Skip to content

A Flexible-Dose Titration Study of Aptensio XR in Children Ages 4 to Under 6 Years Diagnosed With ADHD

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Flexible-Dose Titration Study of Aptensio XR® in Children Ages 4 to Under 6 Years Diagnosed With Attention Deficit-Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02683265
Acronym
EF003
Enrollment
158
Registered
2016-02-17
Start date
2016-04-25
Completion date
2018-03-27
Last updated
2023-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity

Brief summary

This randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose, placebo-controlled, parallel group study is designed to evaluate Aptensio XR® compared to placebo in preschool age children with ADHD. Male and female children ages 4 years, 0 months to 5 years, 8 months with a diagnosis of ADHD (combined, inattentive or hyperactive/impulsive) will be enrolled. There will be 6 phases in this study: a screening phase of up to 4 weeks, which will include washout if applicable, an enrollment & parent training phase lasting 2-4 weeks, an eligibility phase of up to 2 weeks to determine eligibility for the open-label phase, a 6-week open-label dose titration phase, a 2 week double-blind phase for Aptensio XR® responders, and a two-week follow-up call after study completion or early discontinuation to assess for ongoing adverse events and concomitant medications. Up to 150 subjects will be enrolled in this trial to allow for subjects who improve significantly during the behavior training phase and drop-outs. Once 74 subjects have completed the double-blind phase, no additional subjects will be enrolled in the trial. Subjects who are already enrolled at that time will be allowed to complete the trial. The primary objective of this study is to establish that an optimal dose of Aptensio XR® will result in a significant reduction in ADHD symptoms compared with placebo in children ages 4 to under 6 years.

Interventions

Optimized dose of Aptensio XR (10, 15, 20, 30 or 40 mg) administered orally, once daily

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo capsules

Sponsors

Rhodes Pharmaceuticals, L.P.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Blinded active capsules looked identical to the same strength placebo capsules

Intervention model description

Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Flexible-Dose Titration Study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 6 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male and female subjects ages 48 months to 68 months inclusive at time of consent 2. Met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) criteria for ADHD, combined, hyperactive/impulsive or inattentive presentation made during a clinical interview by an experienced clinician and confirmed with Kiddie-Sads-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL) 3. ADHD symptoms must have been present for at least 6 months 4. Age- and sex-adjusted ratings of ≥ 90th percentile Total Score on the ADHD-RS-IV Preschool Version 5. Score of \< 65 on the Child Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) 6. Must have had a CGI-S score of ≥ 4 at Visit 2 (subjects who were granted a waiver to bypass parental training, and did not have a Visit 2, were still qualified to continue in the study based on their CGI-S score at screening) 7. Estimated intelligence quotient (IQ) ≥ 80 on the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, 2nd edition (KBIT-2). If results from the KBIT-2 were deemed invalid because of significant ADHD symptomatology, the PI could submit additional documentation to support average cognitive functioning. This documentation could include progress reports from preschool or other previous testing. These exceptions were evaluated by the Medical Monitor and Study PIs on a case-by-case basis for inclusion. 8. The subject had a parent or legal guardian who would give written informed consent for the subject to participate in the study 9. Subject and parent or legal guardian must have been able to speak and understand English 10. Subject must live with primary caretaker/rater and have been living with primary caretaker for at least 6 months 11. Subject and parent/guardian must have been willing and able to comply with all requirements of the protocol 12. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure below the 95th percentile for age and gender

Exclusion criteria

1. The subject had a lack of response to a trial of adequate dose and duration of MPH or intolerance to previous methylphenidate (MPH) treatment 2. The subject was using any other current psychotropic medication except clonidine, guanfacine, atomoxetine and/or stimulants or had taken an investigational drug in the 30 days prior to screening 3. The subject had used monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) within 14 days of the screening visit 4. The subject planned to use prohibited drugs or agents at any point between the screening visit and the end of the study 5. Use of anticonvulsants, antidepressants, or antipsychotics in the 30 days prior to screening 6. The subject should not plan to start any additional psychotherapy outside of the trial during the duration of the study 7. The subject had a history of chronic vocal or motor tics or Tourette's syndrome 8. The subject had any clinically significant ECG abnormalities at screening 9. The subject had any major medical conditions that would have interfered with involvement in the study or could have been affected negatively by methylphenidate 10. The subject had chronic medical illnesses including a seizure disorder (excluding a history of febrile seizures), severe hypertension, untreated thyroid disease, known structural cardiac abnormalities, serious arrhythmias, cardiomyopathy, glaucoma, or a family history of sudden death 11. History (in the past 12 months) or presence of clinically-significant cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, immunological, hematological, endocrine, or neurological disease that in the opinion of the investigator could have put the subject at risk if he/she participated in the trial or which could have confounded study results 12. Family history (parent or sibling) of structural cardiovascular disease 13. Current or recent (past 12 months) history of drug abuse in someone living in the subject's home 14. Current symptoms or history of major psychiatric illness (for example schizophrenia, psychosis, bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, severe anxiety disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder or autistic spectrum disorder) in addition to ADHD that required treatment with additional medication or, in the opinion of the PI, would have contraindicated study participation 15. History or presence of suicidal ideation or significant self-injurious behavior 16. The subject showed evidence of current physical, sexual, or emotional abuse 17. Both biological parents of the subject had a history of bipolar disorder

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale - 4th Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Preschool Version Total Score Change From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.2 weeks: End of open label phase (Baseline) at study day 84 to end of double blind treatment at study day 98.ADHD-RS-IV is 18-item scale incorporates each of the ADHD symptoms listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) regardless of assigned subtype. Scoring was based on the universally accepted symptom severity as recommended in the DSM-IV-TR manual on a 4-point scale: 0 = never or rarely, 1 = sometimes, 2 = often, and 3 = very often. The total score is the sum of the scores for all 18 items and could range from 0 (no impairment) to 54 (maximal impairment) for each administration per subject. Higher score means higher frequency and severity of symptoms. Trained clinicians administered the questionnaire to parents. The ADHD-RS-IV Preschool Version was used to determine eligibility, optimal dosing and the efficacy of double blind treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale - 4th Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Preschool Version Hyperactivity-Impulsivity Subscale Score Change From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.2 weeks: End of open label phase (Baseline) at study day 84 to end of double blind treatment at study day 98.This 18-item scale incorporates each of the ADHD symptoms listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) regardless of assigned subtype. Scoring was based on the universally accepted symptom severity as recommended in the DSM-IV-TR manual on a 4-point scale: 0=never or rarely, 1=sometimes, 2=often, and 3=very often. The Hyperactivity-Impulsivity even items. The Hyperactivity-Impulsivity subscale score was the sum of the scores for the 9 even items and could range from 0 (no impairment) to 27 (maximal impairment) for each administration per subject. Higher score means higher frequency and severity of symptoms. Trained clinicians administered the questionnaire to parents.
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale - 4th Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Preschool Version Inattention Subscale Score Change From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.2 weeks: End of open label phase (Baseline) at study day 84 to end of double blind treatment at study day 98.This 18-item scale incorporates each of the ADHD symptoms listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) regardless of assigned subtype. Scoring was based on the universally accepted symptom severity as recommended in the DSM-IV-TR manual on a 4-point scale: 0=never or rarely, 1=sometimes, 2=often, and 3=very often. The Inattention subscales were based upon the sum of the odd items. The Inattention subscale score was the sum of the scores for the 9 odd items and could range from 0 (no impairment) to 27 (maximal impairment) for each administration per subject. Higher score means higher frequency and severity of symptoms. Trained clinicians administered the questionnaire to parents.
Summary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.2 weeks: End of open label phase (Baseline) at study day 84 to end of double blind treatment at study day 98.The scale provides a global rating of illness severity during the trial. The subject is rated relative to the clinician's past experience with other subjects who have the same diagnosis. The CGI-S scale is 1 question and rated on a 7-point scale, with the severity of illness scale using a range of responses from 1 (normal) through to 7 (amongst the most severely ill subjects). A lower value a better the outcome.
Clinical Global Impression Scale of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at End of Double Blind Phase Relative to End of Open Label Phase (Baseline).2 weeks: End of open label phase (Baseline) at study day 84 to end of double blind treatment at study day 98.The scale provides a global rating of illness improvement during the trial. The subject is rated relative to the clinician's past experience with other subjects who have the same diagnosis. The CGI-I scale is 1 question, and rates improvement compared with a baseline visit using a 7-point scale. The range of responses are from 1 (very much improved) through 7 (very much worse). A lower value is a better the outcome.
Conners Early Childhood Behavior - Parent (Short) (EC BEH-P(S)) Change in T-score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind2 weeks: End of open label phase (Baseline) at study day 84 to end of double blind treatment at study day 98.Conners EC BEH-P(S) is an assessment tool used to obtain a parent's observations about his/her child's behavior. This tool is designed to assess a range of behavioral, emotional, & social issues in young children. The tool consists of 47 items, responses to which are summarized in 6 behavioral scales & 2 validity scales. Items on Conners assessment are rated on a Likert scale ranging from 0-3. The ratings were converted to raw item scores. Raw item scores were grouped, standardized, and/or compared to lookup tables for interpretation. Assessments were presented as T-scores: item raw scores for a given scale are added together; this raw sum is compared to age- and gender-matched normative data and converted to a T-score. Higher scores indicate higher concerns. T-score is a standard score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Note that Conners assessments do not use T-scores greater than 90; raw scores that produce extremely high T-scores are reported as ''T-score \>= 90.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The Enrolled Population consisted of all subjects who were not screen failures. Of these enrolled subjects, 119 entered the Open-label Treatment Phase and 90 were randomized to the Double-blind Treatment Phase.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Aptensio XR
Optimized dose of Aptensio XR administered orally, once daily.
40
Placebo Comparator
Placebo capsules administered orally, once daily.
50
Total90

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAptensio XRPlacebo ComparatorTotal
Age, Continuous58.5 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.59
59.2 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.42
58.9 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.05
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
15 Participants18 Participants33 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
24 Participants30 Participants54 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
29 Participants39 Participants68 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants11 Participants22 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1190 / 400 / 50
other
Total, other adverse events
82 / 1196 / 402 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 1190 / 400 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale - 4th Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Preschool Version Total Score Change From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.

ADHD-RS-IV is 18-item scale incorporates each of the ADHD symptoms listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) regardless of assigned subtype. Scoring was based on the universally accepted symptom severity as recommended in the DSM-IV-TR manual on a 4-point scale: 0 = never or rarely, 1 = sometimes, 2 = often, and 3 = very often. The total score is the sum of the scores for all 18 items and could range from 0 (no impairment) to 54 (maximal impairment) for each administration per subject. Higher score means higher frequency and severity of symptoms. Trained clinicians administered the questionnaire to parents. The ADHD-RS-IV Preschool Version was used to determine eligibility, optimal dosing and the efficacy of double blind treatment.

Time frame: 2 weeks: End of open label phase (Baseline) at study day 84 to end of double blind treatment at study day 98.

Population: The Efficacy Evaluable (ITT-E) population consists of all subjects in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population who completed ADHD-RS-IV assessments at the end of the open-label treatment phase (i.e., baseline) and had at least one post-baseline ADHD-RS-IV assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aptensio XRAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale - 4th Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Preschool Version Total Score Change From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.6.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.26
Placebo ComparatorAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale - 4th Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Preschool Version Total Score Change From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.17.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.76
Secondary

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale - 4th Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Preschool Version Hyperactivity-Impulsivity Subscale Score Change From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.

This 18-item scale incorporates each of the ADHD symptoms listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) regardless of assigned subtype. Scoring was based on the universally accepted symptom severity as recommended in the DSM-IV-TR manual on a 4-point scale: 0=never or rarely, 1=sometimes, 2=often, and 3=very often. The Hyperactivity-Impulsivity even items. The Hyperactivity-Impulsivity subscale score was the sum of the scores for the 9 even items and could range from 0 (no impairment) to 27 (maximal impairment) for each administration per subject. Higher score means higher frequency and severity of symptoms. Trained clinicians administered the questionnaire to parents.

Time frame: 2 weeks: End of open label phase (Baseline) at study day 84 to end of double blind treatment at study day 98.

Population: The Efficacy Evaluable (ITT-E) population consists of all subjects in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population who completed ADHD-RS-IV assessments at the end of the open-label treatment phase (i.e., baseline) and had at least one post-baseline ADHD-RS-IV assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aptensio XRAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale - 4th Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Preschool Version Hyperactivity-Impulsivity Subscale Score Change From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.3.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.434
Placebo ComparatorAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale - 4th Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Preschool Version Hyperactivity-Impulsivity Subscale Score Change From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.9.37 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.762
Secondary

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale - 4th Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Preschool Version Inattention Subscale Score Change From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.

This 18-item scale incorporates each of the ADHD symptoms listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) regardless of assigned subtype. Scoring was based on the universally accepted symptom severity as recommended in the DSM-IV-TR manual on a 4-point scale: 0=never or rarely, 1=sometimes, 2=often, and 3=very often. The Inattention subscales were based upon the sum of the odd items. The Inattention subscale score was the sum of the scores for the 9 odd items and could range from 0 (no impairment) to 27 (maximal impairment) for each administration per subject. Higher score means higher frequency and severity of symptoms. Trained clinicians administered the questionnaire to parents.

Time frame: 2 weeks: End of open label phase (Baseline) at study day 84 to end of double blind treatment at study day 98.

Population: The Efficacy Evaluable (ITT-E) population consists of all subjects in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population who completed ADHD-RS-IV assessments at the end of the open-label treatment phase (i.e., baseline) and had at least one post-baseline ADHD-RS-IV assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aptensio XRAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale - 4th Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Preschool Version Inattention Subscale Score Change From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.2.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.48
Placebo ComparatorAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale - 4th Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Preschool Version Inattention Subscale Score Change From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.7.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.48
Secondary

Clinical Global Impression Scale of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at End of Double Blind Phase Relative to End of Open Label Phase (Baseline).

The scale provides a global rating of illness improvement during the trial. The subject is rated relative to the clinician's past experience with other subjects who have the same diagnosis. The CGI-I scale is 1 question, and rates improvement compared with a baseline visit using a 7-point scale. The range of responses are from 1 (very much improved) through 7 (very much worse). A lower value is a better the outcome.

Time frame: 2 weeks: End of open label phase (Baseline) at study day 84 to end of double blind treatment at study day 98.

Population: The Efficacy Evaluable (ITT-E) population consists of all subjects in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population who completed ADHD-RS-IV assessments at the end of the open-label treatment phase (i.e., baseline) and had at least one post-baseline ADHD-RS-IV assessment.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Aptensio XRClinical Global Impression Scale of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at End of Double Blind Phase Relative to End of Open Label Phase (Baseline).4 = No change11 Participants
Aptensio XRClinical Global Impression Scale of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at End of Double Blind Phase Relative to End of Open Label Phase (Baseline).1 = Very much improved6 Participants
Aptensio XRClinical Global Impression Scale of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at End of Double Blind Phase Relative to End of Open Label Phase (Baseline).3 = Minimally improved3 Participants
Aptensio XRClinical Global Impression Scale of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at End of Double Blind Phase Relative to End of Open Label Phase (Baseline).2 = Much improved8 Participants
Aptensio XRClinical Global Impression Scale of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at End of Double Blind Phase Relative to End of Open Label Phase (Baseline).5 = Minimally worse4 Participants
Aptensio XRClinical Global Impression Scale of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at End of Double Blind Phase Relative to End of Open Label Phase (Baseline).6 = Much worse6 Participants
Aptensio XRClinical Global Impression Scale of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at End of Double Blind Phase Relative to End of Open Label Phase (Baseline).7 = Very much worse1 Participants
Placebo ComparatorClinical Global Impression Scale of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at End of Double Blind Phase Relative to End of Open Label Phase (Baseline).6 = Much worse16 Participants
Placebo ComparatorClinical Global Impression Scale of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at End of Double Blind Phase Relative to End of Open Label Phase (Baseline).3 = Minimally improved4 Participants
Placebo ComparatorClinical Global Impression Scale of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at End of Double Blind Phase Relative to End of Open Label Phase (Baseline).4 = No change13 Participants
Placebo ComparatorClinical Global Impression Scale of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at End of Double Blind Phase Relative to End of Open Label Phase (Baseline).7 = Very much worse5 Participants
Placebo ComparatorClinical Global Impression Scale of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at End of Double Blind Phase Relative to End of Open Label Phase (Baseline).1 = Very much improved5 Participants
Placebo ComparatorClinical Global Impression Scale of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at End of Double Blind Phase Relative to End of Open Label Phase (Baseline).5 = Minimally worse1 Participants
Placebo ComparatorClinical Global Impression Scale of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at End of Double Blind Phase Relative to End of Open Label Phase (Baseline).2 = Much improved6 Participants
Secondary

Conners Early Childhood Behavior - Parent (Short) (EC BEH-P(S)) Change in T-score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind

Conners EC BEH-P(S) is an assessment tool used to obtain a parent's observations about his/her child's behavior. This tool is designed to assess a range of behavioral, emotional, & social issues in young children. The tool consists of 47 items, responses to which are summarized in 6 behavioral scales & 2 validity scales. Items on Conners assessment are rated on a Likert scale ranging from 0-3. The ratings were converted to raw item scores. Raw item scores were grouped, standardized, and/or compared to lookup tables for interpretation. Assessments were presented as T-scores: item raw scores for a given scale are added together; this raw sum is compared to age- and gender-matched normative data and converted to a T-score. Higher scores indicate higher concerns. T-score is a standard score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Note that Conners assessments do not use T-scores greater than 90; raw scores that produce extremely high T-scores are reported as ''T-score \>= 90.

Time frame: 2 weeks: End of open label phase (Baseline) at study day 84 to end of double blind treatment at study day 98.

Population: The Efficacy Evaluable (ITT-E) population consists of all subjects in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population who completed ADHD-RS-IV assessments at the end of the open-label treatment phase (i.e., baseline) and had at least one post-baseline ADHD-RS-IV assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aptensio XRConners Early Childhood Behavior - Parent (Short) (EC BEH-P(S)) Change in T-score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double BlindInattention/Hyperactivity1.92 T-scoreStandard Deviation 11.412
Aptensio XRConners Early Childhood Behavior - Parent (Short) (EC BEH-P(S)) Change in T-score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double BlindDefiant/Aggressive Behaviors1.00 T-scoreStandard Deviation 11.016
Aptensio XRConners Early Childhood Behavior - Parent (Short) (EC BEH-P(S)) Change in T-score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double BlindMood and Affect2.63 T-scoreStandard Deviation 11.78
Aptensio XRConners Early Childhood Behavior - Parent (Short) (EC BEH-P(S)) Change in T-score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double BlindSocial Functioning / Atypical Behaviors3.79 T-scoreStandard Deviation 10.437
Aptensio XRConners Early Childhood Behavior - Parent (Short) (EC BEH-P(S)) Change in T-score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double BlindAnxiety1.89 T-scoreStandard Deviation 10.211
Aptensio XRConners Early Childhood Behavior - Parent (Short) (EC BEH-P(S)) Change in T-score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double BlindPhysical Symptoms1.92 T-scoreStandard Deviation 13.2
Placebo ComparatorConners Early Childhood Behavior - Parent (Short) (EC BEH-P(S)) Change in T-score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double BlindMood and Affect5.13 T-scoreStandard Deviation 12.335
Placebo ComparatorConners Early Childhood Behavior - Parent (Short) (EC BEH-P(S)) Change in T-score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double BlindInattention/Hyperactivity7.73 T-scoreStandard Deviation 15.067
Placebo ComparatorConners Early Childhood Behavior - Parent (Short) (EC BEH-P(S)) Change in T-score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double BlindSocial Functioning / Atypical Behaviors3.83 T-scoreStandard Deviation 11.96
Placebo ComparatorConners Early Childhood Behavior - Parent (Short) (EC BEH-P(S)) Change in T-score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double BlindDefiant/Aggressive Behaviors3.67 T-scoreStandard Deviation 11.033
Placebo ComparatorConners Early Childhood Behavior - Parent (Short) (EC BEH-P(S)) Change in T-score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double BlindAnxiety-0.02 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.299
Placebo ComparatorConners Early Childhood Behavior - Parent (Short) (EC BEH-P(S)) Change in T-score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double BlindPhysical Symptoms-0.15 T-scoreStandard Deviation 11.13
Secondary

Summary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.

The scale provides a global rating of illness severity during the trial. The subject is rated relative to the clinician's past experience with other subjects who have the same diagnosis. The CGI-S scale is 1 question and rated on a 7-point scale, with the severity of illness scale using a range of responses from 1 (normal) through to 7 (amongst the most severely ill subjects). A lower value a better the outcome.

Time frame: 2 weeks: End of open label phase (Baseline) at study day 84 to end of double blind treatment at study day 98.

Population: The Efficacy Evaluable (ITT-E) population consists of all subjects in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population who completed ADHD-RS-IV assessments at the end of the open-label treatment phase (i.e., baseline) and had at least one post-baseline ADHD-RS-IV assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Aptensio XRSummary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.End of Double-blind Treatment7 = Among the most extremely ill subjects0 Participants
Aptensio XRSummary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.Baseline1 = Normal, not at all ill7 Participants
Aptensio XRSummary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.Baseline2 = Borderline mentally ill15 Participants
Aptensio XRSummary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.Baseline3 = Mildly ill8 Participants
Aptensio XRSummary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.Baseline4 = Moderately ill7 Participants
Aptensio XRSummary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.Baseline5 = Markedly ill1 Participants
Aptensio XRSummary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.Baseline6 = Severely ill1 Participants
Aptensio XRSummary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.Baseline7 = Among the most extremely ill subjects0 Participants
Aptensio XRSummary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.End of Double-blind Treatment1 = Normal, not at all ill4 Participants
Aptensio XRSummary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.End of Double-blind Treatment2 = Borderline mentally ill12 Participants
Aptensio XRSummary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.End of Double-blind Treatment3 = Mildly ill5 Participants
Aptensio XRSummary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.End of Double-blind Treatment4 = Moderately ill6 Participants
Aptensio XRSummary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.End of Double-blind Treatment5 = Markedly ill10 Participants
Aptensio XRSummary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.End of Double-blind Treatment6 = Severely ill2 Participants
Placebo ComparatorSummary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.Baseline7 = Among the most extremely ill subjects0 Participants
Placebo ComparatorSummary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.End of Double-blind Treatment7 = Among the most extremely ill subjects2 Participants
Placebo ComparatorSummary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.End of Double-blind Treatment4 = Moderately ill10 Participants
Placebo ComparatorSummary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.Baseline1 = Normal, not at all ill13 Participants
Placebo ComparatorSummary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.End of Double-blind Treatment1 = Normal, not at all ill3 Participants
Placebo ComparatorSummary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.Baseline2 = Borderline mentally ill14 Participants
Placebo ComparatorSummary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.End of Double-blind Treatment6 = Severely ill7 Participants
Placebo ComparatorSummary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.Baseline3 = Mildly ill11 Participants
Placebo ComparatorSummary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.End of Double-blind Treatment2 = Borderline mentally ill5 Participants
Placebo ComparatorSummary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.Baseline4 = Moderately ill11 Participants
Placebo ComparatorSummary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.End of Double-blind Treatment5 = Markedly ill19 Participants
Placebo ComparatorSummary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.Baseline5 = Markedly ill1 Participants
Placebo ComparatorSummary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.End of Double-blind Treatment3 = Mildly ill4 Participants
Placebo ComparatorSummary of Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) Score From End of Open Label Phase (Baseline) to End of Double Blind.Baseline6 = Severely ill0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026