Skip to content

A Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Placebo in Adults With Rheumatoid Arthritis on a Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response to csDMARDs Alone

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Placebo in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Are on a Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) and Have an Inadequate Response to csDMARDs

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02675426
Acronym
SELECT-NEXT
Enrollment
661
Registered
2016-02-05
Start date
2015-12-17
Completion date
2022-03-10
Last updated
2023-04-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

Musculoskeletal Disease, Arthritis, Joint Disease, Anti-inflammatory agents, Antirheumatic agents, Upadacitinib, ABT-494

Brief summary

The primary objectives of this study are to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of upadacitinib 30 mg once daily (QD) and 15 mg QD versus placebo for the treatment of signs and symptoms of adults with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis who were on a stable dose of csDMARDs and had an inadequate response to csDMARDs.

Detailed description

This Phase 3 multicenter study includes two periods. Period 1 is a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled period designed to compare the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib 30 mg once daily and upadacitinib 15 mg once daily versus placebo for the treatment of signs and symptoms of adults with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were on a stable dose of csDMARDs and had an inadequate response to csDMARDs. Period 2 is a 248-week blinded long-term extension period to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of upadacitinib 30 mg once daily and upadacitinib 15 mg once daily in participants who completed Period 1. Participants were to be randomized in a 2:2:1:1 ratio using interactive response technology (IRT) to receive double-blind study drug in one of the following treatment groups: * Group 1: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD in Period 1 → Upadacitinib 30 mg QD in Period 2 * Group 2: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD in Period 1 → Upadacitinib 15 mg QD in Period 2 * Group 3: Placebo in Period 1 → Upadacitinib 30 mg QD in Period 2 * Group 4: Placebo in Period 1 → Upadacitinib 15 mg QD in Period 2 Randomization was stratified by prior exposure to biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) (yes/no) and geographic region. Following Protocol Amendment 6.0 approval in December 2019, all participants still on study received open-label upadacitinib 15 mg QD, including those on upadacitinib 30 mg QD, with the earliest switch occurring at the Week 168 visit.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

Tablet; Oral

DRUGUpadacitinib

Tablet; Oral

Sponsors

AbbVie
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult male or female, at least 18 years old. * Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for greater than or equal to 3 months. * Subjects have been receiving conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) therapy for greater than or equal to 3 months and on a stable dose for greater than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the first dose of study drug. The following csDMARDs are allowed: methotrexate (MTX), sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, and leflunomide. * Meets the following minimum disease activity criteria: greater than or equal to 6 swollen joints (based on 66 joint counts) and greater than or equal to 6 tender joints (based on 68 joint counts) at Screening and Baseline Visits. * Subjects with prior exposure to at most one biologic DMARD (bDMARD) may be enrolled (up to 20% of study population) if they have documented evidence of intolerance to bDMARDs or limited exposure (less than 3 months) and have satisfied required washout periods.

Exclusion criteria

* Prior exposure to any Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor (including but not limited to tofacitinib, baricitinib, and filgotinib). * History of inflammatory joint disease other than RA. History of secondary Sjogren's Syndrome is permitted. * Subjects who are considered inadequate responders to bDMARD therapy as determined by the Investigator.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12Baseline and Week 12The primary endpoint for United States (US)/Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory purposes was ACR 20% response (ACR20) at Week 12. Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: 1. ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity; * Patient global assessment of disease activity; * Patient assessment of pain; * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI); * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 12Week 12The primary endpoint for European Union (EU)/European Medicines Agency (EMA) regulatory purposes was low disease activity, based on a Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)-CRP score of ≤ 3.2 at Week 12. The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28 score less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12Baseline and Week 12The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire that measures the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and errands and chores) over the past week. Participants assessed their ability to do each task on a scale from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). Scores were averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 represents very severe, high-dependency disability. A negative change from Baseline in the overall score indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 12Baseline and Week 12The Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) Version 2 is a self-administered questionnaire that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life during the past 4 weeks. The SF-36 consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). The physical component summary score is a weighted combination of the 8 subscales with positive weighting for physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The PCS was calculated using norm-based scoring so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores are associated with better functioning/quality of life; a positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on DAS28 (CRP) at Week 12Week 12Clinical remission (CR) based on DAS28 (CRP) is defined as achieving a DAS28 (CRP) of less than 2.6. DAS28 (CRP) is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity Based on CDAI at Week 12Week 12Low disease activity based on the clinical disease activity index (CDAI) is defined as a CDAI score ≤ 10. CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the total tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity.
Change From Baseline in in Disease Activity Score 28 (CRP) at Week 12Baseline and Week 12The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A negative change from Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) indicates improvement in disease activity.
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR50 response criteria: 1. ≥ 50% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 50% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity; * Patient global assessment of disease activity; * Patient assessment of pain; * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI); * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR70 response criteria: 1. ≥ 70% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 70% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity; * Patient global assessment of disease activity; * Patient assessment of pain; * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI); * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 1Baseline and Week 1Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: 1. ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity; * Patient global assessment of disease activity; * Patient assessment of pain; * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI); * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Change From Baseline in in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) at Week 12Baseline and week 12The FACIT-Fatigue scale is a 13-item tool that measures an individual's level of fatigue during their usual daily activities over the past 7 days. Each of the fatigue and impact of fatigue items are measured on a five point Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The FACIT-Fatigue scale is the sum of the individual 13 scores and ranges from 0 to 52 where higher scores indicate better the quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Participants were asked to indicate the time it took for them to get as limber as possible after awakening with morning stiffness over the past 7 days.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Czechia, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Mexico, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were randomized at 149 centers in 35 countries in North America, eastern and western Europe, Asia, South America, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa. The study included a 12-week placebo-controlled, double-blind period (Period 1), and a 5-year (248-week) double-blind extension (Period 2).

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:2:2 ratio to one of the four treatment groups below. Randomization was stratified by prior exposure to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) and geographical region.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants randomized to receive placebo once daily for 12 weeks in Period 1.
221
Upadacitinib 15 mg
Participants randomized to receive upadacitinib 15 mg once daily for 12 weeks in Period 1.
221
Upadacitinib 30 mg
Participants randomized to receive upadacitinib 30 mg once daily for 12 weeks in Period 1.
219
Total661

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Period 1: Week 1 to Week 12Adverse Event3339
Period 1: Week 1 to Week 12Lost to Follow-up0102
Period 1: Week 1 to Week 12Other2102
Period 1: Week 1 to Week 12Withdrawal by Subject1255
Period 2: Week 12 to Week 260Adverse Event13161730
Period 2: Week 12 to Week 260Coronavirus Disease - 2019 (COVID-19) Infection1001
Period 2: Week 12 to Week 260COVID-19 Logistic Restrictions1010
Period 2: Week 12 to Week 260Lost to Follow-up55104
Period 2: Week 12 to Week 260Other8122315
Period 2: Week 12 to Week 260Withdrawal by Subject14213130

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicUpadacitinib 15 mgTotalPlaceboUpadacitinib 30 mg
Age, Continuous55.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.47
55.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.65
56.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.22
55.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.29
Age, Customized
40 to 64 years
153 Participants443 Participants145 Participants145 Participants
Age, Customized
< 40 years
23 Participants66 Participants21 Participants22 Participants
Age, Customized
≥ 65 years
45 Participants152 Participants55 Participants52 Participants
Conventional Synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) Use at Baseline
csDMARD other than methotrexate
51 Participants125 Participants30 Participants44 Participants
Conventional Synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) Use at Baseline
Methotrexate alone
122 Participants399 Participants141 Participants136 Participants
Conventional Synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) Use at Baseline
Methotrexate and other csDMARD
47 Participants135 Participants49 Participants39 Participants
Conventional Synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) Use at Baseline
Missing
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Disease Activity Score Based on CRP (DAS28 [CRP])5.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.97
5.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.91
5.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.84
5.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
Duration of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Diagnosis7.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.89
7.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.72
7.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.45
7.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.86
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
23 Participants80 Participants27 Participants30 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
198 Participants581 Participants194 Participants189 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Geographical Region
Asia
17 Participants48 Participants16 Participants15 Participants
Geographical Region
Eastern Europe
76 Participants223 Participants74 Participants73 Participants
Geographical Region
North America
88 Participants267 Participants90 Participants89 Participants
Geographical Region
Other
8 Participants25 Participants9 Participants8 Participants
Geographical Region
South/Central America
10 Participants29 Participants8 Participants11 Participants
Geographical Region
Western Europe
22 Participants69 Participants24 Participants23 Participants
Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)1.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.61
1.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.62
1.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.63
1.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.61
High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)16.6 mg/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.17
14.7 mg/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.86
12.6 mg/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.96
14.8 mg/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.86
Patient's Assessment of Pain64.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.45
63.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.02
61.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.8
64.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.77
Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity63.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.86
62.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.91
60.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.5
62.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.32
Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity64.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.22
63.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.3
64.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.67
63.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.99
Prior Biological DMARD Use
No
194 Participants577 Participants192 Participants191 Participants
Prior Biological DMARD Use
Yes
27 Participants84 Participants29 Participants28 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian / Alaskan Native
0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
19 Participants59 Participants19 Participants21 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
13 Participants31 Participants10 Participants8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
1 Participants8 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
188 Participants561 Participants187 Participants186 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
182 Participants520 Participants166 Participants172 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
39 Participants141 Participants55 Participants47 Participants
Swollen Joint Count16.0 swollen joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.04
15.8 swollen joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.95
15.4 swollen joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.24
16.2 swollen joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.55
Tender Joint Count25.2 tender joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
25.4 tender joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.34
24.7 tender joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.96
26.2 tender joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.26

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 2210 / 2210 / 2194 / 3247 / 3212 / 179
other
Total, other adverse events
68 / 22183 / 22174 / 219241 / 324233 / 32151 / 179
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 22110 / 2217 / 21991 / 324102 / 32119 / 179

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 12

The primary endpoint for European Union (EU)/European Medicines Agency (EMA) regulatory purposes was low disease activity, based on a Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)-CRP score of ≤ 3.2 at Week 12. The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28 score less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Full analysis set; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 12 or for whom DAS28 data were missing at Week 12 were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 1217.2 percentage of participants
Upadacitinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 1248.4 percentage of participants
Upadacitinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 1247.9 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [23, 39.5]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [22.5, 39]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Primary

Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12

The primary endpoint for United States (US)/Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory purposes was ACR 20% response (ACR20) at Week 12. Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: 1. ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity; * Patient global assessment of disease activity; * Patient assessment of pain; * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI); * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Full analysis set; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 12 or for whom ACR data were missing at Week 12 were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 1235.7 percentage of participants
Upadacitinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 1263.8 percentage of participants
Upadacitinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 1266.2 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [19.1, 37]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [21.6, 39.4]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 12

Participants were asked to indicate the time it took for them to get as limber as possible after awakening with morning stiffness over the past 7 days.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Full analysis set participants with available data; a mixed effect model repeat measurement (MMRM) analysis with data from observed cases to Week 12 was used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 12-34.27 minutes
Upadacitinib 15 mgChange From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 12-85.28 minutes
Upadacitinib 30 mgChange From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 12-85.13 minutes
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-78.14, -23.87]Mixed Effect Model Repeat Measurement
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-78.19, -23.53]Mixed Effect Model Repeat Measurement
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12

The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire that measures the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and errands and chores) over the past week. Participants assessed their ability to do each task on a scale from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). Scores were averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 represents very severe, high-dependency disability. A negative change from Baseline in the overall score indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Full analysis set participants with available data at baseline; multiple imputation was used for missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12-0.25 units on a scale
Upadacitinib 15 mgChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12-0.59 units on a scale
Upadacitinib 30 mgChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12-0.54 units on a scale
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.43, -0.24]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.38, -0.18]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in in Disease Activity Score 28 (CRP) at Week 12

The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A negative change from Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) indicates improvement in disease activity.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Full analysis set participants with available data at Baseline; multiple imputation was used for missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in in Disease Activity Score 28 (CRP) at Week 12-1.02 units on a scale
Upadacitinib 15 mgChange From Baseline in in Disease Activity Score 28 (CRP) at Week 12-2.20 units on a scale
Upadacitinib 30 mgChange From Baseline in in Disease Activity Score 28 (CRP) at Week 12-2.34 units on a scale
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.42, -0.94]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.56, -1.08]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) at Week 12

The FACIT-Fatigue scale is a 13-item tool that measures an individual's level of fatigue during their usual daily activities over the past 7 days. Each of the fatigue and impact of fatigue items are measured on a five point Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The FACIT-Fatigue scale is the sum of the individual 13 scores and ranges from 0 to 52 where higher scores indicate better the quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: Full analysis set participants with available data; a mixed effect model repeat measurement (MMRM) analysis with data from observed cases to Week 12 was used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) at Week 122.96 units on a scale
Upadacitinib 15 mgChange From Baseline in in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) at Week 127.91 units on a scale
Upadacitinib 30 mgChange From Baseline in in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) at Week 127.74 units on a scale
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [3.31, 6.6]Mixed Effect Model Repeat Measurement
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [3.12, 6.44]Mixed Effect Model Repeat Measurement
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 12

The Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) Version 2 is a self-administered questionnaire that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life during the past 4 weeks. The SF-36 consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). The physical component summary score is a weighted combination of the 8 subscales with positive weighting for physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The PCS was calculated using norm-based scoring so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores are associated with better functioning/quality of life; a positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Full analysis set participants with available data; a mixed effect model repeat measurement (MMRM) analysis with data from observed cases to Week 12 was used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 123.03 units on a scale
Upadacitinib 15 mgChange From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 127.58 units on a scale
Upadacitinib 30 mgChange From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 128.01 units on a scale
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [3.13, 5.98]Mixed Effect Model Repeat Measurement
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [3.54, 6.42]Mixed Effect Model Repeat Measurement
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on DAS28 (CRP) at Week 12

Clinical remission (CR) based on DAS28 (CRP) is defined as achieving a DAS28 (CRP) of less than 2.6. DAS28 (CRP) is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Full analysis set; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 12 or for whom DAS28 (CRP) data were missing at Week 12 were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on DAS28 (CRP) at Week 1210.0 percentage of participants
Upadacitinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on DAS28 (CRP) at Week 1230.8 percentage of participants
Upadacitinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on DAS28 (CRP) at Week 1228.3 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [13.6, 28.1]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [11.2, 25.5]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity Based on CDAI at Week 12

Low disease activity based on the clinical disease activity index (CDAI) is defined as a CDAI score ≤ 10. CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the total tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Full analysis set; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 12 or for whom CDAI data were missing at Week 12 were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity Based on CDAI at Week 1219.0 percentage of participants
Upadacitinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity Based on CDAI at Week 1240.3 percentage of participants
Upadacitinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity Based on CDAI at Week 1242.0 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [13, 29.5]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [14.7, 31.3]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 1

Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: 1. ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity; * Patient global assessment of disease activity; * Patient assessment of pain; * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI); * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 1

Population: Full analysis set; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 1 or for whom ACR data were missing at Week 1 were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 18.6 percentage of participants
Upadacitinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 122.2 percentage of participants
Upadacitinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 128.3 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [7, 20.2]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [12.7, 26.7]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 12

Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR50 response criteria: 1. ≥ 50% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 50% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity; * Patient global assessment of disease activity; * Patient assessment of pain; * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI); * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Full analysis set; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 12 or for whom ACR data were missing at Week 12 were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 1214.9 percentage of participants
Upadacitinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 1238.0 percentage of participants
Upadacitinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 1243.4 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [15.1, 31]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [20.4, 36.5]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12

Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR70 response criteria: 1. ≥ 70% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 70% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity; * Patient global assessment of disease activity; * Patient assessment of pain; * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI); * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Full analysis set; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 12 or for whom ACR data were missing at Week 12 were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 125.9 percentage of participants
Upadacitinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 1220.8 percentage of participants
Upadacitinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 1226.5 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [8.7, 21.1]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [14, 27.2]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026