity of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar Imaging in Regions of Interest Relative to Background in All Dose Groups2-3 hours1.59 Percent difference from backgroundStandard Deviation 6.309
RA Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi DoseLocalization Intensity of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar Imaging in Regions of Interest Relative to Background in All Dose Groups4-6 hours3.31 Percent difference from backgroundStandard Deviation 14.544
RA Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi DoseLocalization Intensity of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar Imaging in Regions of Interest Relative to Background in All Dose Groups2-3 hours9.11 Percent difference from backgroundStandard Deviation 25.939
RA Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi DoseLocalization Intensity of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar Imaging in Regions of Interest Relative to Background in All Dose Groups4-6 hours16.34 Percent difference from backgroundStandard Deviation 25.453

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026