Rheumatoid Arthritis
Conditions
Keywords
Rheumatoid arthritis, Tilmanocept, Imaging
Brief summary
Determine the localization of Tc 99m tilmanocept by SPECT and SPECT/CT imaging in subjects with active RA and concordance with clinical symptomology.
Detailed description
While many types of cells, including T-cells, B-cells, dendritic cells and activated synovial fibroblasts contribute significantly to the establishment and maintenance of the pathology of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), (Ma et al., Noack et al., Bugatti et al., Boissier et al., Tran et al.) macrophages play a critical role in RA (Kinne et al.). They produce most of the tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) that drives and perpetuates the inflammatory cycle in RA (Leizer et al., Westra et al., Hamilton et al., Keffer et al., Noack et al., Bugatti et al., Boissier et al., Tran et al., Kinne et al., Zwerina et al., Feldman et al., Schett et al.). In the synovial sublining of a joint affected by RA, macrophages are the dominant cell type (Kraan et al., Cutolo et al.). In the inflamed joint as a whole, macrophages in RA patients make up at least 30%-40% of all cells (Kennedy et al.). Furthermore, macrophages participate directly in the destruction of bone and cartilage (Ma et al.). Activated macrophage populations and synoviocytes are the predominant cell types at the interface between pannus and cartilage and secrete destructive proteases in abundance (Bresnihan et al.). As a result, it may not be surprising that synovial macrophage numbers-but not the numbers of other immune cell types-correlate with radiographically determined joint destruction in RA (Mulherin et al., Yanni et al.). While macrophages may play a role in other pathologies that cause joint pain and inflammation, the degree to which macrophages are involved in the pathological process of RA and the sheer mass or volume of macrophages that infiltrate the joints inflamed due to RA differentiates RA from other rheumatic diseases. Therefore, detection of the density or numbers of macrophages in inflamed joints may permit differentiation of patients with RA from those with other causes of arthritis. In addition, it is known that the RA pathology begins significantly before, perhaps years before, the onset of symptoms (i.e., joint pain and inflammation) and well before the beginning of bone destruction (Deane et al., El-Gabalawy et al.). Macrophage infiltration of synovial tissues precedes development of clinical signs of RA in animal studies (Kraan et al.). In humans, macrophage infiltrations of synovial tissues are present when RA patients first develop clinical symptoms (Demoruelle et al., van de Sande et al.). Therefore, detection of the density or numbers of macrophages in inflamed joints may facilitate more sensitive and specific identification of RA patients as soon as they present with symptoms and early in the course of their illnesses when DMARDs are likely to be most effective. An interesting and important observation that has been made in many studies is that the number of macrophages in synovial tissue, and particularly in the synovial sublining, declines in RA patients when they are given DMARD therapy (Hamilton et al.). Furthermore, the degree to which synovial macrophage numbers decline is correlated with the magnitude of the DMARD (DAS28) with changes in sublining macrophage numbers as determined by biopsies and found a significant correlation between the change in the number of macrophages and the change in DAS28 (Pearson correlation 0.874, p \< 0.01) ( Haringman et al.). The authors of this study have confirmed these findings in two additional studies, which used slightly different methodologies (Bresnihan et al., Bresnihan et al.). This correlation between declining macrophage numbers and the efficacy of DMARD therapy appears to be largely independent of the kind of DMARD therapy being investigated (Hamilton et al., Kinne et al., Franz et al., Kraan et al., Catrina et al., Cunnane et al., Vieira-Sousa et al.). These findings indicate that assaying the number of macrophages in inflamed joints of patients with RA could be used as an objective measure of the efficacy of DMARD therapy. These findings further suggest that assaying the number of macrophages in inflamed joints of patients with RA could be used in clinical studies as a biomarker of clinical response for potential new RA therapeutics. The problem with current methodologies is that macrophage numbers and densities need to be determined with synovial biopsies. This is obviously an invasive procedure that samples only a small portion of the inflamed synovial tissue and is painful and unpleasant for the patient. What would be preferable and likely more accurate is an imaging protocol, such as the one proposed in this application, that can assay synovial macrophages more completely and less invasively.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* The subject has provided written informed consent with HIPPA authorization before the initiation of any study-related procedures. CONTROLS: * The subject is between 21-45 years of age at the time of consent. * The subject has not experienced joint pain for at least 4 weeks prior to the consent date and is deemed to be clinically free of any inflammatory disease(s). ACTIVE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS * The subject is at least 21 years of age at the time of consent. * The subject has moderate to severe RA, based on either the 1987American College of Rheumatology (ACR) score of ≥ 4/7 or the 2010 ACR/EULAR score of ≥ 6/10. * The subject has a DAS28 of \>4.4 (using the ESR). * If the subject is on methotrexate, they have been at a stable dose for \> 4 weeks prior to the screening visit. * If the subject is on biologic therapy, they have been at a stable dose \> 8 weeks prior to the screening visit. * If the subject is on non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NASIDS) or oral corticosteroids, it is ≤ 10mgmg/day or equivalent, and has been at a stable dose for \> 4 weeks prior to the screening visit.
Exclusion criteria
* The subject is pregnant or lactating. * BMI \>32.0. * The subject has had or is currently receiving chemotherapy for a non-inflammatory related condition or radiation therapy. Chronic or persistent infection or has any condition that would, in the opinion of the examining physician, preclude their participation. * The subject has a known allergy to or has had a reaction to dextran exposure. * The subject has received an investigational product within 30 days prior to he Tc99m tilmanocept administration. * The subject has received any radiopharmaceutical within 7 radioactive half-lives of that radiopharmaceutical prior to the administration of Tc 99m tilmanocept.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Localization of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging in Subjects With Active RA and Concordance With Swollen/Tender Joints | Swollen/tender joints assessment at baseline and Tc 99m tilmanocept localization at 2-3 hours and 4-6 hours after administration on Day 1 | The primary endpoint was to compare the cumulative total of anatomical zones of active RA (which were clinically defined by a swollen/tender classification during the DAS28 joint count assessment performed at baseline) with Tc 99m tilmanocept localization observed at 2-3 hours and at 4-6 hours after administration on Day 1. Tc 99m tilmanocept localization is defined by accumulation of radioactivity at an intensity greater than background, which was qualitatively determined by the central reader's visual assessment of the acquired images . |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Dose-dependent Tc 99m Tilmanocept Localization Intensity by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging | 2-4 hours and 4-6 hours | Tc 99m tilmanocept localization intensity on planar imaging was compared among dose/disease groups. Localization intensity was quantitatively analyzed by observing average voxel intensity in regions of interest, which were drawn over areas of increased uptake in the RA-affected joints. |
| Localization Intensity of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar Imaging in Regions of Interest Relative to Background in All Dose Groups | 2-4 hours and 4-6 hours | Tc 99m tilmanocept localization intensity on planar imaging relative to localization intensity in corresponding background regions was calculated (percent of background) for each region of interest and averaged for each dose/disease group. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Control Subjects: 50 mcg/20 mCi Dose Healthy Volunteers: 50 mcg tilmanocept with 2 mCi Tc 99m
Tilmanocept | 5 |
| Control Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi Dose Healthy Volunteers: 200 mcg tilmanocept with 2 mCi Tc 99m
Tilmanocept | 4 |
| RA Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi Dose RA Group: 50 mcg tilmanocept with 2 mCi Tc 99m
Tilmanocept | 4 |
| RA Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi Dose RA group:200 mcg tilmanocept with 2 mCi Tc 99m
Tilmanocept | 5 |
| Total | 18 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Control Subjects: 50 mcg/20 mCi Dose | Control Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi Dose | RA Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi Dose | RA Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi Dose | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 5 Participants | 4 Participants | 4 Participants | 4 Participants | 17 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 35.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.86 | 32.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.74 | 47 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.33 | 56.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.54 | 43.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.88 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 4 Participants | 4 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 4 Participants | 4 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 5 Participants | 4 Participants | 4 Participants | 5 Participants | 18 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 4 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 4 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 7 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 5 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 5 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 1 / 5 | 1 / 4 | 1 / 4 | 1 / 5 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 5 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 5 |
Outcome results
Localization of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging in Subjects With Active RA and Concordance With Swollen/Tender Joints
The primary endpoint was to compare the cumulative total of anatomical zones of active RA (which were clinically defined by a swollen/tender classification during the DAS28 joint count assessment performed at baseline) with Tc 99m tilmanocept localization observed at 2-3 hours and at 4-6 hours after administration on Day 1. Tc 99m tilmanocept localization is defined by accumulation of radioactivity at an intensity greater than background, which was qualitatively determined by the central reader's visual assessment of the acquired images .
Time frame: Swollen/tender joints assessment at baseline and Tc 99m tilmanocept localization at 2-3 hours and 4-6 hours after administration on Day 1
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi Dose | Localization of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging in Subjects With Active RA and Concordance With Swollen/Tender Joints | Total swollen/tender regions at baseline | 0 Joints |
| Control Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi Dose | Localization of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging in Subjects With Active RA and Concordance With Swollen/Tender Joints | Total Tc localized regions at 4-6 hours | 0 Joints |
| Control Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi Dose | Localization of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging in Subjects With Active RA and Concordance With Swollen/Tender Joints | Total Tc localized regions at 2-3 hours | 0 Joints |
| Control Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi Dose | Localization of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging in Subjects With Active RA and Concordance With Swollen/Tender Joints | Total swollen/tender regions at baseline | 0 Joints |
| Control Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi Dose | Localization of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging in Subjects With Active RA and Concordance With Swollen/Tender Joints | Total Tc localized regions at 4-6 hours | 0 Joints |
| Control Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi Dose | Localization of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging in Subjects With Active RA and Concordance With Swollen/Tender Joints | Total Tc localized regions at 2-3 hours | 0 Joints |
| RA Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi Dose | Localization of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging in Subjects With Active RA and Concordance With Swollen/Tender Joints | Total Tc localized regions at 2-3 hours | 1 Joints |
| RA Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi Dose | Localization of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging in Subjects With Active RA and Concordance With Swollen/Tender Joints | Total swollen/tender regions at baseline | 30 Joints |
| RA Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi Dose | Localization of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging in Subjects With Active RA and Concordance With Swollen/Tender Joints | Total Tc localized regions at 4-6 hours | 2 Joints |
| RA Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi Dose | Localization of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging in Subjects With Active RA and Concordance With Swollen/Tender Joints | Total swollen/tender regions at baseline | 35 Joints |
| RA Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi Dose | Localization of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging in Subjects With Active RA and Concordance With Swollen/Tender Joints | Total Tc localized regions at 4-6 hours | 7 Joints |
| RA Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi Dose | Localization of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging in Subjects With Active RA and Concordance With Swollen/Tender Joints | Total Tc localized regions at 2-3 hours | 9 Joints |
Dose-dependent Tc 99m Tilmanocept Localization Intensity by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging
Tc 99m tilmanocept localization intensity on planar imaging was compared among dose/disease groups. Localization intensity was quantitatively analyzed by observing average voxel intensity in regions of interest, which were drawn over areas of increased uptake in the RA-affected joints.
Time frame: 2-4 hours and 4-6 hours
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi Dose | Dose-dependent Tc 99m Tilmanocept Localization Intensity by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging | 2-4 Hours | 0.96 Voxel Intensity | Standard Deviation 0.483 |
| Control Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi Dose | Dose-dependent Tc 99m Tilmanocept Localization Intensity by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging | 4-6 Hours | 0.97 Voxel Intensity | Standard Deviation 0.442 |
| Control Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi Dose | Dose-dependent Tc 99m Tilmanocept Localization Intensity by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging | 4-6 Hours | 1.00 Voxel Intensity | Standard Deviation 0.742 |
| Control Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi Dose | Dose-dependent Tc 99m Tilmanocept Localization Intensity by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging | 2-4 Hours | 0.97 Voxel Intensity | Standard Deviation 0.685 |
| RA Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi Dose | Dose-dependent Tc 99m Tilmanocept Localization Intensity by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging | 2-4 Hours | 1.17 Voxel Intensity | Standard Deviation 0.52 |
| RA Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi Dose | Dose-dependent Tc 99m Tilmanocept Localization Intensity by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging | 4-6 Hours | 1.21 Voxel Intensity | Standard Deviation 0.422 |
| RA Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi Dose | Dose-dependent Tc 99m Tilmanocept Localization Intensity by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging | 2-4 Hours | 1.16 Voxel Intensity | Standard Deviation 0.694 |
| RA Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi Dose | Dose-dependent Tc 99m Tilmanocept Localization Intensity by Planar and SPECT/CT Imaging | 4-6 Hours | 1.13 Voxel Intensity | Standard Deviation 0.648 |
Localization Intensity of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar Imaging in Regions of Interest Relative to Background in All Dose Groups
Tc 99m tilmanocept localization intensity on planar imaging relative to localization intensity in corresponding background regions was calculated (percent of background) for each region of interest and averaged for each dose/disease group.
Time frame: 2-4 hours and 4-6 hours
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi Dose | Localization Intensity of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar Imaging in Regions of Interest Relative to Background in All Dose Groups | 2-3 hours | -2.47 Percent difference from background | Standard Deviation 4.471 |
| Control Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi Dose | Localization Intensity of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar Imaging in Regions of Interest Relative to Background in All Dose Groups | 4-6 hours | -1.32 Percent difference from background | Standard Deviation 4.692 |
| Control Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi Dose | Localization Intensity of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar Imaging in Regions of Interest Relative to Background in All Dose Groups | 4-6 hours | -6.74 Percent difference from background | Standard Deviation 5.326 |
| Control Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi Dose | Localization Intensity of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar Imaging in Regions of Interest Relative to Background in All Dose Groups | 2-3 hours | -9.21 Percent difference from background | Standard Deviation 5.178 |
| RA Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi Dose | Localization Intensity of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar Imaging in Regions of Interest Relative to Background in All Dose Groups | 2-3 hours | 1.59 Percent difference from background | Standard Deviation 6.309 |
| RA Subjects: 50 mcg/2 mCi Dose | Localization Intensity of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar Imaging in Regions of Interest Relative to Background in All Dose Groups | 4-6 hours | 3.31 Percent difference from background | Standard Deviation 14.544 |
| RA Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi Dose | Localization Intensity of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar Imaging in Regions of Interest Relative to Background in All Dose Groups | 2-3 hours | 9.11 Percent difference from background | Standard Deviation 25.939 |
| RA Subjects: 200 mcg/2 mCi Dose | Localization Intensity of Tc 99m Tilmanocept by Planar Imaging in Regions of Interest Relative to Background in All Dose Groups | 4-6 hours | 16.34 Percent difference from background | Standard Deviation 25.453 |