Skip to content

Reduction in Pain Intensity Following IV or Oral Pain-relieving Products

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Two-Part, Cross-over Study in Healthy Adult Male Subjects to Compare the Reduction in Pain Intensity After Single-Dose Administration of Intravenous or Oral Acetaminophen and Intravenous Morphine by Using UVB Burn and Intradermal Capsaicin Experimental Pain Models

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02678416
Enrollment
79
Registered
2016-02-09
Start date
2015-12-07
Completion date
2016-06-13
Last updated
2020-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

comparison

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate two experimental pain models to see if they would be useful for comparing different products for reduction in pain intensity. The models evaluated were the ultraviolet-B (UVB) burn and intradermal capsaicin experimental pain models. Medications compared were a single dose each, of intravenous (IV) acetaminophen, oral acetaminophen, placebo, and IV morphine.

Interventions

DRUGIV Acetaminophen (Treatment A)

Acetaminophen administered by intravenous (IV) infusion

DRUGOral Acetaminophen (Treatment B)

Acetaminophen administered by oral tablets

Placebo administered by IV infusion or oral tablets

OTHERMorphine (Treatment D)

Morphine administered by IV infusion

Sponsors

Mallinckrodt
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Must have a health status of healthy assessed by the investigator and defined as no clinically significant deviation from normal medical history, physical examination, vital signs, and clinical laboratory determinations. 2. Must be male, Caucasian, between 18 and 55 years of age (inclusive) at the time of the screening. 3. Must have a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 19.0 and ≤ 30.0 kg/m2 with a minimum weight of 110 pounds (50 kg) at screening.

Exclusion criteria

1. A positive test result for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B (surface antigen), or hepatitis C virus antibody at Screening. 2. A history of any drug allergy, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to acetaminophen, morphine, or capsaicin or to any of the excipients in the IV or oral formulations used. 3. A positive test result for drugs of abuse, alcohol, or cotinine. 4. Fitzpatrick Skin Type V or VI (based on a Skin Type score of greater than 30. 5. A history of conditions which might be specifically contraindicated or require caution to be used during the administration of any drug in the study. 6. Any other medical, psychiatric and/or social reason for exclusion as determined by the investigator.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity at Hour 6 Using the Thermal Suprathreshold Pain in the Ultraviolet-B (UVB) Burn Pain Modelwithin 6 hoursThe UVB burn pain model is a validated screening tool for pain killers in clinical drug development. A temperature of 50 degrees centigrade (°C) is used to burn the participant for 5 seconds. Then the participant rates his pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most intense pain). That score is recorded as baseline. Then the participant rates his pain again six hours after taking the assigned medication. The average at baseline is subtracted from the average at hour 6. Because this is a measure of reduction in pain intensity, a higher score is better (it means there is more pain relief).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Areawithin 6 hoursParticipants rated their pain intensity on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (most intense pain). The observed mean and standard deviation are disclosed through Hour 6

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 79 participants were enrolled in the study. 12 participants in Part 1 and 66 participants in Part 2 were randomized to sequence, and received at least one dose of the study treatment.

Pre-assignment details

One participant in Part 2 was randomized but discontinued without receiving treatment due to an adverse event.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Part 1
All participants who received a drug product in Part 1
12
Part 2
All participants who received a drug product in Part 2
66
Total78

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Part 1Withdrawal by Subject1
Part 2Adverse Event2
Part 2Withdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPart 1TotalPart 2
Age, Continuous28.9 years26.9 years26.5 years
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race, White
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants6 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race, White
Not Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants72 Participants60 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 Participants78 Participants66 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants78 Participants66 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 120 / 120 / 120 / 640 / 650 / 650 / 64
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 122 / 124 / 128 / 1210 / 6412 / 6514 / 6538 / 66
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 120 / 120 / 120 / 640 / 650 / 650 / 64

Outcome results

Primary

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity at Hour 6 Using the Thermal Suprathreshold Pain in the Ultraviolet-B (UVB) Burn Pain Model

The UVB burn pain model is a validated screening tool for pain killers in clinical drug development. A temperature of 50 degrees centigrade (°C) is used to burn the participant for 5 seconds. Then the participant rates his pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most intense pain). That score is recorded as baseline. Then the participant rates his pain again six hours after taking the assigned medication. The average at baseline is subtracted from the average at hour 6. Because this is a measure of reduction in pain intensity, a higher score is better (it means there is more pain relief).

Time frame: within 6 hours

Population: Completers, defined as participants who were enrolled in the study, took the entire dose of all study drugs, and provided all pain intensity assessments.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IV AcetaminophenPart 1: Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity at Hour 6 Using the Thermal Suprathreshold Pain in the Ultraviolet-B (UVB) Burn Pain Model0.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.104
Oral AcetaminophenPart 1: Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity at Hour 6 Using the Thermal Suprathreshold Pain in the Ultraviolet-B (UVB) Burn Pain Model-0.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.804
PlaceboPart 1: Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity at Hour 6 Using the Thermal Suprathreshold Pain in the Ultraviolet-B (UVB) Burn Pain Model-0.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.567
MorphinePart 1: Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity at Hour 6 Using the Thermal Suprathreshold Pain in the Ultraviolet-B (UVB) Burn Pain Model0.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.206
Secondary

Part 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area

Participants rated their pain intensity on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (most intense pain). The observed mean and standard deviation are disclosed through Hour 6

Time frame: within 6 hours

Population: Per-Protocol Population, defined as participants who were enrolled in the study, have taken the entire dose of all study drugs, and provided all pain intensity assessments designed for the UVB Burn Pain Model without a major protocol deviation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IV AcetaminophenPart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area0.25 Hours5.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.39
IV AcetaminophenPart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area4 Hours5.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.17
IV AcetaminophenPart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area6 Hours5.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.32
IV AcetaminophenPart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn AreaBaseline5.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
IV AcetaminophenPart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area0.5 Hours5.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.34
IV AcetaminophenPart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area0.75 Hours5.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.37
IV AcetaminophenPart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area1 Hour5.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.44
IV AcetaminophenPart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area2 Hours5.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.13
IV AcetaminophenPart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area3 Hours5.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Oral AcetaminophenPart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area3 Hours5.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.44
Oral AcetaminophenPart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area0.5 Hours5.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.36
Oral AcetaminophenPart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn AreaBaseline5.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Oral AcetaminophenPart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area0.75 Hours5.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Oral AcetaminophenPart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area1 Hour4.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.23
Oral AcetaminophenPart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area4 Hours5.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Oral AcetaminophenPart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area0.25 Hours5.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.48
Oral AcetaminophenPart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area6 Hours5.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Oral AcetaminophenPart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area2 Hours5.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.26
PlaceboPart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area0.25 Hours5.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.28
PlaceboPart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area1 Hour5.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.34
PlaceboPart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area0.5 Hours5.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.28
PlaceboPart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area6 Hours5.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.34
PlaceboPart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area2 Hours5.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.28
PlaceboPart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area4 Hours5.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
PlaceboPart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area0.75 Hours5.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.26
PlaceboPart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn AreaBaseline5.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.32
PlaceboPart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area3 Hours5.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.23
MorphinePart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area6 Hours5.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.45
MorphinePart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn AreaBaseline5.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
MorphinePart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area0.25 Hours4.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.56
MorphinePart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area0.5 Hours4.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
MorphinePart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area0.75 Hours4.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62
MorphinePart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area1 Hour4.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.55
MorphinePart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area3 Hours5.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.67
MorphinePart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area4 Hours5.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.42
MorphinePart 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area2 Hours5.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026