Skip to content

Miniflare Versus Long Protocol in Poor Responders

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02681536
Enrollment
200
Registered
2016-02-12
Start date
2016-02-29
Completion date
2016-09-30
Last updated
2016-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infertility

Brief summary

The study is performed to compare the outcomes of two stimulation protocols, the minidose long protocol versus the microdose flare protocol in poor responders undergoing IVF/ICSI.

Interventions

Sponsors

Woman's Health University Hospital, Egypt
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* poor responder women who fulfilled the criteria defined by the ESHRE consensus in 2011\[4\]; Poor responder females are those who possess two out of these three criteria: i) Female age ≥40 years; ii) Females who have at least one previous cancelled IVF cycle; iii) POR according to AFC ≤5 or low AMH value.

Exclusion criteria

* females with FSH more than 20 IU/L * females with previous ovarian surgery * females suffering from causes of infertility other than poor ovarian response, cases with polycystic ovaries syndrome * females refusing to be enrolled in the study, females with any endocrine disorder such as: diabetes, thyroid * patients with male factor of infertility.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of oocytes retrieved6 months

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactDina MR Dakhly, MD
dinadakhly@gmail.com01003498919

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026