Skip to content

Molecular Imaging to Capture Disease Heterogeneity in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Molecular Imaging to Capture Disease Heterogeneity in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02682732
Enrollment
10
Registered
2016-02-15
Start date
2016-04-30
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

Keywords

Acute Myeloid Leukemia, PET/CT Scan

Brief summary

The current understanding of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is that one site of bone marrow (BM) sampling serves as a window that represents all AML cells distributed throughout the BM, an assumption that has yet to be questioned. Simulation in mice led to inconsistent representation of the full BM, which can incorrectly suggest the absence of leukemic cells. Positron-emission tomography (PET) scan can detect areas of high metabolic activity in the body using for instance a radioactive sugar. In one report, its use in human AML has provided proof-of-principle evidence of unequal distribution of AML cells in BM. Accordingly, the alternative hypothesis is to test if PET scan can demonstrate if BM geography can alter AML cells spread and home them as distinct areas rather than uniform spread as if they are distributed in liquid state.

Interventions

PROCEDUREFDG-PET/CT guided bone marrow sampling

(Fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography) FDG-PET/CT guided bone marrow sampling will be used to obtain two different samples from avid and dim bone marrow areas.

Sponsors

Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* New diagnosis of AML according to the WHO (World Health Organization) criteria

Exclusion criteria

* Prior malignancy, unless the patient has been disease-free for at least five years following curative intent therapy, with the following exceptions: patients with treated non-melanoma skin cancer, in situ carcinoma, or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, regardless of the disease-free duration, if definitive treatment for the condition has been completed; or patients with organ-confined prostate cancer with no evidence of recurrent or progressive disease. * Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). * ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status of 3 or more * Inadequate renal function (i.e., estimated GFR (glomerular filtration rate) \< 60 mL/min/1.73m2). * Inadequate hepatic function (i.e., serum bilirubin \> 1.5×ULN; AST (aspartate aminotransferase), ALT (alanine aminotransferase) and ALP (alkaline phosphatase) \> 2.5×ULN) * Presence of uncontrolled systemic fungal, bacterial, viral or other infections (defined as exhibiting ongoing signs/symptoms related to the infection and without improvement, despite appropriate antibiotics or other treatment). * Having any other severe concurrent disease or serious organ dysfunction that may place the patient at undue risk to receive induction therapy. * Pregnancy or lactating female.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of patients with heterogeneous (positron-emission tomography) PET/CT activity before induction chemotherapyUp to 3 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number of patients with residual (positron-emission tomography) PET/CT activity following induction chemotherapyUp to 3 years

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactMohammed Almakadi, MBBS
almakams@mcmaster.ca905-525-9140

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026