Skip to content

Sensory Stimulation to Enhance Hand Function Post Stroke

Sensory Stimulation to Enhance Hand Function Post Stroke

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02675764
Enrollment
12
Registered
2016-02-05
Start date
2016-01-31
Completion date
2017-03-30
Last updated
2024-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

hand function

Brief summary

The objective of this pilot project is to assess the impact of the novel sensory stimulation technique the investigators have developed in enhancing outcomes of hand therapy as well as the central nervous system responsiveness in chronic stroke survivors.

Detailed description

Stroke survivors suffer from persistent hand impairment that diminishes their functional abilities and independence, despite multiple courses of rehabilitation. Sensory stimulation can prime central excitability to increase therapy outcome. The investigators developed a new sensory stimulation technique for the hand, using imperceptible vibration applied to the wrist skin. Wearable devices with a vibrating function are low cost and can be easily adopted for rehabilitation purposes to impact a wide range of patients with sensorimotor impairment. Despite the potential for clinical benefits and easy adoption for high impact, knowledge about the long-term efficacy of this new sensory stimulation technique and its underlying mechanism is limited. The objective of this pilot project is to assess the impact of the novel sensory stimulation technique the investigators have developed in enhancing outcomes of 2-week hand therapy as well as the central nervous system responsiveness in chronic stroke survivors. This impact will be assessed in a double-blind stratified randomized controlled trial. The hypothesis is that (a) improvement in hand function will be greater for the experimental group receiving the wrist subthreshold vibrotactile stimulation during therapy compared with the control group who will wear the device with no vibration (placebo). (b) Improvement in hand function is associated with neurophysiologic measures of central nervous system responsiveness. Clinical and neurophysiologic evaluations will be performed before, immediately after, and 2 weeks after a 2 week standardized hand therapy program with the subthreshold vibrotactile stimulation to the wrist vs. sham. The investigators preliminary studies demonstrated an acute effect of the remote subthreshold vibrotactile stimulation on immediately improved clinical sensory and motor function of the hand as well as cortical excitability in healthy young adults and chronic stroke survivors in single-session studies. The expected outcome is the demonstration that the subthreshold vibrotactile stimulation at the wrist enhances hand function, not only immediately (preliminary studies) but also as a complement to therapy in chronic stroke survivors. This project will also provide preliminary insights regarding plasticity occurring with hand therapy augmented by the subthreshold vibrotactile stimulation. This research will have a positive impact by leading to a portable sensorimotor orthosis worn at the wrist to improve hand function for patients with sensorimotor deficits.

Interventions

OTHERVibration

peripheral vibration at the wrist skin at an imperceptible level

No peripheral vibration at the wrist skin

BEHAVIORALtherapy

standardized hand therapy program

Sponsors

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
CollaboratorNIH
Medical University of South Carolina
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* mild to moderate impairment in upper extremity function

Exclusion criteria

* cognitive dysfunction * stroke\<3 months * treatment with botulinum toxin in the affected arm within 3 months of start of study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Box and Block Test (BBT) About a Week After the 2-week Interventionpost intervention (about a week after the 2-week therapy, or week 3) compared to baseline (before 2-week therapy)Change in hand motor function as measured by the Box and Block Test. This test measures the number of blocks that a participant moved in a minute. The scale ranges from 0 to a positive number. Higher numbers represent better outcomes.
Box and Block Test (BBT) at Least 2 Weeks After the 2-week Interventionfollow up (at least 2 weeks after the 2-week therapy, or week 5) compared to baseline (before 2-week therapy)Change in hand motor function as measured by the Box and Block Test. This test measures the number of blocks that a participant moved in a minute. The scale ranges from 0 to a positive number. Higher numbers represent better outcomes.
WMFT About a Week After the 2-week Interventionpost intervention (about a week after the 2-week therapy, or week 3) compared to baseline (before 2-week therapy)change in hand motor function as measured by the Wolf Motor Function Test hand items time. This test measures time to complete movements in seconds. More negative values represent greater reduction in time and thus better outcomes.
WMFT at Least 2 Weeks After the 2-week Interventionfollow up (2 weeks after the 2-week therapy, or week 5) compared to baseline (before 2-week therapy)change in hand motor function as measured by the Wolf Motor Function Test hand items time. This test measures time to complete movements in seconds. More negative values represent greater reduction in time and thus better outcomes.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Experimental
The experimental group receives the wrist subthreshold vibrotactile stimulation during therapy. Vibration: peripheral vibration at the wrist skin at an imperceptible level therapy: standardized hand therapy program
6
Placebo
The control group will wear the vibration device with no vibration. * Both groups cannot feel the vibration since the vibration intensity is set below the perceptible level. * The vibration device is a generic, commercially-available, vibrator, not particularly used for this peripheral skin stimulation purpose. Placebo (for vibration): No peripheral vibration at the wrist skin therapy: standardized hand therapy program
6
Total12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExperimentalPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
64 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
baseline hand motor function (Box and Block Test score)29 blocks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
28 blocks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
29 blocks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 Participants6 Participants11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 participants6 participants12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants4 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants2 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 60 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 60 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Box and Block Test (BBT) About a Week After the 2-week Intervention

Change in hand motor function as measured by the Box and Block Test. This test measures the number of blocks that a participant moved in a minute. The scale ranges from 0 to a positive number. Higher numbers represent better outcomes.

Time frame: post intervention (about a week after the 2-week therapy, or week 3) compared to baseline (before 2-week therapy)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental (Therapy + Stimulation)Box and Block Test (BBT) About a Week After the 2-week Intervention6 change in # of blocksStandard Error 0.8
Placebo (Therapy + Stimulation Placebo)Box and Block Test (BBT) About a Week After the 2-week Intervention-2 change in # of blocksStandard Error 0.7
Primary

Box and Block Test (BBT) at Least 2 Weeks After the 2-week Intervention

Change in hand motor function as measured by the Box and Block Test. This test measures the number of blocks that a participant moved in a minute. The scale ranges from 0 to a positive number. Higher numbers represent better outcomes.

Time frame: follow up (at least 2 weeks after the 2-week therapy, or week 5) compared to baseline (before 2-week therapy)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental (Therapy + Stimulation)Box and Block Test (BBT) at Least 2 Weeks After the 2-week Intervention4 change in # of blocksStandard Error 0.8
Placebo (Therapy + Stimulation Placebo)Box and Block Test (BBT) at Least 2 Weeks After the 2-week Intervention0.5 change in # of blocksStandard Error 0.8
Primary

WMFT About a Week After the 2-week Intervention

change in hand motor function as measured by the Wolf Motor Function Test hand items time. This test measures time to complete movements in seconds. More negative values represent greater reduction in time and thus better outcomes.

Time frame: post intervention (about a week after the 2-week therapy, or week 3) compared to baseline (before 2-week therapy)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental (Therapy + Stimulation)WMFT About a Week After the 2-week Intervention-0.19 change in ln(sec)Standard Error 0.07
Placebo (Therapy + Stimulation Placebo)WMFT About a Week After the 2-week Intervention0.00 change in ln(sec)Standard Error 0.07
Primary

WMFT at Least 2 Weeks After the 2-week Intervention

change in hand motor function as measured by the Wolf Motor Function Test hand items time. This test measures time to complete movements in seconds. More negative values represent greater reduction in time and thus better outcomes.

Time frame: follow up (2 weeks after the 2-week therapy, or week 5) compared to baseline (before 2-week therapy)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental (Therapy + Stimulation)WMFT at Least 2 Weeks After the 2-week Intervention-0.090 change in ln(sec)Standard Error 0.074
Placebo (Therapy + Stimulation Placebo)WMFT at Least 2 Weeks After the 2-week Intervention-0.089 change in ln(sec)Standard Error 0.074

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026