Skip to content

Evaluation of the Effects of Whole Body Vibration on the Lung Function of Patients With Stable COPD

Evaluation of the Effects of Whole Body Vibration Training With the Galileo Training Device on the Lung Function of Patients With Stable COPD

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02679677
Enrollment
42
Registered
2016-02-10
Start date
2015-04-30
Completion date
2016-08-31
Last updated
2022-09-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COPD

Keywords

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Randomized controlled trial, Physical activity

Brief summary

The typical clinical progression of COPD usually results in a decreased level of tolerable physical exertion for the patient. The avoidance of strenuous physical activity leads to a deteriorating level of physical fitness, which further decreases the patient's ability to undertake physical activities. Recent research has shown that whole body vibration has the potential to improve physical fitness of participants, including such measures as the 6 minute walking distance. However, information concerning lung function is lacking. The goal of the study is to test whether the use of whole body vibration training has an effect on the lung function of patients with stable COPD, or if the previously observed effects can be attributed to either pharmaceutical therapy or physical therapy interventions.

Interventions

DEVICEWhole Body Vibration

The principle of the Galileo vibration platform is a side alternating motion similar to a childrens seesaw. Both the amplitude of movement and the frequency of movement may be altered. Frequency may be controlled on the device and settings range from 5Hz to 30Hz. Amplitude of movement is set by spreading one's legs further apart from the midline. Control arm participants remain fixed at 5Hz through the 6 week training period, while intervention arm participants steadily increase their frequency to a maximum of 28Hz.

Sponsors

National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg
CollaboratorOTHER
Heidelberg University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Stable COPD (Gold II-IV) * Signed understanding of participation * The patients must be able to understand and follow the requirements of participation (Understanding of the German language)

Exclusion criteria

* Acute thrombosis * Hemoptysis * Implants in the targeted training regions (joint implants) * Acute joint inflammation, active arthrosis or arthropathy. * Rheumatoid arthritis * Acute tendinopathy in the targeted training regions * Acute hernia * Acute discopathy * Fresh fracture in the targeted training regions * Gall or kidney stones * Wounds still in the process of healing * Epilepsy * Severe neurologic disorders (apoplexy, paralysis of upper and lower extremities) * Severe circulatory disorders (Cardiac insufficiency NYHA \> or = III, myocardial infarct less than one month prior, circulatory relevant rhythm disorders, idiopathic syncope) * Tension pneumothorax * Acute internal bleeding * Current therapy with fluoroquinolone * Alcohol/drug/medication abuse

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
FEV1Baseline (T0), Change from baseline measured at end of six weeks of training (T1), Change from baseline measured at six week follow-up measurement (T2)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
mMRC: Modified British Medical Research CouncilBaseline (T0), Change from baseline measured at end of six weeks of training (T1), Change from baseline measured at six week follow-up measurement (T2)
CAT: COPD Assessment TestBaseline (T0), Change from baseline measured at end of six weeks of training (T1), Change from baseline measured at six week follow-up measurement (T2)
PHQ-9 (Brief Patient Health QuestionnaireBaseline (T0), Change from baseline measured at end of six weeks of training (T1), Change from baseline measured at six week follow-up measurement (T2)
SF-12: Short Form (12) Health QuestionnaireBaseline (T0), Change from baseline measured at end of six weeks of training (T1), Change from baseline measured at six week follow-up measurement (T2)
SGRQ-C: Saint George´s Respiratory Questionnaire for COPD PatientsBaseline (T0), Change from baseline measured at end of six weeks of training (T1), Change from baseline measured at six week follow-up measurement (T2)
Chair Rising TestBaseline (T0), Change from baseline measured at end of six weeks of training (T1), Change from baseline measured at six week follow-up measurement (T2)
Handheld Dynamometry Strength Testing of ExtremitiesBaseline (T0), Change from baseline measured at end of six weeks of training (T1), Change from baseline measured at six week follow-up measurement (T2)
Diffusion capacity for oxygenBaseline (T0), Change from baseline measured at end of six weeks of training (T1), Change from baseline measured at six week follow-up measurement (T2)
Maximal inspiratory pressureBaseline (T0), Change from baseline measured at end of six weeks of training (T1), Change from baseline measured at six week follow-up measurement (T2)
6 Minute Walking TestBaseline (T0), Change from baseline measured at end of six weeks of training (T1), Change from baseline measured at six week follow-up measurement (T2)

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026