Skip to content

Evaluation of a Flash Glucose Monitoring System in Ambulatory Patients With Type 1 Diabetes

Evaluation of a Flash Glucose Monitoring System in Ambulatory Patients With Type 1 Diabetes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02677454
Enrollment
56
Registered
2016-02-09
Start date
2015-06-30
Completion date
2016-04-30
Last updated
2016-11-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Keywords

Blood Glucose, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring

Brief summary

To evaluate the accuracy of the Flash Glucose Monitoring system (FGM), Abbot FreeStyle Libre, used today in clinical practice in Sweden in estimating plasma glucose levels. Data will be collected in ambulatory patients with type 1 diabetes to determine safety, accuracy, and reliability.

Interventions

DEVICEFlash Glucose Monitor

Sponsors

Vastra Gotaland Region
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 74 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Type 1 diabetes 2. Adult patients, age 18 or older and \< 75 years 3. Written informed consent -

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnancy 2. Patients with severe cognitive dysfunction or other disease which makes FGM use difficult 3. History of allergic reaction to any of the FGMs materials or adhesives in Contact with the skin. 4. History of allergic reaction to chlorhexidine or alcohol anti-septic solution. 5. Continous Glucose Monitor (CGM) or FGM usage in the last month 6. Abnormal skin at the anticipated glucose sensor attachment sites(excessive hair, burn, inflammation, infection, rash, and/or tattoo) \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD)the whole study period, day 1-14Mean absolute relative difference (MARD) of all estimated capillary glucose values registered during the whole study period of the Freestyle Libre system compared to the capillary reference blood glucose measured with HemoCue.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pearson Correlation Coefficientthe whole study period, day 1-14Pearson correlation coefficient (all values registered during the whole study period)between Freestyle Libre System compared to the capillary reference blood glucose measured with HemoCue
Mean absolute relative difference (MARD)the whole study period, day 1-14The MARD registered during day 1-7 and day 8-14 separately of the Freestyle Libre system compared to the capillary reference blood glucose measured with HemoCue
Mean absolute difference MADthe whole study period, day 1-14The MAD registered during day 1-7 and day 8-14 separately of the Freestyle Libre system compared to the capillary reference blood glucose measured with HemoCue
Mean absolute Difference (MAD)the whole study period, day 1-14Mean absolute difference(MAD) of all estimated capillary glucose values registered during the whole study period of the Freestyle Libre System compared to the capillary reference blood glucose measured with HemoCue
Mean absolute difference (MAD)the whole study period, day 1-14The MAD,(for data registered inte the following specified glucose ranges: \< 4mmol/l, 4-10mmol/l and \>10mmol/l) durin the whole study period of the Freestyle Libre system compared to the capillary reference blood glucose measured the HemoCue
questionnairethe whole study period, day 1-14The evaluation of the Freestyle Libre system from a questionnaires rated on a VAS-scale (Visual analogue scale), lowest value (0) equaling to Not true at all and highest value (10) equaling to Completely true
Pearson Correlationthe whole study period, day 1-14The Pearson Correlation (data registered during day 1-7 and day 8-14 separately) between Freestyle Libre system compared to the capillary reference blood glucose measured with HemoCue

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026