Skip to content

Study to Compare Delafloxacin to Moxifloxacin for the Treatment of Adults With Community-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparator-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous to Oral Delafloxacin in Adult Subjects With Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02679573
Acronym
DEFINE-CABP
Enrollment
860
Registered
2016-02-10
Start date
2016-12-14
Completion date
2018-08-07
Last updated
2020-02-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Community Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia

Keywords

Pneumonia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of delafloxacin compared to moxifloxacin in the treatment of adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to determine if delafloxacin, an investigational drug, is safe and effective in the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia compared with moxifloxacin, or linezolid in the case of confirmed MRSA.

Interventions

Antibacterial agent, 300 mg IV, Q12H for at least 6 doses with potential to switch to 450 mg oral tablet, Q12H for up to 20 doses total

DRUGMoxifloxacin

Antibacterial Agent, 400 mg IV, Q24H for at least 3 doses with potential to switch to 400 mg oral over-encapsulated tablet, Q24H for up to 10 doses total

DRUGLinezolid

Antibacterial Agent, at local investigator discretion, subjects in the moxifloxacin arm with confirmed MRSA can switch to linezolid 600 mg IV Q12H for all remaining doses

Sponsors

Melinta Therapeutics, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female 18 years of age or older 2. Evidence of acute onset of CABP with 2 or more of the following symptoms (new or worsening) * Cough * Production of purulent sputum consistent with bacterial infection * Difficulty breathing * Chest pain due to pneumonia AND have at least 2 of the following findings: * Fever (oral temperature \>38.0°C) * Hypothermia (oral temperature \<35.0°C) * Tachycardia (heart rate \>100 beats/min) * Tachypnea (respiratory rate \>18 breaths/min) AND have at least 1 of the following findings: * Hypoxemia (oxygen saturation \<90% or PaO2 \< 60 mmHg) on room air or with subject's baseline (pre-CABP under study) supplemental oxygen * Clinical evidence of pulmonary consolidation and/or presence of pulmonary rales * An elevated white blood cell count (WBC) \>10,000/mm3 or 15% immature neutrophils (bands), regardless of total peripheral WBC count or leukopenia with WBC \<4500/mm\^3 3. Presence of lobar, multilobar, or patchy parenchymal infiltrate(s) consistent with acute bacterial pneumonia on a pulmonary imaging study within 48 hours before the first dose of study drug 4. PORT risk class of II to V (PSI score \>50) 5. Must be a suitable candidate for possible IV to oral switch antibiotic therapy and must also be able to swallow large tablets/capsules intact without crushing

Exclusion criteria

1. A medical history of significant hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to antibiotics of the quinolone or oxazolidinone class or study drug excipients according to the investigator 2. Any infection expected to require other systemic antibiotics in addition to study drug 3. Receipt of systemic antibiotic therapy in the 7 days before enrollment unless 1 of the following is documented: * Received at least 48 hours of antibiotic therapy for CABP and clinic notes document treatment failure (i.e., not by patient history or pulmonary imaging alone) with new or worsening symptoms while on pre-study therapy * Received 1 dose of a single, potentially effective, short-acting antibacterial drug or drug regimen for CABP within 24 hours before enrollment (limited to 25% of enrolled patients) 4. Respiratory infection confirmed or suspected to be secondary to hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated pneumonia OR requires treatment in an intensive care setting, OR requires mechanical ventilation 5. Current or suspected diagnosis of viral, fungal, or aspiration pneumonia, noninfectious causes of pulmonary infiltrates, lung cancer, cystic fibrosis, tuberculosis, empyema (not including sterile parapneumonic effusions) 6. Known anatomical or pathological bronchial obstruction OR history of bronchiectasis OR GOLD Stage 4 COPD OR history of post obstructive pneumonia 7. Severely compromised immune system 8. Known history of Child-Pugh Class B or C liver disease 9. History of post-antibiotic colitis within last 3 months 10. Other exclusions include those described in the safety label for drugs in the quinolone and/or oxazolidinone classes such as QT prolongation, proarrhythmic conditions, concomitant use of drugs known to cause QT prolongation, peripheral neuropathy, tendon disorders, history of myasthenia gravis, liver disease, severe renal disease, seizures and concomitant use of MAO A or B inhibitor agents and adrenergic serotonergic agents

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Early Clinical Response96 (+/- 24) hours after the first dose of study drugEarly clinical response defined as improvement in at least 2 of the following symptoms (as assessed by the investigator): chest pain, frequency or severity of cough, amount and quality of productive sputum, and difficulty breathing, and no worsening of the other symptoms in the ITT population. Symptom severity evaluated by the investigator on a 4-point scale: Absent (0), Mild (1), Moderate (2), Severe (3). Improvement defined as at least a 1-point decrease from baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Early Clinical Response Plus Improvement in Vital Signs and no Worsening of the 4 Symptoms96 (+/- 24) hours after the first dose of study drugEarly clinical response with the addition of improvement in vital signs and no worsening of the following 4 symptoms: chest pain, cough, productive sputum, and difficulty breathing in the ITT population. Symptom severity evaluated by the investigator on a 4-point scale: Absent (0), Mild (1), Moderate (2), Severe (3). Improvement defined as at least a 1-point decrease from baseline. Improvement in vital signs defined as a return to normal of any abnormal vital signs at baseline, and no worsening (ie, be abnormal) of any vital sign that was normal at baseline.
Clinical Outcome at Test of Cure5 to 10 days after the last dose of study drugClinical outcome (Success, Failure, or Indeterminate/missing) based on the investigator's assessment of the patient's signs and symptoms of infection in the ITT population.
Clinical Outcome at End of TreatmentUp to 24 (+4) hours after the last dose of study drugClinical outcome (Success, Failure, or Indeterminate/missing) based on the investigator's assessment of the patient's signs and symptoms of infection in the ITT population.
Microbiologic Response5 to 10 days after the last dose of study drugMicrobiological response for subjects in the MITT set will be based on results of the baseline and follow-up cultures and susceptibility testing or serology.
All-cause MortalityDay 28 (+/- 2 days)Time to all-cause Mortality was assessed on Day 28.

Countries

Argentina, Bulgaria, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Latvia, Peru, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

860 subjects were planned to be enrolled in the study but 859 are included in the ITT population. One subject mistakenly was randomized into the IXRS but did not provide informed consent; therefore, this subject was not included in the ITT population.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Delafloxacin
Delafloxacin: 300 mg IV, Q12H for at least 6 doses with potential to switch to 450 mg oral tablet, Q12H for up to 20 doses total
431
Moxifloxacin/Linezolid
Moxifloxacin: 400 mg IV, Q24H for at least 3 doses with potential to switch to 400 mg oral over-encapsulated tablet, Q24H for up to 10 doses total Linezolid: At local investigator discretion, subjects in the moxifloxacin arm with confirmed MRSA can switch to linezolid 600 mg IV Q12H for all remaining doses
428
Total859

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event136
Overall StudyCould not complete required study visits62
Overall StudyDeath20
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy1215
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up03
Overall StudyPhysician Decision24
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject29

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDelafloxacinMoxifloxacin/LinezolidTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
203 Participants179 Participants382 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
228 Participants249 Participants477 Participants
Age, Continuous60.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.06
59.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 61
60.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.33
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
32 Participants23 Participants55 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
399 Participants405 Participants804 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
PORT Risk Class
II
54 Participants57 Participants111 Participants
PORT Risk Class
III
258 Participants260 Participants518 Participants
PORT Risk Class
IV
115 Participants103 Participants218 Participants
PORT Risk Class
V
4 Participants8 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
4 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
22 Participants33 Participants55 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
398 Participants388 Participants786 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
12 participants8 participants20 participants
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
33 participants25 participants58 participants
Region of Enrollment
Colombia
11 participants9 participants20 participants
Region of Enrollment
Dominican Republic
2 participants0 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Georgia
45 participants50 participants95 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
14 participants12 participants26 participants
Region of Enrollment
Latvia
19 participants21 participants40 participants
Region of Enrollment
Peru
4 participants0 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
20 participants8 participants28 participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
30 participants29 participants59 participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
38 participants42 participants80 participants
Region of Enrollment
Serbia
69 participants73 participants142 participants
Region of Enrollment
Slovenia
8 participants7 participants15 participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
30 participants41 participants71 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
10 participants14 participants24 participants
Region of Enrollment
Ukraine
84 participants84 participants168 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
1 participants5 participants6 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
180 Participants175 Participants355 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
251 Participants253 Participants504 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
8 / 4296 / 427
other
Total, other adverse events
40 / 42930 / 427
serious
Total, serious adverse events
23 / 42920 / 427

Outcome results

Primary

Early Clinical Response

Early clinical response defined as improvement in at least 2 of the following symptoms (as assessed by the investigator): chest pain, frequency or severity of cough, amount and quality of productive sputum, and difficulty breathing, and no worsening of the other symptoms in the ITT population. Symptom severity evaluated by the investigator on a 4-point scale: Absent (0), Mild (1), Moderate (2), Severe (3). Improvement defined as at least a 1-point decrease from baseline.

Time frame: 96 (+/- 24) hours after the first dose of study drug

Population: ITT (intent-to-treat) Population is all the randomized patients with a signed Informed consent form. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment arm to which they were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DelafloxacinEarly Clinical Response383 Participants
Moxifloxacin/LinezolidEarly Clinical Response381 Participants
Comparison: The null (H0) and alternative (Ha) hypotheses to be tested to establish the noninferiority of delafloxacin were:~H0: Pd - Pm ≤ -0.125 Ha: Pd - Pm \> -0.125 where Pd and Pm are the probabilities of the ECR for delafloxacin and moxifloxacin, respectively.~The treatment difference (delafloxacin - moxifloxacin) were presented, and the Miettinen-Nurminen test, without stratification, was used for the 2 sided 95% CI on the difference in response rate.95% CI: [-4.4, 4.1]
Secondary

All-cause Mortality

Time to all-cause Mortality was assessed on Day 28.

Time frame: Day 28 (+/- 2 days)

Population: ITT (intent-to-treat) Population is all the randomized patients with a signed Informed consent form. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment arm to which they were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DelafloxacinAll-cause Mortality8 Participants
Moxifloxacin/LinezolidAll-cause Mortality6 Participants
p-value: 0.5951Log Rank
Secondary

Clinical Outcome at End of Treatment

Clinical outcome (Success, Failure, or Indeterminate/missing) based on the investigator's assessment of the patient's signs and symptoms of infection in the ITT population.

Time frame: Up to 24 (+4) hours after the last dose of study drug

Population: ITT (intent-to-treat) Population is all the randomized patients with a signed Informed consent form. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment arm to which they were randomized.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DelafloxacinClinical Outcome at End of TreatmentSuccess396 Participants
DelafloxacinClinical Outcome at End of TreatmentFailure19 Participants
DelafloxacinClinical Outcome at End of TreatmentIndeterminate/Missing16 Participants
Moxifloxacin/LinezolidClinical Outcome at End of TreatmentFailure20 Participants
Moxifloxacin/LinezolidClinical Outcome at End of TreatmentSuccess390 Participants
Moxifloxacin/LinezolidClinical Outcome at End of TreatmentIndeterminate/Missing18 Participants
Comparison: The null (H0) and alternative (Ha) hypotheses to be tested to establish the noninferiority of delafloxacin were:~H0: Pd - Pm ≤ -0.125 Ha: Pd - Pm \> -0.125~where Pd and Pm are the probabilities of the ECR for delafloxacin and moxifloxacin, respectively.~The treatment difference (delafloxacin - moxifloxacin) was presented, and the Miettinen-Nurminen test without stratification was used for the 2 sided 95% CI on the difference in response rate.95% CI: [-3, 4.6]
Secondary

Clinical Outcome at Test of Cure

Clinical outcome (Success, Failure, or Indeterminate/missing) based on the investigator's assessment of the patient's signs and symptoms of infection in the ITT population.

Time frame: 5 to 10 days after the last dose of study drug

Population: ITT (intent-to-treat) Population is all the randomized patients with a signed Informed consent form. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment arm to which they were randomized.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DelafloxacinClinical Outcome at Test of CureSuccess390 Participants
DelafloxacinClinical Outcome at Test of CureFailure21 Participants
DelafloxacinClinical Outcome at Test of CureIndeterminate/Missing20 Participants
Moxifloxacin/LinezolidClinical Outcome at Test of CureSuccess384 Participants
Moxifloxacin/LinezolidClinical Outcome at Test of CureFailure21 Participants
Moxifloxacin/LinezolidClinical Outcome at Test of CureIndeterminate/Missing23 Participants
Comparison: The null (H0) and alternative (Ha) hypotheses to be tested to establish the noninferiority of delafloxacin were:~H0: Pd - Pm ≤ -0.125 Ha: Pd - Pm \> -0.125~where Pd and Pm are the probabilities of the ECR for delafloxacin and moxifloxacin, respectively.~The treatment difference (delafloxacin - moxifloxacin) was presented, and the Miettinen-Nurminen test without stratification was used for the 2 sided 95% CI on the difference in response rate.95% CI: [-3.3, 4.8]
Secondary

Early Clinical Response Plus Improvement in Vital Signs and no Worsening of the 4 Symptoms

Early clinical response with the addition of improvement in vital signs and no worsening of the following 4 symptoms: chest pain, cough, productive sputum, and difficulty breathing in the ITT population. Symptom severity evaluated by the investigator on a 4-point scale: Absent (0), Mild (1), Moderate (2), Severe (3). Improvement defined as at least a 1-point decrease from baseline. Improvement in vital signs defined as a return to normal of any abnormal vital signs at baseline, and no worsening (ie, be abnormal) of any vital sign that was normal at baseline.

Time frame: 96 (+/- 24) hours after the first dose of study drug

Population: ITT (intent-to-treat) Population is all randomized patients with a signed Informed consent form. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment arm to which they were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DelafloxacinEarly Clinical Response Plus Improvement in Vital Signs and no Worsening of the 4 Symptoms227 Participants
Moxifloxacin/LinezolidEarly Clinical Response Plus Improvement in Vital Signs and no Worsening of the 4 Symptoms184 Participants
Comparison: The null (H0) and alternative (Ha) hypotheses to be tested to establish the noninferiority of delafloxacin were:~H0: Pd - Pm ≤ -0.125 Ha: Pd - Pm \> -0.125~where Pd and Pm are the probabilities of the ECR for delafloxacin and moxifloxacin, respectively.~The treatment difference (delafloxacin - moxifloxacin) was presented, and the Miettinen-Nurminen test without stratification was used for the 2 sided 95% CI on the difference in response rate.95% CI: [3, 16.3]
Secondary

Microbiologic Response

Microbiological response for subjects in the MITT set will be based on results of the baseline and follow-up cultures and susceptibility testing or serology.

Time frame: 5 to 10 days after the last dose of study drug

Population: Microbiological ITT 1 (MITT-1) includes all subjects in the ITT population with a baseline bacterial pathogen identified that was known to cause CABP and against which the study drug had antibacterial activity.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DelafloxacinMicrobiologic Response231 Participants
Moxifloxacin/LinezolidMicrobiologic Response235 Participants
Comparison: The null (H0) and alternative (Ha) hypotheses to be tested to establish the noninferiority of delafloxacin were:~H0: Pd - Pm ≤ -0.125 Ha: Pd - Pm \> -0.125~where Pd and Pm are the probabilities of the ECR for delafloxacin and moxifloxacin, respectively.~The treatment difference (delafloxacin - moxifloxacin) was presented, and the Miettinen-Nurminen test without stratification was used for the 2 sided 95% CI on the difference in response rate.95% CI: [-4.8, 5.9]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026