Skip to content

Percutaneous Nerve Evaluation With Fluoroscopy Versus Without

InterStim Implantation Rates Following Percutaneous Nerve Evaluation With Fluoroscopy Versus Without

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02677753
Enrollment
75
Registered
2016-02-09
Start date
2016-04-30
Completion date
2019-04-30
Last updated
2020-06-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Overactive Bladder, Urinary Incontinence, Fecal Incontinence

Brief summary

The investigators propose a randomized control trial comparing the rate of implantation of the InterStim device following Percutaneous Nerve Evaluation (PNE) performed with or without fluoroscopic guidance.

Detailed description

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is a well-established treatment for refractory urinary urgency, frequency, retention and urge incontinence as well as fecal incontinence. Patients whose symptoms are refractory to more conservative therapies such as behavioral modification and/or medications are candidates for SNS. The InterStim system consists of a permanent tined lead and implantable pulse generator (IPG) or battery that delivers the sacral neuromodulation. This device is typically implanted after patients have a successful response to a trial of sacral neuromodulation with a temporary lead and external battery. The temporary lead placement is known as a Percutaneous Nerve Evaluation (PNE) and is typically done in as an outpatient procedure using local anesthetic. It is standard practice to use fluoroscopy intraoperatively to confirm correct placement of the permanent lead. Additionally, some physicians also use fluoroscopy to confirm correct placement of temporary lead during PNE while others place the lead based on anatomical landmarks and expected elicited responses for S3 stimulation. The investigators propose a randomized control trial comparing the rate of implantation of the InterStim device following (PNE) performed with or without fluoroscopic guidance.

Interventions

RADIATIONFluoroscopy

Sponsors

University of Louisville
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Women age \>18 * English speakers * Patients with urinary urgency, frequency, or urge incontinence refractory to at least 1 other intervention who elect to undergo PNE

Exclusion criteria

* Patients in whom bilateral leads cannot be placed * Pregnant women * Prisoners * Less than 18 years of age

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With InterStim Implantation Following PNE With or Without Use of Fluoroscopy3 monthsPercentage of PNEs that have permanent neuromodulation device implanted by 3 months

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Fluoroscopy Guided PNE
Fluoroscopy will be utilized to assist with placement and/or confirm correct placement of lead wires. Fluoroscopy
36
PNE Without Fluoroscopic Guidance
No fluoroscopy will be used during or after the placement of the lead wires.
38
Total74

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFluoroscopy Guided PNEPNE Without Fluoroscopic GuidanceTotal
Age, Continuous57.94 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.29
57.84 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.01
57.89 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.15
Indication for PNE, Urge urinary incontinence30 Participants33 Participants63 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian participants
29 Participants35 Participants64 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
36 Participants38 Participants74 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 360 / 38
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 363 / 38
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 360 / 38

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With InterStim Implantation Following PNE With or Without Use of Fluoroscopy

Percentage of PNEs that have permanent neuromodulation device implanted by 3 months

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fluoroscopy Guided PNENumber of Participants With InterStim Implantation Following PNE With or Without Use of Fluoroscopy21 Participants
PNE Without Fluoroscopic GuidanceNumber of Participants With InterStim Implantation Following PNE With or Without Use of Fluoroscopy18 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026