Rheumatoid Arthritis
Conditions
Keywords
Musculoskeletal Disease, Arthritis, Joint Disease, Anti-inflammatory agents, Antirheumatic agents, Upadacitinib, ABT-494
Brief summary
The primary objectives of this study are to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of upadacitinib 30 mg once daily (QD) and 15 mg QD versus placebo for the treatment of signs and symptoms of adults with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis who were on a stable dose of csDMARDs and had an inadequate response to csDMARDs.
Detailed description
This Phase 3 multicenter study includes two periods. Period 1 is a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled period designed to compare the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib 30 mg once daily and upadacitinib 15 mg once daily versus placebo for the treatment of signs and symptoms of adults with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were on a stable dose of csDMARDs and had an inadequate response to csDMARDs. Period 2 is a 248-week blinded long-term extension period to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of upadacitinib 30 mg once daily and upadacitinib 15 mg once daily in participants who completed Period 1. Participants were to be randomized in a 2:2:1:1 ratio using interactive response technology (IRT) to receive double-blind study drug in one of the following treatment groups: * Group 1: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD in Period 1 → Upadacitinib 30 mg QD in Period 2 * Group 2: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD in Period 1 → Upadacitinib 15 mg QD in Period 2 * Group 3: Placebo in Period 1 → Upadacitinib 30 mg QD in Period 2 * Group 4: Placebo in Period 1 → Upadacitinib 15 mg QD in Period 2 Randomization was stratified by prior exposure to biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) (yes/no) and geographic region. Following Protocol Amendment 6.0 approval in December 2019, all participants still on study received open-label upadacitinib 15 mg QD, including those on upadacitinib 30 mg QD, with the earliest switch occurring at the Week 168 visit.
Interventions
Tablet; Oral
Tablet; Oral
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adult male or female, at least 18 years old. * Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for greater than or equal to 3 months. * Subjects have been receiving conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) therapy for greater than or equal to 3 months and on a stable dose for greater than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the first dose of study drug. The following csDMARDs are allowed: methotrexate (MTX), sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, and leflunomide. * Meets the following minimum disease activity criteria: greater than or equal to 6 swollen joints (based on 66 joint counts) and greater than or equal to 6 tender joints (based on 68 joint counts) at Screening and Baseline Visits. * Subjects with prior exposure to at most one biologic DMARD (bDMARD) may be enrolled (up to 20% of study population) if they have documented evidence of intolerance to bDMARDs or limited exposure (less than 3 months) and have satisfied required washout periods.
Exclusion criteria
* Prior exposure to any Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor (including but not limited to tofacitinib, baricitinib, and filgotinib). * History of inflammatory joint disease other than RA. History of secondary Sjogren's Syndrome is permitted. * Subjects who are considered inadequate responders to bDMARD therapy as determined by the Investigator.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | The primary endpoint for United States (US)/Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory purposes was ACR 20% response (ACR20) at Week 12. Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: 1. ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity; * Patient global assessment of disease activity; * Patient assessment of pain; * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI); * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 12 | Week 12 | The primary endpoint for European Union (EU)/European Medicines Agency (EMA) regulatory purposes was low disease activity, based on a Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)-CRP score of ≤ 3.2 at Week 12. The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28 score less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire that measures the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and errands and chores) over the past week. Participants assessed their ability to do each task on a scale from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). Scores were averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 represents very severe, high-dependency disability. A negative change from Baseline in the overall score indicates improvement. |
| Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | The Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) Version 2 is a self-administered questionnaire that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life during the past 4 weeks. The SF-36 consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). The physical component summary score is a weighted combination of the 8 subscales with positive weighting for physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The PCS was calculated using norm-based scoring so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores are associated with better functioning/quality of life; a positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on DAS28 (CRP) at Week 12 | Week 12 | Clinical remission (CR) based on DAS28 (CRP) is defined as achieving a DAS28 (CRP) of less than 2.6. DAS28 (CRP) is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity Based on CDAI at Week 12 | Week 12 | Low disease activity based on the clinical disease activity index (CDAI) is defined as a CDAI score ≤ 10. CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the total tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. |
| Change From Baseline in in Disease Activity Score 28 (CRP) at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A negative change from Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) indicates improvement in disease activity. |
| Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR50 response criteria: 1. ≥ 50% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 50% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity; * Patient global assessment of disease activity; * Patient assessment of pain; * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI); * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). |
| Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR70 response criteria: 1. ≥ 70% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 70% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity; * Patient global assessment of disease activity; * Patient assessment of pain; * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI); * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). |
| Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 1 | Baseline and Week 1 | Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: 1. ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity; * Patient global assessment of disease activity; * Patient assessment of pain; * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI); * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). |
| Change From Baseline in in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) at Week 12 | Baseline and week 12 | The FACIT-Fatigue scale is a 13-item tool that measures an individual's level of fatigue during their usual daily activities over the past 7 days. Each of the fatigue and impact of fatigue items are measured on a five point Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The FACIT-Fatigue scale is the sum of the individual 13 scores and ranges from 0 to 52 where higher scores indicate better the quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. |
| Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | Participants were asked to indicate the time it took for them to get as limber as possible after awakening with morning stiffness over the past 7 days. |
Countries
Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Czechia, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Mexico, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants were randomized at 149 centers in 35 countries in North America, eastern and western Europe, Asia, South America, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa. The study included a 12-week placebo-controlled, double-blind period (Period 1), and a 5-year (248-week) double-blind extension (Period 2).
Pre-assignment details
Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:2:2 ratio to one of the four treatment groups below. Randomization was stratified by prior exposure to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) and geographical region.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo Participants randomized to receive placebo once daily for 12 weeks in Period 1. | 221 |
| Upadacitinib 15 mg Participants randomized to receive upadacitinib 15 mg once daily for 12 weeks in Period 1. | 221 |
| Upadacitinib 30 mg Participants randomized to receive upadacitinib 30 mg once daily for 12 weeks in Period 1. | 219 |
| Total | 661 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Period 1: Week 1 to Week 12 | Adverse Event | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| Period 1: Week 1 to Week 12 | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Period 1: Week 1 to Week 12 | Other | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Period 1: Week 1 to Week 12 | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Period 2: Week 12 to Week 260 | Adverse Event | 13 | 16 | 17 | 30 |
| Period 2: Week 12 to Week 260 | Coronavirus Disease - 2019 (COVID-19) Infection | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Period 2: Week 12 to Week 260 | COVID-19 Logistic Restrictions | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Period 2: Week 12 to Week 260 | Lost to Follow-up | 5 | 5 | 10 | 4 |
| Period 2: Week 12 to Week 260 | Other | 8 | 12 | 23 | 15 |
| Period 2: Week 12 to Week 260 | Withdrawal by Subject | 14 | 21 | 31 | 30 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Upadacitinib 15 mg | Total | Placebo | Upadacitinib 30 mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 55.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.47 | 55.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.65 | 56.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.22 | 55.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.29 |
| Age, Customized 40 to 64 years | 153 Participants | 443 Participants | 145 Participants | 145 Participants |
| Age, Customized < 40 years | 23 Participants | 66 Participants | 21 Participants | 22 Participants |
| Age, Customized ≥ 65 years | 45 Participants | 152 Participants | 55 Participants | 52 Participants |
| Conventional Synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) Use at Baseline csDMARD other than methotrexate | 51 Participants | 125 Participants | 30 Participants | 44 Participants |
| Conventional Synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) Use at Baseline Methotrexate alone | 122 Participants | 399 Participants | 141 Participants | 136 Participants |
| Conventional Synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) Use at Baseline Methotrexate and other csDMARD | 47 Participants | 135 Participants | 49 Participants | 39 Participants |
| Conventional Synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) Use at Baseline Missing | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Disease Activity Score Based on CRP (DAS28 [CRP]) | 5.7 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.97 | 5.6 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.91 | 5.6 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.84 | 5.7 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9 |
| Duration of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Diagnosis | 7.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.89 | 7.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.72 | 7.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.45 | 7.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.86 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 23 Participants | 80 Participants | 27 Participants | 30 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 198 Participants | 581 Participants | 194 Participants | 189 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Geographical Region Asia | 17 Participants | 48 Participants | 16 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Geographical Region Eastern Europe | 76 Participants | 223 Participants | 74 Participants | 73 Participants |
| Geographical Region North America | 88 Participants | 267 Participants | 90 Participants | 89 Participants |
| Geographical Region Other | 8 Participants | 25 Participants | 9 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Geographical Region South/Central America | 10 Participants | 29 Participants | 8 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Geographical Region Western Europe | 22 Participants | 69 Participants | 24 Participants | 23 Participants |
| Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) | 1.5 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.61 | 1.5 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.62 | 1.4 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.63 | 1.5 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.61 |
| High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) | 16.6 mg/L STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.17 | 14.7 mg/L STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.86 | 12.6 mg/L STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.96 | 14.8 mg/L STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.86 |
| Patient's Assessment of Pain | 64.1 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.45 | 63.2 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.02 | 61.5 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.8 | 64.0 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.77 |
| Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity | 63.1 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.86 | 62.1 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.91 | 60.3 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.5 | 62.8 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.32 |
| Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity | 64.3 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.22 | 63.9 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.3 | 64.4 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.67 | 63.0 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.99 |
| Prior Biological DMARD Use No | 194 Participants | 577 Participants | 192 Participants | 191 Participants |
| Prior Biological DMARD Use Yes | 27 Participants | 84 Participants | 29 Participants | 28 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Indian / Alaskan Native | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 19 Participants | 59 Participants | 19 Participants | 21 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 13 Participants | 31 Participants | 10 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Multiple | 1 Participants | 8 Participants | 4 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 188 Participants | 561 Participants | 187 Participants | 186 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 182 Participants | 520 Participants | 166 Participants | 172 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 39 Participants | 141 Participants | 55 Participants | 47 Participants |
| Swollen Joint Count | 16.0 swollen joints STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.04 | 15.8 swollen joints STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.95 | 15.4 swollen joints STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.24 | 16.2 swollen joints STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.55 |
| Tender Joint Count | 25.2 tender joints STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8 | 25.4 tender joints STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.34 | 24.7 tender joints STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.96 | 26.2 tender joints STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.26 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk | EG005 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 221 | 0 / 221 | 0 / 219 | 4 / 324 | 7 / 321 | 2 / 179 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 68 / 221 | 83 / 221 | 74 / 219 | 241 / 324 | 233 / 321 | 51 / 179 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 5 / 221 | 10 / 221 | 7 / 219 | 91 / 324 | 102 / 321 | 19 / 179 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 12
The primary endpoint for European Union (EU)/European Medicines Agency (EMA) regulatory purposes was low disease activity, based on a Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)-CRP score of ≤ 3.2 at Week 12. The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28 score less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: Full analysis set; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 12 or for whom DAS28 data were missing at Week 12 were considered non-responders.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 12 | 17.2 percentage of participants |
| Upadacitinib 15 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 12 | 48.4 percentage of participants |
| Upadacitinib 30 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 12 | 47.9 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12
The primary endpoint for United States (US)/Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory purposes was ACR 20% response (ACR20) at Week 12. Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: 1. ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity; * Patient global assessment of disease activity; * Patient assessment of pain; * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI); * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Full analysis set; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 12 or for whom ACR data were missing at Week 12 were considered non-responders.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 | 35.7 percentage of participants |
| Upadacitinib 15 mg | Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 | 63.8 percentage of participants |
| Upadacitinib 30 mg | Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 | 66.2 percentage of participants |
Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 12
Participants were asked to indicate the time it took for them to get as limber as possible after awakening with morning stiffness over the past 7 days.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Full analysis set participants with available data; a mixed effect model repeat measurement (MMRM) analysis with data from observed cases to Week 12 was used.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 12 | -34.27 minutes |
| Upadacitinib 15 mg | Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 12 | -85.28 minutes |
| Upadacitinib 30 mg | Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 12 | -85.13 minutes |
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12
The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire that measures the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and errands and chores) over the past week. Participants assessed their ability to do each task on a scale from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). Scores were averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 represents very severe, high-dependency disability. A negative change from Baseline in the overall score indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Full analysis set participants with available data at baseline; multiple imputation was used for missing data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12 | -0.25 units on a scale |
| Upadacitinib 15 mg | Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12 | -0.59 units on a scale |
| Upadacitinib 30 mg | Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12 | -0.54 units on a scale |
Change From Baseline in in Disease Activity Score 28 (CRP) at Week 12
The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A negative change from Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) indicates improvement in disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Full analysis set participants with available data at Baseline; multiple imputation was used for missing data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in in Disease Activity Score 28 (CRP) at Week 12 | -1.02 units on a scale |
| Upadacitinib 15 mg | Change From Baseline in in Disease Activity Score 28 (CRP) at Week 12 | -2.20 units on a scale |
| Upadacitinib 30 mg | Change From Baseline in in Disease Activity Score 28 (CRP) at Week 12 | -2.34 units on a scale |
Change From Baseline in in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) at Week 12
The FACIT-Fatigue scale is a 13-item tool that measures an individual's level of fatigue during their usual daily activities over the past 7 days. Each of the fatigue and impact of fatigue items are measured on a five point Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The FACIT-Fatigue scale is the sum of the individual 13 scores and ranges from 0 to 52 where higher scores indicate better the quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
Population: Full analysis set participants with available data; a mixed effect model repeat measurement (MMRM) analysis with data from observed cases to Week 12 was used.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) at Week 12 | 2.96 units on a scale |
| Upadacitinib 15 mg | Change From Baseline in in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) at Week 12 | 7.91 units on a scale |
| Upadacitinib 30 mg | Change From Baseline in in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) at Week 12 | 7.74 units on a scale |
Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 12
The Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) Version 2 is a self-administered questionnaire that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life during the past 4 weeks. The SF-36 consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). The physical component summary score is a weighted combination of the 8 subscales with positive weighting for physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The PCS was calculated using norm-based scoring so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores are associated with better functioning/quality of life; a positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Full analysis set participants with available data; a mixed effect model repeat measurement (MMRM) analysis with data from observed cases to Week 12 was used.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 12 | 3.03 units on a scale |
| Upadacitinib 15 mg | Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 12 | 7.58 units on a scale |
| Upadacitinib 30 mg | Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 12 | 8.01 units on a scale |
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on DAS28 (CRP) at Week 12
Clinical remission (CR) based on DAS28 (CRP) is defined as achieving a DAS28 (CRP) of less than 2.6. DAS28 (CRP) is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: Full analysis set; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 12 or for whom DAS28 (CRP) data were missing at Week 12 were considered non-responders.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on DAS28 (CRP) at Week 12 | 10.0 percentage of participants |
| Upadacitinib 15 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on DAS28 (CRP) at Week 12 | 30.8 percentage of participants |
| Upadacitinib 30 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on DAS28 (CRP) at Week 12 | 28.3 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity Based on CDAI at Week 12
Low disease activity based on the clinical disease activity index (CDAI) is defined as a CDAI score ≤ 10. CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the total tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: Full analysis set; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 12 or for whom CDAI data were missing at Week 12 were considered non-responders.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity Based on CDAI at Week 12 | 19.0 percentage of participants |
| Upadacitinib 15 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity Based on CDAI at Week 12 | 40.3 percentage of participants |
| Upadacitinib 30 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity Based on CDAI at Week 12 | 42.0 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 1
Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: 1. ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity; * Patient global assessment of disease activity; * Patient assessment of pain; * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI); * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Time frame: Baseline and Week 1
Population: Full analysis set; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 1 or for whom ACR data were missing at Week 1 were considered non-responders.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 1 | 8.6 percentage of participants |
| Upadacitinib 15 mg | Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 1 | 22.2 percentage of participants |
| Upadacitinib 30 mg | Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 1 | 28.3 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 12
Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR50 response criteria: 1. ≥ 50% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 50% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity; * Patient global assessment of disease activity; * Patient assessment of pain; * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI); * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Full analysis set; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 12 or for whom ACR data were missing at Week 12 were considered non-responders.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 12 | 14.9 percentage of participants |
| Upadacitinib 15 mg | Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 12 | 38.0 percentage of participants |
| Upadacitinib 30 mg | Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 12 | 43.4 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12
Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR70 response criteria: 1. ≥ 70% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 70% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity; * Patient global assessment of disease activity; * Patient assessment of pain; * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI); * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Full analysis set; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 12 or for whom ACR data were missing at Week 12 were considered non-responders.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12 | 5.9 percentage of participants |
| Upadacitinib 15 mg | Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12 | 20.8 percentage of participants |
| Upadacitinib 30 mg | Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12 | 26.5 percentage of participants |