Skip to content

The Effectiveness of Hand Massage on the Pain of Cardiac Surgery Critically Ill

The Effectiveness of Hand Massage on the Pain of Cardiac Surgery Critically Ill- A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02679534
Enrollment
76
Registered
2016-02-10
Start date
2016-04-30
Completion date
2017-04-30
Last updated
2016-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

pain, thoracic surgery, massage

Brief summary

Postoperative pain is a common phenomenon in the intensive care unit (ICU) despite the multitude of efforts dedicated to promote its effective relief. Mounting evidence shows that cardiac surgery ICU patients experience moderate to severe pain reaching proportions as high as 74% despite the use of analgesics. The highest pain intensity is experienced in the first 24 hours post surgery when patients are still in the ICU, and represents a strong predictor for the presence and severity of persistent postoperative pain. To maximize pain relief, massage has been suggested in the recent clinical practice guidelines of the Society of Critical-Care Medicine as a complementary non-pharmacological therapy in the ICU given its opioid-sparing and analgesia-enhancing potential. Some randomized controlled trials showed promising pain relief effects of massage when administered to cardiac surgery patients in acute care units, however, its effects on pain relief while patients are still in the ICU and when pain severity is highest remain unknown. This study aims to compare the effect of three 20-minute hand massage administrations within 24 hours postop on the pain intensity (primary outcome), pain unpleasantness, pain interference, muscle tension, anxiety and vital signs (blood pressure, heart and respiratory rates) of adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients post cardiac surgery versus hand holding (i.e., simple touch) and standard care. Other objectives are to describe the location and quality of pain of cardiac surgery ICU patients. Hypothesis: Patients receiving 3 hand massages within 24 hours postop will have lower pain intensity, unpleasantness and interference, muscle tension, anxiety and vital signs compared to patients receiving hand holding and to those in the standard care group.

Interventions

OTHERapplication of unscented hypoallergenic cream
OTHERenvironmental adjustments

Sponsors

McGill University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* able to speak French or English * elective cardiac surgery requiring sternal incision (e.g., coronary artery bypass graft, valve replacement) * able to answer questions and self-report symptoms

Exclusion criteria

* previous cardiac surgery * diagnostic of cognitive or psychiatric disorder * pulmonary artery pressure \>50 mmHg * right ventricular failure * systolic left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction 35% or less) * body mass index \> 30 * prolonged bleeding from the chest drainage tubes (i.e., \>200 ml/h) * having mechanical blood pressure support (e.g., intra-aortic balloon pump) * receiving cardiac pacing with complete control of HR * peripheral intravenous line in the hands * suppurating/infective/inflammatory skin condition of the hands * hypersensitivity to touch.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
change in pain intensity from pre- to post-intervention as assessed using the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scalebefore and immediately after each intervention within 24 hours postoperativelyPain intensity will be captured using the 0 to 10 Numeric Rating Scale score, and the analysis metric will be the change in pain intensity from baseline (pre-intervention) to immediately after each intervention. For each study group, means and standard deviations of patients' pain intensity levels will be reported. Change in pain intensity levels will be assessed for each of the three interventions administered within 24 hours postop.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
change in muscle tension from pre- to post-intervention by performing passive flexion and extension of patient's arm, and scoring 0 (relaxed), 1 (tense) or 2 (very tense/rigid)before and immediately after each intervention within 24 hours postopThe muscle tension ordinal scale 0-2 is based on the muscle tension item of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool, a behavioral pain scale for the assessment of pain in the non-verbal critically ill.
change in anxiety from pre- to post-intervention as assessed using the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scalebefore and immediately after each intervention within 24 hours postop
changes in 1-minute blood pressure average from pre- to post-intervention as assessed using a data collection computer connected to patient's bedside monitorbefore and immediately after each intervention within 24 hours postop
changes in 1-minute heart rate average from pre- to post-intervention as assessed using a data collection computer connected to patient's bedside monitorbefore and immediately after each intervention within 24 hours postop
changes in 1-minute respiratory rate average from pre- to post-intervention as assessed using a data collection computer connected to patient's bedside monitorbefore and immediately after each intervention within 24 hours postop
pain interference as assessed using the Brief Pain Inventoryon the second and fourth postoperative days
change in pain unpleasantness from pre- to post-intervention as assessed using the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scalebefore and immediately after each intervention within 24 hours postop
change in pain unpleasantness from post-intervention to 30 minutes later as assessed using the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (carry-over effect)immediately after each intervention and 30 minutes later within 24 hours postop
change in muscle tension from post-intervention to 30 minutes later by performing passive flexion and extension of patient's arm, and scoring 0 (relaxed), 1 (tense) or 2 (very tense/rigid)immediately after each intervention and 30 minutes later within 24 hours postop
change in anxiety from post-intervention to 30 minutes later as assessed using the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (carry-over effect)immediately after each intervention and 30 minutes later within 24 hours postop
changes in 1-minute blood pressure average from post-intervention to 30 minutes later as assessed using a data collection computer connected to patient's bedside monitorimmediately after each intervention and 30 minutes later within 24 hours postop
changes in 1-minute heart rate average from post-intervention to 30 minutes later as assessed using a data collection computer connected to patient's bedside monitorimmediately after each intervention and 30 minutes later within 24 hours postop
changes in 1-minute respiratory rate average from post-intervention to 30 minutes later as assessed using a data collection computer connected to patient's bedside monitorimmediately after each intervention and 30 minutes later within 24 hours postop
change in pain intensity from post-intervention to 30 minutes later as assessed using the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (carry-over effect)immediately after each intervention and 30 minutes later within 24 hours postop

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactMadalina Boitor, PhD(C)
madalina.boitor@mcgill.ca

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026